What's new

DVD Review HTF DVD REVIEW: How the West Was Won: Ultimate Collector's Edition (1 Viewer)

JackKay

Second Unit
Joined
Mar 27, 2004
Messages
461
I'm not in the know, but if the Smilebox version was on the SD would it have required more Disks?
 

GerardoHP

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jan 10, 2001
Messages
798
Location
Los Angeles, California
Real Name
Gerardo Paron
Guys, I know this is a sore topic for many who would have loved the Smilebox version but can't get it because it's only available in Blu-ray, but let me just say, if you've been waiting for a good reason to get a Blu-ray player, this should be it. I imagine the letterbox version looks great in SD, but the Smilebox version is nothing short of astonishing.

I scanned through the letterbox version last night after watching the Smilebox version, and while it's without a doubt an amazing transfer, it just doesn't give you the sense of depth that the curved screen simulation provides.

I'd love to see THIS IS CINERAMA the same way, and of course, TWWOTBG, but I wouldn't hesitate to double-dip to see the 50's and 60's big screen epics in Smilebox HD, as well. I really hope this title is a big hit for Warners and that they decide to make Smilebox the next step in video presentation for large format epics like this one.
 

Ken_McAlinden

Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2001
Messages
6,241
Location
Livonia, MI USA
Real Name
Kenneth McAlinden
...the only problem being that there just are not many large format epics like this one.
htf_images_smilies_smile.gif


Regards,
 

Ken_McAlinden

Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2001
Messages
6,241
Location
Livonia, MI USA
Real Name
Kenneth McAlinden
It would be interesting as a curiosity, but in the case of true three-panel Cinerama films, it makes a lot more sense due to the image consisting of three separate wide angle frames photographed at angles to each other. The curvature on real Cinerama films is justified by the way they were photographed whereas on the other large format films, it had to be artificially introduced.

Regards,
 

Brian Borst

Screenwriter
Joined
May 15, 2008
Messages
1,137

I'm sorry, I thought that one disc was used for the film, and one for the bonus material, instead of the film being split up.
 

John Hodson

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2003
Messages
4,627
Location
Bolton, Lancashire
Real Name
John

It was originally planned as a two disc set Brian, but it was switched to three (both the SE and UCE, despite internet scuttlebutt to the contrary) - two for the film, one for the extras.
 

john a hunter

Screenwriter
Joined
Oct 11, 2005
Messages
1,462
I think you are right, Ken, for all the films you mention save 80 Days. The early Todd AO installations all had reasonably deeply curved screens although this was dropped from about "South Pacific" onwards. When this opened in London in April 1958, the depth of the curve had dropped to about 5 feet. Originally, it was much deeper.

I would love a smilebox 80 Days( although I wait patiently- well not really- for my HTWWW and have yet to see it), but given the poor state of the negs, this would appear unlikely.
 

mdnitoil

Supporting Actor
Joined
Sep 20, 2006
Messages
790
Real Name
Scott
I certainly appreciate the thought process here, but that would make this a $2000 movie for me. :eek:
 

RolandL

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2001
Messages
6,623
Location
Florida
Real Name
Roland Lataille

There were nine films that were filmed in a 3-strip process and promoted as being "In Cinerama" that could benefit from being shown in the Smilebox process. The five Cinerama travelogue films, Windjammer which was filmed in Cinemiracle, How The West Was Won, The Wonderful World of The Brothers Grimm and also Cinerama's Russian Adventure which was filmed in the Russian Kinopanorama 3-strip process.

There were also twenty films - It's a Mad, Mad, Mad World, Circus World , 2001: A Space Odyssey, etc. that were filmed in various 70mm and 35mm film formats that were later promoted as being "In Cinerama" and projected on the deeply curved Cinerama screen. I guess they could be released in the Smilebox process if people wanted to see what they would have looked like on a Cinerama screen. The Ultra Panavision films would look the best as they have a 2.76:1 aspect ratio and were cropped to 2.6:1 on a Cinerama screen. But the remaining films that were mostly in 70mm which were 2.2:1 would have to be stretched to 2.6:1 so, they would look distorted if Smileboxed.
 

GerardoHP

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jan 10, 2001
Messages
798
Location
Los Angeles, California
Real Name
Gerardo Paron
I agree, but I think we'd have to admit that any - any- film projected onto a deeply curved screen, including true Cinerama films, are subject to a certain amount of distortion. HTWWW itself, whether shown flat or curved, distorts because of the very wide-angle lenses used by the Cinerama camera. I don't think these films ever meant to look realistic, otherwise they would have been shot and exhibited flat.

Personally, I hate watching modern scope movies at the Cinerama Dome because they are not shot to be shown on a deeply curved screen, so the distortions are ugly and unintended, to say the least.

But Ultra Panavision pictures like BEN-HUR, MUTINY ON THE BOUNTY, KHARTOUM and IAMMMMW definitely had deep curvatures in mind when shot. I think they'd be very appropriate in Smilebox, as would the early Todd-AO movies and 2001.
 

RolandL

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2001
Messages
6,623
Location
Florida
Real Name
Roland Lataille

I don't think Ben-Hur or Mutiny on The Bounty were shown on any Cinerama screens during their roadshow release. On the documentary for It's A Mad, Mad, Mad, Mad World, Stanley Kramer mentions it wasn't until they had completed or near completion of the film that UA decided to promote it as being 'In Cinerama'.
 

AdrianTurner

BANNED
Joined
Dec 5, 2007
Messages
400
Real Name
Adrian Turner
I saw Ben-Hur on a reissue at the Casino Cinerama theatre in London, circa 1970, and it looked terrible on that screen and I saw it again at a Cinerama theatre in Bristol, UK, and it didn't look right there, either. The only non three-panel films that looked OK on the deep curve were Mad World, Grand Prix and 2001. I guess we should also include The Bible and Patton which were also designed for the deep curve D-150 process.
 

GerardoHP

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jan 10, 2001
Messages
798
Location
Los Angeles, California
Real Name
Gerardo Paron
You'd have to wonder whether you saw an Ultra Panavision print or a flat 70mm print. I saw a flat 70mm print of BEN-HUR at the Cinerama Dome and it didn't look right, either. I imagine a wider UP print would be a different story, but I really don't know. Either way, the film would look a bit distorted but my whole point is that the Smilebox, whether in its extreme current form in the HTWWW DVD or in a softer (less "curved") form, would give the film some of its original giant screen oomph.
 

Vern Dias

Second Unit
Joined
Apr 27, 1999
Messages
353
Real Name
Theodore V Dias
What I think most people don't realize is that when Cinerama converted from 3 strip to single strip, they also masked off a considerable amount of the sides of the screen. I know that at the Honolulu Cinerama, they moved both side masking panels inwards about 5 or 6 feet when they converted for single strip. Even with that change they still needed specially ground lenses to achieve reasonable focus across the entire image.

At the Cooper Cinerama in Denver and Minneapolis, the lenses used for 70mm single strip Cinerama must have weighed a good 20 pounds each. http://webserve.govst.edu/users/gaskrau/cinlens1.jpg

To the best of my knowlege, Ultra Panavision / Camera 65 were not usually presented on curved screens at all. I know that when I saw "Mutiny On The Bounty" in San Francisco at the Coronet or Baronet (I don't remember which) using 70mm anamorphic, I was very disappointed when the deeply curved curtains opened to reaveal a totally FLAT screen. Even then, they had focus problems due to lens drift from the heat of the arc lamps.

Vern
 

Fabian Kusch

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
50
Real Name
Fabian Kusch
DVDBeaver has caps of both Blu-Ray versions in full resolution:

How the West Was Won Blu-ray - Henry Fonda* Gregory Peck Debbie Reynolds James Stewart John Wayne

In a stationary screenshot, the smilebox version looks quite odd to me. Things may be different with a moving picture though.

One big disadvantage of the smilebox transfer is the noticable cropping at both sides, which is hereby confirmed to exist not only in the clips from the Cinerama documentary but in the feature itsself.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
356,818
Messages
5,123,881
Members
144,184
Latest member
H-508
Recent bookmarks
0
Top