Fox Lorber Region 0 NTSC "L'Enfer" vs. MK2 - Region 2 - PAL
The Fox/Lorber transfer is very poor, but it is slightly sharper with noticeable grain. The colors are way off on one of these DVD and I would guess it is with Fox. The Mk2 is smoother and anamorphic but slightly hazy in spots. There is artifacting (digital pixilation) issues on both discs and surprising for a film only 8 years old. I assume that somewhere out there is a very tight print of this fine film. The ratio of these discs is not the same. My guess would be that the MK2 is slightly off as the characters look a little elongated to me. Neither version is worth recommending as is, but i you want to buy now, then the Mk2 is your only choice. The Extras on the MK2 are good, but don't have English sub-titles. Hopefully a sterling print will be forthcoming from some other production company.
See the side by side captures here:
http://www.compare.dvdbeaver.com/
Cheers,
The Fox/Lorber transfer is very poor, but it is slightly sharper with noticeable grain. The colors are way off on one of these DVD and I would guess it is with Fox. The Mk2 is smoother and anamorphic but slightly hazy in spots. There is artifacting (digital pixilation) issues on both discs and surprising for a film only 8 years old. I assume that somewhere out there is a very tight print of this fine film. The ratio of these discs is not the same. My guess would be that the MK2 is slightly off as the characters look a little elongated to me. Neither version is worth recommending as is, but i you want to buy now, then the Mk2 is your only choice. The Extras on the MK2 are good, but don't have English sub-titles. Hopefully a sterling print will be forthcoming from some other production company.
See the side by side captures here:
http://www.compare.dvdbeaver.com/
Cheers,




