What's new

Gone With The Wind (1 Viewer)

Mark Bendiksen

Screenwriter
Joined
Mar 16, 1999
Messages
1,090
I am quite pleased with the quality of the current DVD. However, this is the first time I've owned this movie in any format so I have absolutely nothing to compare it against.
 

Chuck L

Screenwriter
Joined
Feb 12, 2001
Messages
1,002
It looks and sounds better than it ever has.

My only complaint on the title is that when it was first announced they had put on the cover many different extra's that were not on the disc itself. To the best of my knowledge, that cover was then changed to represent the disc correctly. For example, one item that comes to mind was that it mentioned screen test were there, which they weren't.

I truly welcome the upcoming 'true' Special Edition of this title coming in the fall in hopes that it will be just what it says...special. Lesser films have gotten better represented and it will be great to finally have this done right.
 

Marty M

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Dec 6, 1998
Messages
2,919

The type of commentary offered by Roger Ebert on Citizen Kane would be nice. I'm not sure if the surviving cast members would be up to doing a commentary.
 

Chad R

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 14, 1999
Messages
2,183
Real Name
Chad Rouch
I know cast members like Cammie King, olivia DeHavilland and Alicia Rhett have tried to distance themselves from that movie--probably due to the fanaticism. Olivia probably feels she has don'e better work, and won Oscars for it, that she would rather be remembered by.
 

Haggai

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 3, 2003
Messages
3,883
Wouldn't surprise me about de Havilland regarding her character; I don't think Melanie Hamilton is all that interesting. She was too much of a saintly figure throughout the movie. I definitely think de Havilland was better as Maid Marian, that was an excellent performance.

I don't think Ashley Wilkes is all that great a character, either. Scarlett, of course, is tremendous, and Rhett Butler is one of my favorite characters in any movie. Fabulous movie overall, but most of the supporting characters don't do much for me.
 

ScottR

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2000
Messages
2,646
DeHavilland hasn't tried to distance herself......she appeared at the 98 re-issue and just loved it! Said that it brought back great memories. She is very proud of the film. As far as Alicia Rhett goes, she left Hollywood early on and is an accomplished artist. It isn't so much that she distances herself from GWTW than it is from the Hollywood community in general.
 

Chad R

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jul 14, 1999
Messages
2,183
Real Name
Chad Rouch
But, DeHavilland doesn't anwer autograph requests and such for GWTW. She may have mellowed with it in recent years, but she used to not want anything to do with the fans.
 

DeeF

Screenwriter
Joined
Jun 19, 2002
Messages
1,689
Since I've had some lengthy online dialogues with Mr. Harris about this particular movie, if I may be so presumptuous, I'd like to list here what I've learned from him about Gone With The Wind (and feel free to correct me):

1. The O-negs exist and are in pretty good shape. Mr. Harris said that, if offered the chance, he could make the movie look pristine and perfect. Of course, returning to the original color palette might be troublesome, because most people today wouldn't like the look of it.

2. The O-negs do contain some sections from the 1954 version, supervised by DOS himself and cut in to the negatives replacing very worn pieces. Since this version was slightly wider-screen (1.66:1?), some vertical panning was done, to protect the actor's feet, etc. When you see the 1989 print projected in theaters, you can actually see the ratio change on some shots.

3. The print was made from the O-negs by Turner's company in 1989, returning for the first time to the 3 separate negatives. But the color was altered to be more aesthetically pleasing to modern eyes. The original O-neg would have had an additional negative which served as a kind of key, say, 50% of the "green" which added contrast and sharpened up the picture. This key negative wasn't used after about 1940 for 3-color Technicolor prints.

4. The version of the film made in 1998 used completely different source materials (an interpositive) and it is not the basis for the current DVD. The current DVD is made from the same 1989 print made by Turner's company, the same print used for LDs and seen on television.

5. The "Ultra-Resolution" process used for Singin' in the Rain and Robin Hood so far, and now Meet Me In St. Louis, doesn't really have anything to do with resolution. The 3 separate negatives are scanned in, separately, and then composited in the computer, where the shrinkage problems can be addressed digitally. They are done at 2K. After this digital work is done, the film can be printed back to film from the computer (this was done for Singin' in the Rain). It isn't a restoration of the film at all, but for digital output, it's probably exemplary. All 3-color Technicolor movies could benefit from this process, at least for output on DVD.

6. I didn't know about the missing bits of dialogue. I wonder what could be done about that?
 

Andrew Budgell

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2002
Messages
2,280
Location
Ontario, Canada
Real Name
Andy Budgell
Does anyone have an comparisons of what the original movies color looked like as opposed to what it looks like today? I'd like to see the difference!
 

Andrew Budgell

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2002
Messages
2,280
Location
Ontario, Canada
Real Name
Andy Budgell
I would like to get all of your input on this subject:

Would you prefer to have a DVD transfer that is repreasentative of the original theatrical colours displayed on the screen, or a transfer that is just an improvement on the colours that we have all assosciated with the film?

Andy
 

ScottR

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Apr 1, 2000
Messages
2,646
I'd like to get one that is representative to 1939. I really don't think there would be an outcry. Let's face it, most of the public doesn't know or care about such things, because if they did, the current version wouldn't look or sound as it does.
 

Jeffrey

Stunt Coordinator
Joined
Jun 30, 1997
Messages
95
I would prefer the look that the director intended.

Also, is this reissue coming this fall? Seems I remember the Warner chat ending with a quick flurry of forthcoming titles and could have sworn they typed GWTW.

Jeffrey
 

Jeff_HR

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2001
Messages
3,593
I'd prefer an improvement on the colours that we have all associated with the film over the years. I don't want the muddy look.
 

Rain

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2001
Messages
5,015
Real Name
Rain
I would prefer a transfer which resembles the original 1939 theatrical exhibition as closely as possible.

I doubt we'll get that though. :frowning:
 

Robert Harris

Archivist
Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Feb 8, 1999
Messages
18,314
Real Name
Robert Harris
If a new set of DVDs is being prepared for GWTW, it might be nice to have both versions (actually three) pictorially, to be synchronized with whatever track one chooses.

As a point of reference the original 1939 prints were not at all "muddy." They were flatter, with less contrast, had much less saturated color, while still retaining the entire color pallette, and had an overall sepia look.

I must side with Warners in their effort to make the film look more modern, as the original 1939 look is really only of interest to those who seek a techno-historical point of view.

I mentioned three versions of the film.

That would be:

1939

1954 (with a Perspecta track)

and the newest incarnation.

RAH
 

Ernest Rister

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Oct 26, 2001
Messages
4,148
"I would prefer the look that the director intended."

Which one? GWTW changed hands at least three times during production.
 

Roger Rollins

Supporting Actor
Joined
Jun 19, 2001
Messages
931


How right you are, Mr. Rister.

The "look" of GWTW was very much decided by David O. Selznick and his production designer William Cameron Menzies.

Regarding this issue, those interested would become highly enlightened by reading Ronald Haver's superb and wonderful book "David O. Selznick's Hollywood".

Haver went into great detail about GWTW, its use of Technicolor, and Selznick's involvement with the original release prints as well as those made for subsequent re-releases.
 

DeeF

Screenwriter
Joined
Jun 19, 2002
Messages
1,689
From what I've read, Selznick himself supervised the 1954 version of the film, and he was very happy with the color, calling it superior to the original.

If only one choice can be made for the DVD, I would choose the color of the 1954 print.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Latest Articles

Forum statistics

Threads
356,815
Messages
5,123,815
Members
144,184
Latest member
H-508
Recent bookmarks
0
Top