1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

Any news or reviews on H/K AVR8000 Flagship Receiver?

Discussion in 'Archived Threads 2001-2004' started by Greg Hamilton, Mar 4, 2002.

  1. Greg Hamilton

    Greg Hamilton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 1999
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    0
    I'd like to know more about this receiver and any issues that might have come up so far. Any opinions?
     
  2. Wayne Ernst

    Wayne Ernst Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 24, 2002
    Messages:
    2,589
    Likes Received:
    0
  3. Arthur S

    Arthur S Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 1999
    Messages:
    2,572
    Likes Received:
    0
    Wayne, HK receivers have been a day late and a dollar short in the last couple years. At the price point of the HK 8000 there are better choices. For example, the Pioneer Elite 49TX has room-speaker correction and 7 channels of amplification. The 49TX can be had for about $2,600, not much more than the HK (at least in the lower 48). Canada may be a different story.

    In any case, the fact that HK gets very little attention on this forum should tell you something.

    Oh yeah, if you really have your heart set on the HK 8000 be patient. The price on HK drops to about half within a year.
     
  4. ColinM

    ColinM Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2001
    Messages:
    2,057
    Likes Received:
    0
    RRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRip!
    [​IMG]
     
  5. John A. Casler

    John A. Casler Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 1999
    Messages:
    479
    Likes Received:
    0
    Arthur,
    You have to be joking? The Pioneer lists for $4200 and you say you can buy it for $2600. Then you say that in a short period the HK will be 1/2 price. Hmmmm
    The HK is street available now for $1700. Probably couldn't find a good two channel amp for $900 anywhere. Especially for the "vaporware" currently available in 7.1.
    No doubt the Pioneer is a great receiver and covers a lot of bases, but not everyone is interested in paying for the extra amps until the software is out there. Why not sink the quality into a good amp section you can use.
    What's this Pioneer specs? (See below) Notice the surround channels have 9% distortion? Strange they put a zero in front of that 9 but forgot the decimal. That is not .09% but 9%. You can almost hear that. For that much money, I want all my amps to have at least one zero after that decimal.
    And why rate at 6 ohms? Look all over the Harman site. They don't even know what 6 ohms looks like. If you want to talk power look at the amps. What other company publishes that?
    The Pioneer rating shown doesn't even tell you the power with "ALL" 5 or 7 channels driven. Again Hmmmm.
    ==================== Pioneer Specs:
    Stereo: 160 Watts per Channel (20 - 20 kHz @ 6 ohm, 0.09% THD)
    Surround: 130W x 7 (20 Hz to 20kHz@ 8 ohm, 09% THD)
    Surround: 160W x 7 (20 Hz to 20kHz@ 6 ohm, 09% THD)
    http://www.pioneerelectronics.com/Pi...,21018,00.html
    =====================
    So if we are talking street money, $2600 vs $1700, although the Pioneer is a great receiver and will light a lot of speakers up just fine. Give me a Harman Kardon and I'll see if anyone can tell the difference in a blind taste test. Chances are the Harman sounds better. But that is a subjective evaluation not "objective".
    I don't think it is accurate to say, it is a "better" choice for everyone. It is just a choice.
    John Casler
     
  6. Brian O

    Brian O Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 1999
    Messages:
    288
    Likes Received:
    0
    Pioneer = Over-rated

    HK = Under-rated

    IMHO
     
  7. ColinM

    ColinM Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2001
    Messages:
    2,057
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ditto.
     
  8. Greg Hamilton

    Greg Hamilton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 1999
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    0
    Here in Canada the price difference is $1500. H/K 8000 MSRP $4000 & Pioneer VSX-49TX $5500.

    BTW-I own an H/K 7000, and I've thoroughly enjoyed to date. -gh
     
  9. Al_Reb

    Al_Reb Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2002
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hello all, this is my 1st post so I'll try to be breif[​IMG]
    As an owner of a Harman Kardon AVR 8000 and H/K PA 4000, I must say these pieces are truely amazing. But they may not be for every one. I'll start with the some of the negatives. IMHO
    Cons.
    The AVR 8000 & PA 4000 are huge and will not fit in a standard A/V rack. The 8000 is 7 5/8" high, 17 3/8" wide and 20 ½" deep + all the inter connects will need some room in the back of it. Roughly it barely fits (depth wise) on the Bell'O. Also weight may also be a problem, 53lbs. I had to call the Bell'O dealer to make sure the rack would hold it.
    About it only having a 5ch amp, well I was bummed at 1st untill I got an explanation on why. Here is a http://www.audioimports.com/newslett...y2001NewsL.htm link. This is for the 7500 & 8500 ero.models but it is relevant. Also the 8000 is ±85 amps, not ±45 amps.

    Both the AVR-7500 and 8500 although being both 7.1 multi channel receiver, will only have 5 channels of amplification built-in. In order to get full 7.1 amplification a 2 channel amplifier, such as the new Harman/Kardon PA-2000 will be required.
    The reason behind this is that it is physically impossible for fit an extra two Audiophile grade channels of amplification which produce a true minimum of 100w RMS each with 45 amperes of current in the same box as the AVR-7500 or 8500 without making these receivers' size totally impractical or compromising the quality of the amplification. Harman/Kardon felt that it would more convenient, as well as not to degrade the sound quality, for the additional channels required for 7.1 surround sound to be available separately.
    Furthermore it allows those who want 7.1 technology, but who are not going to use it immediately, the cost saving of 2 channel amplification, which can be purchased at a later time.

    Price may be a con but I got the 8000 for $1699.95[​IMG] from a local dealer. So there were taxs but no shipping charges. For what you get with the 8000, IMO that's a steal price.
    The 8000 is very power hungery, 694W maximun with 2 channels driven and will get warm, but not hot to the touch.
    Last con, the 8000 does not up-convert S-Video to component, and only has 3 component inputs.
    On to the pros...
    High current, ±85 amps. I really needed this, because the longest surround speaker wire run is 53' and 2nd room run at 110'. Also my old Pioneer VSX-D508 could not handle the Infinity Studio Monitors 255s and would go into overload protection. The 8000 drivers these without breaking a sweat, 125w stereo. The thing I don't understand is, in stereo, the H/K is only 25w, 10w in surround, more than the Pioneer but you can't even be in the room if you trun up the H/K past 85% of max. Do these companies measure the same way?
    EZset remote! This is a great feature, saves much time and agravation with delay setting the speakers.
    OSD, On Screen Display, this is a god sent and makes adjusting the 8000 many features a snap.
    Front optical/coaxial in and outs! And selectable front video and S-video to either in or out.
    5ch and 7ch(+ amp) stereo. I didn't think I would use these but I find myself useing them more and more.
    Oh I seam to be rambling, so much for being brief[​IMG] If anyone wants or needs more info, just ask. I'll be glad to bend you ear.
     
  10. ColinM

    ColinM Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2001
    Messages:
    2,057
    Likes Received:
    0
    I see a used AVR8000 in my distant future...
     
  11. Greg Hamilton

    Greg Hamilton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 1999
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    0
    Al_Reb.. Have you played around with the multiroom/multisource (not just 2nd zone) aspects of the AVR8000 & PA4000? If I read into these products correctly they should marry together nicely to provide the above mentioned features along with the H/K keypads. Documentation isn't all that clear on the setup/hookup. I've asked my rep to look into this for me.. -gh
     
  12. Al_Reb

    Al_Reb Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2002
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  13. Al_Reb

    Al_Reb Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2002
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    John Casler wrote:
     
  14. John A. Casler

    John A. Casler Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 1999
    Messages:
    479
    Likes Received:
    0
    Don't you wish all manufacturers listed their numbers like that (8 ohms, 20-20K, all channels driven and the distortion)

    Then we could make a good evaluation. The Pioneer is probably as powerful or close, but the distortion numbers for all but the front speakers are close to the distortion numbers for subwoofers.

    In my audiophile days I needed to see .00X for distortion, but with home theater, especially the surrounds .0X is probably OK, and not noticable.

    By the way, I like HK's explaination about the size being the limiting factor. Extra channels and larger power supplies take up a lot of space. I wonder what the truth is about these Onkyo and Denon units with 125 watts plus X 7?

    JAC
     
  15. Al_Reb

    Al_Reb Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2002
    Messages:
    41
    Likes Received:
    0
    John A. Casier wrote:
     
  16. Greg Hamilton

    Greg Hamilton Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 1999
    Messages:
    88
    Likes Received:
    0
  17. Arthur S

    Arthur S Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 1999
    Messages:
    2,572
    Likes Received:
    0
    Glad to see there are still a few HK supporters on this forum.

    Greg, I took a quick glance over at audioreview.com

    The first poster paid $700 for his HK 7000 at OneCall. That is what I mean about HK prices taking a nose dive.

    HK's claim to fame these days is Logic 7. If Logic 7 really interests you, a used Lexicon D-1 and multi-channel amp might be a better way to go.
     
  18. Kevin Alexander

    Kevin Alexander Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 1999
    Messages:
    1,367
    Likes Received:
    0
     
  19. John A. Casler

    John A. Casler Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 1999
    Messages:
    479
    Likes Received:
    0
    Arthur,

    The AVR-7000 has been out for over two years. Are you saying you know of recievers this old that don't drop significantly in value when the next generation is introduced?

    Just watch the price on your 49TX plummet when it's successor arrives. It has already dumped close to 50%. Nothing wrong with that. That is how it works.

    And it is the Lexicon DC-1 not D-1. And the chip in the AVR-8000 is said to be superior. Technology generally moves forward.

    Additionally why buy yesterdays (1997-98) technology for (they are selling for $1000, plus a 100 watt x 5 amp add another $800 - $1000) a total of over $2000 when you can get a fully warranteed, latest greatest, for $1500?

    I don't know how much the Lexy listed for, but I heard it was $5000. Damn things just don't hold their value.

    Must be a Harman Product.

    Oh and their claim to fame is not Logic 7, it is their amps, as evidenced by comparing the numbers to some of the other "number pumpers" who must think we can all be fooled by putting zeros (09%) in front of non-decimal whole number distortion figures and then giving power ratings at 6 ohms. Why not rate at 2? That would be impressive.

    Kind of like telling someone how many pennys you have in the bank.

    Now that is funny on a $4000+ (now $2500 and falling) receiver.

    John Casler
     
  20. Arthur S

    Arthur S Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 2, 1999
    Messages:
    2,572
    Likes Received:
    0
    Kevin

    Welcome to the discussion. I can't quite remember, what did you end up buying a while ago when you were waiting for the HK 7000?
     

Share This Page