1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

Need Advice: KING OF KINGS: Theatrical Or Blu Ray?

Discussion in 'Blu-ray and UHD' started by Professor Echo, Apr 23, 2011.

  1. Professor Echo

    Professor Echo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Messages:
    1,919
    Likes Received:
    986
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Real Name:
    Glen
    This is just a quick thread which will fade soon enough, but I didn't want to pose this dilemma in an already existing thread because I didn't think anyone would see it in time for me to make a decision. Any advice will be most appreciated.


    I'm trying to decide whether it would be worth it to go see the Nicholas Ray KING OF KINGS in a theater for the first time on Easter night or to save my money and instead buy the Blu Ray. Why not do both? Well because money is very tight right now and I can't really justify spending over $25 for one movie, which is just about what it would entail.


    Admission to the movie is $11 plus the cost of gas to drive to the theater. The Blu Ray is currently $14.99 at Amazon.


    The theatrical version being shown will not be in 70mm, but 35mm, and according to the theater website, it is about four minutes shorter than the Blu Ray running time, leading me to believe it will probably be missing the Overture or the Entr'acte or Exit music, maybe all three? Adding to this concern is that there is no information at all about the print being shown. I have had mixed experiences in this venue regarding print quality, but reigning in my mind are an absolute horrible print of EL CID I saw there a few years ago and an equally bad ONCE UPON A TIME IN THE WEST I have to admit that if it were in 70mm, there would be no hesitation in going even if the print was worn.


    I guess I could go see it and then hold off on getting the Blu until I had more money or it gets reduced in price.


    What would you do?
     
  2. JohnMor

    JohnMor Premium
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2004
    Messages:
    4,027
    Likes Received:
    1,277
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    Real Name:
    John Moreland
    Given the iffy question of the print, I'd get the blu ray, which is gorgeous. Then you'll always have it forever. And on the off chance you don't like the film, you can always sell the blu ray and get some of your money back, which you can't do on a screening. At least, that's what I'd do of the two choices.
     
  3. Robert Crawford

    Robert Crawford Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 1998
    Messages:
    28,143
    Likes Received:
    3,855
    Location:
    Michigan
    Real Name:
    Robert
    I would go with the Blu-ray too.







    Crawdaddy
     
  4. Mark B

    Mark B Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2003
    Messages:
    725
    Likes Received:
    37
    Location:
    Saranac Lake, NY
    Real Name:
    Mark
    See it in the theater. Good print or bad print it's an experience that can't be replicated at home.
     
  5. Mark-P

    Mark-P Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    2,884
    Likes Received:
    786
    Location:
    Camas, WA
    Real Name:
    Mark Probst
    You don't mention anything about your home setup. If you have a 1080p projector and decent sound system, then of course buy the Blu-ray. But... if you have a smallish screen, I'd say drive to the theater.
     
  6. benbess

    benbess Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2009
    Messages:
    2,049
    Likes Received:
    330
    Real Name:
    Ben Hufbauer
    If it was a new 70mm print, I'd say the theater. But given that it sounds like a bad 35mm, I'd say take the blu-ray.


    Also, for me the beautiful and majestic music by Miklos Rozsa is the best part of this whole film. Even if you end up feeling only so-so about the film (as I did) you'll still have the great music to enjoy. And one of the biggest examples of pure music in the film is the Overture, and so if they cut that...? I think it's an easy choice, but that's just my 2 cents.
     
  7. Professor Echo

    Professor Echo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Messages:
    1,919
    Likes Received:
    986
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Real Name:
    Glen
    Thanks for the recommendations, so far. I appreciate the input and am still considering.


    Mark, my luck I bought my set just before everything went 1080p. My setup at home is a relatively small room with a 62 inch DLP, 1080i and a nice 5.1 surround system with Klipsch speakers. The latter brings up another point: The theatrical print is in 35mm so it may be mono.
     
  8. Guest

    Well, how many chances do you get to see this in the theatre? You can always buy the blu-ray later on.
     
  9. GMpasqua

    GMpasqua Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    1,433
    Likes Received:
    7
    Real Name:
    Greg
    Maybe you should just try to win a VHS copy on ebay for .99 cents
     
  10. Professor Echo

    Professor Echo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2008
    Messages:
    1,919
    Likes Received:
    986
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Real Name:
    Glen

    Is this some kind of slur on my not having as much money for spending on a movie as you might have? If so, nice classy move, Greg. Your advice is noted and discarded with the same respect you have shown someone who may not be as financially independent as you apparently are. Threadcrapping alive and well from the elite who deign to mingle with us low lifes.
     
  11. marcco00

    marcco00 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2010
    Messages:
    195
    Likes Received:
    21
    Location:
    Los Angeles, California
    Real Name:
    marc
    i would go to the movie, it would be a very nice way to commerate the easter holiday. watching a film on the big screen with an audience is a unique experience. and if you really, really like the movie you can get it later..... it's well known to be a very beautiful transfer.
     
  12. TravisR

    TravisR Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Messages:
    24,936
    Likes Received:
    2,766
    Location:
    The basement of the FBI building
    I'm a big proponent of seeing movies in a movie theater but, if money's tight and you spend the cash on the Blu-ray, you've got it forever.
     
  13. benbess

    benbess Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2009
    Messages:
    2,049
    Likes Received:
    330
    Real Name:
    Ben Hufbauer
    And the PQ and AQ of the blu-ray are pretty close to perfect...
     
  14. dana martin

    dana martin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2003
    Messages:
    2,434
    Likes Received:
    441
    Location:
    Norfolk, VA
    Real Name:
    Dana Martin
    KoK in a theater on Easter, is the way to go, then order the blu, any chance to see a film in theater is the way to go
     
  15. GMpasqua

    GMpasqua Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    1,433
    Likes Received:
    7
    Real Name:
    Greg
    Quote: Originally Posted by Professor Echo
    Is this some kind of slur on my not having as much money for spending on a movie as you might have? If so, nice classy move, Greg. Your advice is noted and discarded with the same respect you have shown someone who may not be as financially independent as you apparently are. Threadcrapping alive and well from the elite who deign to mingle with us low lifes.



    I always choose seeing a film in the theater whenever possible - that's how they were meant to be seen. (my slur had nothing do to with money (sorry if it offended you) My point was "VHS" is lacking in quality (which is also why it would only sell for .99 cents)
    Though, I believe the Egyptian Theater is screening "Kings of Kings" $11.00 and the Blu-ray is selling for &19.99.



    For me there would be no choice, I would see the film in the theater, as others have said, you can always buy the blu-ray later if you like the film that much (and it will probably drop to $9.99 on Amazon after Easter) How often is a good print of "King of Kings" screened?
     
  16. GMpasqua

    GMpasqua Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2010
    Messages:
    1,433
    Likes Received:
    7
    Real Name:
    Greg
    Quote: Originally Posted by Professor Echo
    The theatrical version being shown will not be in 70mm, but 35mm, and according to the theater website, it is about four minutes shorter than the Blu Ray running time, leading me to believe it will probably be missing the Overture or the Entr'acte or Exit music, maybe all three? Adding to this concern is that there is no information at all about the print being shown. I have had mixed experiences in this venue regarding print quality, but reigning in my mind are an absolute horrible print of EL CID I saw there a few years ago and an equally bad ONCE UPON A TIME IN THE WEST I have to admit that if it were in 70mm, there would be no hesitation in going even if the print was worn.



    (sorry, I gave up before reading your last pharagaph) The Egyptian & Aero Theaters usually gets very good prints and I believe the one they are showing was the one WB would have struck when the pre-pared "King of Kings" for Blu-ray (they struck incredible looking prints of "Doctor Zhivago" and "The Wizard of Oz" when the blu-rays came out. I'm guessing this is the screening your are referring to


    don't go by the shorter running time - some do not include the overture even if it will be screened with one.
     
  17. dana martin

    dana martin Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2003
    Messages:
    2,434
    Likes Received:
    441
    Location:
    Norfolk, VA
    Real Name:
    Dana Martin


    that is what i was thinkings as well, and was checking if any of the independent theaters had anything this weekend,nothing, but i saw that it is at the Egyptian Theater , where it premiered, but it say's 35 mm print where ww
     
  18. JohnMor

    JohnMor Premium
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2004
    Messages:
    4,027
    Likes Received:
    1,277
    Location:
    Los Angeles, CA
    Real Name:
    John Moreland
    Glen, your home setup is better than mine, and while I usually advocate seeing films in a theatre first, given that's 35mm and lacking the Overture, Entr'acte and Exit music, and the venue has a history of terrible prints, I honestly think you'd have a better visual/aural experience with the blu. A faded, beat-up old print can affect one's opinion of a film. I say go with the guaranteed quality and complete blu. Whichever you choose, I hope you enjoy and feel it was worth it.
     
  19. Stephen_J_H

    Stephen_J_H All Things Film Junkie
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,535
    Likes Received:
    395
    Location:
    North of the 49th
    Real Name:
    Stephen J. Hill
    Sadly, most Blu-Rays are taken from elements that exceed the quality of some of the best 35mm prints out there. I say sadly because I love the theatrical experience. Given the nominal difference in price between the BD and the theatrical experience (which would likely be eaten up in transportation costs anyhoo), I would go with the BD.
     
  20. MatthewA

    MatthewA Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2000
    Messages:
    6,836
    Likes Received:
    696
    Location:
    Salinas, CA
    Real Name:
    Matthew

    Some studios have repertory divisions that still try to keep popular titles available with good prints. Sony Repertory, which I assume is still run by Michael Schlesinger, is probably the best. On the other hand, Warner Bros. is hit or miss. I, too, love the theatrical experience, but I have my limits.
     

Share This Page