Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Blu-ray, DVD, Streaming Video and Digital Downloads › Blu-ray › 3D Blu-ray › Additional 3-D Films from the Golden Age
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Additional 3-D Films from the Golden Age

post #1 of 54
Thread Starter 
Richard's excellent studio-by-studio breakdown of vintage 3-D product is a valuable tool. Please allow me to fill in some gaps. The following are the remaining titles from the Golden Age: 1952-1955

A DAY IN THE COUNTRY - Lippert short narrated by Joe Besser - 1953 - Preserved.

COLLEGE CAPERS - Lippert short with Dolores Fuller - 1953 - ditto

BANDIT ISLAND - Lippert short with Lon Chaney and Glenn Langan - 1953 - LOST. One side of the 3-D negative was cut for inclusion in the 1954 feature THE BIG CHASE.

ROBOT MONSTER - Astor - 1953 - Survives. Condition of elements unknown.

CAT WOMEN OF THE MOON - Astor - 1954 - ditto

HANNAH LEE - Jack Broder Productions - 1953 - ditto

BOO MOON - Paramount Casper cartoon, 1953 - Preserved

THE ADVENTURES OF SAM SPACE - Filmed by Volcano Productions in 1953, released as SPACE ATTACK in 1960 by 20th Century Fox - Preserved.

M.L. GUNZBERG PRESENTS THIRD DIMENSION - Arch Oboler - 1952 - Prologue to BWANA DEVIL - Preserved.

ROCKY MARCIANO VS. JERSEY JOE WALCOTT - United Artists boxing newsreel, 1953 - Preserved.

DOOM TOWN - 3-D Productions - Atomic bomb short - 1953 - Preserved.

MOTOR RHYTHM - RKO 1953 (originally NEW DIMENSIONS - 1940) Preserved.

STARDUST IN YOUR EYES - Al Zimbalist - 1953. Companion short to ROBOT MONSTER. Preserved.

LOVE FOR SALE - Dan Sonney Productions burlesque short - 1953 - Preserved.

I was founder of the 3-D Film Archive in 1991 and have been doing research and preservation work on the Golden Age material for over 25 years. While I don't have any information on the current status of elements at the various studios, I'll be happy to share any information or answer any questions that you may have.

Bob Furmanek
Vice President
3-D Film Preservation Fund
http://www.3dfilmpf.org/

700

700

700

700

700

700

700
post #2 of 54
Thanks for taking the time to assemble this list.
It's very useful.
Most of these that do survive, I've seen at your Expos.
The impact of your Expos on the industry-players in Los Angeles is still being felt, I think.
Edited by Richard--W - 9/2/11 at 12:22am
post #3 of 54

Great information and really fascinating to contemplate what might be assembled for home release one day.Thanks so much!

post #4 of 54
+1 to that - Some great information indeed.


The 3-D Film Preservation Fund (and Bob's many pioneering efforts starting many years before the creation of the Preservation Fund) have saved many Golden Age 3-D titles from being lost to the ages. It's a very safe bet to say all of this work, combined with the previous World 3-D Expos, caused many of the studios re-examine their 3-D assets. ..And also helped educate many to the fine stereoscopic cinematography and production values that most of these titles offered.


Bob, is there any one 3-D horror story that sticks out from a preservation / restoration standpoint?
post #5 of 54
Thread Starter 
Thank you for the nice words, it was truly a labor of love!

Horror stories? So far as something that was lost, or something that I worked on?
post #6 of 54
I was thinking something you had worked on.

On a sidenote: Your interviews (showing the polarized filters) used in the "Creature From the Black Lagoon" DVDs were far better than what was done with the DVD for "Dial M". In the Dial M extra features, as someone thought it was original shown with red & blue colored filters. "Say what.....??" :-)
Edited by GregK - 9/3/11 at 9:50am
post #7 of 54
Thread Starter 
Thanks, Greg! I was sick as a dog the day we did those interviews for the CREATURE set. I'm glad it didn't show!

Yes, I thought displaying the filters would make the point. I'm sorry to hear that the red/blue myth was repeated on the DIAL M set.

Another myth on DIAL M is that it never played in 3-D in 1954. Not true, I've documented two play dates. I know that's not many, but one was the world premiere.

There are several horror stories regarding restorations. The most tedious would have to be HANNAH LEE. Everything that could possibly be wrong happened with those prints with the worst sin being incorrect edge codes. Every 3-D feature of the 1950's had a set of numbers every 16 frames on the side of the print to indicate the side and footage point. For instance, L2549 would identify the left side, reel 2, 549 feet from the first frame. This was VERY useful if a print got damaged and the operator had to slug it with black film to keep it in sync. On HANNAH LEE, they not only got the numbers wrong between eyes, sometimes they marked left as right and visa versa. In that case, the only way to properly identify the reel was by eye, hunched over a light box comparing the parallax between prints with a magnifying loop. I had at least a dozen unidentified prints in my possession and still had trouble creating a complete left/right match.

After screening the results at Expo 1 in 2003, Bob Burns commented that I had spent more time on syncing the prints than they did making the movie. He was probably right!

Unfortunately, that's one film that will probably never see a full restoration. The current distributor has nearly 30 boxes of elements, mostly trims and separation masters. The only thing they could say for certain is they only have one camera negative. The copyright is in question and it's doubtful anybody would ever spend the money on a full blown preservation.
post #8 of 54

Bob, what's the status of Disney's Melody? I know a 2D version was included with the Fantasia Anthology in 2001, but do you know if both eyes are preserved?

post #9 of 54
Thread Starter 
Yes, MELODY is completely preserved in the Disney vaults. The same with WORKING FOR PEANUTS. I'm not sure about 3-D JAMBOREE. The new print we struck in 2006 was from a fading negative. I don't know if they've done preservation on that one.
post #10 of 54
Thread Starter 
Here is a rare photo of Lon Chaney from the lost 3-D short, BANDIT ISLAND. Released by Lippert in September 1953, it was available in both dual-strip Polaroid or single strip anaglyph.

700700

In 1954, most of the short was edited into the flat feature, THE BIG CHASE. We believe that one side of the original 3-D negative was cut and utilized for the feature. It has not been seen since its original release and no 3-D elements are known to exist.
Edited by Bob Furmanek - 9/4/11 at 1:07am
post #11 of 54
The Big Chase doesn't survive, either?
post #12 of 54
Thread Starter 
The flat feature survives and was released on DVD by VCI/Kit Parker Films.
post #13 of 54
What about Inferno from 1953, with Robert Ryan and Rhonda Fleming?
post #14 of 54
Thread Starter 
INFERNO is fully restored visually but the stereo audio is gone.
post #15 of 54
Will the 3-D films from the 1950's be released on Blu-ray 3D in the full-frame 1.33:1 aspect ratio?
post #16 of 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Furmanek View Post

Yes, MELODY is completely preserved in the Disney vaults. The same with WORKING FOR PEANUTS. I'm not sure about 3-D JAMBOREE. The new print we struck in 2006 was from a fading negative. I don't know if they've done preservation on that one.

Working for Peanuts was show in 3-D with another Disney 3-D film a few years ago. I don't remember any 3-D effects coming out of the screen.
post #17 of 54
Thread Starter 
Quote:
Originally Posted by RolandL View Post

Will the 3-D films from the 1950's be released on Blu-ray 3D in the full-frame 1.33:1 aspect ratio?

Of the 50 domestic "Golden Age" features, approximately 20 are photographed and intended for 1.37. The rest were all composed for widescreen, ranging in aspect ratios from 1.66 up to 2.1.
post #18 of 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Furmanek View Post


Of the 50 domestic "Golden Age" features, approximately 20 are photographed and intended for 1.37. The rest were all composed for widescreen, ranging in aspect ratios from 1.66 up to 2.1.

How were they shown at 3-D Expos? I saw Dial M for Murder in dual-projection 3-D at the NYC Film Forum and it looked like 1.33:1. I think these films look better in 3-D at the 1.33;1 ratio. I have House of Wax in 1.85: 1 and 1.33:1 on DVD and the 3-D looks a lot better in 1.33:1.
post #19 of 54
Thread Starter 
HOUSE OF WAX was not intended for widescreen so 1.37 is the correct ratio. DIAL M was intended for 1.85 and that is the way it should be seen.

Most studios switched to widescreen cinematography in April/May of 1953. However, the films were all protected for 1.37 and that's the way they've been (incorrectly) presented ever since.

Don't go by the way these films have been shown in revivals over the past 30 years. They've always been run 1.37 which is wrong.

We ran some titles widescreen at Expo 2, including TAZA, SON OF COCHISE, DIAL M FOR MURDER, KISS ME KATE and REVENGE OF THE CREATURE. We would have run more but didn't have the correct documentation.

This is not opinion. We have original, primary studio documentation and source materials to back up this information.

Bob Furmanek
3-D FILM PRESERVATION FUND
post #20 of 54
Bob pretty much nailed it - During this somewhat "murky" shift to widescreen, proper studio documentation and source materials are vital.

When widescreen first came into vogue, yes - there were a few studios who suggested showing a couple features "cropped" when they were never composed or intended to be shown in such a manner. "It Came From Outer Space" fits into this category, when someone at the studio decided it was fine to be matted for widescreen if a theater chose to do so. But this was clearly composed for the 1.37 Academy ratio, and is supported as such by studio documentation.

But these one or two exceptions aside, the studios were quick to formally adopt widescreen for future releases, and comprise a good number of the Golden Age 3-D features. These titles will have extra headroom at the top and bottom of the image, as they were intended and composed to be cropped for widescreen, and therefore have the best framing when viewed in their intended aspect ratio. I've seen most of the "shot for widescreen" Golden Age 3-D features in both full frame and in widescreen. The advantage of the intended widescreen ratio framing is clear, with tighter and better balanced shot compositions. Just as it is with standard 2-D material that has been composed for widescreen.

We all of course want to view these features in their original intended aspect ratio. Thankfully people like Bob Furmanek and Jack Theakston have spent a good deal of time researching exactly which 3-D titles were intended for widescreen during this transitional period.
post #21 of 54
Well said, GregK. I'm always impressed with the diligence of the 3-D Film Preservation Fund's research and the meticulous care they put into projection. A couple of years ago Jack Theakston posted on this forum a studio circular to exhibitors advising them on the correct aspect ratios and the "safe" aspect ratios for that studio's films. It was from 1953-54. The circular listed titles and the aspect ratios for each. Might have been Universal, but I don't recall, nor do I recall which thread Jack posted it in. It's here somewhere.
post #22 of 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard--W View Post

Well said, GregK. I'm always impressed with the diligence of the 3-D Film Preservation Fund's research and the meticulous care they put into projection. A couple of years ago Jack Theakston posted on this forum a studio circular to exhibitors advising them on the correct aspect ratios and the "safe" aspect ratios for that studio's films. It was from 1953-54. The circular listed titles and the aspect ratios for each. Might have been Universal, but I don't recall, nor do I recall which thread Jack posted it in. It's here somewhere.



The one I copied and saved was from Warners. It was great to see that films I've never seen correctly framed on disc like Calamity Jane had their stated aspect ratios there as plain as day. I wish those in charge of such things would refer to these notes when transferring the films to disc.

 

post #23 of 54
Could you retrieve that scan and post it here, Matt?
I'm just curious to see it.
Edited by Richard--W - 9/25/11 at 1:26pm
post #24 of 54
Thread Starter 
Thank you very much for the kind words. We're just trying to honor the intent of the craftsmen who made the films and have them look their very best. One point that is often overlooked is that the films were conceived and designed for 3-D. Watching them flat is not how they were meant to be seen. Hopefully the new HD Blu Ray format will allow these films to come back to life in true third-dimension.

4824fea9.jpg
Edited by Bob Furmanek - 9/25/11 at 11:33am
post #25 of 54
That's the one!
Thanks, Bob.
Edited by Richard--W - 9/25/11 at 1:15pm
post #26 of 54
Thread Starter 
You'll note that films in production prior to WB going all widescreen in May, 1953 are designated 1.66. Paramount was the first to recommend and implement that ratio for catalog titles on March 24, 1953.

The important point to remember is that most studios were experimenting and planning for some form of non-anamorphic widescreen in March. After the first test showings of CinemaScope at 20th Century Fox on March 18 to nearly 1000 industry executives and theater owners, the widescreen race was on.

The common mis-conception is that widescreen exhibition began with the September premiere of THE ROBE.

It did not.
post #27 of 54
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob Furmanek View Post

Thank you very much for the kind words. We're just trying to honor the intent of the craftsmen who made the films and have them look their very best. One point that is often overlooked is that the films were conceived and designed for 3-D. Watching them flat is not how they were meant to be seen. Hopefully the new HD Blu Ray format will allow these films to come back to life in true third-dimension.

4824fea9.jpg
 



Thanks for putting this back up for others to see, Bob. It's exactly what I was referring to.

 

post #28 of 54
Thread Starter 
My pleasure Matt, always happy to share!

Bob
post #29 of 54
Have you found a similar circular from one of the other studios, Bob?
post #30 of 54
Thread Starter 
Yes, I have widescreen documentation from all the studios covering the 1953-1956 period.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: 3D Blu-ray
Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Blu-ray, DVD, Streaming Video and Digital Downloads › Blu-ray › 3D Blu-ray › Additional 3-D Films from the Golden Age