- Joined
- Dec 10, 2001
- Messages
- 6,722
- Real Name
- Bob
So much for "the story goes".Bob Furmanek said:That's not true.
GIANT was planned and story-boarded as a wide screen film from day one.
George Stevens composed for 1.66 rather than the new standard of 1.85 because he preferred extra height to his widescreen image.
George Stevens 1.66.jpg
Bob,Bob Furmanek said:GIANT began filming for 1.66:1 on May 19, 1955.
I beat you to it just three posts above yours. Where's my props?bluirv said:The best deal on Giant is from Amazon UK when you order the James Dean Collection. This set also includes East of Eden and Rebel Without a Cause.
Amazon UK's price on the set is $28 for all 3 movies. That's $9.33 per movie.
Compare that to Amazon US' price of $69.99!
Here in Australia, the set is $19.95.Ronald Epstein said:Yeah, despite the fact I wanted the larger box, I went
ahead and preordered the James Dean set from the UK.
It was a no brainer based on getting it shipped for just under $28.
You can't pass that up.
It's never a good idea to assume that a previous release was cropped correctly - they may have transferred areas of the negative that weren't meant to be seen in projection.moviebuff75 said:What's up with the cropping on the left side? In some shots, it is substantial.
It is quite funny he would say that a really good picture needs height as well as width.Bob Furmanek said:That's not true.
GIANT was planned and storyboarded as a wide screen film from day one.
George Stevens composed for 1.66 rather than the new standard of 1.85 because he preferred extra height to his widescreen image.
Certainly not, but it is hard to believe that whoever worked on previous home video releases was clueless regarding the areas to be used. It would be good to get a bit of background info about the changes that were made. Different framing, contrast and colors are things that immediately can be obvious to people who owned previous versions of a movie on other formats and to get an explanation for what was done would go a long way towards avoiding discussions about those issues.haineshisway said:It's never a good idea to assume that a previous release was cropped correctly - they may have transferred areas of the negative that weren't meant to be seen in projection.