1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

Behold! Excalibur in HD DVD

Discussion in 'Blu-ray and UHD' started by AaronSCH, Oct 31, 2006.

  1. AaronSCH

    AaronSCH Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2006
    Messages:
    284
    Likes Received:
    0
    Forged when the format was young... I couldn't wait to pop this into the HD A1 when I got home this evening. Though I didn't have time to view the whole film, what I have seen so far looks spectacular. Though much of this film was photographed in soft focus, the increased detail and rich colors delivered by this HD DVD really pay tribute to Alex Thomson's cinematography. The daylight forest scenes reveal details in every leaf of foliage and pebble on the ground. Excalibur shimmers in the daylight as it rises from the lake...just beautiful. My only complaint is the lack of extras and the photoshop cover. Please Warner Bros., use poster art whenever you can.
     
  2. JonZ

    JonZ Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 1998
    Messages:
    7,794
    Likes Received:
    7
    I dont understand the complaints about this transfer. I think it looks beautiful.

    Just finished watching it.
     
  3. Stan Rozenfeld

    Stan Rozenfeld Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2000
    Messages:
    199
    Likes Received:
    0
    Thanks for the reviews, guys. I can wait to watch it.
     
  4. Shawn.F

    Shawn.F Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 16, 2005
    Messages:
    561
    Likes Received:
    0
    I...URYENS! WILL TRY (and pick up this disc sometime this weekend)!!!!!!!!! [​IMG]
     
  5. Craig S

    Craig S Premium
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2000
    Messages:
    5,703
    Likes Received:
    182
    Location:
    League City, Texas
    Real Name:
    Craig Seanor
    One of the problems with the SD version was that it appeared the framing was a little tight. Can anyone out there who's seen both the SD and the new HD-DVD discs comment on the framing, and if there are any improvements?
     
  6. DeeF

    DeeF Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2002
    Messages:
    1,683
    Likes Received:
    11
    The framing does seem tight. How do I know what's correct?
     
  7. Jace_A

    Jace_A Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2005
    Messages:
    293
    Likes Received:
    0
    The framing on the SD-DVD wasn't tight in so much as it was badly misframed. The DVD was matted incorrectly. Hopefully the HD-DVD has fixed this, but I'm not hopeful.
     
  8. Ric Easton

    Ric Easton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2001
    Messages:
    2,817
    Likes Received:
    76
    I'd also like to know if it was framed correctly. I'm still hanging on to my old laserdisc. Alas, I've been hoping for a DVD re-issue of this movie (I haven't jumped in to HD-DVD yet). When I heard it was coming out in an HD format, I was quite suprised.
     
  9. DeeF

    DeeF Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2002
    Messages:
    1,683
    Likes Received:
    11
    There are a lot of heads being cut off mid-forehead. I don't know if it's right or wrong, just noting it...
     
  10. Dave>h

    Dave>h Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    377
    Likes Received:
    6
    For anyone who has seen this HD DVD, how was the sound track?

    Did they do anything special to it? AS I recall on the SD DVD, it was a 5.1 remix but it was not very good. The only use of surrounds at all was the scene with the Grail at the end...

    Thanks for the comments.

    Dave
     
  11. DeeF

    DeeF Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2002
    Messages:
    1,683
    Likes Received:
    11
    I can't really comment on the soundtrack. I have to use PCM, which puts out a 2.0 track.
     
  12. Jace_A

    Jace_A Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2005
    Messages:
    293
    Likes Received:
    0

    This means the HD DVD is misframed in the same way as the DVD.
     
  13. Paul_Scott

    Paul_Scott Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 19, 2002
    Messages:
    6,546
    Likes Received:
    1
    Has Boorman commented on the misframing? presumably if he'd given a commentary track he was watching the same transfer we are seeing.
    If he hasn't commented on this issue in the last 5 or 6 years, either he hasn't seen it, or else he didn't think it was as big a deal as the viewers.

    I used to have the LD and the only thing I remember about it was being disappointed to learn that the film wasn't shot in 2.35 but a much less wider AR.
     
  14. Ric Easton

    Ric Easton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2001
    Messages:
    2,817
    Likes Received:
    76

    Great. This probably would have been one of the first movies I purchased when jumping into Hi-Def DVD. Looks like I can still sit out the format war. Very disappointing that they couldn't get this properly framed for even the HD version. Some movies get no respect.
     
  15. Mark Bendiksen

    Mark Bendiksen Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 16, 1999
    Messages:
    1,090
    Likes Received:
    0
    I cannot attest to the quality (or lack thereof) of the HD-DVD release, but I can say one thing definitively: The current SD-DVD of Excalibur COMPLETELY sucks. I'm so desperate for something better that I'll even settle for a marginal improvement in picture quality.
     
  16. Ric Easton

    Ric Easton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 6, 2001
    Messages:
    2,817
    Likes Received:
    76
    I asked during the last chat if there was any chance of us getting a new version, since this year was the 25th anniversary and all. They said there were no plans.

    I still just can't believe the HD version got the same mis-framed crap. I guess it will be a cold day in Hell before we get any version that is properly framed.
     
  17. DeeF

    DeeF Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2002
    Messages:
    1,683
    Likes Received:
    11
    I did a comparison of the new HD-DVD and the standard DVD, showing them simultaneously on my monitor. The HD-DVD has been opened up, ever so slightly.
     
  18. Ron-P

    Ron-P Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 25, 2000
    Messages:
    6,285
    Likes Received:
    0
    Real Name:
    Ron
    Just picked it up today, my local BB had only one copy. Can't wait to watch it.
     
  19. Stephen_J_H

    Stephen_J_H All Things Film Junkie
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,535
    Likes Received:
    395
    Location:
    North of the 49th
    Real Name:
    Stephen J. Hill
    Being cut off mid-forehead is not "proof" of misframing, as others are indicating. I only quote DeeF because his quote is the only one providing any clarity. A director or DOP will have various reasons for framing shots in a certain way. We cannot assume that this is misframed just because tops of heads are lopped off. We're talking about a movie here, not a family portrait.
     
  20. Scott Calvert

    Scott Calvert Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 1998
    Messages:
    885
    Likes Received:
    2

    What he said.

    Although, the cropping did seem a little tight in the upper portion of the frame.
     

Share This Page