Apple for you, Carats for her =)
Good one!Originally Posted by Sam Posten
Apple for you, Carats for her =)
Originally Posted by DaveF ">[/url]
Quote:
I was perhaps too sardonic.
Ripping your own DVDs is easy.* MacWorld has published detailed how-to's in the past. It's a good way to get stuff you own onto your iPod for convenient viewing; and not waste money on the overpriced iTunes movies. Just don't "pirate" stuff you don't own. :)
If you have a Tivo or TivoHD, you can copy recorded shows from it onto your Mac, and then sync it to your iPod.
* Yes, breaking copy protection is a violation of the DMCA. No one cares. This law is an offense to normal people, but to say more is too political to HTF :)
[/QUOTE]Gotcha.
That's an interesting argument. While I agree that Jobs wants to iTunes-ify the publishing industry, I'm not convinced that that's the driving rationale for the iPad. It's a component, but not the whole story.Originally Posted by Carlo Medina
I've been thinking about this after my initialdisappointmentambivalence to the launch.
My conclusion: Jobs' aim is to revolutionize the publishing industry with the iPad and its associated App/Product store in the same way the iPod and iTunes did for the music industry.
Agreed. It was a revelation to me when I finished my graduate research and discovered I don't use my computer for anything substantial anymore! I got a job, and the home computer was for email.Originally Posted by Carlo Medina
Dave,
I don't think our theories/arguments are mutually exclusive. I think what you propose is true, especially for the non-power users of computers out there...which let's face it, is the majority of people
I did a personal recalibration on computer predictions: I considered what I expected of previous technologies (MS Tablets, iPod Touch, iPhone) and what actually transpired. And so orientated, I agree with you: the iPad may change the course of computing.While I do believe his focus is to bring publishing into the 21st century, certainly what you propose is likely also a goal of Jobs'. That's why the more I think about the iPad, and especially what it can be 2-3 revisions down the line, the more I realize this could really be a masterstroke by Jobs.
What you're seeing in the industry's reaction to the iPad is nothing less than future shock.
The Real Work is not formatting the margins, installing the printer driver, uploading the document, finishing the PowerPoint slides, running the software update or reinstalling the OS.
The Real Work is teaching the child, healing the patient, selling the house, logging the road defects, fixing the car at the roadside, capturing the table's order, designing the house and organising the party.
Think of the millions of hours of human effort spent on preventing and recovering from the problems caused by completely open computer systems. Think of the lengths that people have gone to in order to acquire skills that are orthogonal to their core interests and their job, just so they can get their job done.
The iPad launches will a complete office suite (iWork). It will soon have a bevy of third-party productivity apps. Assuming it's as full of awesome as hoped, my wife agrees that replacing my MBP with a pair of iPads (one for each of us) in a year or two makes complete sense.Yes. Five. We want to bring all five of our productivity apps to iPad: OmniGraffle, OmniOutliner, OmniPlan, OmniFocus, and OmniGraphSketcher.
You can listen to music and surf the net on an iPhone and iPod Touch -- of course you'll be able able to on the iPad. Or are you yet another person who's bought the false BS about the iPhone not multitasking?Originally Posted by Dave Scarpa
Yeah I can Listen to Music and surf the Net on my Droid Eris but not this ??
Plus you can always redownload apps you have purchased before for free. Unlike music!Originally Posted by Parker Clack
John,
That's what I was thinking, in other words whatever you have in iTunes will get transferred over but I wasn't sure.
Thanks,
Parker
God I hope not. that will kill battery performanceOriginally Posted by Ted Todorov
Quote:
It does of course, but only allows you to run one third party app at a time, but you can/are running multiple Apple apps in background. The general suspicion is that running multiple third party apps will be implement in iPhone OS 4.0.
The feature per se won't affect battery life. Actually using it might, but that would be a nice user preference, no?Originally Posted by Sam Posten
God I hope not. that will kill battery performance