New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Transformers 3

post #1 of 103
Thread Starter 

They had a 6PM showing at the Cinemark in Kansas City tonight (for those that know, near Antioch/I35).. let's just say.. I have walked out of very few films in my life, and I came damn close here.   It's noisy without purpose... there are HUGE explosions and events, but also what seems like long bursts of at best static that take over the screen.  I'm normally good with the big spectacular explosions, but I felt as though my ears needed a rest about 3/4 in.

 

The story never made very much sense, the action is disorienting.  It's better then the last one, I suppose.. but I can't imagine how it could be worse.  

 

I suppose it will sell tons of tickets. 

 

D+

post #2 of 103

Here's a glowing review:

 

http://www.hitfix.com/blogs/motion-captured/posts/review-transformers-dark-of-the-moon-wraps-up-with-the-best-of-the-franchise

 

I don't plan to see the film, but I saw that linked somewhere else.

post #3 of 103

Bay's Transformer movies are basically crap when it comes to some sort of coherent story, but he manages to make the films look visually exciting. I saw the trailer for the film in front of Super 8 and I have to admit that I'm tempted to go and see it at least once in 3D, just for the scenes of giant robot mayhem. Story wise, it couldn't be much worse than Battle: Los Angeles which was total shit.

post #4 of 103

Im gonna need something more from all these reviews than "best of the franchise" to make me go and see this because that really isn't a very high benchmark they are setting there - the first two were hardly any good.

Hopefully this will be Bay's last Transformers pic. Id be quite keen on seeing someone else give it a shot.

post #5 of 103
post #6 of 103
No way I'm paying to see another one of these films at the theater. The first one was just OK. The second one was MST3K bad. Robot testicles indeed.
post #7 of 103

I'm not paying to see it this time around either.  The cool factor is gone for me, and I enjoyed the first movie. 

post #8 of 103

http://www.empireonline.com/reviews/reviewcomplete.asp?FID=136209

 

That pretty much sums up what I thought it would be like

 

TF2 was so bad this just has to hit mediocre to be well regarded it seems.

post #9 of 103

Yeah the bottom of the barrel has been dug so deep by the last film that any attempt by DotM to be anything short of Citizen Kane would be considered not much of an improvement.

 

And seeing that Baysplosions lacks both the artistic talent and drive to make such a film thus we have this predicament.

post #10 of 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by mattCR View Post
 
 It's noisy without purpose... there are HUGE explosions and events, but also what seems like long bursts of at best static that take over the screen.  I'm normally good with the big spectacular explosions, but I felt as though my ears needed a rest about 3/4 in.
 

 

That's how I felt about the last two.

 

Pass.

post #11 of 103

Variety reports that the final battle takes up nearly an hour of screen time, a third of its 154min running time - -

 

 

Quote:
If the world needed another epic cinematic clash between Autobots and Decepticons (and that's a Megatron-sized if), it certainly gets one in "Transformers: Dark of the Moon." A considerably better modulated, more bearable experience than "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen," Michael Bay's latest gift to little boys and aspirin companies everywhere places ever more advanced CGI wizardry in service of an orgiastic pileup of crushed metal and cataclysmic mayhem. Climaxing with an hourlong setpiece that lays waste to most of Chicago, Paramount's 3D tentpole should leave the summer B.O. competish in roughly the same condition.

 

 

Quote:
Pic makes more sophisticated and consistently noticeable use of 3D than most recent blockbusters, though foreground objects are often distractingly cut off by the edge of the frame. As reported in Variety, Paramount is releasing enhanced digital 3D prints in about 2,000 RealD theaters, hopefully nailing the ideal level of image brightness on display at the screening attended.

 

post #12 of 103

Hell, I'm going to see it and can't wait to see some robotics flying all over the big screen.

 

However, I'm looking forward to Larry Crowne more.

post #13 of 103

Yeah, I'm in too.  I don't care how negative the reviews are.  This is one of those movies where you check in your brain at the door and just let yourself have fun.  I loved The Transformers since the cartoons and comics.  When the animated movie came out, I was there.  When the first live action movie came out, I was there.  Yes, the second one did disappoint but I blame it more on the writer's strike than Michael Bay.  It was still entertaining though.  I can't wait to see the new one.

post #14 of 103

And right on cue a post for all those who repeat ad nauseam that "its just a bit of fun" and we should "check our brains at the door"

Didnt Inception prove that a summer blockbuster can be visually stunning, action orientated AND , God forbid, require a little thought from its audience ?

 

http://www.empireonline.com/empireblogs/empire-states/post/p1094

 

And Im sorry but blaming Transformers 2 on the writer's strike ??? Plenty of other films managed to come out at that time and be entertaining. It is Bay's fault pure and simple. The man hasnt made a half decent film since The Rock.

 

post #15 of 103

leave your brain a the door.. such an insulting remark. I really dont understand why people say that about such movies. I think i even lost a few iq points from watching bad boys 2.. it seems that its more of the same with tf 3. I guess there is a reason that cameron is still king. .make no mistake. he knows how to make a good movie with such classic hits of terminator and aliens. regardless if you hate avatar or not.

 

Jacob

post #16 of 103
I've never been able to get much past the visual design of the bots. Just make them look like scrambled car parts, not some busy insectoid design that's hard to look at just to make them alien. If that was the only problem, maybe I could have gotten over it, but the first was terrible and I made it about a half hour into the second. In fact, I know I could, since the current cartoon uses the basic design and it's worth watching. A shame they went with mute Bumblebee, though.

I wouldn't mind someone else taking a crack at these, but with a total redesign and the Marvel comic as the base.
post #17 of 103

and if you feel insulted, then good.  I won't fucking apologize.

post #18 of 103

Gotta love this move: you can see TF3 tonight, but for shows around the 9 p.m. timeframe, it's mainly 3D, to see it in 2D tonight, you have to wait until midnight showings.

 

post #19 of 103
I want to see it. I know it is going to be crap (hence the matinee showing!). Giant battles, loud explosions, check your brain at the door... oh yeah!
post #20 of 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheBat View Post

leave your brain a the door.. such an insulting remark. I really dont understand why people say that about such movies. I think i even lost a few iq points from watching bad boys 2.. it seems that its more of the same with tf 3. I guess there is a reason that cameron is still king. .make no mistake. he knows how to make a good movie with such classic hits of terminator and aliens. regardless if you hate avatar or not.

 

Jacob



I don't know why you're insulted as that person was talking about himself.  I'm sure he doesn't care whether you watch this film or not.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Crawdaddy

 

post #21 of 103



 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jose Martinez View Post

and if you feel insulted, then good.  I won't fucking apologize.



Did you insult them as I took your prior post as simply talking about your own motivation for seeing this film?

 

post #22 of 103
I think you're kidding yourself if you don't know what you're getting yourself into when you go see a Michael Bay Transformer movie. Given those lofty expectations, while the film does its best to keep the adrenaline pumping in the final hour, the first half of the film is a bit over-"written" and could have had 15 minutes cut out of Sam's job hunting subplot. .The casting of Rosie Huntington-Whiteley is distracting, as you just sort of have to accept her being shoe-horned into the film dispensing enough 411 to keep the plot going at times, which was just weird (like a record screeching to a halt when something weird just went down).

The story beats are a little jarring, but let's face it, it's about transformer-on-transformer action pr0n that people come to see, and Michael Bay delivers in spades, definitely in excess. Those wondering about what the alien invasion of earth looked like for "Fallen Skies" just need to watch this movie, it'll fill in those blanks. This is a long, loud, bombastic movie featuring lots of everything (except clever writing). But still, I was entertained given my expectations.

Saw it in 3D, and it wasn't too distracting in terms of following the action.

I give it 2.5 stars, or a grade of C+
post #23 of 103
Decided after the last one I would never go back to see the next....and I hold to that promise. Reviews so far have not been kind. James Berardinelli's take is pretty harsh but I trust his take.
post #24 of 103

I enjoyed the previous two Transformers and I'm looking forward to seeing the new one some time next week. Unlike some people here I know exactly what to expect from the film, just like I knew exactly what to expect from the first two. Hopefully I can catch this one in 3D.

 

 

Quote:

LOS ANGELES (Hollywood Reporter) - "Transformers: Dark of the Moon" -- which begins its assault Tuesday night -- will be the biggest referendum yet on 3D, which is showing sudden signs of fatigue in North America.

 

This past weekend, only 37% of the domestic grosses for domestic champion "Cars 2" came from 3D screens, an all-time low. Just a few months ago, a studio could count on 55% or 65% of the total gross coming from 3D.

 

Taking no chances, Paramount and director Michael Bay have marketed the 3D aspect of "Dark of the Moon" as much as the movie itself, which returns Shia LaBeouf in the title role. Bay has been urging theater owners to boost the 3D experience by not scrimping on certain bulbs. He's also written to fans asking them to choose the more expensive format.

 

As part of the studio's marketing efforts, "Dark of the Moon" is rolling out in theaters Tuesday night -- but only in 2,700 3D locations (a mix of digital 3D and Imax theaters). It's yet another way of sparking word-of-mouth and getting people to see "Dark of the Moon" in 3D.

 

Tracking suggests "Dark of the Moon" will rake in $150 million to $160 million through the July 4 holiday, which falls on a Monday. "Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen" earned $200.1 million in its five-day debut in summer 2009, but it's unclear whether the domestic box office has returned to full health and able to support such a big number.

 

http://beta.news.yahoo.com/transformers-3-faces-tough-3d-market-024711656.html

 

post #25 of 103
I think everyone on here knows exactly what to expect with this film just as everyone knew exactly what to expect for the first two. It's just some of us hope ( however misguided) that Bay might actually learn from his mistakes and you know tack on a decent story and interesting characters to his action ... Imagine that a Transformers film with great action AND a good story... Too much to ask for ??? Wouldn't that be worth getting excited about?? Wouldn't that serve to make all those action scenes even more exciting because u care ??
post #26 of 103

Simon, the whole concept of giant sentient robots clashing and using Earth as a battlefield is so absurd that a deeper more meaningful story would be wasted on it. Wasn't this created for children decades ago?

 

How different would this have been in the hands of fanboy favourite director Chris Nolan? He would still need to include the requisite large scale destruction and including Morgan Freeman and Gary Oldman into the mix won't make it any less absurd. My thoughts are the only way to make this more intelligent and respectable is to make the robots silent and with no affection shown to the leading actors by the 'good' robots. smile.gif

post #27 of 103
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon Massey View Post

Imagine that a Transformers film with great action AND a good story...
Bay's been making movies for about 15 years and it's clear that he has no interest in delvering a good story. However, I'd be somewhat happy if he just gave me a 90 minute effects reel of robots fighting and left out the 60 wasted minutes of awful story involving the human characters (or, rather, the broad stereotypes that he calls characters).
post #28 of 103

IMO the most unrealistic thing about the Transformers movies is goofy awkward nerd Sam Witwicky getting all the hot babes. biggrin.gif

post #29 of 103
Speaking of what to expect. . .for those who have seen it, what's your opinion of the violence? My son (almost 6) loved the first two and is PSYCHED to see this one, but from what I hear, the violence is amped way up. There was almost no blood in the other movies, but it sounds like there's more human carnage this time.

Without dropping any spoilers, how rough is it? I don't really want to pay to see it twice (so I can screen it ahead of time), but my son will be very disappointed if I don't take him to see it. I'm hoping to be able to make a reasonable decision based on word of mouth.
post #30 of 103
There is some vaporization of humans (or just the bones remain from the blasts from the bots).
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Movies (Theatrical)