Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Blu-ray, DVD, Streaming Video and Digital Downloads › Blu-ray › A Few Words About By Robert Harris › A few words about...™ Fright Night (1985) -- in Blu-ray
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

A few words about...™ Fright Night (1985) -- in Blu-ray - Page 4

post #91 of 100
Well my copy arrived Thursday morning but I just finished watching it a short while ago.

Short but sweet, I won't use words like "perfect" but it did in fact look damn good for a film of it's vintage. I know some have complained of the poorly placed chapter stops but what annoyed me most were the sound effects as you navigated the menu.

In the end I'm glad I own the BD, not terribly enthused about the price for a featureless release (I could swallow $25 a bit easier though) but it is what it is. If you're only looking for a quality presentation of the film itself, "Fright Night" certainly delivers.

Gear mentioned in this thread:

post #92 of 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Allred View Post

Well my copy arrived Thursday morning but I just finished watching it a short while ago.
Short but sweet, I won't use words like "perfect" but it did in fact look damn good for a film of it's vintage. I know some have complained of the poorly placed chapter stops but what annoyed me most were the sound effects as you navigated the menu.
In the end I'm glad I own the BD, not terribly enthused about the price for a featureless release (I could swallow $25 a bit easier though) but it is what it is. If you're only looking for a quality presentation of the film itself, "Fright Night" certainly delivers.

Ultimately isn't that really what we are all looking for? The bonus features are just that, a bonus. Don't get my wrong I love extra features, but for me its about the film.

I know that we have all become a little spoiled with DVD's under $20, and blu-ray dropping into that price range. But if its a film that I REALLY want, I don't mind paying more to get it. And that is really the customer that these limited editions are focusing on. By now the studios know through market research, which titles are going to sell enough to make it worth while to release and which aren't. This model, not unlike the Warner Archive, is a way to get those films out that just won't get a release any other way.

Doug
post #93 of 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Douglas Monce View Post

Ultimately isn't that really what we are all looking for? The bonus features are just that, a bonus. Don't get my wrong I love extra features, but for me its about the film.
I know that we have all become a little spoiled with DVD's under $20, and blu-ray dropping into that price range. But if its a film that I REALLY want, I don't mind paying more to get it. And that is really the customer that these limited editions are focusing on. By now the studios know through market research, which titles are going to sell enough to make it worth while to release and which aren't. This model, not unlike the Warner Archive, is a way to get those films out that just won't get a release any other way.
Doug

Ultimately? Well I can't speak for everyone, just myself but no. If I'm a super fan of a movie, I'd like to see as many features as possible in addition to a quality presentation of the film itself and for a premium price, I don't think that's asking for too much.

Now I don't know why Sony would demand that TT could not produce any bonus features for this release (of course this is assuming they even would/could have if given the opportunity) as it seems they themselves have little to no interest in the title at all. Very strange stipulation to add into a licensing agreement, I mean why would they care?
post #94 of 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Allred View Post

Ultimately? Well I can't speak for everyone, just myself but no. If I'm a super fan of a movie, I'd like to see as many features as possible in addition to a quality presentation of the film itself and for a premium price, I don't think that's asking for too much.
Now I don't know why Sony would demand that TT could not produce any bonus features for this release (of course this is assuming they even would/could have if given the opportunity) as it seems they themselves have little to no interest in the title at all. Very strange stipulation to add into a licensing agreement, I mean why would they care?

Read the interview with Twilight Time's Nick Redman. His company doesn't have the funding to produce their own extras, and the studios, I suspect for legal reasons, for the most part aren't licensing them out.

In the interview he states that The Big Heat is a title that is in the works. That is a film that I would gladly pay $35 for, bonus features or no.

Doug
post #95 of 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Douglas Monce View Post

Read the interview with Twilight Time's Nick Redman. His company doesn't have the funding to produce their own extras, and the studios, I suspect for legal reasons, for the most part aren't licensing them out.
In the interview he states that The Big Heat is a title that is in the works. That is a film that I would gladly pay $35 for, bonus features or no.
Doug

Well then there you have it, TT couldn't. Fair enough though I DO wonder if something could've been worked out to acquire those two commentary tracks for the disc. Technically TT didn't make them or pay to have them made so perhaps wouldn't have been an issue with Sony? Just thinking out loud here.
post #96 of 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Allred View Post

Well then there you have it, TT couldn't. Fair enough though I DO wonder if something could've been worked out to acquire those two commentary tracks for the disc. Technically TT didn't make them or pay to have them made so perhaps wouldn't have been an issue with Sony? Just thinking out loud here.

It really depends on the agreements Sony has with those people who created and participated in any bonus features that may exist. It maybe that they have to pay those people all over again in order to license the extras out to a 3rd party company. I don't know that that is always the case, but knowing how things work with soundtracks, and how often times musicians have to be paid their salery in full a second time to release a soundtrack album, it wouldn't surprise me.

Doug
post #97 of 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Douglas Monce View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Allred View Post

Well then there you have it, TT couldn't. Fair enough though I DO wonder if something could've been worked out to acquire those two commentary tracks for the disc. Technically TT didn't make them or pay to have them made so perhaps wouldn't have been an issue with Sony? Just thinking out loud here.

It really depends on the agreements Sony has with those people who created and participated in any bonus features that may exist. It maybe that they have to pay those people all over again in order to license the extras out to a 3rd party company. I don't know that that is always the case, but knowing how things work with soundtracks, and how often times musicians have to be paid their salery in full a second time to release a soundtrack album, it wouldn't surprise me.

Doug


Based on the interview, if the studios are willing to license the special features (including commentaries), Twilight Time will make every effort to include them.  Like Doug said, for various reasons the studios don't always allow them to be licensed with the film.  Twilight Time does make an effort to try to get any existing features.
 

 

post #98 of 100
It seems the on-line commentaries for FRIGHT NIGHT had nothing to do with the studio at all. If you listen to them you don't even hear any of the film sounds, just the participants speaking, so the studio would have no ownership of those commentaries at all, rather the website that commissioned and posted them would have the rights.

Vincent
post #99 of 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent_P View Post

It seems the on-line commentaries for FRIGHT NIGHT had nothing to do with the studio at all. If you listen to them you don't even hear any of the film sounds, just the participants speaking, so the studio would have no ownership of those commentaries at all, rather the website that commissioned and posted them would have the rights.
Vincent

Right but monetary issues would still remain though.
post #100 of 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vincent_P View Post

It seems the on-line commentaries for FRIGHT NIGHT had nothing to do with the studio at all. If you listen to them you don't even hear any of the film sounds, just the participants speaking, so the studio would have no ownership of those commentaries at all, rather the website that commissioned and posted them would have the rights.
Vincent

That is exactly the model that Rifftrax uses, and the reason they are able to do commentaries on popular movies like Batman and Star Wars, which they sell for between $2 and $3.

Doug
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home

Gear mentioned in this thread:

Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Blu-ray, DVD, Streaming Video and Digital Downloads › Blu-ray › A Few Words About By Robert Harris › A few words about...™ Fright Night (1985) -- in Blu-ray