>just a 6" pipe has twice the volume of 2-3" of same length. ==== What's the relevance? I mean for a given alignment, a 6" diameter pipe requires 4x the Vb of (2) 3" diameter vents.
The wider the port, the less compression/chuffing noise will eminent from the port. Using multiple ports doesn't always equate to same performance as the equivalent single port under stressful condition.
I find that multiple ports are more difficult to fit in a box. I have made up a spreadsheet on excel based on the forumulas on diysubwoofers.org, and it is helpful to see the impact of changes in diameter, number of ports, box size etc.
Here's an example: 100L box 20 Hz tuning
4" vent >>> 520mm long, 4.1L volume 2 x 2.8" vent >>> 540mm long, 4.2L volume note: the area is the same, the volume and length of the smaller vents is slightly more.
What is annoying is that in practical terms they take up more space, require more effort to build, add complicaton, and probably don't perform quite as well at the extremes of operation regarding turbulence.
>Or...are you just kidding & saying the EXACT same thing myself & Patrick said in triple-speak....lol ==== No, I'm way too simple-minded to be witty. I just didn't understand what point you were trying to make. ==== >What is annoying is that in practical terms they take up more space, require more effort to build, add complicaton, and probably don't perform quite as well at the extremes of operation regarding turbulence. ==== Correct, the most efficient vent is a single round one. Using multiple smaller diameter vents and/or other than round has the benefit of flexibility in placement and adds acoustic resistance. I assume this is why Adire spec'd them.
Here's another theory. Perhaps the presence of deeper bass is creating the "slower" impression you are getting. Perhaps similar to the way an 8" woofer cna sound "faster" merely because it is not attempying deeper bass?