1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

Far And Away (1992)

Discussion in 'Blu-ray and UHD' started by Brent Avery, Feb 28, 2014.

Tags:
  1. Brent Avery

    Brent Avery Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2002
    Messages:
    728
    Likes Received:
    26
    I just checked the disc - the back cover says 2:35 but viewed on my lcd tv it looks to be the proper 2:20 but will be viewing it on a 2:35 screen Saturday to confirm. The audio is listed as 5.1 dts hd and the disc is a bd 50 with bitrate over 30 and usually around 35 - 38 mbs. It looks good so far but again, for me the real test will be projected and will update tomorrow.
     
  2. schan1269

    schan1269 HTF Expert
    HW Reviewer

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2012
    Messages:
    17,038
    Likes Received:
    894
    Location:
    Chicago-ish/NW Indiana
    Real Name:
    Sam
    Far and away, a great way to start a nap.
     
    JustinFow likes this.
  3. Jari K

    Jari K Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2007
    Messages:
    3,278
    Likes Received:
    242
    Yes, I remember this was a bit boring. But haven't seen it in years. Perhaps I should see it again.
     
  4. John Stockton

    John Stockton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2000
    Messages:
    386
    Likes Received:
    18
    I would be quite shocked if Universal actually scanned this from 65 MM.

    Awaiting your confirmation Brent.
     
  5. DP 70

    DP 70 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2011
    Messages:
    568
    Likes Received:
    105
    Real Name:
    Derek
    I had the UK DVD and it was 2.35:1.
     
  6. FoxyMulder

    FoxyMulder 映画ファン

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2009
    Messages:
    5,236
    Likes Received:
    1,612
    Location:
    Scotland
    Real Name:
    Malcolm
    I'd actually be shocked if it looked good as other Ron Howard films from Universal do not look good on blu ray.
     
  7. Brent Avery

    Brent Avery Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2002
    Messages:
    728
    Likes Received:
    26
    John - I admit to being less than observant at times, I was a bit under the weather Saturday so did not run the projector, but decided to check Hello Dolly on the tv just for comparison and it appears that my initial thoughts on the oar were off, as from what I am seeing it does look to be 2:35. Still, I hope to view it projected if only to see how it looks. When looking at something like Dolly it is not difficult to imagine Universal did not use the 65mm elements, assuming one should be expecting the same level of clarity. Far And Away certainly looks good from what I saw so far, but still, it is a shame that being one of the few modern exceptions to use the large format that Universal did not treat it better. One has to consider cost I suppose but as Mr. Harris has said more than once that generally it really is not that much more of an expense for the studios.
     
  8. Mark-P

    Mark-P Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    2,887
    Likes Received:
    786
    Location:
    Camas, WA
    Real Name:
    Mark Probst
    Screen caps have finally been posted on another review site, which confirms a 2.35:1 aspect ratio. It would appear we are not getting a new transfer from the 65mm elements. :(
     
  9. Michel_Hafner

    Michel_Hafner Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2002
    Messages:
    952
    Likes Received:
    102
    Yes, no 70mm detail at all on this Blu Ray (meaning detail approaching the 1080p 4:2:0 limit).
     
  10. OliverK

    OliverK Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2000
    Messages:
    2,219
    Likes Received:
    509
    I guess that after what they repeatedly did with Spartacus one has to be thankful for every large format release that looks like Far and Away or Airport.
     

Share This Page