No doubt you are having trouble understanding the various kinds of glasses.
First, let's review Cinema. The are four modes currently being used, three of which used passive glasses (RealD, IMAX, Dolby) and a small percentage of theaters which use active shutter glasses. RealD uses circularly polarized light and requires the glasses be circular polarizers. IMAX uses linearly polarized light and as such needs linear polarizers for glasses. Dolby (which licensed its technology from Infitec) uses 6-color interference filters. Dolby should not be confused with the red/cyan anaglyphs that are still used with low end systems. There are advantages to each mode, and it would take many pages here to describe them all. Perhaps the primary reason that RealD is so popular in the US is that the cost OF THE GLASSES to the cinema owner is so low, where patrons seem to prefer DISPOSABILITY. Elsewhere around the world, disposable glasses is not necessarily valued to the same degree as in the US and as such Dolby has the lead in market share. Blogs suggest that many of the professional studios (where viewing performance is desired) favor the Dolby 6-color interference approach.
Now for TV. In general, there are two general approaches: the first uses glasses (active shutter glasses -wait, they are not all alilke, passive polarized glasses, red/cyan anaglyphs) and the second does not use glasses (autostereoscopic, lenticular and parallax barrier). The latter technology generally directs light to each eye. Autostereoscopic is blogged to be the best of this group, although there is a sweet spot location for seeing 3D, and as such is currently best restricted to smaller displays. Lenticular is used on larger sets, but most who see it are not particularly impressed - that said, progress is being made each day and improvements are evident at every new trade show. Parallax barrier has advantages especially for notebook size displays, but I am personally not aware of any TV's using this approach.
Now back to glasses approach to 3DTV. You are probably well acquainted with red cyan anaglyphs. The glasses are dirt cheap and any TV can show 3D using this technology. The challenge of course is that the viewing experience is pretty cheesey, and no TV manufacturer has decided that it is appropriate for their sets. A small percentage of market share belongs to micro-retarder/micro-polarizer approach, which I believe is being worked on by LG. These sets use circular polarized glasses, and your RealD may work for these sets. Blogs have not been particularly excited about this approach - not that they don't want to get rid of shutter glasses, - but that the viewing experience is not always superior. Again, development continues and improvements are being made everyday. Finally shutter glasses....
Not all shutter glasses are alike. Perhaps the biggest difference is between those for plasma vs. LCD / LED TVs. And even amongst LCD & LED TVs, there are differences. The big deal is in the synchronization between the set and the glasses. Not all timing sequences are the same and not all IR signals (what communicates between the set and the glasses) are compatible. So some shutter glass manufacturers have come out with generic shutter glasses that work on most, if not all, 3DTV systems. These tend to be pretty expensive (about $150/pair).
So, amongst all of these technologies, your question is which are compatible with which? Really, only the RealD cinema glasses may be compatible with only the micro-retarder 3DTVs. And that is a may, because the systems need to be coded correctly so that you don't see zoom back when you are supposed to see zoom in. Some generic TV shutter glasses may be compatible with a very small percentage of movie theaters that use active glasses.
But in general, RealD/IMAX/Dolby glasses are NOT compatible with the lion's share of the shutter glasses used by most 3DTV manufacturers. Sorry.
