1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

Executive Decision (1996) Blu-Ray

Discussion in 'Blu-ray and UHD' started by JoHud, Aug 5, 2011.

  1. JoHud

    JoHud Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 12, 2007
    Messages:
    3,175
    Likes Received:
    483
    Real Name:
    Joe Hudak
    To my surprise, I found out this is being released as a Best Buy Exclusive However, there seems to be some unfortunate news about this from users on the blu-ray.com forums regarding scenes that have been removed due to Islamic/9-11 references. Notable changes cited on the forum:
    Doesn't seem much, but it appears to be specific censorship. Hopefully, there in an unedited version to either replace it or sold alongside it. I'll probably hold off buying to see if this issue is resolved.
     
  2. cineMANIAC

    cineMANIAC Premium
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2008
    Messages:
    2,050
    Likes Received:
    286
    Location:
    New York City
    Real Name:
    Luis
    This explains the "Blu-ray Edition" tag they slapped on the cover. I don't know if I would've boycotted this release had I known about the censorship but I love the movie enough that I'm willing to overlook it. Still, it's a bit troubling.
     
  3. Radioman970

    Radioman970 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2006
    Messages:
    6,722
    Likes Received:
    673
    Location:
    Could be anywhere
    Real Name:
    James Perry
    Thanks for the warning. Won't be buying. They'll have to re-release. I guess I"ll grab a DVD instead. Still on my VHS> Love the film. But I don't want it changed.
     
  4. Adam Gregorich

    Owner

    Joined:
    Nov 20, 1999
    Messages:
    15,559
    Likes Received:
    643
    Location:
    The Other Washington
    Real Name:
    Adam

    Interesting marketing verbiage and it is unfortunate. I have always enjoyed this movie after all:


    How great was it to see Steven Seagal bite it in the first ten minutes and have Kurt Russell be the one to kick butt!
     
  5. Matt Hough

    Matt Hough Well-Known Member
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2006
    Messages:
    13,642
    Likes Received:
    2,385
    Location:
    Charlotte, NC
    Real Name:
    Matt Hough
    Count me as another big fan of this movie. Very sorry to read about these deletions however small.
     
  6. TonyD

    TonyD Who do we think I am?

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 1999
    Messages:
    16,851
    Likes Received:
    280
    Location:
    Disney World and Universal Florida
    Real Name:
    Tony D.
    I already have the DVD, might rent it but will never buy it. Are the trying to protect us from something?
     
  7. PatH

    PatH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 4, 2004
    Messages:
    325
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'm glad I bought this years back on DVD. I'm not into BD but no censorship--from Executive Decision to Zoolander--is acceptable to me and shouldn't be to anyone else, especially for political correctness. End of comment except to ask if the Paramount forced changes to Sum Of All Fears refer to those in the film as originally released--shockingly extensive from the book--or to further edits in the DVD/BD release? If the latter, please elaborate. Thanks! PatH
     
  8. Tim Glover

    Tim Glover Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 1999
    Messages:
    7,982
    Likes Received:
    244
    Location:
    Monroe, LA
    Real Name:
    Tim Glover
    Big big fan of this as well and was really waiting for the BD. Guess I'll keep the dvd version. I really don't get the reasoning behind the changes. Film was made in 1996.
     
  9. Radioman970

    Radioman970 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2006
    Messages:
    6,722
    Likes Received:
    673
    Location:
    Could be anywhere
    Real Name:
    James Perry
    :tu: to the spoiler part. Agree agree! That knocked me out when I first saw it.
     
  10. TravisR

    TravisR Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Messages:
    24,945
    Likes Received:
    2,766
    Location:
    The basement of the FBI building
    How is this political correctness? If they were being politically correct, they wouldn't release it at all because it might be offensive to some people. I'm not advocating that but at least that would be a move that had its heart in the right place. In this case, Warners edited the movie so they can still make money and hopefully not take any shit. In my mind, that kind of greed and cowardice is far worse than political correctness. And I realize it's a dangerous world and Warners is scared of everything from being called racist to setting off some maniac into an act of violence but let's face it, if anyone is offended by this movie, a few seconds trimmed out isn't likely to calm them down.
     
  11. Mark-P

    Mark-P Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    2,885
    Likes Received:
    786
    Location:
    Camas, WA
    Real Name:
    Mark Probst
    Censorship continues to baffle me - in literature or movies. School libraries need Huckleberry Finn intact! You know there were tons of movies made in the 80s were the heroes threw around the word "fag", and yes I found it offensive, but I wouldn't want them to remove it now just because I was offended by it. It's an ugly part of our history the same as the offending stereotypes in "Song of the South."
     
  12. Radioman970

    Radioman970 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 22, 2006
    Messages:
    6,722
    Likes Received:
    673
    Location:
    Could be anywhere
    Real Name:
    James Perry
    ^ Mark Twain is a whole other thread. ...and I couldn't agree more. I'm fairly non-religious, often groaning when it's thrown in classic stuff and today's stuff too but I sure wouldn't want it removed for my benefit. that's ridiculous.
     
  13. Carlo Medina

    Carlo Medina Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 1997
    Messages:
    10,340
    Likes Received:
    562
    Wow, just wow on the decision to censor. They've finally outdone the minor edits that Lucas did in the OOT when he changed the frames of the blaster hits on certain shots. There's no doubt there is an intent to these edits, but the logic behind it is completely faulty. The movie is a product of its time and I just don't see this igniting some sort of backlash in its original form. Just sad to see this decision. I was very much looking forward to this. Now I'm just going to end up writing a letter to the studio informing them of exactly why I will not be buying this edition.
     
  14. cineMANIAC

    cineMANIAC Premium
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 3, 2008
    Messages:
    2,050
    Likes Received:
    286
    Location:
    New York City
    Real Name:
    Luis
    I'm not looking forward to the Blu-ray Edition of True Lies. They'd have to cut out about half the film :)
     
  15. Mr. Pacino

    Mr. Pacino Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 29, 2008
    Messages:
    346
    Likes Received:
    0
    The new US-Blu-ray has nothing to do with the 9/11 incident!!!!!! The US-Bluray has simply the European version on the disc. That´s all......
     
  16. Bob Cashill

    Bob Cashill Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2001
    Messages:
    2,713
    Likes Received:
    415
    But why?
     
  17. TheHutt

    TheHutt Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 15, 2009
    Messages:
    44
    Likes Received:
    0
    I suppose Warner already had got cold feet after they shot this film, and for international distribution, they already toned down the "islamist terrorist" aspect. Remember, it's pre-9/11 we're talking about. So for the new release, they just took the Euro version with the islamistic issue toned down. Here is a full report on the differences between the Euro and the US version (in German): http://www.schnittberichte.com/schnittbericht.php?ID=2965833 Here a crude Google translation of what happens there: Google translation
     
  18. smithb

    smithb Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    1,536
    Likes Received:
    0
    It could also be that a european blu-ray release was already in the works using the europena cut, so it was just easier to take what had already been transferred to HD.
     
  19. TravisR

    TravisR Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2004
    Messages:
    24,945
    Likes Received:
    2,766
    Location:
    The basement of the FBI building
    Having always had two cuts of this movie shows how hypocritical Warners is. It's fine to be offensive in the U.S. since Muslims are a minority but there's more of them in Europe so they needed a version to cover their asses there. Disgusting.
     
  20. RobertR

    RobertR Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 1998
    Messages:
    9,661
    Likes Received:
    152
    Hollywood's been doing this for some time. They changed the villains in The Sum of All Fears from Arab terrorists to neo-Nazis (as if they've been shown to be an organized, significant threat).
     

Share This Page