1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

Lionsgate Press Release: Heavenly Creatures: The Uncut Version (Blu-ray)

Discussion in 'Blu-ray and UHD' started by Ronald Epstein, Oct 12, 2011.

  1. Ronald Epstein

    Ronald Epstein Administrator
    Owner

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 1997
    Messages:
    44,726
    Likes Received:
    3,682
    Real Name:
    Ronald Epstein



    [​IMG]


    Heavenly Creatures: The Uncut Version

    Called "a visionary triumph" (Rolling Stone), Academy Award®-winning director Peter Jackson (Best Director, The Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King, 2003) presents a true crime drama involving two friends separated by their parents. Oscar®-winner Kate Winslet (Best Performance by an Actress in a Leading Role, The Reader, 2008), in her big screen debut, stars alongside Melanie Lynskey (Up in the Air) in the Oscar®-nominated screenplay (Best Writing, Screenplay Written Directly for the Screen, 1994) co-penned by Jackson and his writing partner Frances Walsh (The Lord of the Rings Motion Picture Trilogy). The Uncut Version features ten minutes of footage not seen in the released theatrical version.



    Based on the shocking true story, two teenage girls form an unwavering bond rooted in a fantasy world that only they share. When their parents become disturbed by the intensity of the friendship, they separate the girls and threaten to keep them apart permanently. Scarred by the decision and blinded by their anger, the two girls hatch a devastating plan and vow murderous revenge on their families.

    December 13, 2011

    $19.99
     
  2. Jeff Ulmer

    Jeff Ulmer Producer

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 1998
    Messages:
    5,593
    Likes Received:
    0
    Good to see, although I'll hold my enthusiasm until we get some feedback on the quality.
     
  3. Bryan Tuck

    Bryan Tuck Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2002
    Messages:
    1,636
    Likes Received:
    158
    Real Name:
    Bryan Tuck
    Very good movie, but I sure wish they'd include the shorter, 99-minute version as well, since Peter Jackson has apparently stated that's the one he prefers.
     
  4. Vincent_P

    Vincent_P Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,848
    Likes Received:
    189
    Can somebody point me to an interview where Jackson explicitly says this? Vincent
     
  5. theonemacduff

    theonemacduff Second Unit

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2010
    Messages:
    377
    Likes Received:
    106
    Location:
    the wet coast
    Real Name:
    Jon Paul
    The uncut version has been available in Canada in a butchered release by Alliance, which is 1080i, and (apparently; I refused to buy it) in a 1.78 ratio, whereas the OAR is 2.39. Let's hope this release is a better effort.
     
  6. Vincent_P

    Vincent_P Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,848
    Likes Received:
    189
    There's a weird hybrid cut that's on Netflix streaming. It's mostly the short cut, but has at least one shot from the uncut version-
    the guy splitting up blood into his bedpan.
    Vincent
     
  7. cafink

    cafink Producer

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 1999
    Messages:
    3,045
    Likes Received:
    36
    Vincent, are you sure that shot is exclusive to the uncut version? I only saw the movie once, a few years ago, so I'm not all that familiar with it, but I can't find the shot you describe in this list of the differences between the two versions. Maybe I just missed it among a larger change or something, though.
     
  8. Vincent_P

    Vincent_P Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,848
    Likes Received:
    189
    Yes I'm sure. The shot is PARTIALLY in the short version,
    but cuts away before you see any blood.
    It was like that when I saw HC theatrically and also on my LaserDisc and always stood out as a very jarring edit to me. I should note that the first time I saw HC was at a Miramax test screening of the uncut version, so watching the theatrical cut the first time I was very aware of most of what was removed. Vincent
     
  9. Bryan Tuck

    Bryan Tuck Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2002
    Messages:
    1,636
    Likes Received:
    158
    Real Name:
    Bryan Tuck
    I admit I've never seen an actual interview, but if it's an Internet legend, it's a persistent one. On the IMDB "Alternate Versions" listing, it mentions that he prefers the shorter version, but as always that's grain-of-salt information (although that entry has been there for years). So I honestly don't know, I guess. Either way, though, there are some fans who do prefer the 99-minute cut, so I wish they'd include both. (Personally, I haven't seen either in quite some time, so I'm not sure which one I prefer, but I'm always interested in alternate released cuts).
     
  10. Vincent_P

    Vincent_P Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2003
    Messages:
    1,848
    Likes Received:
    189
    I once asked Jackson via a post on the unfortunately now long-defunct "The Bastards Have Landed" website which cut he preferred, and he basically said something along the lines of he felt the short version would be better for general audiences, but the uncut version would be better for big fans of the film. He also mentioned that there was an even longer cut with about 10 additional minutes over the "uncut version" that he hoped to release as a special edition some day. My read of Jackson's opinion of the short cut based on that exchange is that he thought Miramax did a good job cutting it down to make it more palatable to general audiences, but not that he specifically preferred that cut. I wish that website hadn't disappeared, Jackson used to post there all the time and it was great having him respond to my question re: which version of HC he preferred, even if he did kind of skirt the question by essentially endorsing both cuts (and his mention of an even longer cut makes me wonder if that one will ever actually surface one of these days). Vincent
     
  11. TravisR

    TravisR Studio Mogul

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Messages:
    24,967
    Likes Received:
    2,773
    Location:
    The basement of the FBI building
    I really like Jackson's crazy horror movies but this is my favorite of his movies. Coincidentally, a 35mm print is playing at an art theater near me in Pennesylvania in a couple weeks.
     
  12. Bryan Tuck

    Bryan Tuck Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2002
    Messages:
    1,636
    Likes Received:
    158
    Real Name:
    Bryan Tuck
    Interesting. From what I understand, that's basically the position he took on the LOTR films as well, not really choosing one over the other (which is kind of how I feel, too; generally speaking, I think the theatricals work better as films, and the longer cuts work collectively as a kind of six-part miniseries). Like I said, I'm just fascinated by different (official) presentations of certain movies and the effect they have on certain audiences, and I often wonder how different that effect might have been if the alternate cut was shown to that audience first instead. (Does that make sense?) I guess it's the editor in me. :)
     

Share This Page