New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Coming Soon From Olive Films - Page 8

post #211 of 640
Strange. StudioCanal controls both FACE TO FACE and FEAR IS THE KEY overseas, and since Paramount reportedly had no elements, Olive used StudioCanal's master of FACE TO FACE for their domestic DVD. I wonder why they couldn't just use their FEAR master as well?
post #212 of 640
Am definitely on board for "Twilight's Last Gleaming" -- and great to hear Olive is adding a documentary there. Looking forward to future Olive announcements/releases.

All that said, the lead time between announcement and street date for these Olive releases makes me think "Coming Soon from Olive Films" might be an oxymoron... rolleyes.gif
post #213 of 640

Definitely interested in Dead Pigeon on Beethoven Street. Glad that there's some progress on it's Olive Films release.

post #214 of 640
Thread Starter 
April 24th Releases
6 Films - 6 DVD - 4 BLU-RAY

343
post #215 of 640
1900 Blu....YES!
post #216 of 640
Nice, glad to finally get the original The Buccaneer, even if it's not going to be blu-ray.
post #217 of 640
The Buccaneer ,Pony Express and the Jayhawkers . I hope Olive keeps this up . They are putting out some really nice titles . I'm up for all of these and Badge 373 too .
post #218 of 640
Does seem odd about FEAR IS THE KEY in that the European DVD put out by Canal is technically absolutely first rate. Perhaps they wouldn't part with the master ...
post #219 of 640
Any word on CASABLANCA, the David Soul TVseries?
post #220 of 640
Quote:
Originally Posted by BIANCO2NERO View Post

Does seem odd about FEAR IS THE KEY in that the European DVD put out by Canal is technically absolutely first rate. Perhaps they wouldn't part with the master ...

Thanks, looks like that will be the best option for a while.
post #221 of 640
What is Paramount doing with Ridley Scott's Columbus epic, 1492: Conquest Of Paradise, nothing. Never released a DVD, so the question is why won't they license it off to a studio like Olive films or another interested studio, if they have the home video rights for a USA release what are they holding onto it for??? does no other studio have any interest in releasing it, it's a great film should have seen a DVD release in the USA. I don't understand why there is no interest in the USA for it, every other Ridley Scott film at the very least has seen a DVD release in the USA. 1492: Conquest Of Paradise has only been released on VHS and Laserdisc in the USA. This makes no sense, it could be a rights issue with the international coproduction it was released onto DVD in just about every other country in the world but the USA, does no one want to clear that up if it is the case? very frustrating if you like the movie.
post #222 of 640
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterLime View Post

April 24th Releases
6 Films - 6 DVD - 4 BLU-RAY
343



Just a reminder that I preordered The Buccanner and Pony Express for a pretty good price at Amazon.

 

post #223 of 640
Rick, there is a nice BD of 1492 available now through Amazon France. I had bought another BD release of 1492 from France a couple years ago (different company) and found it to be quite nice. This one, which is now available, is from TFI and can be found under both 1492 and CHRISTOPHE COLOMB (which is the title on the box) through the Amazon.fr search engine. It is a Region B BD, but the French subs ARE removable. Sadly, I had to "give in" and "go international" with a region free blu-ray player in order to get the titles I craved to own. Here is a revue of 1492 in English from the Amazon.fr site:
"This is a competent Ridley Scott epic about Columbus, and this French blu-ray is English friendly, although accessable only to players capable of region B delivery. A lossless, matrixed surround soundtrack is presented in DTS. The French subtitles are optional and can be removed, unlike many TFI titles that have forced subtitles when choosing the English language track. The 1080 interlaced or 720 progressive image is clean and filmlike; comparable to the best high-definition television presentations. This should impress any fan looking to experience a theatrical-quality version of the film."
post #224 of 640
Here's another customer for Twilight's Last Gleaming--superb flick which I remember fondly from the theater. Have had to make do with that rotten laser disc for years.
post #225 of 640

Amazon has The Jayhawkers on BRD for 19.99

post #226 of 640
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ed Lachmann View Post

Rick, there is a nice BD of 1492 available now through Amazon France. I had bought another BD release of 1492 from France a couple years ago (different company) and found it to be quite nice. This one, which is now available, is from TFI and can be found under both 1492 and CHRISTOPHE COLOMB"

Thanks for that info, I am aware there is a Blu-ray released in France for 1492: Conquest Of Paradise but it doesn't play on a Region A player. How is anyone going to ever enjoy this film in the USA if there isn't a DVD or Blu-ray available, got to hope it sees a USA release someday.
post #227 of 640
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricktech12 View Post

Thanks for that info, I am aware there is a Blu-ray released in France for 1492: Conquest Of Paradise but it doesn't play on a Region A player. How is anyone going to ever enjoy this film in the USA if there isn't a DVD or Blu-ray available, got to hope it sees a USA release someday.

By getting a region free player! I paid $40 for mine and it's the best investment I've ever made.
post #228 of 640
I've never quite understood why people who routinely drop $15-30 a pop on DVDs or blu-rays believe that spending $100 on a region-free blu-ray player, or $40 for its DVD equivalent, is somehow too expensive.
post #229 of 640
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thomas T View Post

By getting a region free player! I paid $40 for mine and it's the best investment I've ever made.

$40 for a region-free Blu-ray player? DVD player, yes, but Blu-ray? I find that hard to believe. All of the ones I've seen are a few hundred dollars and sometimes require manipulation to change from region to region on the Blu-ray end of things.
post #230 of 640
About the best deals I've seen for a true Region ABC player is just about $200. Sometimes on Ebay one can make an offer lower than the "buy it now" option and get it for a bit under that. Of course, the brand name models you can get for that are the LG BD630, Panasonic DMP-BD75 and the Pioneer BDP-330. The Pioneer is about $229, but I've had their machines before and would recommend them. You can find an odd little player called the OREI BDP-M1 for about $150, but be careful. Usually the dance for changing regions goes like this: Turn machine off, hold down blue button on the remote, the player will beep a few times, press the 2 on the remote hold through several beeps then release, turn on machine and you are in Region B (or 2) and ready to play a European BD. Of course, go back to Region A (or 1) to play American BDs.
post #231 of 640
I've got a Toshiba BluRay player that whilst "basic" (ie lacking in fluff like wifi or Netflix etc) is extremely good at what it does and it cost about $50. By downloading Toshiba's own Australian latest upgrade software, it;s possible to access the factory settings and it lets you set it to any DVD and any BluRay region you like

It's true though that BluRay multiregion (or more often, being able to switch the region as desired, since BD doesn't have DVD's 'region free' 0 setting) is usually much more difficult and in quite a numbe rof models requires modification to the hardware.

So if you want a specific manufacturer the only recourse is to go to a specialist store and buy a modified player - these sometimes have multiple copies of the player's operating system onboard, so the player can autoswitch and the 'multiregion' ability is able to survive ay updates the manufacturer puts out.

Another solution is to simply import a second player from the desired region and have two - often cheaper than the modified ones, guaranteed to work and survive any update. And it halves the wear on the player too. Of course, you need a voltage transformer usually but they are cheap.

I simply don;t understand why folks who will drop up to $25 on a disc deny themselves access to the expanded range of titles that comes with being able to play discs outside of their own region.

I do recognise though, that multiregion is more common outside of the USA than within it. That is because the US is home to region-1, which has the largest selection of titles - espescially niche ones, by virtue of it;s being the single largest consumer base and also probably the largest single rights area.

Europe (plus Japan) has more consumers by far, but it;s a market fragmented by different languages and rights divided across individual national boundaries.


Certainly here in the UK multi-region is very common indeed and many consumers have it. Virtually every online store has a selection of such players and so do some highstreet ones - for DVD anyway.

For BluRay, that is the domain of specialists - as it was in the first few years of DVD. However, it's also true to say that the BluRay catalogue is different in nature; the latest movies don;t trail months behind the US these days (in theatres or on disc). Also, many BD discs are not even region coded at all.
post #232 of 640
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chuck Pennington View Post

$40 for a region-free Blu-ray player? DVD player, yes, but Blu-ray? I find that hard to believe. All of the ones I've seen are a few hundred dollars and sometimes require manipulation to change from region to region on the Blu-ray end of things.

Yes, I was referring to a DVD player. I hate hi-def and have no interest in blu but I'll go no further as blu-ray people tend to be very defensive about the format.
post #233 of 640
If it's only a question of DVD, then yes, being multiregion is both very easy and very cheap. Many makes and models are simply unlocked with codes keyed in from the remote control.

I imagine that this is for two reasons: first, region coding was very much a late addition to the DVD standard - the original design and intent was for a truly worldwide standard where any disc would play in any player. The advantages for the manufacture of discs and players are obvious. But of course the studios didn;t like that - particularly as (at the time) movie releases were staggered, they didn't want folks buying DVD's of movies, from the USA say, before films hit theatres in their home countries. And thus the abomination of region coding was born. But still, manufacturers make universal players - they just switch on their region locking as they leave the factory. And this makes it easy to turn it off again...

Ironically, it seems that the designers of BluRay worked very hard to put region coding into the heart of it, and this time round the studios are largely not bothering to use it on their discs. Because films release pretty much at the same time everywhere anyway...

And thus the ridiculous dance goes on.
post #234 of 640
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebiroth View Post

If it's only a question of DVD, then yes, being multiregion is both very easy and very cheap. Many makes and models are simply unlocked with codes keyed in from the remote control.
I imagine that this is for two reasons: first, region coding was very much a late addition to the DVD standard - the original design and intent was for a truly worldwide standard where any disc would play in any player. The advantages for the manufacture of discs and players are obvious. But of course the studios didn;t like that - particularly as (at the time) movie releases were staggered, they didn't want folks buying DVD's of movies, from the USA say, before films hit theatres in their home countries. And thus the abomination of region coding was born. But still, manufacturers make universal players - they just switch on their region locking as they leave the factory. And this makes it easy to turn it off again...
Ironically, it seems that the designers of BluRay worked very hard to put region coding into the heart of it, and this time round the studios are largely not bothering to use it on their discs. Because films release pretty much at the same time everywhere anyway...
And thus the ridiculous dance goes on.

Very interesting post . I was unaware of most of the issues surrounding region coding and the way region free players work . Thanks .
post #235 of 640
Quote:
Originally Posted by Worth View Post

I've never quite understood why people who routinely drop $15-30 a pop on DVDs or blu-rays believe that spending $100 on a region-free blu-ray player, or $40 for its DVD equivalent, is somehow too expensive.

I don't think it's the price people are complaining about - it's the fact that they have to buy a second machine to play the foreign discs. As someone posted above, the addition of region-coding was a last minute thing, demanded by the studios. Originally all DVDs were to going to be playable worldwide. So, now people have to buy additional players to be able to view, in most cases, our own freaking movies because some studio executive doesn't think Title X will sell big numbers in the U.S. but believes it will break BO records in France or Zimbabwe. The whole thing is stupid.
post #236 of 640
Yes, like I said, the studio worry (at the time) was that consumers would buy DVD releases elsewhere of movies that hadn't reached their theatres - in essence this was that people outside the USA would import US DVD's of the latest blockbusters rather than wait for up to six months for the films to hit the box office - which was still quite a common practise when DVD was being designed. And of course the box office is where they make a lot of money.

Thus the idea of region coding was born but it was spectacularly ineffective because of that.

As I say, region coding is in the heart of BluRay's design and it is much more robust - but the studios in many cases do not bother to use it. Largely because the worl has changed - movies release simultaneously everywhere and many movie fans go for the big-screen experience anyway/. And on top of that, lack of prompt and broadly available DVD/BD releases simply encourages pirate copies to appear on the net.

In both cases, 'home video' has been a step behind both what the studios wanted and the consumer market. And in both cases region coding was just a bad idea full stop.
post #237 of 640
Quote:
Originally Posted by elDomenechHTF View Post

I don't think it's the price people are complaining about - it's the fact that they have to buy a second machine to play the foreign discs. As someone posted above, the addition of region-coding was a last minute thing, demanded by the studios. Originally all DVDs were to going to be playable worldwide. So, now people have to buy additional players to be able to view, in most cases, our own freaking movies because some studio executive doesn't think Title X will sell big numbers in the U.S. but believes it will break BO records in France or Zimbabwe. The whole thing is stupid.

Luis, you are so right! It pisses me off to no end when USA made movies are released overseas but not in the very country they're from which has 10 times the population. Fox is at the top of the list for this practice, but to "right" this situation, they license out a bunch of great titles to Twilight Time. TT has released a few good ones but seems to have reversed course and are now more concerned with re-releasing top Fox and Sony titles already released, on Blu-ray, and ignoring such favorites as THE INCIDENT, CHE, SHOCK TREATMENT etc. that have never gotten any DVD release here, even though they have them in the aquisitions library.
post #238 of 640
THE INCIDENT I get, SHOCK TREATMENT is OK, but...CHE is someone's favorite? "I love you, Che," Jack Palance as Castro, CHE? smile.gif
post #239 of 640
I thought Twilight Time's objective was films with great scores or music based films. I'm sorry-I just do not get TT and their selections and especially their limited release pattern. It seems no one is the winner-the buyer for paaying a price we havent seen since laserdisc (and now on retreads to boot); the disributor that after licensing and manufacturing the discs will make a paltry profit on 30000 units. Where did this business model come from? Its asf someone on this board had alot of money and put out not for profit films of their choice and charged just enuf to cover costs.

Given all that-has there ever been a ompany-boutique-like this before? Are they trying to gain momentum by having limited releases to create a frenzy? The price is not the problem but the extras filled Criterion Blu-rays are the same price or less. Its very frustrating. At least Olive is releasing films we want to see -at a much fair price. I'd never thought Id get to see SKIDOO-as bad as it is-i got to see it for myself. CHE! (for some it should be titled Que? AS IN wtf) but , I too want to see that on disc.

TT should have done Columbia's OBSESSION with its lush score -instead it went the archive route (Que?). I would have gladly paid the 30 buck pricetag for that -not so much for AS GOOD AS IT GETS which has no standout score. score related Fox films would include ALL THIS AND WW2, AT LONG LAST LOVE , A MATTER OF TIME (thru MGM) and many more.

Twilight Time is defintely providing quality work to films that people want. But none of thei releases has knocked my socks off yet. If they can get ALL THIS AND WW2 out there, than TWILIGHTS LAST GLEAMING for a very long time in my mind But thats mixing apples and olives
post #240 of 640
A reminder that you can get a fine, region-free Blu of OBSESSION from Amazon.uk, for less than $30.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: DVD