The copies we got in for sale at my work are in a double alpha, and black, just like the rest. I cannot confirm the no insert thing, as i cant buy it until tues......dammit.
Just picked mine up. White Box! What's the deal with this anyway? Did they run low on black? Doesn't matter much to me, they're going in thinner doubles with custom covers, it's just that consistancy would be nice.
And of course the no insert issue still bugs me but... what the hell! It's all about the movie, right?
One piece of clarification: as my review notes, I think the difference seems fairly small for folks with 4X3 sets. The new one will offer a much more substantial improvement for those with 16X9 TVs. For them, I totally recommend the DVD - it's more questionable for people with 4X3 TVs...
The white case doesn't bother me too much. I'll just swap it with one of the black double Disney cases I have (Atlantis or Tarzan will do nicely). The Disney discs look better in white anyway.
It's a packed special edition with a brand-new transfer and it retails for less than $20 - aren't complaints that it lacks a crummy insert card kinda petty?
Comparing OUATITW and ST:VI is apples and oranges.
OUATITW underwent a painstaking restoration by Lowry Digital - something that film is definitely worthy of. It's not something that a studio can afford to do to every release in its catalog.
Also, you can't blame the amount of grain on the transfer if that grain was inherent in the original elements. If the grain is SUPPOSED to be there, then the transfer still gets high marks. Whether or not that grain should have been in the original negative is a whole different issue.
Remember that all the Trek features had limited production budgets. Where a budget limitation from over a dozen years ago affects a DVD transfer, you can't blame the transfer.
I never did purchase or rent the last ST:VI DVD... I was waiting for the SE. I obviously can't compare directly - but I was not disappointed by this transfer.
Just to add a comment from my film-school geek knowledge:
As Colin noted in his review of the DVD, ST6 was shot using the Super 35 format. I wanted to say that while yes, the optical frame extraction and blowup to produce the 2.35:1 release prints can result in additional grain, that shouldn't be a factor for this DVD release. Since the DVD presents the image in a 2:1 ratio, there's no way they could have made that from a scope release print; the extra information on the top and bottom wouldn't be there. That means it was made from elements closer to the original negatives than a scope release prints, which would lead me to believe that any visible grain in the film was intended, or at least, part of the original production rather than a result of the transfer.