Hi Ben, just thought I would share a little of what I think. By the way, I like them both. Just like Aliens(actually Alien) for the dark "feel" throughout.
| In Predator, we see what the special forces can do when they raid that enemy hideout, surprising and annihilating a numerically superior force. |
Then we see the single Predator wipe them out. The Colonial Marines escape(well, a handfull do) from 100 or so "aliens." Is the Predator more dangerous than an "alien?" That debate could go on for years....
| In Aliens we never see the marines doing anything but getting their *sses kicked. Wouldn't a scene of them on a typical, successful "bug hunt" have added to their mystique? |
We are told at the beginning that the Colonial Marines are very tough. And their "macho" attitude(their banter in the ship, apparent lack of fear of their mission, etc...) futher attests to them being very good soldiers. Why show them getting wiped out quickly? This shows us exactly how bad the "aliens" are. The "aliens" are the ones that had their mystique added to.
| Third, Predator has cooler weapons. You'd think that a movie about space marines battling deadly aliens would be a good opportunity to showcase some cool weaponry. But the coolest weapons in Aliens, the unmanned sentry cannons, weren't even in the theatrical version. Other than that there were the marines' standard machine guns that 1) they were told not to use because they would risk blowing up the place, 2) used anyway, 3) didn't do much good at keeping the aliens at bay, 4) didn't look any more impressive than a modern-day M-16, and 5) didn't blow up the colony's reactor like they said would happen when they used them. The most effective weapon in the movie was Hicks' 12-guage shotgun. |
Well, *I* think this goes along with the fact that the movie was made to be semi-realistic. You mention "modern day M-16," and I think that is correct. Vasquez and Drake also carry a futuristic version of the M-60. I would rather see these plausible versions of future assault weapons, rather than something not feasable. Also Vasquez and Drake did indeed rupture the reactor. This is why they had to get the other drop ship and leave...also why the complex blew up.
On the other hand, the only weapon I found cool in Predator was his cannon. Very cool sighting system. Arnold and his gang used real weapons(M-16/M203,MP5's, etc), which I doubt would do anymore damage than the Marines in Alien. A portable gatling gun is nice(high rate of fire, low accuracy), but I think the Sentry's can get close.
| Predator, on the other hand, has truly awesome weapons and demonstrations of firepower. The scene where the soldiers fire into the jungle at their unseen foe, Mac wielding a gatling gun, is an action-movie classic. And the Predator's shoulder-mounted cannon and triple-laser sight are hard to forget. |
Indeed an impressive sight. How would the Aliens weapons have looked substituted in that scene? Sentry cannons, up-graded "M-16s", and up-graded "M-60s." Most likely would have exceeded what the older weapons in Predator did. Bad comparison, but you used it as the "demonstration of firepower."
This is one of those things that has no answer. It is all in the mind of the viewer, and what the viewer prefers. BUT, I do think Newt should have had her head punctured by a "alien."
