1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

A Few Words About A few words about...™ High Noon -- in Blu-ray

Discussion in 'Blu-ray and UHD' started by Robert Harris, Jul 17, 2012.

  1. Robert Harris

    Robert Harris Archivist
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 1999
    Messages:
    8,619
    Likes Received:
    4,018
    Real Name:
    Robert Harris
    The changeover to acetate was not as simple as one might surmise. Early acetate elements, c. 1951-2, can be extremely problematic. Far more so than nitrate, which is more stable in some ways. RAH
     
  2. Lromero1396

    Lromero1396 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2012
    Messages:
    640
    Likes Received:
    33
    I seem to recall you mentioning this in the 3-strip Technicolor thread. So the state of High Noon's OCN could be even more dire than if it were nitrate. That is, if it's not stored properly.
     
  3. Robert Harris

    Robert Harris Archivist
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 1999
    Messages:
    8,619
    Likes Received:
    4,018
    Real Name:
    Robert Harris
    Most likely in regard to early acetate having much greater registration problems, especially in pre-digital era. Do a search for surviving release prints, c. 1951-52. Slim Pickins'.
    RAH
     
  4. Lromero1396

    Lromero1396 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2012
    Messages:
    640
    Likes Received:
    33
    I'd certainly like to hear something from Warner concerning Sergeant York. It's one of my favorite films and I've been wanting it released on BD for a while.
     
  5. Colin Jacobson

    Colin Jacobson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2000
    Messages:
    5,663
    Likes Received:
    352
    Agree. I rented the "High Noon" Blu-ray and just watched it. I agree with RAH's assessment - actually, I was relieved to read it, since it confirmed what I saw though other reviews didn't comment on the "frozen grain" and whatnot.
    However, none of this makes the BD unwatchable. Is it a disappointment? Certainly, but it's still a watchable rendition of a great film...
     
  6. Lromero1396

    Lromero1396 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2012
    Messages:
    640
    Likes Received:
    33
    I believe Mr. Harris was disappointed because of what it should have been considering this film's status. Honestly, I may purchase the disc at some point, but I feel that that money would be better spent on a properly done Twilight Time release and not a half-a**** effort by Olive/Paramount.
     
  7. David Weicker

    David Weicker Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 26, 2005
    Messages:
    2,171
    Likes Received:
    528
    Real Name:
    David
    You do realize that if Twilight Time had gotten it, it would have looked the same. Twilight Time does not do transfers - they only take what they are given. I'm tired of all this bitching and moaning by people who don't even own the disc, and have not seen the disc. Its just wrong.
     
  8. Dick

    Dick Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 22, 1999
    Messages:
    4,901
    Likes Received:
    1,024
    Real Name:
    Rick
    I say again -- I found the HIGH NOON Blu to be an exponential improvement over any video release I've ever owned (I bought them all -- even CED!), so I have no complaints. Looks terrific to me.
     
  9. Lromero1396

    Lromero1396 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2012
    Messages:
    640
    Likes Received:
    33
    I'm not saying it would have looked any better from TT. Whether I own the disc or not is beside the point; the release has not been furnished with a proper image harvest and restoration.
     
  10. FoxyMulder

    FoxyMulder 映画ファン

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2009
    Messages:
    5,236
    Likes Received:
    1,612
    Location:
    Scotland
    Real Name:
    Malcolm
    If Sony/Columbia held the rights to it then i think it would have looked its very best.
     
  11. Richard Gallagher

    Richard Gallagher Well-Known Member
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2001
    Messages:
    3,622
    Likes Received:
    489
    Location:
    Fishkill, NY
    Real Name:
    Rich Gallagher
  12. Josh Steinberg

    Josh Steinberg Premium
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Jun 10, 2003
    Messages:
    4,180
    Likes Received:
    1,894
    Real Name:
    Josh Steinberg
    Wouldn't surprise me. When I started doing DVD/BD work at PBS Video, all I had to do QC on was a 13" monitor and headphones! (I left in 2009...just after they bit the bullet and added a single 30" monitor for additional QC.) Granted, PBS isn't Paramount or any of the other major studios, but it doesn't surprise me. When I visited other small distributors as well as authoring houses around that time period, I didn't see anything larger than 40" or 50" being used, and most monitors were a lot smaller.
     
  13. Tony Bensley

    Tony Bensley Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2013
    Messages:
    2,144
    Likes Received:
    996
    Location:
    North Bay, ON; Canada
    Real Name:
    Anthony
    bubuwest and Flashgear like this.

Share This Page