1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

Get this! (or better yet, don't!): New Wonka SE? Pan 'N Scan ONLY! Part II

Discussion in 'Archived Threads 2001-2004' started by Parker Clack, Aug 7, 2001.

  1. Parker Clack

    Parker Clack Schizophrenic Man
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 30, 1997
    Messages:
    12,220
    Likes Received:
    57
    Location:
    Kansas City, MO
    Real Name:
    Parker
    I am continuing this thread here as the other was getting difficult to read and to post to.
    Parker
     
  2. SteveMc

    SteveMc Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2001
    Messages:
    230
    Likes Received:
    0
    Like most of the rest of you, I am in shock. Both that Warner would do this, and the outrageous response that rallied behind this disc. I've been away for a few days so the first i heard was at Digital bits and saw their petition link, then come here and the Hot Topic is already 20 pages and closed to start part 2! Unbelievable. Warner will be crazy not to fix this, look at the response that this has gotten in two days! I am crossing my fingers...
    ------------------
    Crash
    "I don't even own a gun, let alone many guns that would necessitate an entire rack."
    Help us get the Friday the 13th films-UNCUT. Click Here or here
     
  3. Mark Cappelletty

    Mark Cappelletty Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 1999
    Messages:
    2,209
    Likes Received:
    138
    Everyone should read Donald from DVD Empire's statement on Page 20 (!) of the previous thread. I haven't had much on pre-order except for the odd Anchor Bay title or box set here and there, but have always had good service from the DVD Empire gang and want to let them -- and other retailers -- know that we the consumers and customers are well aware that the retailers aren't the bad guys here, but Warner Bros., who have misled the fans of this film and left a lot of bitterness through their actions.
     
  4. Dwayne

    Dwayne Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2000
    Messages:
    756
    Likes Received:
    2
    Well, I called Warner today from work. Actually, I called twice. The first time, the receptionist transferred me to one of the reps and got her voice mail. I simply stated my name and the number at which she could reach me. About five minutes later, I decided to call back, hoping that I would get someone. Again, the receptionist transferred me. Low and behold, it was to the same woman. That time I left a message expressing how disappointed I was with their decision and that I would not purchasing the title because of it. Afterwards, I couldn't help but think that she was intentionally not picking up the phone since it seemed that everyone calling in about Wonka would get transferred to her.
    ------------------
    -Dwayne
    "And vidi films I would."
    [Edited last by Dwayne on August 07, 2001 at 11:40 PM]
     
  5. Tom Ryan

    Tom Ryan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2001
    Messages:
    1,044
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think Warner actually might buckle under the pressure on this one..........over 3000 sigs in about 24 hours is awfully impressive, and who knows how many more there will be.
    -Tom
     
  6. Sean Oneil

    Sean Oneil Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2001
    Messages:
    936
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think that simply boycotting ALL Warner product INCLUDING the 16 x 9 OAR material is a huge mistake. I can understand the boycot of this one title, but ripping Warner a new A**hole is only going to encourage them to cater to a different market.
    I have heard many state that they will catagorically refuse to buy ANY new Warner product over this issue. That they will cancel they're pre-orders of 'The Goonies' even though it is a 2.35:1 16 x 9 title. What everyone should be doing is putting they're money where they're mouth is, and buying as much OAR widescreen material from studios as they can. If you support WS OAR with sales, then it gives the studios reason to keep producing DVDs in that format. If you simply stop buying all DVDs which are WS OAR out of protest, then the studios will simply stop making WS OAR titles completely -and focus on the P&S market who do not care about WS OAR.
    Frankly, I thought we had a good thing going with the studios here at the HTF. We should not be trying to intimidate Warner out of doing any more chats with members, and instead we should simply voice our disapproval of releasing P&S only titles -which the majority of us have done, but there are always those overwhelmingly angry few who think that they can speak for everyone and tend to ruin a good thing. Boycott Wonka if you like, but do not boycott a good WS OAR DVD from Warner or any other studio out of anger over a single P&S only release. If you do, then you will find the eclipsing of OAR WS DVDs happening much more swiftly, because the studios will just give up on WS OAR ...and happily cater to 'Joe Pan and Scan' exclusively.
    Warner: I will not be buying this 'Wonka' release on DVD, thank you very much. I will be buying 'The Goonies' and any other favorite films in your catalog which are Anamorphically Enhanced WS OAR titles.
     
  7. CharlesD

    CharlesD Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2000
    Messages:
    1,495
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks for posting Donaldp. Hopefully Warner will at least listen to retailers such as DVDEmpire, even if they don't listen to the actual end users of their DVDs!
    ------------------
    -- Will Work for Five Million Dollars
     
  8. Andy_S

    Andy_S Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2000
    Messages:
    393
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree with Sean on this one. Warner Bros needs to see that an OAR movie in their catalog can sell just as good (or hopefully better!) than a non-OAR movie.
     
  9. Carlo Medina

    Carlo Medina Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 1997
    Messages:
    10,343
    Likes Received:
    562
    I think the most disappointing thing about this release is that WB had an anamorphic OAR DVD master ready to go. J.M. Kenny said so at Comic-Con. The transfer had been done. It was to be included on the disc.
    It's one thing if a studio can't afford (or won't shell out the money) to produce a new transfer. That, at least, can be chalked up to a cost-analysis decision. But the new OAR was ready to go and set for inclusion, and WB for some unknown reason, decided to forego it.
    Un-frickin'-believable.
     
  10. Scott Weinberg

    Scott Weinberg Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2000
    Messages:
    7,482
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks for the new thread, Parker. I was getting about 40 emails an hour after posting the original thread. [​IMG] [​IMG]
    Not that I'm complaining! I'm thrilled to see so many people as outraged about this decision as I am. Let's hope that our collective voice has been heard...even a little.
    (3,513 signatures and counting!)
    http://www.petitiononline.com/wonkadvd/petition.html
    ------------------
    Scott
    TheAngryJew's Movie Reviews at HBS.com
    AOL IM: ScottFromPhilly
     
  11. Chuck Blair

    Chuck Blair Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 1999
    Messages:
    39
    Likes Received:
    0
    What amazes me is how long it's taken for the home theater crowd to jump on Warners en masse for a long history of not presenting titles OAR. Remember their string of budget titles with budget transfers? Personally, I took a big step away from Warners when one of my favorite films of the 90s, "Fearless", showed up fullscreen. I don't boycott Warners titles, but I only purchase the "I really have to have this one" DVDs. Of course I'm not going to boycott the special edition of "Blade Runner" (I'm not a hero), but the type of run of the mill stuff that I buy every week I don't buy from Warners (I have about 800 DVDs) and won't be buying from them until they make good on past disasters like "Fearless". And now with "Willie Wonka" its just the bitter (make that poisoned) icing on the cake. Unless it's a masterpiece, no more Warners, and even if it is a masterpiece, no more Warners if they don't do it right. They've shown they don't need my money. Now multiply that by tens of thousands and maybe they'll have a change of heart (if they only had a heart).
    I just became number 3535. I think I hear "Network" playing in the background.
    [Edited last by Chuck Blair on August 08, 2001 at 12:56 AM]
     
  12. Jon D

    Jon D Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2000
    Messages:
    166
    Likes Received:
    0
    Funny, Warner has one of, if not the, biggest DVD's ever with "The Matrix," and it was 2.35:1 widescreen. That didn't seem to hurt it's sales AT ALL, so why do they think that widescreen on "Wonka" would? Do they honestly think parents buy widescreen for themselves but P&S for their kids to spare them the misery of the bars?
    ------------------
    Gee, I hope this doesn't lower your opinion of me
     
  13. Mark Cappelletty

    Mark Cappelletty Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 1999
    Messages:
    2,209
    Likes Received:
    138
    Ha! Read this post from the wonderful and esteemed Mobius Home Video Forum (and y'all on HTF thought YOU were picky-- you should read some of the posts there!):
    http://www.mhvf.net/forum/general/posts/124218115.html
    Apparently, Warner Bros. got so many calls on this today that they had to shut their switchboard down at one point!
     
  14. James David Walley

    James David Walley Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 1999
    Messages:
    149
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  15. EricCr

    EricCr Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2001
    Messages:
    150
    Likes Received:
    0
    Posted this in the personal message to WB thread, then decided it was better in this one.
    I e-mailed Amazon about still listing the widescreen version as being on the DVD. They got back to me and said that after speaking to their supplier they were told that it still has the widescreen version on it. Just goes to show you how little some of these stores know about the products they carry.
     
  16. Henry Gale

    Henry Gale Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 1999
    Messages:
    4,633
    Likes Received:
    1
     
  17. Richard Freeman

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 1999
    Messages:
    6
    Likes Received:
    0
    Why is the sales ranking of Wonka going up at Amazon. I canceled my preorder like so many others but I now see it's sale ranking at 14th. It was 23rd Monday when I canceled and 17th last night. Whats up?
    Also, still listed widescreen and full screen at Amazon!
     
  18. Mike Witt

    Mike Witt Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 1999
    Messages:
    143
    Likes Received:
    0
    I was 4033...
     
  19. Gary_E

    Gary_E Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 1999
    Messages:
    370
    Likes Received:
    0
    Warner Bros.,
    I'm sorry I just don't get it. Your decision to omit the OAR version on this new disc will be in the back of my mind while I'm browsing the DVD section of my local video store.
    I currently have many of your titles but I will be much more selective when it comes to my purchases.
    -Gary
     
  20. DaViD Boulet

    DaViD Boulet Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 1999
    Messages:
    8,805
    Likes Received:
    3

Share This Page