What's new

HTF HD-DVD Review: Star Trek: The Original Series Season One (2 Viewers)

Douglas Monce

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2006
Messages
5,511
Real Name
Douglas Monce

I believe the re recorded it because all of the original music was recorded in mono. (or at least mono stems are all they have left) They have been doing a fake stereo image on the music for the DVDs up till now. I think they wanted the title music to have a some what more spectacular recording. I'm not sure I agree with this choice, but the recording is so close to the original in terms of performance that it doesn't bother me.

Doug
 

JackKay

Second Unit
Joined
Mar 27, 2004
Messages
461
What the heck everyone, were getting Star Trek in High Def finally. I just wish the price lands back on Earth sometime.
 

Carter of Mars

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Jul 31, 2006
Messages
245
Real Name
John Carter
What was shown was an effects shot from the weekly series.

The re-recorded main title is a curiosity since the main titles sound fine in 5.1 on the current DVDs.

The Menagerie, as screened theatrically, also featured the audio mistake that was on the first DVD, where Pike and Spock handle the singing leaves. They're supposed to stop singing. This was fixed for the SD season 1 box set from a few years ago. I think the re-mastered episode went back to the old version.
 

Nelson Au

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 16, 1999
Messages
19,027
The documentary in the box set describes the remastering process and covers the music issue. No reason other then wanting to spruce up the series to modern standards. The idea was to go to the film negatives and clean-up and restore the film elements. They then thought they could recreate, using the original Alexander Courage scoring notes, the music with a similar band of about 25 to 29 muscicans as originally done and re-record it with modern recording equipment. They found the original recording of Shatner doing the Space: The Final Frontier monologue and infused that into the remix. So the sole reason was give the show a new shine, visually and audibly too.
 

Jim_K

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 7, 2000
Messages
10,087



Maybe. Last night I watched What Are Little Girls Made of?, Miri and Dagger of the Mind on disc 3 and did not notice it again, but I wasn't looking for it either.

As for the other debate going on all I'll say is I've said right from the start that this set should have also included the original unaltered versions in HD. It doesn't, so one has to choose to either buy it, rent it or pass on it. I chose to buy it and feel no need to justify that decision to anyone else.
 

Ronald Epstein

Founder
Owner
Moderator
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 3, 1997
Messages
66,478
Real Name
Ronald Epstein
Oh, no doubt, Paramount really screwed this set up.

I see what they were out to do....they wanted to release this
set as one "sku" so that sDVD and HD-DVD owners could both
benefit on these new modified transfers.

The problem is, sDVD owners are paying waaay too much to
own this set and HD-DVD owners aren't getting the benefit of
having the original unaltered versions of these episodes in HD.

You are correct in that Paramount should not have gone the
combi-disc route here and offered both versions for HD-DVD owners.
 

RickER

Senior HTF Member
Deceased Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2003
Messages
5,128
Location
Tulsa, Oklahoma
Real Name
Rick

I have a little voice in the back of my head telling me this isnt the last word on this release. I bet we see it again. But in my perfect world they would use seamless branching to give us both versions, and it wouldnt be on combo discs with semi cheap packaging.
 

Dave Scarpa

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 8, 1999
Messages
5,765
Real Name
David Scarpa
Paramount should have released this as a SD set and an HD set, I think in that way the price could've been lowered on the HD set, they could've avoided Combo's and all the possible problems, and they could've sold alot of SD sets. Now that being said. They were'nt going to release the Original Episodes in HD. In fact the reason for this redoing of the Special Effects was specifically for releasing the series in HD (oh and to sell the sets again to the same people who bought them the first ime, hey I'm not that Naive!) but when going from a Pristine Cleaned Up , HD Live action footage, to the Dirty, Matte line encrusted Original effects it was just way too jarring. So it was never Paramounts intention to release the originals in HD, those sets stand as a very good representation of the original non altered series.

I wish paramount would release newly remastered Next Gen and DS9 disks, I look at some of those today on my "Next Gen" hardware and quite frankly they are tough to watch, DS9 is a Compression nightmare, TNG have some awful Video scan lines, yuck.
 

Mike_G

Screenwriter
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
1,477
Real Name
Mike
So, here's my perspective.

I watched these shows on NBC. I bought the ORIGINAL VHS tapes, the original DVDs, and I have some episodes on 16mm. I've been a fan forever and quite frankly, I hated some of the silly effects shots, even as a kid. Green planets, purple planets, the ridiculous shimmying Enterprise during the sligshot sequence. They always bugged me because they could have done so much better, but who knew the show was going to last this long?

Enter CGI. Now they can fix the shots, and they did, and I'm DAMN happy with the results. I can put aside my silly prejudice towards the original effects and just enjoy this for what it is.

As for "the effects don't make a difference to the story", they most certainly do! The CGI team has done a great job at FIXING stupid things we saw in the original series. Double flybys, effects that made no sense, and the biggest problem I always had with the show: reused footage.

This thought that they redid these effects for the Playstation generation is partially correct, but not in the vain that it was stated. The effects looked like ass. There, I said it. They were poor and inconsistent by today's standards. Watching the show in the 60's was one thing when the show wasn't meant to survive, but now that it has after 40 years, you NEED to fix it up or it will be scrutinized and laughed at. Science fiction is part of today's culture and you can't get away with green planets anymore.
 

Arnie G

Supporting Actor
Joined
May 29, 2002
Messages
662
Real Name
Arnie Douglas
I don't think this set is overpriced. When it came out I paid $100 for a single movie, Silence of the Lambs LD, then paid $100 for a single SD DVD season of The X-files. You get more for your $ on this set comparatively.
 

Mark Zimmer

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 30, 1997
Messages
4,318
The combo decision is an interesting one, at least in hindsight. Given Paramount's shift to HD DVD-exclusive, it's obviously in their best interests to promote that format, and what better way than to use a stealth maneuver to get HD DVD discs into the hands of Trek fans, especially while prices are dropping. Whether they were already thinking of going HD DVD exclusive when they announced this set, I don't know, but given the present state of affairs there's a strong incentive for them to at least test the waters of whether this will work to increase acceptance of the the HD DVD format.
 

Dave Scarpa

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 8, 1999
Messages
5,765
Real Name
David Scarpa
I'm kinda happy I'll have the SD versions because then I can get them to my portable devices, something I could not do with the HD Version.
 

Chuck Anstey

Screenwriter
Joined
Nov 10, 1998
Messages
1,640
Real Name
Chuck Anstey
I am on the fence for these being combos. Personally I will benefit from having the SD version because I only have the one HD player in the HT room and I will likely watch them on the TV once in a while and on the road. I certainly wouldn't buy the set twice.

Do you really think that the SD only versions would be that much cheaper? Maybe $99 at the cheapest. Also I don't see the HD-only versions being any cheaper because you are paying the premium for HD. You almost are getting the SD for free because Paramount is hoping to induce enough DVD only owners to buy this set anyway, paying about a $30-$40 premium to be able to view HD in the future. TOS fans have always been willing to pay a significant premium for the show and is still way cheaper than when TOS first came out on DVD so Paramount's strategy seems like a reasonable one.

Sure I wish the set cost similar to other sci-fi season sets series which would be about $99 for HD and $59 for SD but that was(is) never going to happen.
 

Douglas Monce

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2006
Messages
5,511
Real Name
Douglas Monce

I don't think we are really paying much more than we paid for the SD season sets a few years ago. I think they were around $120 when first released.

Doug
 

Douglas Monce

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 16, 2006
Messages
5,511
Real Name
Douglas Monce


Don't hold your breath for these. Post production for them were all done in 480i NTSC format. All post production would have to be re done from scratch for each episode for them to be presented in actual 1080 HD.

Doug
 

John H Ross

Screenwriter
Joined
Oct 16, 2000
Messages
1,044

I just don't agree with this at all. I made a rather sarcastic comment earlier about watching The Dambusters in colour, but the point I'm making is sound I think. If Casablanca had been made now it would have been made in glorious technicolour. Does that mean the original version should be colourised? Or re-shot? The original Night Of The Living Dead was made in 1:33 aspect ratio. If it had been made now it would have been shot, maybe 2.35:1. Should the top and bottom of the picture now be hacked off in order to satisfy modern 16x9 displays? The original Twilight Zone's all look somewhat cheap compared to the big-budget TV productions of today, etc. etc.

What I'm saying is we should be embracing film and television the way it was originally made. Sure, we should present that vision as clearly, both visually and sonically, as possible but we shouldn't change the artistic results just because the technology of the delivery system has moved on, even if those results didn't quite match the artists's vision (when do artistic results EVER match the artists's vision?!)

Star Trek looks old. It was made in 1966-69, live with it! I'm surprised they didn't try and replace all the Klingons with CGI characters that more closely resemble their TNG etc counterparts. Those old Klingons are poor and inconsistent by today's standards!


This is how I would have loved the Treks to be presented:



SPECIAL FEATURES (Excerpt):
CGI Effects: The option to watch the story with seventeen of the original video effects sequences replaced by CGI versions.

The effects in Doctor Who make those of Star Trek look like 2001 in comparison - but bloody hell I love them that way. They're quaint and endeering and the other departments had to work twice as hard to make up for them. It's like Trek. Some of the acting is so unbelievably melodramatic that to make the effects look more realistic seems inappropriate somehow. Viva tacky sci-fi! :)
 

Mike_G

Screenwriter
Joined
Jun 1, 2000
Messages
1,477
Real Name
Mike
You can't compare Star Trek to Casablanca. That's a stretch, and a long one at that. The black and white of the time doesn't distract from the storytelling. The effects in Star Trek DO. That's the point I was making.

Star Trek has the ability to live on because the stories are very good. The bridge set looks good even by today's standards, the costumes look good, the music is phenomenal, and although the effects were cool for up to maybe the late 70's, the fact is that they're old. Redoing Casablanca in color won't help it at all. Changing a green planet with a blue sky to a Class M planet makes much more sense. Using the same matte shots in several shows is now fixed. I found "The Doomsday Machine" to be a perfect example of how things can go bad because your brain is expecting one thing and shown another. Now they fixed it and the STORY makes much more sense.

And don't get me started on the images of Earth with no clouds. Even as a kid I knew it was wrong, but there wasn't much to go by in the 60's. Now you see these beautiful shots of Earth in "Tomorrow Is Yesterday". It grounds the show much more than if they kept the original shots in.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
356,710
Messages
5,121,132
Members
144,146
Latest member
SaladinNagasawa
Recent bookmarks
0
Top