Michael Elliott
Senior HTF Member
BTW, did anyone else notice how big 2015 is going to be for blockbusters??
For the record, I was always on board with Ledger. His work in Brokeback Mountain, among other films, showed amazing promise as a dramatic actor.joshEH said:Every retort to Affleck-criticism should just be: "Heath Ledger."
Can you imagine if the Internet was what it was in 1988, back when Michael Keaton was cast as Batman? It would have shut down for a day:Michael Elliott said:I must admit that this entire news is downright hilarious to me because of the violent outrage that it has caused.
Still, as an actor it is now Affleck's job to get into the character. We can't judge what he's going to do here based on past performances he's given and especially when we don't know what type of character they are going to make him. I doubt they're writing a screenplay for Bale and just replacing him with Affleck. A good director should be able to take Affleck's talents and do something with them.
People are fucking stupid when it comes to this kind of thing. See also: Daniel Craig announced as Bond in 2005.Mr. Mom as Batman?
July 03, 1988
So Michael Keaton has been cast as Batman/Bruce Wayne (Cinefile, by Leonard Klady, June 26)?
He might have made a good Joker, but his comic style, which he seems unable to shake (but can amplify), has doomed this promised "serious" treatment of Bob Kane's character to the same tired, boring level of artificial "camp" that made the TV series a hit yet simultaneously doomed it to an early cancellation.
The painful lesson of "Superman III" -- when you don't treat venerable superheroes with respect the audience rejects the property -- has been ignored in this cynical, opportunistic attempt to capitalize on the success of "Beetlejuice" (same director, same star).
The Sam Hamm script that director Tim Burton is filming has many blunders, but does treat the characters basically seriously. Obviously, in casting Keaton, Burton is rejecting this approach altogether, and going after a manic comedy.
Batman has been a popular character for almost five decades -- not because he is a figure of comedy, but precisely because he is not, especially in the last couple of years. By ignoring this, by casting a clown as Batman, Warner Bros. and Burton have defecated on the history of Batman and on the hopes of those who appreciate the character and his potential.
Better they should have filmed Frank Miller's "Batman: the Dark Knight Returns." But that would have required courage, taste, and imagination.
I have to admit that I had a lot more fun reading the insane posts around the internet than I did watching Man Of Steel (and I liked that movie).Michael Elliott said:I must admit that this entire news is downright hilarious to me because of the violent outrage that it has caused.
Richard Dreyfuss @RichardDreyfuss
You read for a part, you feel good about it, you feel confident, then they cast Ben Affleck.
Then you can say that for any star actor playing a certain character's role. For me, that's not a problem.Adam Lenhardt said:The problem with casting Ben Affleck is that he's too big of a star. When I'm watching the movie, I won't see Bruce Wayne, I'll see Ben Affleck. There's a reason these roles tend to go to unknowns and character actors: because their wattage doesn't outshine the character's wattage.