It seems rather dishonest to advertise something (and contract to) as a "high speed unlimited plan" when it's obviously no such thing for some of their customers. Sure the network can get congested, but as the article points out, Verizon only throttles temporarily, and only by the amount needed, While AT&T does it for the rest of the billing cycle, and for as little as 1.5 to 2.3 gB of usage. This is another example of why I've never signed to a contract, and why I'm VERY happy AT&T didn't buy Tmobile. They're up front about their 5 gB limit (which I've never approached).
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/t-customers-surprised-unlimited-data-limit-080906861.html
It seems rather dishonest to advertise something (and contract to) as a "high speed unlimited plan" when it's obviously no such thing for some of their customers. Sure the network can get congested, but as the article points out, Verizon only throttles temporarily, and only by the amount needed, While AT&T does it for the rest of the billing cycle, and for as little as 1.5 to 2.3 gB of usage. This is another example of why I've never signed to a contract, and why I'm VERY happy AT&T didn't buy Tmobile. They're up front about their 5 gB limit (which I've never approached).
It seems rather dishonest to advertise something (and contract to) as a "high speed unlimited plan" when it's obviously no such thing for some of their customers. Sure the network can get congested, but as the article points out, Verizon only throttles temporarily, and only by the amount needed, While AT&T does it for the rest of the billing cycle, and for as little as 1.5 to 2.3 gB of usage. This is another example of why I've never signed to a contract, and why I'm VERY happy AT&T didn't buy Tmobile. They're up front about their 5 gB limit (which I've never approached).









