1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

HTF REVIEW: "Rock Star"

Discussion in 'Archived Threads 2001-2004' started by Ronald Epstein, Jan 12, 2002.

  1. Ronald Epstein

    Ronald Epstein Administrator

    Jul 3, 1997
    Likes Received:
    Real Name:
    Ronald Epstein


    All Rock. No Soul.
    It's as if it came and went without much
    notice. Rock Star is an easily
    forgettable film that movie audiences didn't
    seem to embrace and neither will DVD viewers.
    The film takes place in the 1980s. Amateur
    Rock Bands are fighting for attention on stage,
    mimicking their favorite rock idols.
    Chris Cole (Mark Wahlberg) worships the
    rock group STEEL DRAGONS and its fiery lead singer,
    Bobby Beers (Jason Flemyng). By day Chris works
    as a photocopy repairman, but at night dons makeup and
    leather and takes the stage as a lead singer of a
    local heavy-metal STEEL DRAGONS tribute band.
    One day, Chris receives a phone call that changes
    his life forever. Bobby Beers invites Chris and
    his girlfriend/manager Emily (Jennifer Aniston) to
    Los Angeles to audition for lead singer of the band.
    Chris quickly rises to stardom. Every night is a
    party and there are plenty of women to choose from
    (and I thought only HTF owners lived like this).
    This naturally puts a strain on the relationship
    with Emily, and Chris must make some heartfelt
    decisions about his career's future.
    Filled with a rockin' 80's soundtrack from the
    GOES TO HOLLYWOOD, Rock Star tries to be the
    ultimate 80's movie, but alas, never really becomes
    hip. The story is too far-fetched, there are no
    characters to care about, and the film never becomes
    inspiring. Though the film is promoted as
    "unbelievably exciting!", I found it to be one big yawn.
    How does the DVD look and sound?
    Once again Warner Brothers has put out an
    exceptional anamorphic transfer. The print looks
    stunning, preserving all the colors that spray
    across the stage from gorgeous blues to hot reds.
    The 5.1 Dolby Digital Mix puts you right in the
    center of Steel Dragon's rock concerts. From
    screeching guitars to booming drums, my front
    speakers pounded to the metal music as the rears
    came alive with the sound of a roaring crowd.
    Extra Features
    In addition to a full length audio commentary
    by Director Stephen Herek....
    Backstage Pass is an extremely short
    promotional piece that is as bland as the film
    itself. Basically, Director Stephen Herek, Mark
    Wahlberg and Jennifer Aniston talk about the film
    and the big-haired era that it represents. There
    isn't much behind-the-scenes material here.
    The film's music video, Rockstar, sung
    by Everclear is included.
    Final Thoughts
    I am getting tired of Mark Wahlberg movies.
    I never felt he was a credible lead actor as
    he lacks charm and charisma. His performances
    are easily forgettable and I often feel that a
    movie would have succeeded far better if someone
    else was playing the lead.
    Out of all of Wahlberg's films, Rock Star
    will be the easiest to forget. From start to
    finish it's a rather dull, lackluster film that
    really never rises to the occasion.
    Rent it before even considering a purchase.
    Release Date: January 22, 2002
  2. Bergan Peters

    Bergan Peters Well-Known Member

    Dec 7, 2001
    Likes Received:
    How could you POSSIBLY give a positive review to Fast and the Furious AND The Grinch, and not like Rock Star? This movie is worth it SOLELY for the fact that during the credits they play some Marky Mark and the Funky Bunch and Mark Wahlberg gets PISSED.

    Also, not a credible actor? Mark Wahlburgs performance in Boogie Nights is better than EVERY actor in the Fast and the Furious combined.
  3. Mitty

    Mitty Well-Known Member

    Jan 13, 1999
    Likes Received:
    While I wouldn't presume to speak for Ron on this, any attempt to cross-compare reviews of films like this is a bit of a ridiculous enterprise.

    A good reviewer will look at each movie on its own merits, whether it reasonably attains the goals it sets for itself. One certainly wouldn't try to compare Rock Star to The Fast and the Furious or The Grinch.

    Imagine if every critic had to stand up against such obscure scrutiny? "Excuse me, Mr. Ebert, how is that you can give a thumbs up to 'Kate and Leopold' and a thumbs down to 'Fight Club?'"

    And, really, what shines brighter in 'Boogie Nights?' Wahlberg's performance, or the material itself? Is it not possible that Ron's statement ("...I often feel that a movie would have succeeded far better if someone else was playing the lead.") still holds true for him, even in that instance?
  4. AaronJB

    AaronJB Well-Known Member

    Nov 2, 1998
    Likes Received:
    I sat through "Rock Star" when it was in theaters late last year and - it's really not awful, but it's not great, either. Totally forgettable. What I really was displeased with is the part that Jennifer Aniston had. While people will always see her as part of "Friends", I think she has really matured as an actress over those years. To have her as some sort of half-developed "girlfriend" character was really one of the biggest wastes of talent in the film.

    Just my two cents.
  5. cafink

    cafink Well-Known Member

    Apr 19, 1999
    Likes Received:
  6. Ronald Epstein

    Ronald Epstein Administrator

    Jul 3, 1997
    Likes Received:
    Real Name:
    Ronald Epstein

    I wanted to write more about the Jennifer

    Aniston role in my review, but decided not to

    because I felt I had written enough already.

    I felt exactly as you had in that

    Jennifer Aniston is such a fine actress and

    her presence in this film was reduced to a

    backseat role.
  7. Adam Tyner

    Adam Tyner Well-Known Member

    Sep 29, 2000
    Likes Received:
  8. Vince Maskeeper

    Vince Maskeeper Well-Known Member

    Jan 18, 1999
    Likes Received:
    I just wanted to say that I, too, agree with Ron's assessment. I saw this film at Mann's in LA during the HTF meet in Sept, and thought it to be the worst big budget movie I've seen in years!

    I think the idea of Tim Owen's story is really a great start for a movie- but I don't know if it could really support 90-100 minutes of film without a very capable screenwriter and more subtle actors.

    The sad part about the film was that the absolute best take on the character would have been to play him more like the naive but cocky Dirk Diggler that Markey Mark played in Boogie Nights. Unfortunately, he already played that character.

    I would certainly say rent before you buy- and if you don't ever get around to renting it-- no huge loss. But if you do suffer through it, make sure to stick around for the credits- the best part of the whole film happens after it ends.

  9. Dave H

    Dave H Well-Known Member

    Aug 13, 2000
    Likes Received:
    I agree with most of the comments already made. There are no strong characters in this movie and I don't think this is the kind of movie that's going to be "remembered." I'm not sure if I would buy this movie, but I think it's worth a rental. Prior to seeing this movie I was hoping it was going to be another "Boogie Nights-type" film. It was far from it.

    With all that being said, I wouldn't call this a bad movie and do think it's worth a rental. I just had a bit higher expectations.
  10. Sean Conklin

    Sean Conklin Well-Known Member

    Oct 30, 2000
    Likes Received:
    I haven't seen this film, but as usual I will take Ron's review to heart(He's usually right), I have made several purchases and held off on some because of Ron's reviews(I haven't rented in 8 month's) and he hasn't missed with me yet.
    BTW Ron, I know your busy, but have you acquired that taste for Bill and Ted yet[​IMG]
    Thanks for the review Ron!
  11. Scott Weinberg

    Scott Weinberg Well-Known Member

    Oct 3, 2000
    Likes Received:
    I'm with Ron on this one. I wouldn't classify Rock Star as an atrocious movie, simply a bland and forgettable one.
    Good review.
  12. Darrin B

    Darrin B Guest

    I think I will also take Ron's word on this one. We do pretty much have total opposite taste (Fast & Furious, Grinch...oh and that horrible Moulin Rouge come to mind) but

    he makes some pretty good points about why it would be a

    forgetable film. I disagree (somewhat) with Ron's opinion about Mark though. I thought he did an excellent job in

    The Perfect Storm.
  13. Gavin_L

    Gavin_L Well-Known Member

    Aug 24, 2001
    Likes Received:
    thanks ron for the review, i was on edge of buying this dvd, but i think I'll have to think a little bit longer about [​IMG]
  14. JohnS

    JohnS Well-Known Member

    Jan 17, 2001
    Likes Received:
    Real Name:
    John Steffens
    I sorta liked this film. I'm definitely buying this on release date.
  15. AndrewW

    AndrewW Well-Known Member

    Oct 21, 2001
    Likes Received:
    I don't know, for some reason I really enjoy Marky Mark; Basketball Diaries and Boogie Nights were great. I also thought this was an excellent movie, as did my wife...no Almost Famous, but still entertaining. I found the music to be quite ammusing. I'll be buying this one.
  16. Sutjahjo Ngaserin

    Sutjahjo Ngaserin Well-Known Member

    Jun 30, 1997
    Likes Received:
    I agree with Ron that this is a forgettable movie, if you like the music however, it is worth a viewing.
    "Fast and Furious" however is really a bad movie [​IMG] and unless you enjoy the car race scenes (which is heavily criticised by street car racers) this one has no redeeming value.
  17. Tom Bley

    Tom Bley Member

    Sep 14, 1998
    Likes Received:
    Saw it in the theater....I'm buyin' this one!
  18. Jeff Kleist

    Jeff Kleist Well-Known Member

    Dec 4, 1999
    Likes Received:
    I loved this movie. No, it's not a great film, but I'm a sucker for hair metal, and I thought the concert scenes were kickin
    Yes, and the Marky Mark blooper had me rolling [​IMG]
  19. John Thomas

    John Thomas Well-Known Member

    Mar 23, 2000
    Likes Received:
    That is what's great about opinions: yours isn't wrong. I enjoyed the movie, personally. Worth the price of admission and entertaining but after you leave the theater, it fades quickly.
  20. Aaron Silverman

    Aaron Silverman Well-Known Member

    Jan 22, 1999
    Likes Received:
    Real Name:
    Aaron Silverman
    My feelings are much the same as Jeff's- although I wouldn't say I *loved* it.

    You definitely need some knowledge of Judas Priest and of 80's metal in general to appreciate a lot of the material in Rock Star.

    In fact, the movie was originally entitled "Metal God", after the Priest song "Metal Gods". My guess is that over the course of the development of the film, the portrayal of the main character and the band became more and more negative, and they disassociated themselves from it. I found the movie to be more condescending than nostalgic towards its subject matter, which bothered me a bit. (I wonder how much Marky Mark had to do with that- he was very public about how he doesn't like or respect heavy metal at all!)

Share This Page