I don't think Julia overreacted. Zoe's reaction upon seeing Julia watching her basically said it all. Caught in the act, as it were. That's not to say J/J can't still get the baby, but at the very least it's going to be heart wrenching for everyone no matter which way it goes now that Zoe and her child have bonded.
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
Featured Reviews
-
Hal Ashby’s Harold and Maude, a dark comedy with poignant underpinnings, was a film much misunderstood in its day. Reviled for its February-December love affair (much older woman, very young...
-
Man on a Ledge plummets onto Blu-ray this week with an edition that presents the picture and sound as well as possible, along with a minimum of special features. The movie itself is hard to...
-
The most infamously unsuccessful movie at the box-office thus far in 2012 (though Battleship and Dark Shadows may give it some competition), Andrew Stanton’s John Carter mixes elements of...
-
What can I say? I love 3D! From the moment I began watching 3D content in my home I quickly discovered that I needed more content. I suspect that those of you just purchasing...
-
Smokey and the Bandit drives onto Blu-ray in a nice edition that can really take the viewer back to 1977 for 90 minutes of sheer moviemaking fun. The Blu-ray comes with the same HD transfer...
Parenthood - Season 3 thread - Page 8
- Greg_S_H
- Location: North Central Texas
- online
- Joined: May 2001
- Posts: 14,242
- Select All Posts By This User

Maybe I'm not familiar enough with that whole type of situation, but did Julia overreact? I know it wouldn't be a great idea for a mother about to give up her baby to interact with the baby but did Julia majorly jump to conclusions there? Who knows, maybe it wasn't even the right baby...

You know what would have been awesome?
Julia: "Zoe! What are you doing, girl?"
Zoe: "I'm speed-dating!"

(look here if you don't get it) - http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hh8hS8uSoJs
OK. More time to think, so here are my thoughts this morning:
We don't think about it as sexual harassment, and some will roll there eyes when I point it out, but what happened there is textbook sexual harassment. Amber was willing, consenting. So was the candidate. Legally, that doesn't matter, he was her superior.. her boss.. and under the law that's an issue. But like I said before, the people it's a real issue for are the other interns. It creates what is called a "hostile sexual environment". While we could say "hey, this is borderline" yep, that's true. Maybe they wouldn't win in a criminal court with the argument the fact that a girl was promoted through sex wasn't harassment by creating the image that they could sleep their way to the top. But it would sure make a hellacious scandal for a political campaign, if it came out "oh, he's sleeping with a 19 year old intern" would not be a good way to win over votes.
In regards to Julia, I have disliked the storyline for a while, and while it's convenient to say "look at how much good she did for her.." I don't know if I really view it that way. When she revealed that she hadn't even told her mother and sister, you realize that while Julia provided her shelter from a storm, she also allowed her to hide out from family and others, the people who whether she gave up the baby or kept it will be her longterm support. Joel had said "once she has the kid, we will have to detwist our lives" (or something like that), and he was right, Zoe would have to find her way in the world. And giving up a child would be something where family level support would be important. The fact that she hid out away from them wasn't necessarily a favor that Julia did her. I had thought this the moment the show had her move in, basically: you've made her entirely dependent on you.. this cannot end well."
The Sarah/Amber storyline was baffling "oh well! They consent! Let her make her own mistakes!" I about had a jaw drop.. how is did Sarah go from an potential playwright to someone this foolish? Even putting her daughter's need to make her own mistakes aside, I was also surprised that Kristina's response wasn't "uh, because it would be a serious scandal, would destroy this campaign, and she'll be snickered at by EVERY female employee here if this were ever known?!?" And Sarah is so tone deaf she sat in the office basically yelling about it *boggle*
The problem with the Jasmine storyline is that it was totally unearned. Ok, so we've spent time with Crosby + Cello player, with Crosby enjoying his new home as the head of the Luncheonette, and while a lot of people roll there eyes at how annoying Jasmine can be, her relationship with the doctor was sensible; he was a good person with means that was by all accounts good with her kid, that she had chemistry with, and that relationship was moving forward. I had thought the best thing for all involved was that they were moving on with their lives, and the choices they were making weren't actually bad ones.
So, now the Cello player and the pediatrician are tossed in one night at a camping event "let's get married!" which is preposterous .. it's like pressing the giant reset button on the whole season of movement on them. It's not just pressing the reset button, it's also one of those spur of the moment crazy things that is just..
I guess my whole thought for the episode was: UGH
- Greg_S_H
- Location: North Central Texas
- online
- Joined: May 2001
- Posts: 14,242
- Select All Posts By This User
- Mike Frezon
-
- Location: Rensselaer, NY
- online
- Joined: October 2001
- Posts: 24,146
- Select All Posts By This User
Jasmine (explaining how her upcoming nuptials with Crosby came about): We went on this camping trip and I realized how much I loved this man here and no matter what happened, I want to spend the rest of my life with him.
When the Parenthood writers wrote that line, didn't they see how inane the entire storyline had become?!?
We (the viewing audience) deserve better than that.
I kinda enjoyed Adam & Crosby's tussle before the opening theme, though...even though Crosby is being his typical immature self.
The wedding was laughably bad considering all that was setup about jasmines family beforehand.
- Adam Lenhardt
- Location: Albany, NY
- online
- Joined: February 2001
- Posts: 12,211
- Select All Posts By This User
Interesting choice with Sarah and Mark, considering Jason Katims knew Jason Ritter wouldn't be available because he cast him on another of his shows. The ending in Mark's apartment was the right ending. This just drags out the inevitable.
I will remain grateful for the Drew losing his virginity scene, though. I kept waiting for the show to pull the TV trope of having someone walk in on them, but nope, they let it be perfect. Lots of teenagers have absolutely miserable first times. But some don't, and we don't get to see those on TV very often. Drew and Amy are careful, shy, cautious people. It makes sense that they'd have waited until they were ready, and it makes sense that their patience would be rewarded. Whether the sex was good or bad is irrelevant, because these were two young people who made a decision to share something intimate with each other, and that shared experience made their bond even tighter. It rang true to me in a way only one other scene tonight did.
That was the scene where Zoe stopped by, and apologized, and thanked Julia. Very little was said, and so much was conveyed. I'm still not sold on the storyline or a lot of the build up to that point. But Erika Christensen and Rosa Salazar are terrific actresses, and they really brought it in their scenes together the last couple episodes.
During the final scene, though, I was wondering: where the hell is Sydney?
- Mike Frezon
-
- Location: Rensselaer, NY
- online
- Joined: October 2001
- Posts: 24,146
- Select All Posts By This User
It looked late at night. I assumed she was asleep.
- Adam Lenhardt
- Location: Albany, NY
- online
- Joined: February 2001
- Posts: 12,211
- Select All Posts By This User
Jasmine's explanation (as mentioned above). Her smirking during the ceremony, Her family as a non-story (although her brother's toast was pretty good).
The whole time-compression thing - all these momentous events within a three-day period.
Up until this episode, I thought the Bob Little/Amber story was realistic (despite how some felt it was distasteful). Monica's part in this - her hotel break-in - was bad. This episode try to bring it back to realism, but rang false for me. As for all them still working together (without awkwardness) - not gonna happen. I would have found it more realistic if Amber quit and started dating him.
Although the Drew/Amy scene was great, and they didn't have anyone walk in on them (yes, I too, was expecting that). I was just too distracted by the fact that they decided their first time would be so close to 55 potential witnesses.
What was with Hattie's outfit? It was a wedding - shouldn't she have had a prettier outfit? And if the sweater was supposed to indicate it was cold, how come she was the only one affected.
Did not like the 'grand gesture' of the torn up napkin. Why is it on TV, people never sit down and actually talk about different options.
The hand-off of the boy at the end was strange - no paperwork? no medical history? No advance warning that it would be a older boy, instead of a baby? (with all the home preparation / supply buying that might be necessary).
While I saw the Sarah/Mark scene eventually happening (the first one), why was it done right before the wedding? And then her acceptance of his proposal at the wedding - don't her reasons for ending things still apply?
Things I did like:
Loved Max's line about 'getting a consequence'
Liked the brother's fight (although, it would have been more realistic if they had gone outside first, and then possibly be 'discovered' fighting on the lawn).
Liked the drunk best-man.
David
After I originally posted this, I've had some additional thoughts. Given the way the last few episodes have gone, we are lucky they didn't include this scene (sorry, not really a script-writer, but you'll get my drift)
{Drew and Amy return to the reception and are met by Sarah}
Sarah: "Are you guys ok? You look a little sweaty?"
Drew: 'We're ok Mom."
Sarah: "Wait a minute - did you you two just have sex? Hey everybody, come here. Drew and Amy just had sex!'
{the whole Braverman clan surround the three}
Zeke: "Way to go, my boy!"
Monica: "Did you use protection?
{all the Bravermans look at Amy} "one of us, one of us, one of us"
Edited by David Weicker - 2/29/12 at 1:16pm
- Greg_S_H
- Location: North Central Texas
- online
- Joined: May 2001
- Posts: 14,242
- Select All Posts By This User
Katims probably wants Mark and Sarah together, and is banking on not being renewed. If it is renewed, and they come back with, "Oh, he needs to have kids and I can't give that to him" . . . lame. They could have just ended it where they did. But, if it wasn't for the loss of Ritter, I don't mind the two of them ending up together.
I thought it was kind of rude how Haddie said, "I'm *not* worried about Cornell." Like it never even entered her mind the hell it's going to put on the family, especially without the buyout deal. But I'll allow that I just don't like Haddie.
Would they really do a late-night adoption like some clandestine Cold War information drop?
"The hamster is out of his wheel."
"He's running down the hall in his hamster sphere."
"Those are the correct code words. Before you even look at this kid, I want your verbal agreement."
"You got it."
"Surprise! He's 9-years-old!"
I've never been in the adoption world, but none of this seemed plausible.
For a moment, I figured Billy was Billy Riggins, but I can't think of any reason he'd have spent time in California. Plus, I don't think Riggins was this much of a jerk.
I agree with most that's been said already. At best the episode felt rushed. Maybe Zeke should have had a medical scare and been rushed to the hospital the same night as the wedding. If you're going to cram crap in, you might as well do it right.
My "shell of it's former self" comment doesn't look so out there now, does it? 
- Mike Frezon
-
- Location: Rensselaer, NY
- online
- Joined: October 2001
- Posts: 24,146
- Select All Posts By This User
It never did, Scott. Unfortunately, I've been saying as much since Season 2.
- DaveF
- Location: Rochester, NY
- online
- Joined: March 2001
- Posts: 10,420
- Reviews: 2
- Select All Posts By This User
Parenthood is one of two show that completely arrest me. I can't watch a whole episode of Nikita or Two Broke Girls without my iPhone in hand. But parenthood ... I love it.
I've read the critiques here. Partly , especially after BSG and Lost, I've come to accept tv shows aren't books or movies. They aren't crafted to perfection and then released fully realized. They are written and produced on the fly. Storylines, characters, motivations appear and vanish. (i miss alex and hot receptionist) I won't defend Patenthood, but I accept it as a cost, a universal constant of TV physics, for such an amazing and large ensemble.
Other critiques...
Jasmine and joe were "sensible"? What about J and C is sensible? I don't like the choices of these people, but I believe and enjoy the story of these characters. Crosby carries a torch for the love that rejected him? That he fills the void with other women? That's not a ruduculous notion.
Haddie and Cornell...I went to an expensive private college. Had no idea of my parents finance. No idea about the realities of moving & having two mortgages for a year. She made lots of sense to me

(My wife having paid her own way on scholarship, with patents that didn't help their kids with college, thinks its nonsense to pay for a Cornell. )
I agree on Bob Little. Idiot. He's going to ruin his career for tweeting photos of his junk in a year.
Was annoyed at Kristina for coming down on Amber. She should have quit bobs campaign for him foolishly risking sexual harassment of her niece.
I didnt understand any of the "next logical step is a baby"!!??!? With Sarah and Mark. I thought marriage was the next step?!?! Resolved, finally.
It's had it's ups and downs but I love this show. The music, characters, stories, production quality. What else is there like this? With this sincerity, heart?
I lost Hellcats. I don't want to lose parenthood

- DaveF
- Location: Rochester, NY
- online
- Joined: March 2001
- Posts: 10,420
- Reviews: 2
- Select All Posts By This User

- Mike Frezon
-
- Location: Rensselaer, NY
- online
- Joined: October 2001
- Posts: 24,146
- Select All Posts By This User
And we missed ya, Dave! 
- DaveF
- Location: Rochester, NY
- online
- Joined: March 2001
- Posts: 10,420
- Reviews: 2
- Select All Posts By This User
Moving really screws up the TV watching routine :) But I knew it was important, so I dedicated my self to the watching of Parenthood and got 'er done this week :)
It is entertaining reading two months of comments knowing what the "future" holds, regarding the hopes, predictions, and "they better not"'s :)
I never understood the Jasmine / Crosby relationship from the start. I posted in previous threads that the relationship just did not make sense. Here is a woman who you had a passing relationship with that couldn’t have been all that serious if she was able to have a baby and raise him for years without you knowing and after learning about the child you suddenly have feeling for and want to wed.
Seriously does anyone really believe that would happen in real life?
They neat tie up of the other story lines.
Really I’m on the fence as to whether or not I want this to even come back next season.
- Adam Lenhardt
- Location: Albany, NY
- online
- Joined: February 2001
- Posts: 12,211
- Select All Posts By This User
- Parenthood - Season 3 thread
Recent Discussions
- › Aspect Ratio Research 4 minutes ago
- › Is CBS Paramount Going To Continue With Accelerated TV Show Releases? 8 minutes ago
- › While we wait for A few words about...™ Lawrence of Arabia -- in... 9 minutes ago
- › Lionsgate MOD Coming 13 minutes ago
- › MGM Press Release: BOND 50 (Blu-ray) 21 minutes ago
- › Experts Please Help, Receiver 46 minutes ago
- › Movie soundtracks 54 minutes ago
- › What are some options for good inexpensive rear speakers? 1 hour, 3 minutes ago
- › Green Acres? - Not a bang but a whimper 1 hour, 5 minutes ago
- › USHE Press Release: E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial 1 hour, 12 minutes ago
Recent Reviews
- › Harold and Maude (The Criterion Collection) [Blu-ray] by MattH.
- › TouchSquid Universal Remote Control Tablet TS781 by dannydonqui
- › Man on a Ledge [Blu-ray] by Kevin EK
- › The Woman in Black (+ UltraViolet Digital Copy) [Blu-ray] by Richard Gallagher
- › John Carter (Four-Disc Combo: Blu-ray 3D/Blu-ray/DVD + Digital Copy) by MattH.
- › Journey 2: The Mysterious Island (Blu-ray 3D / Blu-ray / DVD /... by Ronald Epstein
- › Smokey and the Bandit [Blu-ray + DVD + Digital Copy]... by Kevin EK
- › Summer with Monika (The Criterion Collection) [Blu-ray] by MattH.
- › The Jungle Bunch: The Movie by Kevin EK
- › Chronicle (Two-Disc Blu-ray/DVD Combo +Digital Copy) by MattH.
New Articles
- › Harman Kardon Introduces a New Sound Bar... by nickvalluri
- › TruGreen by brand46
- › HTF Oscar Chat Prize List by Adam Gregorich
- › HTF AWARDS 2011 by Ronald Epstein
- › 2012 Home Theater Forum Meet Information by Ronald Epstein
- › HTF Official Blu Ray Review Archive Part 2 by Ronald Epstein
- › Robert Fowkes, HTF Moderator, 1942-2011 by Ronald Epstein
- › Blu-ray Previously Released Listing: #-D by Robert Crawford
- › Blu-ray Previously Released Listing: E-I by Robert Crawford
- › Blu-ray Previously Released Listing: J-P by Robert Crawford
About Home Theater Forum | Join the Community | HTF Chat | HTF Events | Advertise
© 2012 Home Theater Forum is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map







