What's new

FLAC - SACD (1 Viewer)

Steve Tannehill

R.I.P - 4.28.2015
Senior HTF Member
Deceased Member
Joined
Jul 6, 1997
Messages
5,547
Location
DFW
Real Name
Steve Tannehill
I get most of my high-res music from HDTracks.com and play it through my Oppo. The Oppo is also my goto player for SACD and DVD-Audio. You can find lots of SACDs from Acoustic Sounds online. Sometimes you can find them on Amazon. You can also rip DVD-Audio and stream it, I did that for the high-res tracks (both 2-channel and 5.1) from my Talking Heads cube.If you're a pink Floyd fan, you can get great 5.1 mixes on SACD, and on the Immersion box sets for Dark Side of the Moon and Wish You Were Here, really spectacular stuff.MFSL keeps releasing SACD, you can find them on Amazon. There is also a lot of SACD released in Japan, like at CDJapan.co.jp, but they are expensive.
 

erew99

Second Unit
Joined
Sep 5, 2006
Messages
357
Real Name
Guy
Excellent information. I have a HTPC connected to my receiver, also apparently I can put the tracks onto a USB disk.

I normally prefer to have the disk, but with streaming, it's so easy now.
 

JohnRice

Bounded In a Nutshell
Premium
Ambassador
HW Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2000
Messages
18,935
Location
A Mile High
Real Name
John
erew99 said:
Also- what is MFSL?
Mobile Fidelty Sound Lab - It's a music label that remasters existing music and releases them. Some are SACD.
 

JohnRice

Bounded In a Nutshell
Premium
Ambassador
HW Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2000
Messages
18,935
Location
A Mile High
Real Name
John
Audio Fidelity is another label which does the same thing. Their SACD prices are lower than MFSL.
 

JohnRice

Bounded In a Nutshell
Premium
Ambassador
HW Reviewer
Senior HTF Member
Joined
Jun 20, 2000
Messages
18,935
Location
A Mile High
Real Name
John
My two cents on SACD. I have quite a few SACDs (not as many as some people, but 100 or so) and a better than average SACD playback system. The big attraction for some people is that many of them have surround sound mixes along with 2 channel. I'm not interested in surround music, personally. I have a lot of remastered SACDs. like Bob Dylan, early Elton John, Yes, even some NiN and the entire Genesis studio collection. In the end, I find the greatest benefit (again, my SACD player can't even play surround, so this is 2 channel) is with newer recordings that were made originally in DSD, the SACD format. This is mainly recordings from Telarc, which are limited to Classical and Jazz. That doesn't mean the new SACD of Yes Close to the Edge doesn't sound fabulous, because it does. I'm just not sure the SACD sounds demonstrably better than the CD layer on the same disc if played back on the same system.
 

erew99

Second Unit
Joined
Sep 5, 2006
Messages
357
Real Name
Guy
I'm going to check out the Metallica Black SACD vs my MP3. I want to hear the difference(s) back to back.
 

jcroy

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
7,932
Real Name
jr
schan1269 said:
But no...not dead.OV is primarily a device codec. Outside Samsung, not sure if anybody else supports it straight off a USB.Back before lossless, it mattered more. But...
For most of the 2000's decade, I use to encode all my audio cd rips in Ogg Vorbis. At the time, it was largely to save hard drive space.

These days with high capacity hard drives and flash drives, I don't bother anymore with lossy codecs for audio rips. (Not even flac).

Easier to just listen to the straight wav files from audio cds, or demuxed audio tracks from a concert dvd.
 

erew99

Second Unit
Joined
Sep 5, 2006
Messages
357
Real Name
Guy
I do plan to rip the disks to a media server. Is FLAC a bad option? I don't want to encode it in a lesser quality than the disk.
 

jcroy

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
7,932
Real Name
jr
erew99 said:
I do plan to rip the disks to a media server. Is FLAC a bad option? I don't want to encode it in a lesser quality than the disk.
I haven't looked at flac in a long time. IIRC, it was advertised as a lossless format.

When I did my own flac encodes from audio cd rips, it didn't really save much hard drive space. (At least not for heavy metal albums). So I didn't bother using it any further.
 

erew99

Second Unit
Joined
Sep 5, 2006
Messages
357
Real Name
Guy
Oh I see. So basically you just keep the raw WAV, rather than encoding in another format.

I'll check that out when I rip.
 

jcroy

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
7,932
Real Name
jr
erew99 said:
Oh I see. So basically you just keep the raw WAV, rather than encoding in another format.

I'll check that out when I rip.
These days, for the most part. Raw WAV all the way.

I just rip a copy of an audio cd into one huge wav file, and listen to that 30-60 minute file from start to finish (frequently on auto-replay).

If I'm only interested in one or two songs, I'll just rip those one or two songs.
 

erew99

Second Unit
Joined
Sep 5, 2006
Messages
357
Real Name
Guy
The only issue I have with WAV is that you can't tag it. No title, artist, album, etc...

FLAC allows that. From what I am reading on a few other forums is that FLAC is lossless too, but with tagging.
 

jcroy

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
7,932
Real Name
jr
erew99 said:
The only issue I have with WAV is that you can't tag it. No title, artist, album, etc...

FLAC allows that. From what I am reading on a few other forums is that FLAC is lossless too, but with tagging.
On my previous computer, I used the foobar2000 player to play wav (or ogg) albums.

I set up foobar2000 such that the cue files (from ripped cds) and other tagging information, were used in conjunction with the wav files of albums. At the time, it was good enough for my purposes.

These days, I don't bother anymore with *.cue files and tagging information. Easier to just click on a wav file (with the artist + album name as the file's name), and listen from start to finish.
 

erew99

Second Unit
Joined
Sep 5, 2006
Messages
357
Real Name
Guy
I understand what you mean, but for me it won't work. I generally use the 'random' option. With thousands of mp3s already in my library, it gets confusing.
 

jcroy

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
7,932
Real Name
jr
Another thing I did briefly several years ago, was to put a wav file and its corresponding *.cue file into an *.mka container.

When the *.mka file was played on the computer (such as using the "media player classic" program), one could fast-forward to another song just like an ordinary cd player.
 

jcroy

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
7,932
Real Name
jr
erew99 said:
I'm going to check out the Metallica Black SACD vs my MP3. I want to hear the difference(s) back to back.
On a tangent.

It would be great if Death Magnetic is ever re-released without the crappy "loud" mastering, on sacd, dvd-a or bluray-audio.
 

jcroy

Senior HTF Member
Joined
Nov 28, 2011
Messages
7,932
Real Name
jr
Chuck King said:
FLAC is totally lossless. However it only compresses on the order of 50% of the original file size.
I rarely ever got 50% file size reductions using flac.

On average, I was getting around a 20% to 30% reduction of the original file size (if that).

If I was able to consistently get 50% file size reductions, I certainly would have used flac as my codec of choice. :)
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Sign up for our newsletter

and receive essential news, curated deals, and much more







You will only receive emails from us. We will never sell or distribute your email address to third party companies at any time.

Forum statistics

Threads
357,037
Messages
5,129,307
Members
144,284
Latest member
Ertugrul
Recent bookmarks
0
Top