Alan K
Agent
- Joined
- Jul 25, 2001
- Messages
- 36
Or is it just me? I thought it was one of the most innovative shows I've ever seen.
Person 1: "Hello"
Person 2: "Hello?"
Person 1: "Hello!"
Person 2: "Hello??"
Person 1: "Hello!!!"
Person 2: "Oh, Hello."
True.
I loved the show, and watched every episode, both when it first came out and in syndication on Comedy Central. But it did get a little formulaic in turning a single observation into 5 minutes of 'banter.'
"I really like bread"
"You really like bread?"
"I'm telling you. On the list of things I like, please place BREAD."
"So its bread you like?"
"Bread it is."
"Bread, huh?"
"That's what I'm saying."
. . . .
"Places people."
New scene
I loved the show when it was on, never missed an episode. I thought was kind of cool when Jeremy was going out with the porn actress, played by Paula Marshall.
Boy was I ecstatic when I saw Paula Marshall show up in Sports Night. I fell in love with her when I got hooked on Cupid, another victim of ABC's cancellation (anyone got some tapes of that show?).
I was shocked that I had missed the resolution to her storyline when it originally aired. I happened to be flipping channels and came across the episode on Comedy Central (in the usual 1:30am slot)... can you imagine a storyline about an "adult film actress" being handled like this on any other "sitcom"? I thought it was hillarious that Jeremy told everyone she was a "Choreo-animator."
Has anyone else picked up on the reworkings of SN plots on WW?
I don't remember the SN stories well enough to have caught that. But the banter in WW is clearly derived from SN. But I think Sorkin learned from SN, and now the banter is both more interesting (less repetitive), and is no longer the sole form of dialogue -- making it all the more effective when it is used.
As for the "obsessive" plot, if it works, run with it
I also thought the person playing the Natalie character was a babe.
I thought I was the only one!