New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

The First Nudie Musical - Bluray Review

post #1 of 4
Thread Starter 

In the mid 1970's, a group got together to skewer the porn industry of the era. With a mainstream film. The end result is:

 

nudie.jpg

 

 

The First Nudie Musical

 

 

Important Note: First and foremost, please be aware that this is a film about the production of a pornographic feature, or, as it was called in the era, a ‘nudie,’ and as such has a significant quantity of (mostly casual, non-erotic) nudity, language, and the portrayal of ‘non-sexual’ sexual scenes.

Kritzerland releases a Paramount Pictures film, The First Nudie Musical. The film is written and co-directed by Bruce Kimmel, with the other co-director being Mark Haggard. It stars Stephen Nathan (Harry Schechter,) Cindy Williams (Rosie,) and Bruce Kimmel (John Smithee.)


This Bluray disc has the feature framed at 1.77:1, and runs approximately 94 minutes, and has been divided into 28 chapters. The audio is a DTS-HD Master Audio monaural track.

 

On loading the disc, there is an FBI slate, a Kritzerland slate, a standard disclaimer, and then the menu.

 

The package is a fairly standard Bluray case, with an insert. The outside of the single-fold is program-related advertising and images; the inside is fairly detailed essay “about the transfer” by the director.

 

This disc has not been captioned or subtitled for the deaf or hearing impaired.

 

The feature has been rated R by the MPAA, most likely for frequent nudity and ‘adult themes,’ and some language. This disc seems to have an official street date of November 5, 2011, and has an MSRP of $29.98, but is already available and shipping directly from Kritzerland’s website.

The Feature — star.gifstar.gifstar.gif½
The First Nudie Musical follows Harry Schechter (Nathan,) the up and coming producer, heir to Schechter Studios, provided he can keep possession of the studio, and not have it turned into a shopping center. When challenged by the finance people, he manages to sell them on the notion of a ‘nudie film’ with a gimmick: not cheerleaders, stewardesses, or even particularly “licking,” but rather, a musical nudie. In the grand tradition of musical theater, the opening expositional scene breaks out into a full-scale musical number, complete with (naked) dancing girls. The money people agree, but promptly saddle him with three impossible conditions: the same budget (nonexistent,) a tight schedule (two weeks or so,) and, just in case it’s not enough, one of the guys’ nephew, John Smithee (Kimmel,) who has never been involved in film in his short life, has been appointed director. With his secretary and love-interest Rosie (Williams,) we then follow the trials and tribulations of no-budget porn production, with a fairly happy, campy perspective. And lots and lots of donuts.


It is an entertaining cross-time romp; seventies styles and sensibilities, crossing with the low-budget porn sector, crossed with the styles and traditions out of Depression era Broadway, with plenty of diversions to fill out a nicely shaped satire of the film industry.

The Picture — star.gifstar.gifstar.gif
The saga of finding film elements, the transfer, and so on, is interestingly recorded in the insert in the case. This covers some of the saga of making the disc, and also has a discussion on the aspect ratio. In the 1970’s, this film was presented in 1.85:1; the director always felt it “too tight,” and had the frame opened up to the full HD frame. This being a reasoned decision by the director and restoration team, and being a relatively slight adjustment (rather than, say, taking a 2.4:1 ’scope film down to 1.77:1,) I do not have any particular issue, other than to say, for the purists who recall, yes, it is different.


The transfer is— pretty good, all things being considered; the surviving negative sounds like it should not have survived. (Clarification: this is not meant to be an editorial comment, but more rather a reflection of the fact that the color reversal internegative (CRI) not only had not been lost or destroyed, but that it had not faded.) Film grain is visible throughout — with a comment, again in the insert, about its preservation. The colors are surprisingly good and, for the most part, natural.


In a good player and a good projector, the picture was quite good.

The Sound — star.gifstar.gifstar.gif
This is, obviously, a low-budget feature from the mid 1970’s, and as such, has a mono soundtrack. They went to some efforts to make a clean and clear copy for this disc, and it is preserved, warts and all, in a DTS-HD Master Audio mono track. It played well, and was intelligible through either a conventional home theater system or a decent pair of headphones.


Of note, the soundtrack was recorded in stereo, and stereo elements are used in the accompanying documentary, From Dollars to Donuts.

The Extras — star.gifstar.gifstar.gifstar.gif
This disc includes quite a lot of “extras,” including the following:


• Feature Commentaries. First by the cast (Bruce Kimmel, Cindy Williams, and Stephen Nathan,) and a second with Bruce Kimmel and Nick Redman (directed the documentary.) The cast commentary is especially entertaining.


From Dollars to Donuts: An Undressing of The First Nudie Musical, a documentary by Bruce Kimmel and Nick Redman. Standard definition, 4:3, 54½ minutes, stereo. There is also a commentary track for this documentary by Bruce Kimmel, Nick Redman, and Michael Rosendale.


• A deleted scene, 2:47, HD, 1.77:1, mono.


• A deleted musical number, 4:58, recovered from a bad BetaMAX tape, 4:3, mono. Alternate audio track includes a commentary track, talking about why it was deleted, as well as some of the things that they were proud of in the scene.


• A deleted musical number that was never filmed. Audio only. 1:37.


• A costume test reel, about 4½ minutes, silent, black and white, HD.


• An early trailer, the soundtrack lost. 2:41, HD.


• The theatrical trailer, with sound. 2:48, HD.


• A Photo Gallery. With lots of stills of promotional photos, reviews, posters, one-sheets, and more.


• A radio spot. 30 seconds, audio only.


Some of these, especially the commentaries, may have been ported from the previous DVD release.

In The End — star.gifstar.gifstar.gif
Before I get to the wrap-up, I need to take a moment to make a few comments about the technical operation of the disc. The disc navigation is slow, and as one explores the disc, all of the menu and navigational access is painfully slow. Even on a good, fast player, the start-up was painfully slow. While the feature is divided into chapters, the documentary program (just shy of an hour,) is presented as a single chapter. Choosing alternate audio programs (commentary tracks) for either the feature or the documentary is done from the main menuing system, and at least on one player of mine, could not be changed ‘on the fly.’ Another thing that I am perhaps more sensitive to from my day-job, rather than my personal need, is that none of the material on this disc appears to be captioned or subtitled.


The film itself is quite entertaining. The picture and sound are remarkable for the source elements of the era. There is a fairly interesting depth to the supplemental features, and the cast commentary is fun to listen to. The disc programming and operation, however, feels clumsy.


This is a remarkable restoration project of a quirky little film that unexpectedly turned out to have some staying power. Maybe camp; maybe cult — but the film is great fun. Especially if you have any background or love in film-making or American musical theater.


In spite of it’s operational lumps, recommended.

 

Please note another related thread, A Few Words About by Robert Harris.

 

 


 


Edited by Leo Kerr - 10/26/11 at 6:51pm
post #2 of 4
I have to ask, regarding this comment in the review:

On an inexpensive player on a less than ideal monitor, the picture was, in a word, poor. Much to my surprise, the second viewing in a good player and a good projector, the picture was perfectly acceptable. I need to track down if it was the player or the monitor, or the combination that was the weak point on the first viewing.

Would you not have expected the film -- any film, actually -- to look poor played on an inexpensive player on a less than ideal monitor? And why start to review it that way if you have better equipment at your disposal?

I appreciate your candor, and I applaud any efforts you make toward discerning the 'cause' of the less-than-optimal first viewing. I hope you can use your very best equipment on all future review assignments.
post #3 of 4
Thread Starter 

Please note a few things; someone else pointed out how with my phrasing, some of the comments could be misinterpreted. There have been some edits throughout.

 

As for the question above, it's quite simple: normally, I do a first viewing on "the good setup," and reserve the "less good one" for making detailed notes about features, extras, play order of logos, and so on. When I did the first viewing, it was on the "b set," because the "a set" was already in use. In the past, there have been some issues -- mostly fairly minor differences -- between the displays. I've not tracked down what might be the aspect that made the second display... not be happy. It is, however, the second time that a disc that has conflicted with the display. In any case, every disc I review gets a full viewing on the "a set."

 

Leo Kerr

 

 

 

 

 

post #4 of 4

I have the original DVD release which was somewhat a disappointment with all the scratches, fading, splices etc but I had never seen the film before but knew of it. 

 

I ordered the Blu Ray with the soundtrack CD and a couple of other CDs involving Bruce Kimmel who is Kritzerland and have had e-mail correspondence with him. I got my package at the beginning of the week which was rather quick service from LA and good to get things before the release date or a review when I live so far away. 

 

The disc is above my expectations. The notes, which I also read partially elsewhere, are frightening when you read that a lab sold off copies of this film and other elements to a film dealer. I thought copyright governed this as a no-no and material, unclaimed, is destroyed.I guess all considered it has worked for the best outcome. Bruce has worked with a DVD reviewer e-mail correspondent of mine.

 

There is no trailer with visual only. But there is a reel of costumes tests of which the location or existence of an audio track is unknown.

 

A member of the main cast is a woman called Diana Canova(nee Diana Rivero) in a Hispanic-accented part as Juanita. I took a lot and then checked my suspicions and sure enough she is the daughter of the Republic hillbilly, Judy Canova(currently playing in the Lady in Red featured number in WAC's In Caliente(1935) where she somewhat scares the crap out of Edward Everett Horton when she first opens her mouth in his ear). This Canova, apparently lives in Connecticut as of now. 

 

Ron Howard(Happy Days, Richie) has an uncredited part in an audition scene early in the film. Cindy Williams is assistant to the producer. 

 

Bruce Kimmel has produced a CD release of the London Stage Cast of Camelot from EMI original tapes. I got with the package. He has produced recordings with Helen Reddy(aged 70 on Oct 25 and a hypnotist in Sydney/Australia, her home country) and British singer Petula Clark.

 

The First Nudie Musical is a fun film of its time and worth a look and there are some funny lines and scenes in the film.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Official HTF Blu-ray Reviews