1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

LOTR:TTT Extended Edition to be Rated PG-13

Discussion in 'DVD' started by GlennH, Apr 1, 2003.

  1. GlennH

    GlennH Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 1998
    Messages:
    2,135
    Likes Received:
    7
    Real Name:
    Glenn
    I think it had been reported some time ago, based on Peter Jackson's comments in an interview, that the upcoming Extended Edition (EE) of Lord of the Rings: The Two Towers would include more intense battle scenes that may bring an R rating.

    I just noticed that TTT EE version is now listed at www.cara.org, and it has a PG-13 rating, same as all previous LOTR:FOTR and TTT versions.

    If that turns out to be the case, it's good IMO.

    The entire epic is really one continuous story; I think it's best to have a consistent rating throughout. To do otherwise may alienate part of the audience that has already been developed.

    I also don't think there needs to be any additional excessive gore in this film. It's intense enough to tell the story at the PG-13 level.

    It's not like going to the R level would sell more copies.
     
  2. Gary->dee

    Gary->dee Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2003
    Messages:
    1,923
    Likes Received:
    1
    Yeah I remember the rumors of the extended cut of Fellowship being rated R for violence and that didn't happen. But it does lead me to a question: How much or what kind of violence, especially in a fantasy genre such as LOTR, could provoke an R rating?
     
  3. WillG

    WillG Producer

    Joined:
    Jan 30, 2003
    Messages:
    5,305
    Likes Received:
    30
    Yeah, I think the same thing happened last year with FOTR:EE where is was rumored that added footage would up the rating to a "R" but still PG-13
     
  4. GlennH

    GlennH Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 1998
    Messages:
    2,135
    Likes Received:
    7
    Real Name:
    Glenn
    I would think that any more intense scenes of gratuitous decapitations or limb hacking accompanied by lots of blood would get an R. And I for one don't need to see it to enjoy this series.
     
  5. DavidBL

    DavidBL Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2002
    Messages:
    204
    Likes Received:
    0
    We've been discussing this lately in the Movies forum under the ROTK/TTT:EE spoilers thread. A comparison was made between Pearl Harbor: Director's Cut, and FOTR:EE. Both had more violence in the extended editions vs. theatrical versions, but PH cranked the graphic violence WAY up to Saving Private Ryan-type war gore, while the additional violence in FOTR was not drastically more graphic than what was already there, just a little more of it. Thus PH got an "R" and FOTR stayed PG-13.

    And I agree 100% with Glenn's sentiments that the "high PG-13" level of violence and gore in the LOTR series is sufficient to tell the stories in all theatrical and extended versions. No fan of these films is going to say "dang, I'm not buying that 4-disc extended edition because it's not gory enough."

    Some concern has been expressed about a particular scene in ROTK involving catapults, but that's a possible spoiler so I'll refer anyone interested to the Movies forum thread for further discussion on that.
     
  6. Nathan V

    Nathan V Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Messages:
    960
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm quite satisfied with the level of violence (hard PG-13) in the series. I'm glad it isn't PG, like SW. The battle sequences have an energy that Pearl Harbor (theatrical), or any other recent PG/PG-13 offerings lack. It actually reminds me a lot of Kurosawa. Fierce action/atmosphere without graphic gore; most directors can't/don't do that. Of course, I wouldn't have objected to seeing orc blood spattering the camera [​IMG], but I guess that's why we have Black Hawk Down (which, for those of you who don't know, will be a 3-disc set in june).

    Regards,
    Nathan
     
  7. Stephen_Ri

    Stephen_Ri Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Sep 10, 2002
    Messages:
    96
    Likes Received:
    0
    You know, I think Ralph Bakshi's animated LOTR is actually more violent that FOTR;EE. More bright red blood filling the screen. The series does get more and more brutal as it goes on, however, so an R wouldn't be too suprising. It doesn't matter to me either way, and I don't think an R would alienate very much of an audience.
     
  8. MarkHastings

    MarkHastings Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2003
    Messages:
    12,013
    Likes Received:
    0
    Didn't PJ say (in the FOTR commentary) that the orc blood didn't get an R rating because it wasn't red?
     
  9. Malcolm R

    Malcolm R Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2002
    Messages:
    12,401
    Likes Received:
    466
    Location:
    Vermont
    Real Name:
    Malcolm
     
  10. Nathan V

    Nathan V Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Jul 16, 2002
    Messages:
    960
    Likes Received:
    0
    Yeah. that's why Scorsese had to desaturate the finale in Taxi Driver, the MPAA was threatening an X rating; they thought the blood was "too red." I realy don't get this concept. How is the movie any less violent now that it's been desaturated? Maybe it's a few iotas less startling, but certainly not less violent.
     
  11. Dave F

    Dave F Screenwriter

    Joined:
    May 15, 1999
    Messages:
    2,891
    Likes Received:
    2
     
  12. Tim Glover

    Tim Glover Lead Actor

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 1999
    Messages:
    7,983
    Likes Received:
    244
    Location:
    Monroe, LA
    Real Name:
    Tim Glover
    I'm glad they're keeping it a PG-13 rating too. I think if there was excessive violence it could detract from the film's already existing intensity and drama.

    While the Pearl Harbor: Vista Series Director's Cut is a Fabulous dvd set; I prefer the theatrical version over it.
     
  13. Gary->dee

    Gary->dee Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2003
    Messages:
    1,923
    Likes Received:
    1
    I was always under the impression that heavy sexual scenes and/or saying the word "fuck" more than once in a movie gets it an R rating. That's why I can't imagine any version of an LOTR movie getting an R rating based on violent scenes alone, but correct me if I'm wrong because I haven't read the books. I think Conan the Barbarian might be an example of a fantasy movie getting an R rating based on violent content even though it does contain some nudity.
     
  14. Daniel J

    Daniel J Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    May 8, 2001
    Messages:
    186
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  15. Qui-Gon John

    Qui-Gon John Producer

    Joined:
    Oct 2, 2000
    Messages:
    3,527
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  16. Bill Buklis

    Bill Buklis Premium
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 1999
    Messages:
    659
    Likes Received:
    22
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    Real Name:
    Bill Buklis
    As I recall weren't a lot of people complaining that the violence in Pear Harbor was too clean? I imagine then that the new R rating would be an improvement. At least from that viewpoint. However, I haven't seen the movie since thatone time in the theatre, so I can't really say one way or the other.
     
  17. Tommy G

    Tommy G Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Sep 19, 2000
    Messages:
    1,235
    Likes Received:
    0


    No, there is essentially no rhyme or reason to the MPAA. If you watch "The Patriot", there is no swearing at all in the entire film and there is no sexual content. It just depends on the mood of the MPAA at the time. Lilo and Stitch rated PG......Papillon rated PG [​IMG] case in point.
     
  18. GlennH

    GlennH Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Sep 28, 1998
    Messages:
    2,135
    Likes Received:
    7
    Real Name:
    Glenn
     
  19. JustinCleveland

    JustinCleveland Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2002
    Messages:
    2,059
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Madison, WI
    Real Name:
    Justin Cleveland
    I was watching Back to the Future the other day, and I was just MARVELED by the amount of profanity (F-bombs etc) dropped by MJFox... yet that was only PG. I'm with Dave... it's random.
     
  20. MarkHastings

    MarkHastings Executive Producer

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2003
    Messages:
    12,013
    Likes Received:
    0
     

Share This Page