1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

Digital Cameras: Suggestions?

Discussion in 'After Hours Lounge (Off Topic)' started by Angelo.M, Oct 13, 2003.

  1. Angelo.M

    Angelo.M Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2002
    Messages:
    4,007
    Likes Received:
    0
    Love my 35mm, but I need a digital camera and have just begun to shop. Obviously, there are many to choose from. What are key/necessary features, things to look for or things to avoid? Price not an issue.
     
  2. Keith Mickunas

    Keith Mickunas Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 1998
    Messages:
    2,044
    Likes Received:
    0
    Well if price is no problem, I'd have to recommend the Canon EOS-1Ds. It's an 11 megapixel camera and the sensor is the same size as 35mm film. It regularly goes for $8k, although some places have it in the $6k range. I've heard that a lot of photo-journalists use the Nikon D1, but I don't know much about those.

    Seriously, you got to provide some parameters. The market is huge. What kind of camera do you have now? If you have one of the major brand SLR systems, look at their digital offerings. Canon sells a few digital cameras in a more reasonable price range that use all the EOS EF lenses. The same goes for Nikon, and I believe Olympus, Kodak and Fuji also.
     
  3. Angelo.M

    Angelo.M Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2002
    Messages:
    4,007
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have the Canon EOS Rebel 2000 now.

    Parameters? OK, $1000 or less.
     
  4. Curt_Dennis

    Curt_Dennis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2002
    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'd recommend the Sony Cybershot...the zoom is awesome and mine is a 5.2 megapixel. Takes amazing pictures and with enough light awesome movies too. It also has a Carlos Zies (sorry don't know how it's spelled) which is a great flash for all kinds of cameras. Here are some things to look for when looking for a digital camera:
    1. Megapixel...the more the better
    2. Zoom...Optical and Digital (the first digital cameras had very little and sucked)
    3. Ease of the controls on the camera (the Cybershot F717 has awesome and easy controls)
    4. File format
    5. How big of a memory card can you use
    6. What features does it have? Make sure you are comparing apples to apples. Some features aren't important to everyone, so look for what you need.
    7. Can you add additional equipment to it...lens, flashes, etc.
     
  5. Bejoy

    Bejoy Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 13, 2001
    Messages:
    61
    Likes Received:
    0
    Since you already own a Rebel, try its digital version. It goes for $999. Shop around and you may get it for less.
     
  6. Keith Mickunas

    Keith Mickunas Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 1998
    Messages:
    2,044
    Likes Received:
    0
    I second the EOS Digital Rebel. You should be able to use the lenses and some of the other accesories you have. If you have a good assortment of lenses already, you can buy the Digital Rebel without a lens for $100 less. Go read Steve'sreview and check out the reviews and forums at DPReview.
     
  7. ThomasC

    ThomasC Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2001
    Messages:
    6,526
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'd like some suggestions as well, I'm in the $300-$350 range, but willing to pay $400 if it's really worth the extra $50-$100.
     
  8. Carlo Medina

    Carlo Medina Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 1997
    Messages:
    10,343
    Likes Received:
    562
  9. Rhett_Y

    Rhett_Y Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 23, 2001
    Messages:
    1,265
    Likes Received:
    2
    Sony F717....Hands down.......And now the new Sony the F826 I believe it is called.........

    R~
     
  10. Keith Mickunas

    Keith Mickunas Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 1998
    Messages:
    2,044
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  11. Thomas Newton

    Thomas Newton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 16, 1999
    Messages:
    1,484
    Likes Received:
    13
     
  12. Curt_Dennis

    Curt_Dennis Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2002
    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    0
    Keith, sorry but the Canon you mentioned is NOT better than the F717. It is way more usually which is true, BUT it is also lower quality in megapixels, lower in zoom with the base camera, movie format is .wav and only 30 secs (which may or may not be a feature that you want). So how can you say your Canon is better than the F717? I personally like having a nice movie mode on my camera, because there has been times were having a movie was better than taking pictures. But, a camera is a personal thing and each person will like different things. At least Rhett and I agree that the F717 for $800 or under is an awesome camera.
     
  13. Keith Mickunas

    Keith Mickunas Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 1998
    Messages:
    2,044
    Likes Received:
    0
    I said
     
  14. DaveBB

    DaveBB Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 24, 1999
    Messages:
    792
    Likes Received:
    0
    I agree with Carlo, go check out dpreview.com. There's a lot, almost too much, information over there.

    IMHO: if you've got Canon lenses and accessories go with the Digital Rebel.
     
  15. JackMe

    JackMe Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2003
    Messages:
    13
    Likes Received:
    0
    Sony has a $75 rebate on the 717 at the moment. This means it can be picked up for a total cost of less than $600. As to the fellow wanting to spend half of that, Nikon 3100, Canon A70, Sony P72, Olympus Stylus 300. Check them all (
     
  16. Max Leung

    Max Leung Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2000
    Messages:
    4,612
    Likes Received:
    0
    Comparing the Sony F717 or any other non-SLR digital camera to a digital SLR is comparing apples and oranges.

    It's like comparing a standalone DVD player to an HTPC.

    If you're into serious photography, a digital SLR would work very well - more flexibility, more options - particularly for action/sports, long-zoom nature photography, and portraits (for money).

    However, the high-end point-and-shoot type cameras like the Canon G3 and Sony F717 are excellent for many situations - great for party shots and pictures of static objects (landscapes, architecture, etc). They really suck for action photography though - the auto-focus is too damn slow, especially when you're indoors under household lightbulbs. Taking pictures of pets is damn difficult.

    The higher-end P&S cams are great for learning photography though...you can use the manual modes when you outgrow the automatic modes. Lots of bells and whistles that appeal to everyone (movie and audio recording, over-the-top sharpness, contrast, and color saturation for minimal post-processing). Many feature swivel LCDs or swivel bodies for low-angle shots that are more difficult to achieve (and more obvious to onlookers) with SLR cameras.

    Most people just use digital cameras to take pictures of people at parties, candids, and for the occasional vacation. They'd probably be happy with the pocket digital cameras...even a Sony F707 or F717 is total overkill for their needs. [​IMG]
     
  17. Todd Hochard

    Todd Hochard Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 1999
    Messages:
    2,314
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  18. Tim K

    Tim K Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 1999
    Messages:
    402
    Likes Received:
    0
    I haven't heard anyone mention the SIZE of the camera or what it will be used for. I'm in the market for a digital camera and size is one of the most important factors for me. I want a 3MP camera with a 3x optical zoom that will fit in my pocket. I will probably go for the Olympus Stylus 300 which runs around $349. I have 3 friends with Canon digital elphs and while small, good cameras, all 3 have had to send them back to be repaired under warranty.
     
  19. Dan D.

    Dan D. Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 29, 1999
    Messages:
    215
    Likes Received:
    0
    If you love your Rebel 2000 and you are comfortable with the $1000 price point, there's no question you should be looking at the Digital Rebel. It has one of the best sensors on the market (the same 6.3MP CMOS from the 10D) and you will be able to share lenses and flashes between both of your cameras. FYI, the $999 cost for the Digital Rebel includes the 18-55mm (28.8-88mm 35mm-equivilent) EF-S lens (this one won't be compatible with the Rebel 2000) designed for the camera. The body alone is available for $899 if you already have some good lenses. Keep in mind that there is a 1.6x multiplier with the Digital Rebel's sensor when considering lens focal lengths (e.g. a 28mm lens would be the equivilent of 44.8mm on the Digital Rebel) which is why the 18-55mm lens is attractive.

    Regarding the above comments on the Sony F717... the F717 is a fine camera with one of the best built-in lenses on the market. That said, it still not going to match the quality of a serious SLR lens. Another issue with any Sony besides the F717's successor, the F828, is that you are stuck using Memory Stick, which tends to be costlier per megabyte and much less common than the more popular options like CompactFlash. As I said, they are fine cameras, but with the introduction of the Digital Rebel into that price range, it's tough to make an arguement against the SLR.
     
  20. Jamie Doucette

    Jamie Doucette Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 3, 2002
    Messages:
    103
    Likes Received:
    0

Share This Page