The first two were far better then this weeks, but I can appreciate they are at least not making this in any way a simple 'he returns!" Brody storyline.
It's not just you.NolanJ said:Maybe it's just me, but I have no interest in the subplots involving Brody's family, ESPECIALLY the daughter. Doesn't interest me in the least.
They haven't fully explained it, but it's reasonable to assume it's been some time. Saul knows there's a mole at CIA. He has to conduct a bulletproof cover story for Carrie to get her in place with the Iranians. He drags her through the mud in front of Congress, under oath no less, and then she goes to the press. Even though her name isn't public, the well connected Iranians and law firm know who she is (presumably through the mole or other sources) and they see the whole mental hospital drama unfold. After that, they have to be convinced that Saul and Carrie are totally opposed and she is vulnerable. When else would they have a chance to get access to a highly connected, mentally unstable CIA operative who is mad at her bosses? Perfect!Scott Hanson said:So when exactly did Carrie and Saul start working together? Is that clear yet?
I'm not sure how I feel about it. It's definitely a pull-the-rug-out game changer, but I kind of feel like they cheated. There was too much genuine sense of betrayal from Carrie, even when she didn't have an audience, for me to feel like it was earned.Patrick_S said:Wow, interesting twist at the end.
I agree 100 percent. I thought the stuff with her in the first couple episodes was very powerfully done, especially because it was so simple and undramatic. By contrast, the potentially homicidal boyfriend comes across as such an artificial plot point. The best storytelling derives from the character. By contrast this is something that happens TO her, and that's fundamentally less interesting.Michael_K_Sr said:I both laughed and cringed when the big reveal was made about Dana's boyfriend. Laughed because it was so over the top and expected and cringed because it smacked of the same idiot subplot last year with Finn. Hope it's wrapped up quickly because it adds nothing to the the show.
I'm hoping that their arrangement was worked out after that scene, because otherwise it really feels like cheating to me.Scott Hanson said:I'd have to watch it all again (I won't), but I seem to remember scenes between only Carrie and Saul where they weren't acting as if they were scheming. The only one I can remember explicitly is when Saul visits her in the hospital and she says "Fuck you", so maybe there weren't any others.
I though about that too, but I'm willing to accept that in order to be an effective deep cover agent, you have to totally believe your cover story (reference - Argo). It doesn't work if you come out of character, ever. At least that's how I can look back at those scenes and not consider them cheating. When Carrie finally does break character and goes to visit Saul, even knowing it was all an act and that it was successful, she still breaks down and cries because of the emotional toll playing that cover took on her. I concede there's some stretching there, but it doesn't bother me too much. Not nearly as much as season two's storylines bothered me.Adam Lenhardt said:I'm not sure how I feel about it. It's definitely a pull-the-rug-out game changer, but I kind of feel like they cheated. There was too much genuine sense of betrayal from Carrie, even when she didn't have an audience, for me to feel like it was earned.
I'm hoping that their arrangement was worked out after that scene, because otherwise it really feels like cheating to me.
I don't remember it, but if she really said, "Saul, I can't do this anymore" then that actually changes my outlook on it.MarkMel said:One way to look at the "Fuck you" - she was all doped up on whatever meds they gave her, she's clearly struggling with being in deep cover, she even said "Saul, I can't do this anymore." So the "Fuck you" could have been not because she was betrayed but because of what Saul was asking her to do.