Philip Hamm
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Jan 23, 1999
- Messages
- 6,874
What does it matter anyway. The American League doesn't even play Baseball. They play some baseball-like game that doesn't really count.
Absolutely agreed. However, I can still be happy that two Phils will be starting.That's about the only thing Philly fans can look forward too. Personally, I'm looking forward to the Eagles training camp to start (not saying much for our poor Phills)
I never liked him, he will always be a member of the Red Sox in my eyes.The funny thing is, the "Texas Con Man" is loathed in New England; I don't know if he's got any fans left, anywhere. (Bill Simmons wrote a pretty good column on this as one of his first ESPN pieces) Weird phenomenon; I'm trying to think of another professional athlete as talented as him who has so thoroughly burned his bridges.
I don't know if he's got any fans left, anywhere.Rob Dibble, who apparently finds it impressive when a pitcher isn't afraid to put a little mustard on their beanballs.
Back to the thread at hand, Chavez robbed, what about Hinske. Go check the numbers and come back to defend Chavez. Ventura has no biz being there, but I can still see Chavez passed over at this point.Hmmm, maybe you need to check the numbers again.
Chavez: 20 HR 58 RBI .280 AVG .353 OBP .561 SLG
Hinske: 14 HR 45 RBI .281 AVG .372 OBP .522 SLG
I don't see anything to back up your argument.
One player that no one has said anything about is John Smoltz. He's got an ERA of 4.63!!!!! I like Smoltz but I don't think there's any place in the All Star game for an ERA like that. Robb Nen would've been a much better pick and should've made it before B.H. Kim also.
I think one of the biggest problems with the All Star game is the requirement that each team be represented. If they got rid of that rule, it would definitely help.
but should NOT be added to his slugging (!!!) his steals are already increasing his runs scoredMy point was that for a lead-off/setup type of batter the SB DOES affect his effective slugging or final total bases.
You are right, the SB does end up showing up as runs scored, but you know what, the lack of true slugging also shows up in lower RBIs for him, so don't act like somehow evaluating a leadoff hitter this way in an affront to god.
Jeter loses the RBI on a 1B that ends up 2B and 3B, doesn't he?
But if you want a guy to get himself in scoring position when no one else is on then a guy who can turn a 1B into a 2B, or better yet a BB into a 2B, then a base stealer does have an improved "effective" slugging. That was my point, evaluating Jeter for what he actually brings based upon what is required of his batting position.
Not only that, but you neglected a few other aspects that brings to the game. First you eliminate the double play, which is a HUGE factor with a slower 3 or 4 batting next. Second, when you are an effective base stealer you disrupt what the pitcher is trying to do. Everyone has always praised Ricky Henderson for this aspect, for example. Third, you eliminate the need for a wasted AB on a sacrifice bunt to gain that base.
But most important, a good base stealer can give you a run scored without a hit. BB, SB, sacrifice, sacrifice. It happens all the time. (Phil Hamm should appreciate that NL baseball method )
You can never have a slugging PCT high enough to score a run without an actual hit (discounting errors).
Jeter has the potential to hit 30 HR. He is certainly at a rate to get 30 SB. It's a diminished stat in the live ball era, but 30/30 still ain't too shabby.
Hard to believe anyone would think that a 30/30 type doesn't belong on the All-Star team.
One other thing, as far as SB guys go, how does Jeter compare:
Soriano 23/6
Suzuki 22/8
Lofton 21/6
Damon 20/4
Durham 19/3
Jeter 19/1
In fact in all of MLB he has the best rate of any guy with 13 or more attempts. At 12/0 Knoblauch is the closest guy with a better rate.
Chavez: 20 HR 58 RBI .280 AVG .353 OBP .561 SLG
Hinske: 14 HR 45 RBI .281 AVG .372 OBP .522 SLG
As if these are the stats that Torre looked at on the afternoon of June 30th when picking the team.
How about these instead.
Chavez 46 R, 20 HR, 57 RBI, .274 AVG, .348 OBP, .563 SLG, .911 OPS
Hinske 47 R, 14 HR, 44 RBI, .294 AVG, .386 OBP, .545 SLG, .931 OPS.
Those were the stats when the team was actually picked. Chavez plays for the guy that basically came up with OPS, it's an A's philosophy. Hinske at the time was 20 points higher in both AVR and OPS. I'd call that significant.
Of course being behind in HR and RBI is a big deal too, but it just seems to me that lately one of the biggest factors people evaluate hitters on is the OPS.
As far as RBIs go, let's be fair here. Hinske bats 2nd, Chavez bats 5th (both for more than half their games played).
BTW, Mike, I know you are a big A's fan (and have little love for the Yanks), but I'm not trying to knock Chavez here. The main point is that Ventura was so far back in line at the 3B spot that it's rather embarrassing that he is on the team. Just like Stanton over Nelson last year, among others.
Torre picks a good team, but then he takes that 1 extra guy that doesn't belong and spoils it.
But I still think Brenley was a much bigger "homer" this year. Funny to note that 2 of the higher bonuses of 50K went to Luis G and Damian Miller. Ventura got 25K.
The funny thing is, the "Texas Con Man" is loathed in New England; I don't know if he's got any fans left, anywhere.Yeah, you know how popular he was in Houston after he dissed his "hometown" team a few years ago. People down there were pretty ticked off with the way he dicked them around on coming to the Astros.
If you'll recall he basically got his trade to the Yanks instead of the Astros by talking crazy numbers on a required contract renegotiation. HE put the Astros out of the running financially, even though they could handle his current contract.
I hate that he has a WS ring, even more so when you look at the 1996/1998 teams (the true Yankee champs IMO). His first year was WORSE than Wells had in Toronto, but he still got his WS ring. Yeah, thanks for all you added Roger.