1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

Jvc Rx-6030vbk

Discussion in 'AV Receivers' started by svenge, Apr 30, 2003.

  1. svenge

    svenge Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2003
    Messages:
    153
    Likes Received:
    0
    This budget receiver caught my eye at Crutchfield, can anyone comment on its quality?

    JVC RX-6030VBK
     
  2. svenge

    svenge Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Apr 2, 2003
    Messages:
    153
    Likes Received:
    0
    Bump?
     
  3. Dennis Gardner

    Dennis Gardner Stunt Coordinator

    Joined:
    Dec 12, 2002
    Messages:
    206
    Likes Received:
    0
    JVC has always been noted for a large number of features for the $ spent. I have a RX 9010VBK and have been very happy with it. Some people believe that JVC has focused more on providing features on their line at the expense of good sound, but considering the under $200 pricing, JVC, Kenwood, Sony etc. are all going to be reasonable choices as long as you don't plan on driving large power hungry speakers at high volumes. I do also own a RX-DV3SL combo receiver/DVD and find it great for a bedroom theater.
    You might also consider the RX-7030, It has 7 channels of surround and can be found on ebay, new for around $30 more.

    Good luck,

    Dennis
     
  4. BrianWoerndle

    BrianWoerndle Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2002
    Messages:
    794
    Likes Received:
    0
    I had an older (about 3-4 years old now) JVC receiver. It did have some nice features. It was one of the only cheaper receiver to offer S-video switching at the time. I also loved the compu-link system since most of my other gear was JVC at the time. But the sound quality was sub-par. I have since upgraded to a Denon receiver, and the sound quality improved dramatically. The biggest problem I had with the JVC was that it didn't have bass management on stereo. So stereo sounded horrible, and I listen to CDs in stereo. They may have improved on these over the years, but I still think you could get better quality from an entry level receiver from Denon, Marantz, or H/K.
     
  5. RobWil

    RobWil Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2003
    Messages:
    733
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  6. RobWil

    RobWil Supporting Actor

    Joined:
    Mar 17, 2003
    Messages:
    733
    Likes Received:
    0
    Actually the website does state the specs for the surround mode.
    100 watts x 5 min. RMS, into 8 ohms, 1kHz, 0.8% THD

    Notice they further cheat there by using the 'at 1kHz' spec.
     
  7. Bill Will

    Bill Will Screenwriter

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2001
    Messages:
    1,288
    Likes Received:
    0
    Svenge, I would say it depends on what your looking for in a receiver. If I was looking for a low-price receiver the Panasonic 100 is the best receiver out there. It can be had for under $250 & it has the amp built into it to drive the rear center speaker & it puts out a measured 70 watts a channel with all 6 channels driven as tested by S&V Mag. plus they were very impressed with it's low noise levels & etc. I think when your looking at under $200 receivers that they are all around the same & I would look for one that has the featues you want & the remote you like the best. The only exception might be Sherwood which seems to put out some pretty good low priced receivers. I would stay away from KLH, Aiwa & other odd ball brands. But again, for the money I don't think the Panasonic 100 can be beat.
     

Share This Page