Re: The official BLADE RUNNER SE thread. (Check out page 8 and #790.)
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Doug Cummings
In short, the set is clearly geared towards fanboys more than film buffs (not that there isn't crossover). It's amazing for what it is, but I would hardly call it the "greatest special edition ever produced." That's quite a claim! (But then , if you're only thinking of movies like LOTR and Superman, you may be right.)
|
Well, to be fair, I did say that it "may be", not that it was... it's far too early to say, I generally like to have things sit on my shelf for a few months before I try to say for sure, and I also did say that I hadn't been able to finish looking through it all. I think more than anything it depends on what you consider important in a special edition; some people look for and expect different things than others, and there's absolutely nothing wrong with that.
I'm curious -- and I say this as a fellow film fan, not to be antagonizing in any way -- what would you consider to be the greatest special edition out there?
Personally, I don't believe a set needs to include critical analysis to be considered great; I often think that that sort of discussion belongs in a separate volume, and certainly there's been plenty written on Blade Runner before this release, and I'm sure plenty yet to be written, providing the type of critical analysis that you were looking for. That's not to say that I don't appreciate that material; I definitely do, but for me, that's not the kind of thing that needs to be in the set for it to be a success.
Also, I'm not really big on art galleries on DVDs (just a preference), or booklets included, etc. I would go so far as to say that the briefcase packaging, while nice and pretty, has absolutely no effect on my feelings about the release. If I could have purchased a five disc set without the briefcase, I would have happily done so; but I couldn't, and it wasn't really worth complaining about.
Also, and this probably is its own conversation right here, I think Blade Runner is too new of a film for it to be necessary to include a critical commentary or scholarly report as part of the package. The Final Cut in and of itself is a new thing, and being that Ridley Scott feels its finally the film as he wanted it, I think it's worth letting it sit around for a few years before writing about it extensively in an academic sense, to allow it to have some context. Don't get me wrong, I do love academic and scholarly commentaries when done well (one of my favorites is Roger Ebert's on "Citizen Kane"), but I'm not sure this film requires something like that just yet.
All in all, this special edition delivered everything I could have wanted for a 25 year old film with a sordid history: the original versions of the film looking better than ever, the director's cut that gave it new life, the workprint cut that led to the creation of the director's cut, and the newly tweaked final cut. It includes an extensive behind-the-scenes documentary that (from the half hour or so that I watched) is as good as I could have hoped for. It includes deleted scenes, not just carelessly thrown together, but assembled in a way that makes them watchable, that really allows a viewer to get a sense of what might have been, as well as being very entertaining on their own. It includes extra bonus material about the filmmakers and the writer that inspired the film. Multiple commentary tracks from the filmmakers, allowing you to hear from the director, the writers, and the technicians, as well as a commentary on the workprint that (so far--I've only heard the first half hour or so) has done a great job of pointing out what makes that version so unique. It includes the trailers from the different releases, giving historical perspective to how it was originally marketed to an audience. In short, it has everything that I'd want for this film. That's why I chose to say that I think it's one of the great special editions, and worth consideration as the greatest. This all with the caveat that I haven't fully explored the entire set: maybe I'll listen to the three commentaries on the first disc and think they suck, maybe I'll think the rest of Dangerous Days is boring, maybe I'll come to the conclusion that there's tons of quantity but not as much quality. I highly doubt it, but it's always possible.
(Truth be told, there probably is no one single special edition that is the single greatest ever; there have been too many quality releases of films of all genres, with bonus features of all kinds, so varied in nature that it wouldn't be really fair, or useful, to hail one as being better than all the rest. That was definitely a bit of hyperbole on my part, but what can I say other than that I feel like a kid in a candy shop?)
The real point I'm trying to make, and probably could have done a better job of doing, is that for me at least, this is *the* release of 2007, and one of the best special editions ever done. They opened up the vaults and gave us just about everything they could have. I might not be as impressed by that in and of itself for some other films, but considering all of the legal issues that have surrounded this film since the beginning, it's practically a miracle just to have anything, and I definitely take that into account in my opinion of the set. (I think the most recent James Bond releases had the potential to be among the great special editions, for instance, but that it ends up being an "almost, but not quite" affair ... had those features been provided for Blade Runner, I would have been ecstatic, but since James Bond hasn't had the sort of legal nightmare that Blade Runner has had, they had no excuse not to have done better.) Also, I like that with the briefcase set, Warner is essentially saying, "This has everything, and you won't need to hold on to your earlier edition of the film, or buy something else that's already been out, to have everything." If you want everything for LOTR, you have to buy what, three different versions now? That counts for a lot with me. I would have bought the Gold version of Twin Peaks to replace my Season 1 and 2 sets, but since the Gold box doesn't include everything and I'd still have to retain my other sets, to me it's not as definitive as it could have been and thus not deserving of the same praise I'm giving to Blade Runner (though it is still a very high quality set).
Like I said, it's all a matter of taste and preference, and for me, this Blade Runner briefcase set gives me everything I could have ever hoped for and much more. (OK, Vangelis chose not to be involved and the music is very important to the film, but is it fair for me to knock the set for that when it comes with so much? I don't think so. Frankly, it was stupid and shortsighted for Vangelis not to be interested in appearing on it, but I'm not going to hold that against Charlie or Warners or the set.)
Anyway... I'd say at the least, any set that has me writing about it for a couple hours instead of doing work must have some merits
