Damn, have to miss "Woman in the Window"!! I should be good for most of the others.
So true, I've just been to see the re-released Titanic 3D and the 2 girls sitting next to us obviously hadn't been fed in a week because they proceeded to eat for the full 3 hours plus of the movie. First it was BBQed chicken (no kidding) , then popcorn and chips, then MacDonalds, god knows where they put it or maybe they were bulimic... as a side note the 2K 3D Titanic was good but not a patch on the original 70mm viewing.Sam Posten said:I'm sure it will seem rude to say but I long since stopped caring about movie theaters. The first time they started showing commercials instead of trailers I knew it was over. Theater owners have no one to blame but themselves, they got greedy and reduced experience and piled on costs.
Most towns never had the beautiful show cases like posted above and today's boxes are a shell filled with rude patrons who don't care about movies as an experience.
Originally Posted by Jack Theakston /t/318779/a-few-words-about-the-loss-of-the-neighborhood-movie-theater/90#post_3910288
While we're at it, I should plug my own theater, the Capitol in Rome, NY. If you are in the Central New York area, please come visit us!
[SIZE= 16px]1928 movie palace, complete with 1939 Art Moderne remodeling:[/SIZE]
, now celebrating our Tenth festival. A $55 pass gets you three days of all-35mm silents and early talkies that aren't available ANYWHERE. All silents will be accompanied on the theater organ by Avery Tunningley, Bernie Anderson, Jr., and Dr. Philip C. Carli.
More information is available on our website: www.romecapitol.com
For a modern cinema, the Billy Wilder looks like a really nice place to see a movie. And that Hot Pink curtain, well it works, doesn't it? My favorite pizza place in Westwood is the one with NY subway signs all over it. You forgot to mention the shuttered Majestic Crest. Honestly, the Mann and UA plexes were just flat boxes in spaces not designed to be theatres. I liked the Plaza though, with it's cool curved marquee and it was a real theatre. The Festival had real charm. The National is a cautionary tale - a well deserved nightmare for the greedy owner who refused an offer to sell the theatre as it was and now has nothing. Have you seen the writeup on LA Curbed about all the notes from sad patrons that have been left on the fence?Kevin EK said:Just a couple of weeks ago, I went to an event screening at the Billy Wilder Theater in Westwood.
The theater can hold what looks like 400-500 people. Only 25 or so people were there - we were watching a movie from 1939 after all...
Afterwards I went to have a drink at a pizza place by the Village and the Bruin, which look about the same to me as they always did, even though they no longer fly the Mann flag.
On the way in and out of Westwood, I went by the Whole Foods Market where the Mann Westwood multiplex used to stand, the CVS Pharmacy where the UA Theater south of Wilshire used to be, the bank/office building where the UA Egyptian Westwood used to be, and finally, the desolate, fenced-off lot of weeds that was once the Mann National. The last nearly broke my heart.
I'm told that the Avco Cinema Center will be reopening at some point soon under new management, but that sign has been up for months with no sign of any activity...
Yes. The book is authored by one of CT's owners.EricSchulz said:I'm really surprised no one has posted this link...
I found it quite by accident while looking up info on the old Granada Theater which was located three blocks from where I live now. Also found some omissions on the site that I will try to fill in!
Cinema Treasures
Can't find any info as to whether it is linked to the book of the same name...
We have 3 Alamo Drafthouse theaters here in San Antonio, although I think it originated in Austin. I can vouch for their excellent reputation. They have cinema festivals and theme tributes several times a year in addition to first run features, and comfort food menus (burgers, fries, sandwhiches, pizza, beer, etc) served by waitresses and waiters just prior to the start of the movies. First run, nostalgic, cult movies and more.NY2LA said:As for the Avco, the buzz is it's to be the LA debut of Alamo Drafthouse. Not particularly theatrical but they have a good rep nonetheless.
I wouldn't say it's a favorite. It's rather dull and sloppy, a lot of incorrect or missing details, like an an old abandoned warehouse with a few squatters and scattered debris left behind. Cinema Treasures is not ideal, but at least they make an ongoing effort to keep it relatively clean, fresh and attractive.Toddwrtr said:Another favorite website on cinemas from around the world is CinemaTour.
Sounds nice, if not exactly theatrical in the classic sense. I'm sure they don't use curtains, but they don't have commercials either, right? What do they have on the screen before the feature starts? How are the food and admission prices? Do they run cartoons and shorts?Richard V said:We have 3 Alamo Drafthouse theaters here in San Antonio, although I think it originated in Austin. I can vouch for their excellent reputation. They have cinema festivals and theme tributes several times a year in addition to first run features, and comfort food menus (burgers, fries, sandwhiches, pizza, beer, etc) served by waitresses and waiters just prior to the start of the movies. First run, nostalgic, cult movies and more.
The fact is that theatrical movie presentation is a terrible business from a financial standpoint. Movie theaters are concession stands that happen to show movies, not the other way around. In the opening weeks of a film (and today, there are only opening weeks, as the small theatrical windows are absurd), theaters generally get only 5-10% of the take. Would you open a movie theater for 5%? (Traditionally, in New York and Los Angeles, the studios guaranteed the theatre's "nut", but I don't know if that's the case any longer.) So IMO, it's not the theatre owners who are greedy, it's the studios. The theaters should have forced a bigger share of revenues from the studios and they should have simply refused to play movies that were quickly going to home video. Movies have become unimportant because they're treated as being unimportant. Theatrical distribution is simply a marketing exercise for the home video.Sam Posten said:I'm sure it will seem rude to say but I long since stopped caring about movie theaters. The first time they started showing commercials instead of trailers I knew it was over. Theater owners have no one to blame but themselves, they got greedy and reduced experience and piled on costs.
Most towns never had the beautiful show cases like posted above and today's boxes are a shell filled with rude patrons who don't care about movies as an experience.