New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

HTF TOP 16 MUST OWN 3D TITLES

post #1 of 484
Thread Starter 

 


htf3daddictbanner.jpg
TOP 16 MUST OWN 3D TITLES
 
Last Updated April 23, 2012
 
  These are the titles that I consider will give you the best in-home 3D experience and are most worthy of your purchase consideration. Rest assured that this list will be updated regularly to show you which titles are currently reigning champs.  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1.avcov.jpg Avatar (Fox) in the top spot should come as no surprise.  The home 3D experience exceeds that of the theatrical.  This is the title that sets the benchmark. Currently only bundled with Panasonic displays.
2. 61JH4+ktebL._SL500_AA300_.jpg Hugo (Paramount) Hugo is such a rare wonder; a children’s film that is more for the child in all of us than strictly for the young. An exceptional 3D presentation though many have reported excessive crosstalk.
 
 
3. 226x291px-LL-885f950b_61lXzSalaCL._SL500_AA300_.jpeg A Very Harold & Kumar 3D Christmas (Warner) is the most obscene and outrageously funny 3D spectacle I have ever seen.  Play it at your next adult gathering.
 
4. megamind100.jpg Megamind (DreamWorks) is currently the best rated 3D title you can buy in stores, though exclusive to Best Buy.  Wickedly funny with an outstanding 3D presentation.
 
5. 1000x500px-LL-bdf8c144_613UojO2glL._SL500_AA300_.jpg Despicable Me (Universal) is the rarest of sorts.  It is the first title that provided exceptional laughs, highly effective 3D and makes for perfect family entertainment.
6.corl100.jpg Coraline (Universal) is a wonder to behold as its intricate story and amazing visuals slowly unfold in glorious 3D.  
7.yogibear3d100.jpg Yogi Bear (Warner) is perfect family entertainment enhanced with 3D that reaches far out to its audience.
8.237x306px-LL-91b78136_toystorytril3d.jpeg Toy StoryToy Story 2Toy Story 3. Whether you buy individually or in the trilogy set, these are perhaps the finest example of 3D at its best without the added gimmickry.
 
9. 1000x500px-LL-2546f024_monsters-vs-aliens-blu-ray-3d-cover.jpg Monsters vs. Aliens (DreamWorks) boasts highly enjoyable animation and effective 3D though plagued with some ghosting issues.  Currently only bundled with Samsung displays.
10.200x200px-LL-15e3d445_51mKMts-EL.jpeg Born To Be Wild (Warner) is the most visually appealing of all the IMAX documentaries. Overpriced for 41 minutes of content, but If you can nab this for about $20, do grab it.
 
 
 
11.1000x500px-LL-57c96308_510sc6vgrAL._SL500_AA300_.jpg Deep Sea 3D (Warner) is one of the most entertaining of the Imax documentaries with excellent 3D.  We don't agree with the $40 pricetag for content under 45 minutes.
 
 
12.1000x500px-LL-32a652e5_61DOxBEn8tL._SL500_AA300_.jpg Under The Sea 3D (Warner) just places itself behind Deep Sea 3D.  Highly entertaining and effective underwater 3D.  Lackluster narration by Jim Carrey.  Overpriced at $40 for content under 45 minutes.
 
13. 1000x500px-LL-e2958ecf_61jpL0s5FhL._SL500_AA300_.jpg Step Up 3D (Touchstone) should have been rated higher.  It is the best live action 3D I have reviewed.  Problem is, it may have limited appeal.  Don't judge this movie by its cover!
14. howto100.jpg How To Train Your Dragon (Dreamworks) excels at being beautifully animated with a wonderful storyline.  It's 3D presentation is more subtle than other animation fare, but overall a worthy purchase.
15.51caMcni-PL._SL500_AA300_.jpg Dolphin Tale (Warner) resorts to wonderful, natural-looking 3D that pulls the viewer into one of the most heartwarming stories in recent memory.  The perfect family film!
 
16.journey100.jpg Journey to the Center of the Earth (Warner) places the viewer dead smack in the middle of an adventure that mimics a wild theme park ride with plenty of projected effects. 
 
 
 
post #2 of 484

Wow...now I know why I'm NOT investing in 3d.

 

Doug

post #3 of 484

I just watched Coraline in 3D bluray and it was a real treat.

Great depth and lots of "in your face" moments.

Lots of beautiful colors too.

And no ghosting!

 

I'm going to watch Despicable Me on 3D bluray right now.

post #4 of 484


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronald Epstein View Post

The following titles have been unavailable for review due to being bundled with 
hardware.  They have not been considered in this top listing of titles:
 
 
Avatar 
Coraline
How To Train Your Dragon
Ice Age 3D
 
 
 

I think it's a problem when you've reviewed nearly 20 titles and the 3 I'm most interested in are not available for purchase.  Are they trying to kill 3D at home on purpose?  The people buying now are early adopters and I think I bunch of these people would be interested in 3D movies from the 50's.  Release Creature from the Black Lagoon and It Came from Outer Space in 3D and you'll here me pleading "Honey, now's the perfect time to upgrade to 3D."

 

Attaching films to hardware is short sighted, IMHO.
 

post #5 of 484

You're right. There are a number of quality 3-D films made in the 50's which would most definitely help spur interest in owning a 3-D TV set - at least there'd be something to show off to your friends. They're not only live action (how many animated titles can one watch?) but the 3-D effect is more natural looking than most of the recent live action stereo films I've seen in the theatres recently. Mind you a lot of bad stuff was made to cash in on the 3-D boom in the 50's but I'd love to see the following titles made available on 3-D Blu-ray: the MGM musical Kiss Me Kate, Hitchcock's Dial M for Murder, Charles Bronson & Vincent Price in House of Wax, John Wayne & Geraldine Page in Hondo. Other lesser known 3-D titles could be packaged as double bills. The 3 Stooges made a couple of shorts in 3-D and even such stars as Bugs Bunny & Donald Duck appeared in a couple of 3-D cartoons. They could be used as added attractions to help sell some of the less known features such as Gun Fury with Rock Hudson and Miss Sadie Thompson with Rita Hayworth.

 

How about it Hollywood? You got 'em, we want 'em!

post #6 of 484

I would probably pick up that Despicable Me 3D BD combo pack for the extra ~$10 (ie. ~50% premium) *IF* the 3D BD landscape looks much more promising than it is right now.  But like others pointed out, things do not look good at all w/ this format launch so far -- and it doesn't look to change for the better anytime soon... thumbsdown.gif

 

_Man_

post #7 of 484
Quote:
Originally Posted by ManW_TheUncool View Post

I would probably pick up that Despicable Me 3D BD combo pack for the extra ~$10 (ie. ~50% premium) *IF* the 3D BD landscape looks much more promising than it is right now.  But like others pointed out, things do not look good at all w/ this format launch so far -- and it doesn't look to change for the better anytime soon... thumbsdown.gif

 

_Man_


Check the HD Deals thread.  You can get the 3D four disc pack from NBC with free shipping for a penny cheaper than the 3 disc pack at Amazon.  I think the biggest problem now is a lack of titles.  Most of the non-special interest documentary titles are tied to HW sales.
 

post #8 of 484

Thanks, Adam.

 

Yeah, I saw your post in the Consolidated Bargains thread and went ahead and bit on that deal -- it's actually still a bit more than I originally wanted to spend on the BD (at ~$24 after tax), which is why I hadn't bought the regular BD combo pack sooner, but it's close enough, especially since the 3D disc is actually a separate disc.  Hope the backorder wait doesn't turn out to be much longer than the stated 12/27 date (plus shipping time).

 

Not sure when I'd actually be able to give the 3D disc a whirl though...

 

Thanks again (and to ScottJH as well for the original heads up)... thumbsup.gif

 

_Man_

post #9 of 484

Hmmm... I wonder if the studios will eventually do 3D BD upgrade offers for those of us who already bought some of the 2D BD versions...

 

I could probably go for a $5-10 upgrade price for some titles if/when I do the needed hardware upgrades...

 

_Man_

post #10 of 484

Just a question. To get 3D, do you have to own a 3D Bluray player AND a 3D monitor? Why is that?

post #11 of 484
Thread Starter 

Hi Dee!

 

The simple answer (and I am certain a more

technical one will follow) is that the 3D Blu-ray

player needs to have the ability to decode the

3D content to send to the 3D capable monitor.

 

Older Blu-ray players do not have the encoding

capability.

post #12 of 484

FWIW, the only older player that can (after software update) is the PS3 because it's just that much more powerful than standard standalones.  So if you have a PS3, it can playback those discs in 3D (w/ some limitations nonetheless).

 

_Man_

post #13 of 484

I know this recommended film is going to be groan inducing, but have you seen the Blu-ray release of Friday the 13th Part 3-D?  Yes, the video quality (sharpness, clarity, detail, etc) is overall dreadful.  However the 3-D is, in my opinion, unrivaled.  I'm not kidding here, its truly outstanding.  Fans of "in your face" 3-D quality are bound to be amazed.  Shots of clothes on a line blowing towards the camera, poles, antennas, a baseball bat, a rake & a projectile spear (my favorite effect) went beyond the limits of the TV right onto the viewers lap!  I was very surprized by how good these effects were.  I'm guessing since the 3-D back in the day was "real" rather than digitally added, it makes that much of a difference.  If I'm correct about that, then I'd love to see other older 3-D movies make their way to Blu-ray 3-D such as:

 

  • House of Wax (1953)
  • Jaws 3-D
  • Parasite
  • Treasure of the 4 Crowns

 

These may not be classics (except for House of Wax), but I do remember the 3-D for these films being very good at the time.  I welcome any & all comments. 


Edited by tbaio - 12/23/10 at 6:42pm
post #14 of 484
Quote:
Originally Posted by Douglas Monce View Post

Wow...now I know why I'm NOT investing in 3d.

 

Doug



Right there with you. smiley_wink.gif

post #15 of 484

The best attribute of 3D is in the marketing.  That and some occasionally superb software.

 

Unfortunately, the worst attribute of 3D is in the marketing.

 

The fact that those who invested in Samsung, Sony and other 3D systems can't simply order a copy of Avatar is simply wrong-headed.

 

Can you image a situation via which there might be competing systems, and if one wished to own HD software from various studios, you would have to have two players?

 

Same thing, only far more ridiculous.  If anything is going to bring 3D down, this is it.

 

RAH

post #16 of 484

There are some films that I would love to see in 3D. Among them It Came From Outer Space and Creature from the Black Lagoon, which I saw at a double feature in 3D when I was a kid in the 70's. But also I'd KILL to see Dial M for Murder in 3D.

 

Beyond those there isn't much that gets me excited about the format.

 

Doug

post #17 of 484

As I said in a 3D thread in the DVD section of the forum, Warners is sitting on three marvelous 3D classics: Dial 'M' for Murder, Kiss Me Kate and House of Wax. (I don't guess they own the rights to Hondo.) While we wait for new 3D films to come down the pike, why not make new 3D masters of these films for distribution on Blu-ray? I saw two of these at theaters during the 3D craze of the 1980s, but I've never seen Kiss Me Kate in 3D.

 

If 3D in the home is going to catch on, there has to be all kinds of product out there to tempt folks of all ages to dive into the format.

post #18 of 484
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattH. View Post

 I saw two of these at theaters during the 3D craze of the 1980s, but I've never seen Kiss Me Kate in 3D.

 Best 3D movie--ever! Bob Fosse dancing across the rooftops is a religious experience.

post #19 of 484
Quote:
Originally Posted by Larry Geller View Post



Quote:
Originally Posted by MattH. View Post

 I saw two of these at theaters during the 3D craze of the 1980s, but I've never seen Kiss Me Kate in 3D.

 Best 3D movie--ever! Bob Fosse dancing across the rooftops is a religious experience.


Having never seen it, naturally it's the one I most want to see. Come on, Warners! Do us all a favor and release this in 3D!
 

post #20 of 484
Quote:
Originally Posted by Douglas Monce View Post

Wow...now I know why I'm NOT investing in 3d.

 

Doug


3D is very big joke even for someone with millions of dollars. Am not interested movie studios and not interested in Avatar. James Cameron cannot make good movies anymore. All is plagarism from Dances with Wolves Ferngully The Last Samurai The Smurfs Dune Pocahontas but set in space.

Yes, only reason why is top grossing movie currently is because the added fee for IMAX and 3D to watching.

post #21 of 484
Quote:
Originally Posted by SergeiShadow View Post

Yes, only reason why is top grossing movie currently is because the added fee for IMAX and 3D to watching.



Avatar made earned 2.7 billion dollars. If you think a movie made that much just because it charged $3 or $4 more a ticket, you're wrong.

post #22 of 484


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by TravisR View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by SergeiShadow View Post

Yes, only reason why is top grossing movie currently is because the added fee for IMAX and 3D to watching.



Avatar made earned 2.7 billion dollars. If you think a movie made that much just because it charged $3 or $4 more a ticket, you're wrong.


Still dead setting on defending film? Where is sites ignore button?

post #23 of 484
Quote:
Originally Posted by SergeiShadow View Post


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by TravisR View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by SergeiShadow View Post

Yes, only reason why is top grossing movie currently is because the added fee for IMAX and 3D to watching.



Avatar made earned 2.7 billion dollars. If you think a movie made that much just because it charged $3 or $4 more a ticket, you're wrong.


Still dead setting on defending film? Where is sites ignore button?


Place your mouse arrow over the person's name in the heading and a drop down menu will contain the ignore button.
 

post #24 of 484
Quote:
Originally Posted by SergeiShadow View Post


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by TravisR View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by SergeiShadow View Post

Yes, only reason why is top grossing movie currently is because the added fee for IMAX and 3D to watching.



Avatar made earned 2.7 billion dollars. If you think a movie made that much just because it charged $3 or $4 more a ticket, you're wrong.


Still dead setting on defending film? Where is sites ignore button?

Gee, on this forum we're interested in the opinions of others.  Of course when you're right and we're wrong, you might as well ignore us.rolleyes.gif
 

post #25 of 484


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by SergeiShadow View Post


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by TravisR View Post

Quote:
Originally Posted by SergeiShadow View Post

Yes, only reason why is top grossing movie currently is because the added fee for IMAX and 3D to watching.



Avatar made earned 2.7 billion dollars. If you think a movie made that much just because it charged $3 or $4 more a ticket, you're wrong.


Still dead setting on defending film? Where is sites ignore button?



He isn't defending anything, he is only pointing out how silly, uninformed and delusional the opinion that Avatar made nearly 3 Billion dollars simply due to 3D surcharges (despite the fact that the film played in 3D in only 50% of overseas theaters, which is where the film grossed 2 Bil alone) is

post #26 of 484
Thread Starter 

It has already been reported that Avatar's

success was not based on 3D surcharges

attached.  The film became the highest-grosser

ever based on its own merits.

post #27 of 484
Quote:
Originally Posted by SergeiShadow View Post


Still dead setting on defending film?



 

No and I don't see how you can get that from what I've said. For what it's worth, I liked Avatar well enough but there's plenty of valid criticism to make about the movie. All I'm saying is that the movie made alot of money because many people really enjoyed it & saw it multiple times and not simply because they charged a few dollars more a ticket.

post #28 of 484

I enjoyed Avatar too. Why all the hate? Success breeds contempt.

post #29 of 484

Yes, but unfortunately contempt doesn't breed success. smile.gif

(As one former member will know.)

 

 

Cees

post #30 of 484

I didn't like Avatar at all. I'm not ashamed to say it.

 

P.S. I did think some of the 3D effects were interesting. That's about all, though.

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: 3D Blu-ray