Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › Shame - quick review
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Shame - quick review

post #1 of 4
Thread Starter 
I suppose the following paragraphs contains spoilers, but the film itself should be seen from viscerally experiencing it, as any discussion of the plot doesn't lend itself to the feelings the film evokes from viewing it. It's somewhat similar to "Requiem For A Dream", knowing the plot synopsis has very little impact from actually seeing the film itself.

The title of the film derives from literally the sense of shame that envelops Brandon (Michael Fassbender), who otherwise looks to be a normal, well-groomed, professional man working in New York City, with the means to live alone in an apartment, but has an addiction to sex, in all manners, be it online webcams/chatrooms, in-person trolling in bars and subways, porn, etc.

Actual one-on-one emotional connections with women eludes Brandon. Living on his own, his addiction occupies most of his waking moments, but his carefree sister Sissy (Carey Mulligan) shows up for an open-ended stay, and basically cramps his style to the point where her presence does the same as putting a mirror to Brandon's growing shame as his addiction continues to consume him, to the point of very selfish levels when it comes to feeding his urges with all manners of sexual interludes (quite a few graphic scenes are in the film) at the expense of living in the moment and putting his needs ahead of anything else.

Fassbender's character study of Brandon is very brave and strong work. His needs for sex overwhelms any sense of intimacy he might develop with anyone, including friends or family. It's quite a strong performance of a tortured soul caught in the throes of unbridled need for sexual activity and release. Even running through the streets of NYC and its release of endorphins don't seem to be enough for Brandon's appetite. Heh.

It's NC-17 for good reason, and if you aren't comfortable with the subject matter, you'd be better off avoiding this film, otherwise, it's a compelling look at something that probably goes on with some of your own friends, co-workers, acquaintances, and you just have no idea what goes through their own mindspace, but this film will give you an unflinching look at such addictive traits.

The direction and camerawork and framing in the film heightens the sense loneliness and isolation that Brandon feels at times when he is unable to act upon his urges.

I give it 3 stars, or a grade of B.
post #2 of 4

This is one of the films that ended up in my "Top 10 of 2011" list.   I found Fassbender's performance just phenomenal how well he grabs hold of that character and just becomes that. 


Yes, it's NC-17, with good reason; but those who are expecting a Cinemax-Late-Night romp are going to be sorely disappointed.   This is a film that really gets to the root of a man who uses people as a means to fill a void in his life; he finds himself stuck in a downward patter of his personal shame over his acts and his inability to escape the use of other people for temporary relief of his condition - but never one that lasts very long.

 

The performances here are all very good.   I will say this: there is a sequence that does involve the running that Patrick eludes to that will turn some of the audience off; but I found it almost 2001-esque in it's ability to communicate the urgency, depth and struggle that his life had become by only using his facial and body language to really communicate his inner thoughts.   Fassbender managed to make his character come off as someone really struggling with serious inner turmoil over what direction his whole life was stuck in.

 

This wasn't my "favorite" film of 2011, but it's in my Top10, easily.

 

A-

post #3 of 4
star.gifstar.gifstar.gifhalf.gif

The performances were certainly extremely good but it seems Mulligan is being overlooked as all of the praise is going to Fassbender.

With that said, I thought the visual style of the film was great and I'm glad that the director didn't try to be cute by adding unneeded style and silly and obstructive camera shots. I really enjoyed how he let many scenes just drag on so that the actors could really develop in front of our eyes.

I did have a couple problems and that included the start of the film with the full frontal nudity. I'm in no way, shape or form against nudity and if anyone has followed the TRACK threads then you know I watch some very graphic stuff. However, it really did seem that the nudity early on was just there to add some shock value. I adore Mulligan but even her nude scene really didn't seem to be needed other than for shock. I mean, why didn't she cover up or the brother look away?


MAJOR SPOILER
Warning: Spoiler! (Click to show)
I also didn't care for the ending or should I say endings. I guess many films like this must end with the "viewer will take from it what they want" moments but when he finds his sister was just a punch in your gut. Even though you knew it was coming it was still a major shock and it was so hurting and sad. I think the film would have been better had it ended with this scene fading to white.
post #4 of 4
Excellent performances from Fassbender and Mulligan, but I thought the film itself was extremely overrated. It would have made a better short, I think, because after awhile it starts to feel redundant. I also didn't like the multiple endings stacked one on top of the other.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Movies (Theatrical)
Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › Shame - quick review