Brook K
Senior HTF Member
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2000
- Messages
- 9,467
re: F for Frankenstein
Firstly, unlike most of you, I think I laughed once the entire movie. The one thing Sgt. Hartman hates is an unlocked footlocker, and if there's one thing I hate it is an unfunny comedy. So it would probably get a D from me in any event just for not being funny. The F stems from my utter distaste for what Brooks has done to a real movie classic and work of art, The Bride Of Frankenstein. His movie moves well beyond simple parody of broad elements of the previous films. By mocking specific scenes, such as the heartbreaking blind man episode, he is placing his work as somehow superior. In my view, he see's Frankenstein as an assortment of old clunky movies ripe to be sent up (otherwise, why parody (a euphemism for "make fun of") the films in the first place?
Frankenstein is one of the great characters of film and literature. Whale and Karloff brought out the tragic, tortured qualities of the "monster" to great effect. Brooks makes an utter mockery of who Frankenstein is. James Whale placed Frankenstein in a world of absurdity, exploitation, and pain but with ephemeral moments of joy that further reinforce the tragic nature of the character. Mel Brooks uses Frankenstein as a silly joke.
Please spare me all the passionate defenses of the movie, because bottom line, none of you can talk me into thinking a movie that I don't think is funny is a comedy classic.
Firstly, unlike most of you, I think I laughed once the entire movie. The one thing Sgt. Hartman hates is an unlocked footlocker, and if there's one thing I hate it is an unfunny comedy. So it would probably get a D from me in any event just for not being funny. The F stems from my utter distaste for what Brooks has done to a real movie classic and work of art, The Bride Of Frankenstein. His movie moves well beyond simple parody of broad elements of the previous films. By mocking specific scenes, such as the heartbreaking blind man episode, he is placing his work as somehow superior. In my view, he see's Frankenstein as an assortment of old clunky movies ripe to be sent up (otherwise, why parody (a euphemism for "make fun of") the films in the first place?
Frankenstein is one of the great characters of film and literature. Whale and Karloff brought out the tragic, tortured qualities of the "monster" to great effect. Brooks makes an utter mockery of who Frankenstein is. James Whale placed Frankenstein in a world of absurdity, exploitation, and pain but with ephemeral moments of joy that further reinforce the tragic nature of the character. Mel Brooks uses Frankenstein as a silly joke.
Please spare me all the passionate defenses of the movie, because bottom line, none of you can talk me into thinking a movie that I don't think is funny is a comedy classic.