1. Guest,
    If you need help getting to know Xenforo, please see our guide here. If you have feedback or questions, please post those here.
    Dismiss Notice

A Few Words About A few words about...™ 2001: A Space Odyssey -- in BD & HD

Discussion in 'Blu-ray and UHD' started by Robert Harris, Oct 24, 2007.

  1. Robert Harris

    Robert Harris Archivist
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 1999
    Messages:
    8,622
    Likes Received:
    4,030
    Real Name:
    Robert Harris
    I was there when it opened, as an NYU film school senior.
    There are a short list of films that of which it can be said...
    "There was cinema before and after..."
    Mr. Kubrick's 2001 is one of them. In your face. In spades!
    To have the opportunity to view it (without drugs) in 70mm on a huge screen, is one of these life altering experiences.
    Is it on par with watching the Stars and Stripes being raised at Iwo Jima?
    Doubtful.
    But in the world of cinema, it doesn't get much better.
    And neither could this high definition disc, for which I set aside the opening game of the World Series this evening to preview. The game actually went on without me.
    This is one of those "few words" that is short, sweet and to the point.
    The original 65mm negative of 2001 has been over-loved during the decades.
    Over-printed, with dupes scattered about throughout, it comes to to this new DVD in nearly transparent condition. My assumption is that this transfer is derived from a 35mm interpositive produced several years ago, and it has yielded a superb master.
    Warner Bros. has done a beautiful job with Mr. Kubrick's magnum opus.
    Image and audio quality are superb. And while we are viewing what is essentially the soft cover version of a film which was designed to be seen on a huge screen with audio blaring...
    We finally have a version of 2001 on home video of which I believe Mr. Kubrick would be proud.
    And then he would change the conversation to baseball, and the World Series.
    2001 is a beautifully stuck disc from Warner, which I screened on Blu-Ray. I have no doubt that the HD version will be equally as pleasing.
    On the short list of the most important classic releases of 2007...
    2001 may well be at the top.
    Just beautiful. Hats off to the archival crew at Warner Bros.
    2001: A Space Odyssey is Unhesitatingly Extremely Highly Recommended!
    RAH
     
    aPhil likes this.
  2. Stephen_J_H

    Stephen_J_H All Things Film Junkie
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,543
    Likes Received:
    396
    Location:
    North of the 49th
    Real Name:
    Stephen J. Hill
    My resolve not to buy into any HD format yet continues to erode. Thanks, RAH.
     
  3. Dennis Nicholls

    Dennis Nicholls Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 1998
    Messages:
    8,547
    Likes Received:
    244
    Location:
    Boise, ID
    Real Name:
    Dennis
    I first saw 2001 in its original release as a 15 year old student in the "Century 21" theater in San Jose, which was a purpose-built theater for showing Cinerama films. The Century 21 is a concrete dome theater with fancy sound systems and a projection room custom built for 70mm and Cinerama projections.

    I was disappointed that 2001 wasn't a 3-strip Cinerama film. But everything else about the film was a delight.

    After owning 2001 in CED, WS VHS, non-anamorphic DVD, anamorphic DVD, and finally HD DVD, the HD culmination is what we have been waiting for all these years.

    A pedant will claim that the HD DVD will make more obvious the studio set vs. the background photos in the Dawn of Man sequence. There are many other portions that highlight the limitations of the 1968 special effect. But what the heck did you expect? This is as good as it's going to get.

    Having said all this, there are things in the transfer that Bob Harris may wish to comment upon. When Dave brings the pod up to the emergency airlock, the white lighting of the ship is overlaid by pinkish light from the pod's lights. Is this correct? Kubrick had a trademark of having 'halos' around lighting effects so I'm not sure.
     
  4. Tim Glover

    Tim Glover Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 1999
    Messages:
    7,982
    Likes Received:
    244
    Location:
    Monroe, LA
    Real Name:
    Tim Glover
    Loved your review RAH. One of your best. [​IMG]
     
  5. Seppo

    Seppo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2004
    Messages:
    201
    Likes Received:
    4
    Real Name:
    Seppo
    The review gets me even more annoyed by the fact that DVD Pacific have yet to dispatch my copy of the film on BD. [​IMG]
     
  6. Robert Harris

    Robert Harris Archivist
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 1999
    Messages:
    8,622
    Likes Received:
    4,030
    Real Name:
    Robert Harris
    Deleted as duplicate
     
  7. Michel_Hafner

    Michel_Hafner Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2002
    Messages:
    952
    Likes Received:
    102
    I heard that the HD transfer is based on a >= 4K scan from a 65mm element. Does someone know anything definitive?
     
  8. Robert Harris

    Robert Harris Archivist
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 1999
    Messages:
    8,622
    Likes Received:
    4,030
    Real Name:
    Robert Harris
     
  9. Gary Seven

    Gary Seven Grand Poo Pah

    Joined:
    Aug 15, 2003
    Messages:
    1,564
    Likes Received:
    126
    Location:
    Lake Worth, Florida
    Real Name:
    Gaston
    I cannot help but smile at this statement as I've had the opportunity to experience it both ways on the big screen way back in the day.
    Nice to get the enthusiastic RAH stamp of approval on one of my favorite science fiction movies. Great review.
    And thank you Warner.
     
  10. Michel_Hafner

    Michel_Hafner Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2002
    Messages:
    952
    Likes Received:
    102
  11. Robert Harris

    Robert Harris Archivist
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 1999
    Messages:
    8,622
    Likes Received:
    4,030
    Real Name:
    Robert Harris
    According to AVS...
    "The 65mm neg was scanned within the last few years and was described as being in "perfect" condition to me by the guys that scanned it so there should be a pretty marvelous HD master available."
    Not when I wound through it. Overused, dupes, tape...
    The word "perfect" obviously has numerous meanings. I have yet to learn all of them.
    RAH
     
  12. OliverK

    OliverK Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2000
    Messages:
    2,219
    Likes Received:
    509
    A 6k scan is nice to have but more important is that there is no hideous EE added to the picture like with Battle of the Bulge.
    Everybody raves about the detail on that one but the EE completely destroys the illusion of a cinematic presentation. I take it 2001 is not affected by it judging by RAH's statements here - good !
     
  13. Michel_Hafner

    Michel_Hafner Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2002
    Messages:
    952
    Likes Received:
    102
    Do you think the HD-DVD could come from this 6K scan? (Have not seen the disc yet.)
     
  14. Robert Harris

    Robert Harris Archivist
    Supporter

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 1999
    Messages:
    8,622
    Likes Received:
    4,030
    Real Name:
    Robert Harris
    A 6k scan, to the best of my knowledge, is not the way that Warner has been generally handling their 65s. Unless one is seeking to create additional digital preservation elements, it adds little toward the purpose of an HD release which may be harvested from a 35mm element.
    Large format scans are horrifically expensive.
    Whether they did a digital scan in this case is anyone's guess.
    RAH
     
  15. Ken_McAlinden

    Ken_McAlinden Well-Known Member
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2001
    Messages:
    6,160
    Likes Received:
    61
    Location:
    Livonia, MI USA
    Real Name:
    Kenneth McAlinden
    The latest SD version (not the subject of this thread, I know) still has noticeable edge halos, especially evident on the horizon shots during the "Dawn of Man" sequence and just about everywhere during the space station/white corridor scenes early on in the picture. They looked about the same as they did in the previous 16:9 enhancded DVD and the HDNET broadcast.

    I'm hoping to see the Blu-Ray this evening and will report back. If nothing else, the PCM 5.1 should be ear candy.

    Regards,
     
  16. Ken_McAlinden

    Ken_McAlinden Well-Known Member
    Reviewer

    Joined:
    Feb 20, 2001
    Messages:
    6,160
    Likes Received:
    61
    Location:
    Livonia, MI USA
    Real Name:
    Kenneth McAlinden
    ...Well, the edge halos were there, but they were lower in intensity and less bothersome on the BRD then on the SD release. The ones on the SD release more or less jumped out at me while I had to look a bit more actively to notice them on the HD. I will now spend the evening trying to train myself to stop looking actively for them so I can enjoy the film. [​IMG] The PCM 5.1 track is as nice as I hoped it would be.
    Regards,
     
  17. BrettB

    BrettB Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2001
    Messages:
    3,024
    Likes Received:
    0
    Looks like the higher resolution is revealing the matte paintings at the beignning. A few shots are very ugly.
     
  18. Douglas Monce

    Douglas Monce Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Nov 16, 2006
    Messages:
    5,514
    Likes Received:
    12
    They aren't matte paintings. They are large format still photographs that are front projected on to a screen that is coated with 3M reflective material. I think what we are seeing is an uneven application of that 3M material.
    Doug
     
  19. BrettB

    BrettB Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2001
    Messages:
    3,024
    Likes Received:
    0
    Interesting. Thanks for the info. At first I didn't know what was going on. It sort of looked like a dirty lens or something.

    The 20-30 mins I sampled after that were pretty damned impressive.
     
  20. Carlo Medina

    Carlo Medina Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 1997
    Messages:
    10,340
    Likes Received:
    562
    Talk about an Odyssey...try finding one of these in a B&M store! [​IMG]
    The Best Buy store locater says that my local one has some in stock. I'm going to take a long lunch in a bit to try and track a copy down since Amazon is still listing this as 2-5 weeks and I'm not the waiting type...
     

Share This Page