Aaron Silverman said:Good link, Sam.
Aaron Silverman said:Good link, Sam.
Ditto.Russell G said:I'm not too surprised. I'm still sticking with the PS4 though.
"Screw you guys, I'm goin home."Hanson said:Yes, it's very much a, "I'm taking my ball and going home" reaction. If they wanted to do this right in the first place, they should have had two price tiers, one for traditional media and a lower price for digital downloads. That's one way to move to the future while letting people have their Start button. It's like they're sore at their audience for the mistakes they made.
It will get much clearer when there's a product being advertised and sold. Right now it's all VP speak to journalists about "market pivots" and synergizing monetization of business jargon.MS needs clear advertising that shows why this is awesome. The kinect lets dad digitally light-saber duel with his son, just $498.88 at Walmart. The daughter can watch Doctor Who and twitter her friends in split view on the big screen. And mom doesn't have her cable all confused and broken because the Xbox One video pass through makes it all seamless.mattCR said:That's something I can't understand the point of them doing. They basically said "fine, if you don't like X, you can't have Y either!". If they said a one time activation check, most people would be OK. Who knows; it's going to be difficult for a lot of consumers on this because the water stays muddy, and as a result, the Xbox-one-80 will have a hard time really cutting through FUD now.
iPhonemattCR said:When I was young, they would market food processors and quisinart type machines by saying: "It does EVERYTHING!" Then, a few years later, people pretty well realized they didn't want anything that does "everything" they want one specific tool that does one specific thing. We like twitter and the like on our phones.. we are happy with our DVR of choice, whatever it is.
The problem with convergence, merging all these things into one is that the human mind always feels as though it is missing out on something by having everything lumped together in one.
The only thing we want a video game console to do is play video games. Everything after that is neat, but it's not as though we view it as a purpose for buying. Netflix? So what, my TV has netflix built in. Pass-through HDMI? Big deal, lots of people have even basic home theater receivers, they don't want to pass-through twice. Manage fantasy leagues? People generally go to leagues online that they like, not one subscribed to them, and no way MS covers all of them. Easily flick back and forth between the game you're playing and TV? In general, most of the time in the flow of a game it's not "casual" enough for me to just pause and flick to something else and come back in place.
The entire concept just seems flawed.
Hanson said:They'll have to convince sane people that it's better to Twitter in a split screen using a keyboard add-on instead of YOUR FUCKING PHONE OR TABLET.
This is why so much of the convergence stuff is out of touch and out of date -- it's 2013, and most people have smart phones and tablets for these functions. Then again, MS has no good phone or tablet presence to speak of, so maybe it's a function of corporate blindness.
It's still a very stupid strategery.
I don't think Apple has any interest in chasing that market to begin with. The cost to market as well as develop such a project would be a huge gamble.Sam Posten said:I don't agree with that at all.
Replace the 360 with about a thousand more board and card games (and not quite so many Skylanders, but we'll get there) and that's me. Well, except for the "late 30s" part.DaveF said:My point of reference to the online sturm and drang is a friend of mine. Late 30's, big time gamer. Has a closet with a few hundred german-style strategy boardgames. Has a Wii, 360, PS3 with hundreds of games. His son has a few dozen Skylanders. I asked him what he thought of the new systems, thinking he'd buy one or more of the next gen systems within a year of release.
He said he didn't see what else there was to be done with video games (more graphics? meh). And hadn't really heard anything about the new One or PS4.
Really? I listen to podcasts while playing Skyrim and Fallout 3. *ducks head*Hanson said:I can't even listen to a podcast while playing Candy Crush Saga, so I doubt I could watch football AND play a console game at the same time.
Sometimes there's a game on that I kinda wanna watch but I also feel like playing something. With split-screen, I can focus mainly on the game I'm playing, and pause it if something exciting happens in the "real" game.Morgan Jolley said:Aaron - Uhh...I think the XBOne is basically trying to give you exactly what you describe with the split-screen stuff. That said...I mean...are you really going to play a game while watching something on half the screen? Personally, I think its cool to be able to do but not worth actually doing because I don't see myself WANTING to do that more than, really, just one time to see that it works.