What's new

How The West Was Won, Errol Flynn, Warner Westerns - 26/08/08 (1 Viewer)

John Hodson

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2003
Messages
4,627
Location
Bolton, Lancashire
Real Name
John

*Sigh*; everytime I see a Blu-ray release I fancy, I talk myself round to sticking with SD for a while longer. But, this...

Get thee behind me Warners.
 

RolandL

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2001
Messages
6,626
Location
Florida
Real Name
Roland Lataille

All 3-strip Cinerama films. The 70mm Cinerama films do not need the smilebox.
 

Mark-P

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2005
Messages
6,499
Location
Camas, WA
Real Name
Mark Probst

That example of smilebox uses pretty mild curvature. It actually doesn't look too bad. The examples I had seen on the new Oklahoma! DVD were horrendously distorted.
 

PaulP

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2001
Messages
3,291
DVD Empire has the Ultimate box up for 50% off, only twenty bucks, a no-brainer really!
 

Stephen_J_H

All Things Film Junkie
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Messages
7,889
Location
North of the 49th
Real Name
Stephen J. Hill
Smilebox on Oklahoma? I'm guessing this would have been the Todd-AO version (shot simultaneously in CinemaScope). Where did you see these examples and do you have a link?
 

Stephen_J_H

All Things Film Junkie
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 30, 2003
Messages
7,889
Location
North of the 49th
Real Name
Stephen J. Hill
There are smilebox demos on King Kong, but Mark-P was referring to some in connection with Oklahoma, which struck me as odd.
 

Mark-P

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2005
Messages
6,499
Location
Camas, WA
Real Name
Mark Probst

It's in one of the special features documentaries. Since I can't find any examples posted anywhere on the net, I'll post my own screencap tomorrow.
 

Simon Howson

Screenwriter
Joined
Feb 19, 2004
Messages
1,780
It's part of a documentary comparing Todd-AO with Cinerama. Basically they argue that Todd-AO was intended to be better than CinemaScope, but cheaper than Cinerama.




I don't know why a Todd-AO film would have to be smileboxed as drastically as a Cinerama film. Were Todd-AO screens as deeply curved as Cinerama screens, I didn't think so.
 

Mark-P

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Sep 26, 2005
Messages
6,499
Location
Camas, WA
Real Name
Mark Probst

Thank you Simon! Now I don't have to make my own screencap. This was the silly-looking curvature I was referring to in my first post, ranting about smilebox. But if the smilebox curvature is the subtle version shown in PaulP's link then I am all for it.
 

Simon Howson

Screenwriter
Joined
Feb 19, 2004
Messages
1,780
I just don't think Smilebox works well with Todd-AO material. Or more specifically, the curvature is too radical for a Todd-AO film on those examples from the documentary. I suspect that for a Cinerama film the smilebox format will look a lot better, probably better than watching it flat.

Perhaps also the fact the documentary is 4:3 caused a problem, and to top it off the footage was interlaced. I captured it in VLC with a deinterlacing filter, but that just made it look blurry.
 

GerardoHP

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jan 10, 2001
Messages
799
Location
Los Angeles, California
Real Name
Gerardo Paron
When Cinerama movies aren't smileboxed, they suffer from great distortions on the horizontal plane, where lines are broken in 2 parts along the screen joints. Smilebox is the best way to watch Cinerama, better than letterbox and of course better than pan-and-scan.

I'm just a little bothered that they have apparently erased the lines, which I thought were sometimes obtrusive but very cool.
 

RolandL

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2001
Messages
6,626
Location
Florida
Real Name
Roland Lataille

The screens for 3-strip Cinerama should have a 146 degree curve. For 70mm Todd-AO they would be 120 degree. But films like Oklahoma only used 120 degree lenses in a few scenes so, they do not need to be smileboxed.
 

PaulP

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2001
Messages
3,291

It looks like that's been addressed. Look closely at the before/after screenshots. It seems the angles of the panels have been horizontally corrected.

And they haven't erased the lines, but aligned the panes without any visible join lines.
 

RolandL

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2001
Messages
6,626
Location
Florida
Real Name
Roland Lataille

I could be wrong but that "the silly-looking curvature" that you refer to is what we will probalby get for the smilebox version of How The West Was Won. I have seen How The West Was Won at a Cinerama theatre and that is pretty much what it looks like. Plus, I think the top people at Warner Brothers probably like the idea that it fills more of the screen.
 

RolandL

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2001
Messages
6,626
Location
Florida
Real Name
Roland Lataille

The CinemaScope "before" frame has been stretched to the size of the "after" Cinerama one below it. I have partially corrected it on my web site - htwwwdvd
 

john a hunter

Screenwriter
Joined
Oct 11, 2005
Messages
1,462
No Todd AO film used the 120 degree bug eye lens all the way thru but only for certain sequences but that did not prevent the format's use of a curved screen in their installations. I'm not sure of the depth of the curvature at the Rivoli in NY but but the time Todd AO opened in Lodon in April 1958, it had been reduced to 5 feet.
I think the first few Todd AO features would benefit greatly from a not to severe Smile box treatment.Especially as we badly need a proper version of Oklahoma!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
356,978
Messages
5,127,587
Members
144,224
Latest member
OttoIsHere
Recent bookmarks
0
Top