Adam Lenhardt
Senior HTF Member
My problem with "Glee" -- especially in the the later seasons -- isn't that it addresses serious subjects in a highly-stylized way; plenty of musicals have done the same in a highly effective way. You won't see real gangs prancing around Manhattan in choreographed fashion, but "West Side Story" still works as a powerful examination of the toll of urban youth violence across the racial divide. "Sound of Music" only has a very tangential relationship with the real story of Maria and the family Von Trapp, but the themes of family and remaining true to one's beliefs in the face of enormous personal consequences ring clearly. "Cabaret" uses cabaret to present an unnerving portrait of the corruption of German society as a result of the rise of national socialism. "South Pacific" took on racism more or less head on.DaveHof said:I'm not going to say you're wrong, but I do think that the series has been consistent (for good or ill) in the attention (or lack thereof) it pays to its characters and stories from the first season to the present. 'Glee' is an odd duck - it wants to address real-world issues and dispel stereotypes and generate discussions about serious subjects - religion, bullying, acceptance - but like most musicals it wraps that content in a highly-stylized, over-the-top presentation that is very easy to dissect and say, 'That would never happen in a real high school.'
The presentation in all of those classics was highly stylized, and in most cases quite lightly drawn. But the topics being addressed were taken seriously. "Glee" doesn't take anything seriously any more, and it ALWAYS favors the sledgehammer for making its points.
While I was definitely not a huge fan of anything about Schuester's first wife, and especially not the pregnancy storyline, the difference is that storylines carried over the whole season. They were set up and allowed to play out over a natural length of time. We took the journey of Quinn's pregnancy along with her. The characters and plot came first, and the song selections were used to augment the storytelling. Season 2 was the worst offender for trying to shoehorn the plot to fit a preselected roster of songs, but season 3 introduces and drops plotlines pretty willy-nilly too.The most common perception out there is that 'Glee' was better in season one and has gone downhill since. Season 1, as I recall, had Mr. Schuester's wife faking a pregnancy, and waiting for Quinn to give birth so she could claim that baby as her own. That may still be the most ridiculous story they've ever tried, and yet season 1 gets a pass from those who remember that season fondly.
Yes, Sue has always been an outrageous, over-the-top character. But in the first season they took certain pains to justify her behavior within the context of the rules of this universe. She was a highly successful cheerleading coach that brought a lot of funding into the school from her regular National Championship wins, so the administration overlooked her horrible behavior. She was a character we loved to hate, and then the introduction of her disabled sister helped humanize her in a really satisfying way. Over the first season she goes on a journey that leads to that wonderful moment in the finale where she's the lone vote in favor of the Glee club she resents and despises. The development made me believe that she would get there.And Sue has, for me, always been an outrageously exaggerated character that would never hold a job for ten minutes in a public school - in season 1 she pushed the school nurse down a flight of stairs so Teri could take that job, blackmailed the principal by sleeping with him, and demanded that Madonna music be played over the PA system throughout the school day. I still love the character because I think Jane Lynch is a brilliant actress. There have been episodes where Sue has behaved abominably, and in the final moments she has something of an epiphany (the first Christmas show and 'Grilled Cheezus', for instance) and with minimal dialogue she conveys so much.
Now, there's no rhyme or reason to her character. If the writers feel like making her a monster one week, she'll be horrible. If they want her to be sympathetic the next week, suddenly she'll be decent again. Nothing made me groan more than when she was acting principal, and they had her deliver these impassioned anti-bullying speeches, when she herself is a consummate bully.
There's just no glue that holds the show together any more. Much like "Family Guy", they throw it all at the wall and see what sticks.
I agree that it's one of the more ambitious shows we have, and it's got a lot of production challenges other shows don't, but that's no excuse for letting the characters get lost in the shuffle. I don't buy Rachel and Finn getting married, I don't buy Trout Lips and Mercedes together, I don't buy Quinn suddenly (and undoubtedly temporarily) paralyzed for a half-assed anti-texting moral of the story, I don't buy the Irish exchange student character, etc. etc.It's not a perfect show and never has been - but it is certainly one of the more ambitious shows we have now, and given the challenges of a large cast and numerous guest stars and intertwining music with plot and crafting full-out production numbers alongside intimate character moments,
If the show was thoroughly crap, I don't think I'd care so much. The disappointment is in its failure to live up to the potential it's repeatedly demonstrated in the past.