New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

X-Men: First Class Blu-ray Review

post #1 of 26
Thread Starter 

Matthew Vaughn and his crew of filmmakers have done a smashing job of providing a credible and involving backstory for the mutants we know and love in X-Men: First Class. Giving us a sobering, humane look at the beginnings of the relationships between the characters so familiar to international filmgoers through the X-Men movies, the film has also cleverly tied its fictional origin story to a riveting moment in world history turning this rousingly into a piece of historical comic book fiction that’s both entertaining and moving. In terms of quality and talent, this ranks right up there with the first two movies in the franchise.

 

xmen.jpg

 

X-Men: First Class (Blu-ray + Digital Copy)
Directed by Matthew Vaughn

Studio: 20th Century Fox
Year: 2011

Aspect Ratio: 2.35:1   1080p   AVC codec
Running Time: 132 minutes
Rating: PG-13
Audio: DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1 English; Dolby Digital 5.1 French, Spanish
Subtitles: SDH, Spanish

Region: A

MSRP: $ 39.99


Release Date: September 9, 2011

Review Date: September 9, 2011

 

 

The Film

4/5

 

After killing his mother in a concentration camp in Poland in 1944, Sebastian Shaw (Kevin Bacon) has made an enemy for life of Erik Lensherr (Bill Milner as a boy, Michael Fassbender as an adult). The mutant boy grows into a embittered man who feels he’s alone in the world with his special powers that can control metal, so he’s shocked when he first meets the wealthy and privileged Charles Xavier (James McAvoy) with his powerful mind reading and controlling abilities and his adopted sister Raven (Jennifer Lawrence) who can morph into the visage of anyone she has seen. It’s 1962, and Cold War tensions between America and the Soviets have reached a fever pitch. CIA operative Moira MacTaggert (Rose Byrne) feels the mutants can serve some useful purpose in global affairs, but the remainder of the federal government personnel’s feelings run from mistrustful to downright disgusted. A few other mutants have been gathered together including Alex Summers/Havok (Lucas Till), Darwin/Armando Munoz (Edi Gathegi), and Hank/Beast (Nicholas Hoult). But Sebastian Shaw has his own plans. He wants to start a mutant army and have the world’s two superpowers destroy each other so there will be nothing any longer for the mutants to fear. Xavier not only wants to stop him but feels if the mutants can show the government what valuable powers the mutants possess and how helpful they can be in the upcoming conflict, he thinks they’ll be more readily accepted into the fabric of mainstream America.

 

By setting the origin story of the mutants in the middle of the well-known Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962, co-writer/director Matthew Vaughn has a ready-made nail-biter backdrop against which to play out his story, And what a rousing story it is (co-written by original X-Men director Bryan Singer) with a genuinely heartfelt tale of friendships gone sour between Xavier and Lensherr and investigations into the wonderful powers of same familiar and unfamiliar mutants. In fact, one of the film’s most entertaining sequences involves our watching the young mutants training to hone their skills as they make mistakes, cheer each other on, and genuinely bond through their uniquely special gifts. This also sets up the really moving last act of the film as certain characters choose one side over the other and some of the characters morph into roles we’re more familiar with from viewing the previous movies. It goes without saying that the special effects are dazzling, but much of their use seems much more practical this time out and less simply for a bombastic show and lots of spectacular noise. Though the film runs over two hours, Vaughn’s slick direction speeds things along, and the pace never drags. It’s also remarkable that he’s able to cram so many characters so well realized into a thickly-plotted story and manage to keep things amazingly clear and concise.

 

Because the original films used two of the world’s most talented mature actors to play Professor X and Magneto (Patrick Stewart, Ian McKellen), it makes perfect sense to cast two of the world’s most talented young actors to play their younger counterparts. Michael Fassbender exudes hyper-intense feelings from the moment he appears before the camera, and his tortured Erik Lensherr is the film’s most magnetic performance (no pun intended). James McAvoy’s Charles Xavier seems altogether right as the privileged, open-hearted character whose brotherly affection for Erik ends in hurtful estrangement. Kevin Bacon makes for a wonderfully evil villain with January Jones as his blankly icy right hand (wo)man equally effective. Jennifer Lawrence’s Raven is a believable younger version of the character played in the first films by Rebecca Romijn capturing the quiet shame of her gift that even the love of Charles and Erik can’t quite erase. Look quickly and you’ll see a couple of cameos from original X-Men actors that are very enjoyable indeed.

 

 

Video Quality

5/5

 

The film’s Panavision aspect ratio of 2.35:1 is presented in 1080p using the AVC codec. It’s a reference quality transfer with stunning clarity filled with mounds of detail in skin, clothing textures, and surrounding terrain. Color is deeply saturated without ever going fluorescent, and flesh tones are natural and appealing. Black levels are rich and deep, and there are no compression artifacts to mar the viewing experience. The film has been divided into 32 chapters.

 

 

Audio Quality

5/5

 

The DTS-HD Master Audio 5.1 sound mix is also of reference quality. Dialogue has been well recorded and placed in the center channel. Otherwise, the remaining channels are alive with almost constant ambient sounds with frequent pans across and through the soundstage, and explosive use of the LFE channel. Henry Jackman’s bombastic music score also contains great range through the entire soundstage and the subwoofer.

 

 

Special Features

4/5

 

All of the bonus featurettes are presented in 1080p.

 

“X” Marks the Spot is an interactive viewing mode which the user may choose upon first playing the film. With it, the film allows the viewer to segue into eight featurettes which extend information about a specific scene in the movie. One may also choose to view the featurettes apart from the film, so they’re also available from the bonus features menu. They can be played individually or in one 20-minute grouping. They deal with the individual introductions of Erik, Charles, and Raven, Hugh Jackman’s cameo, the sound design, the climactic roket sequence, and the design of the credit sequence.

 

The disc offers an isolated score track (in DTS-HD MA) which can be chosen from the bonus features menu.

 

“Cerebro Mutant Tracker” is another interactive bonus feature in which the viewer may choose individual mutants who have been shown in the five X-Men films and watch montages of scenes featuring those mutants from all of the films.

 

“Children of the Atom” is an expansive making-of documentary dealing with many of the aspects of the movie including the writing of the script, the casting, the special effects, the music, the costumes, and the make-up. The eight featurettes may be watched individually or in one 69 ¾-minute grouping.

 

There are thirteen deleted/extended scenes which may be viewed individually or in one 14 ¼-minute bunch.

 

The disc is BD-Live Ready. Two bonuses offered here and not on the disc are the theatrical trailer (2 minutes) and “Dogfight” (2 ¼ minutes) which shows the aerial preparations for the flying stunt people used in a spectacular flying sequence late in the movie.

 

The second disc in the set is the digital copy of the movie with enclosed instructions for installation on Mac and PC devices.

 

Also enclosed in the package are instructions for accessing free X-Men digital comics (ten in all).

 

 

In Conclusion

4.5/5 (not an average)

 

Returning to the quality and humanity of the first two X-Men features, X-Men: First Class is an enjoyable and enlightening superhero film. Blu-ray offers reference picture and sound quality and a host of bonus features that fans of the movie will surely enjoy. Highly recommended!

 

 

 

Matt Hough

Charlotte, NC

Gear mentioned in this thread:

post #2 of 26
Day one purchase for me. Loved it in the theater and have been waiting for it on blu ever since. Will buy it from my local BB on the way home from work. Thanks for the thorough review!
post #3 of 26

Well this review settles it. I'm going to go order this. :)

post #4 of 26
Yeah, I really loved this in the theater. I'm there.
post #5 of 26

I loved it too and think it's the best of the 5 X-Men films to date. My only minor gripe is with the makeup design on Beast in this movie. The look they went with on Kelsey Grammar in X3 fits the character better IMO, but it's a minor complaint. Picked up a copy for $20 at K-Mart on my way home and I'm looking forward to blasting it this evening.

post #6 of 26
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpippel View Post

I loved it too and think it's the best of the 5 X-Men films to date. My only minor gripe is with the makeup design on Beast in this movie. The look they went with on Kelsey Grammar in X3 fits the character better IMO, but it's a minor complaint. Picked up a copy for $20 at K-Mart on my way home and I'm looking forward to blasting it this evening.


 

You'll enjoy one of the bonus featurettes which explains why they went for a different make-up design for the Beast. It was the director's mandate! He didn't like Kelsey's make-up design.
 

 

post #7 of 26

Thanks for the reveiw Matt.  I am looking forward to this one too.

 

Here is the trailer:

 

Here is a 3D projection they ran on the side of a building in Hollywood last night to promote the Blu-ray release:

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

post #8 of 26

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattH. View Post

You'll enjoy one of the bonus featurettes which explains why they went for a different make-up design for the Beast. It was the director's mandate! He didn't like Kelsey's make-up design.
 


Thanks for the heads-up Matt. I'll definitely be interested in the why of it.

 

post #9 of 26
The only thing that bugged me about this film was the ending, as it completely disregarded the continuity as established in the '20 years ago' flashback in Last Stand and at the end of Wolverine. Unless, of course, Xavier regained the use of his legs and made it up with Magneto in time for both of those, then fell out again and became wheelchair-bound again.tongue.gif

Other than that, though. a damn fine film.smile.gif
post #10 of 26
The term 'Polish concentration camp' is incorrect. The Nazi Germans established the 'concentration camps' on occupied Polish soil. They were not Polish as implied by the statement. Please correct the statement so that is not picked up and propagated throughout the internet.
post #11 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonathan Kaye View Post

The only thing that bugged me about this film was the ending, as it completely disregarded the continuity as established in the '20 years ago' flashback in Last Stand and at the end of Wolverine. Unless, of course, Xavier regained the use of his legs and made it up with Magneto in time for both of those, then fell out again and became wheelchair-bound again.tongue.gif

Other than that, though. a damn fine film.smile.gif

That's the exact reason I love the movie. Well, one of them. It goes out of its way to reference the first two films and firmly plant itself within their continuity, going as far as a shot-for-shot remake of the opening of X-MEN. At the same time, it also goes out of its way to completely ignore and disregard X-MEN: THE LAST STAND and X-MEN ORIGINS: WOLVERINE and pretend they didn't happen. Which I'm fine with, because they blow smile.gif

Beyond Professor X, lets not forget that Moira McTaggart would have had to move to Scotland and develop a thick accent (and become a doctor) by the time of THE LAST STAND smile.gif
Edited by MattAlbie60 - 9/12/11 at 4:53pm
post #12 of 26
Thread Starter 



 

Quote:
Originally Posted by KubaPrzed View Post

The term 'Polish concentration camp' is incorrect. The Nazi Germans established the 'concentration camps' on occupied Polish soil. They were not Polish as implied by the statement. Please correct the statement so that is not picked up and propagated throughout the internet.


Obviously no offense was meant. I have reworded the statement you found offensive.
 

 

post #13 of 26
To be fair...it doesn't really match up with the continuity of X1 & 2 either, albeit in more subtle ways. Prof. X claimed in the original movie that he and Magneto had known each other since they were 17, I think. Here, they clearly meet in their late 20s. Xavier also says Magneto helped him construct Cerebro...here Beast has already built the prototype, and Eric likely isn't around for the eventual construction of the final one. The big thing to me is that in the original film, Xavier was baffled he couldn't track Magneto, and was later surprised when it turned out to be the helmet blocking his telepathy. If this film were in-continuity, he'd have to be suffering from amnesia/dementia to have forgotten about the damn helmet!

The impression I get from the (excellent) making-of docs is that, if Singer had stayed on and directed it, it probably would've stayed more in-continuity with the other films. Once Matthew Vaughn joined up, though, he re-wrote the script and basically made it its own stand-alone adventure, with some winks toward what had come before. Which, to me, was fine. At the end of the day, the X-Men films have never had the greatest of internal consistency (Kitty Pride was played by three different actors of jarringly different ages across the original trilogy, for instance), so eventually you just kind of have to shrug and go with it. So this one works as a prequel, if you don't think about it too much...or it works well as a total reboot if you haven't seen/didn't care for the previous three X-films.

And as for 'Wolverine'...who gives a shit? smiley_wink.gif
post #14 of 26
Matt, thanks for making the change to the statement about the camps. The insertion of the word Nazi in front of the statement would clarify it further and leave no doubt to who built and ran the camps. I appreciate your taking action on this pervasive problem.
post #15 of 26

I don't think that anyone in the world has ANY doubt who it was that built and ran the concentration camps in WWII.

post #16 of 26

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by MattH. View Post

You'll enjoy one of the bonus featurettes which explains why they went for a different make-up design for the Beast. It was the director's mandate! He didn't like Kelsey's make-up design.
 


Well I watched the extras and just have to say WOW to Vaughn's decision on the Beast makeup. I've seen the look described elsewhere as "Teen Wolf Beast" and I can't think of a better way to put it. Fur? It was the director's one big mistake with the film IMO. This Beast just doesn't work for me. At all.

 
post #17 of 26

I am not a fan, at all, of any of the previous X-Men films and are among my least favorite of all comic book films. But this, this was good. We blind bought it due to the wife and kid really wanting too. I was not expecting to like it considering the bad taste in my mouth from the previous films but this was a breath of fresh air, very good and enjoyable film with much better casting than the previous films. The blu looks and sounds amazing!

post #18 of 26
dpippel said:
"I don't think that anyone in the world has ANY doubt who it was that built and ran the concentration camps in WWII."

I wish you were right. But it is unfortunately not true.
I have read that 30% of kids in the UK think that "Holocaust" is an Entertainment park. In Addition - 20% of Americans know the US was on the Allies side, but they think it was together with Germany, fighting against Russia. They mess up WWII with cold war. Young generation do not know who exactly Nazis were. There is not anymore automatic link between Nazis and German.

I think what KubaPrzed said is a very reasonable request. When it is "concentration camp in Poland" - it still may mean Poles set it up and ran. We should also take into account that in 1944 there was no Poland on the map, so the camp was not in Poland, but could be in " Germany occupied Poland".

I know it sounds a bit as a scholar discussion, but I would appreciate if Matt agreed to add German or Nazi, or "Nazi occupied Poland" just to make it all right.
post #19 of 26

It's a movie review.

post #20 of 26
I know that.
I am Polish and I do not think any movie review may make any part of my country's history distorted. I highly appreciated Matt removed "Polish" already.
I supported KubaPrzed's remark and I explained why I think he is right. That is all.
It is up to Matt to make it right, which I hope he will.
post #21 of 26

Matt's review is not distorting your country's history. I think you're being overly sensitive.

post #22 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by dpippel View Post

Matt's review is not distorting your country's history. I think you're being overly sensitive.



Sorry, but I'm forced to take a side on this one.  Mr. Przedzienkowski's request was proper.  There is so much dis and mis-information out there regarding who did or did not do what during WWII, that we need clarity at all times.  Far too many people have no idea what they're talking about.  The facts are simple.  It was the Nazi regime that built and operated camps, which BTW did exist, on Polish soil.  This was not the Polish people.

 

Clarity, clarity, clarity.  Please.  Matt had no problem making the correction.  

 

And, IMHO, Mr. Przedzienkowski is absolutely not being overly sensitive.

 

I've met far too many people, especially in my youth, who had numbers on their arms, and far too many people today who will argue that this never happened.

 

RAH

 

post #23 of 26

I didn't say that I thought his request was improper, just that he was being overly sensitive. In my opinion of course, which apparently differs from yours. This review covers a film that makes it quite clear who is operating the camp in question, and I'll end my comments here on that note.

post #24 of 26
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick H. View Post

Kitty Pride was played by three different actors of jarringly different ages across the original trilogy, for instance


How do you figure?  All three actors were born between 1985 and 1987.  Yes, that meant KP Actor 1 was 14, KP Actor 2 was 18 and KP Actor 2 was 19, but did the movies make any claims that the characters weren't supposed to age at all?  It's not like the first was 14 and the second was 20 and the third was 25...

 

post #25 of 26


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by dpippel View Post

I didn't say that I thought his request was improper, just that he was being overly sensitive. In my opinion of course, which apparently differs from yours. This review covers a film that makes it quite clear who is operating the camp in question, and I'll end my comments here on that note.

 

You said you're ending it, and I don't intend to continue this particular discussion in this thread.

 

I just wish to add that his remarks don't prove any overly sensitive state of mind to me. The subject is indeed still 'sensitive' here in Europe, and his points were not trivial nor could be felt as such, IMO.

 

 

Cees

 

 

 

post #26 of 26
Thank you - Robert Harris and Cees Alons!
I am very glad we shared the same view. I very much appreciate your help in getting this right.
I did not mean the say Matt is distorting Polish history, but I just do care about precise wording when talking about history. In fact, more people read blogs and on-line movie reviews than historical books. Thank you again for your support and have a great day!
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Official HTF Blu-ray Reviews

Gear mentioned in this thread: