ericanthonE
Stunt Coordinator
- Joined
- Feb 21, 2004
- Messages
- 204
the bryston can handle 220v and my father said that it would be cheaper as far as the power bill is concerned, and it would be easier on the equipment.
If you take the peak watts that it can handle which is 2100 and divide by 110
I guess that you would take the RMS watts though, which would be 600 watts total(for it would not be more than that for each channel?), and divide by 110 or 120 to get the amplification requirements.
He is a physicist, i am probably just the idiot here.
Eric
If you take the peak watts that it can handle which is 2100 and divide by 110
I guess that you would take the RMS watts though, which would be 600 watts total(for it would not be more than that for each channel?), and divide by 110 or 120 to get the amplification requirements.
He is a physicist, i am probably just the idiot here.
Eric