Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Blu-ray, DVD, Streaming Video and Digital Downloads › Blu-ray › Official HTF Blu-ray Reviews › HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: The Bridge on the River Kwai Collector's Edition
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: The Bridge on the River Kwai Collector's Edition

post #1 of 45
Thread Starter 

265x265px-LS-964834fb_bridgeontheriverkwaibrd.jpg

 

 

The Bridge on the River Kwai (Collector's Edition)

Studio: Sony/Columbia
Year: 1957
Rated: PG
Program Length: 162 minutes
Aspect Ratio: 2.55:1 1080p
Languages: English, French, Portuguese 5.1 DTS-HD MA; Spanish Dolby Digital 5.1
Subtitles: English, English SDH, French, Spanish, Portuguese, Chinese, Korean, Thai

The Program

Do not speak to me of rules! This is war! This is not a game of cricket! -- Colonel Saito, Commanding Officer, Japanese Prisoner of War Camp

Madness...Madness! - Major Clipton, British Medical Officer

The Bridge on the River Kwai is perhaps the greatest war movie ever made. It also is one of the finest films ever made of any genre. After many years of anticipation, it is now being released by Sony in a stunningly spectacular Blu-ray edition.

As befits a film of its fame, it is unlikely that there are many readers of this review who are not already familiar with the plot of The Bridge on the River Kwai. Based upon a novel by the French author Pierre Boulle, the film is directed by David Lean and written by Carl Foreman and Michael Wilson. Based in part on fact, the story takes place in a Japanese prisoner of war camp in the jungles of Thailand (Siam) in 1943. The Japanese are building a crucial railroad link between Bangkok and Rangoon, but to complete it they must erect a bridge across the River Kwai. Allied prisoners of war have been brought to the nearby camp to do the construction work. The commanding officer of the camp is Colonel Saito (Sessue Hayakawa), who was educated in England but who has nothing but contempt for his captives. Japanese POW camps in World War II were remarkable for the brutality which was inflicted upon prisoners. By most accounts, the prisoners of the Japanese were seven times for likely to die - from disease, malnutrition, beatings, executions, etc. - than POWs held by Germans or Italians. For American prisoners, the outlook was even bleaker. Fully 35% of the American prisoners held by the Japanese during World War II failed to survive the war.

It is no surprise, then, that The Bridge on the River Kwai opens with images of handmade crosses marking the graves of deceased POWs. It is during a burial detail that the film introduces the only American in the camp, Navy Commander Shears (William Holden). Shears survived the sinking of his ship, but he was captured by the Japanese when he made it to shore. He has thus far survived by his wits, finding a compliant guard who is willing to periodically place Shears on the sick list in exchange for bribes. The prison population has been decimated, but a company of British soldiers, forced to surrender in Singapore years earlier, is marched into camp, to be put to work completing the bridge. The British soldiers are led by Colonel Nicholson (Alec Guinness), a by-the-book (but intriguingly ambiguous) officer who is determined to maintain morale and good order among the soldiers in his command.

Colonel Nicholson initially is impressed by Colonel Saito, except for the fact that Saito has announced that he expects the British officers to do manual work along with the enlisted men. This is a violation of the Geneva Convention (which, incidentally, Japan signed but never ratified), and Nicholson has no intention of complying with Saito's order. This leads to a compelling battle of wills between the two officers. Nicholson is cruelly beaten and placed into "the oven," a solitary confinement cage. Saito expects to break Nicholson's will, but the British officer's resolve cannot be shaken. In the meantime, little progress is being made on the bridge, and Saito has a deadline to meet.

There are really two parallel stories here. The other story focuses on Commander Shears, who is determined to make an escape attempt even though a successful one appears to be an impossibility. The camp has no walls, no barbed wire, and no watchtowers. It is, in effect, a Southeast Asia version of Devil's Island. Getting out of the camp is easy, but what then?

While Shears tries to make his way to freedom, Colonel Saito becomes increasingly desperate to complete the building of the bridge. He eventually accedes to Colonel Nicholson's demand that the British officers will not do manual labor, but in return he receives a pledge that the British soldiers will erect not just a bridge, but a better and stronger bridge than the Japanese were capable of building. The dilemma, of course, is that in securing better treatment and living conditions for his men Colonel Nicholson runs the risk of undermining the war effort by helping the enemy.

 

The parallel story lines eventually come together and lead to a shattering climax.

Although The Bridge on the River Kwai has a running time of nearly three hours, there is not a single superfluous scene. The drama is intense and riveting, and the performances are nothing short of brilliant. Alec Guinness won the Academy Aware for Best Actor in a Leading Role, and Sessue Hayakawa received a nomination for Best Actor in a Supporting Role. William Holden gives one of his best performances as Commander Spears, and Jack Hawkins provides sturdy support as a British commando. David Lean won the Academy Award for Best Director, and The Bridge on the River Kwai was named the Best Picture of 1957. The film also took home Academy Awards for Best Cinematography (Jack Hildyard), Best Music Score (Malcolm Arnold), Best Film Editing (Peter Taylor), and Best Screenplay Based on Material from Another Medium. The screenplay award deserves special mention because it was given to Pierre Boulle, who wrote the novel but who had essentially nothing to do with the screenplay (Boulle did not even speak English). The real screenwriters, Carl Foreman and Michael Wilson, had been blacklisted because they refused to "name names" during investigations of Communists in Hollywood. This was eventually rectified in 1984, when Foreman and Wilson were posthumously given awards for the screenplay, and their names now appear in the film's credits.

When The Bridge on the River Kwai opened 53 years ago, it was reviewed in The New York Times by Bosley Crowther. He closed his review with these words: "Here is a film we guarantee you'll never forget." More prescient words have rarely been written.

The Video

The 2.55:1 1080p Blu-ray transfer by Sony is positively stunning. When The Bridge on the River Kwai was released on laserdisc, I was pleased with how good it looked, although there were some issues with the transfer. The first incarnations on DVD were significant improvements, but now the film apparently replicates the way it looked when it opened in 1957. This is what our resident expert, Robert Harris, has to say about the Blu-ray presentation: "Finally, under the steady hand of Columbia's Grover Crisp, Kwai has been brought back to its early glory with pitch perfect color, densities, grain structure and shadow detail, all in their proper places."

An A/B comparison with the previous DVD release bears out Mr. Harris' assessment. The Blu-ray image is substantially sharper, and the difference in color accuracy and intensity is striking. In the opening scene of the railroad tracks and crosses, on the DVD the jungle foliage is a pale green. The Blu-ray is like viewing another film altogether. Here the foliage is a deep green, just as one would expect to see it in a damp, tropical climate. The movie was filmed on location in Ceylon, and distant shots of mountains and rivers which are muddy and indistinct on the DVD are now breathtaking in their detail.

Flesh tones are realistic and accurate, black levels are solid, shadow detail is very good and the contrasts are strong. As Mr. Harris has noted, The Bridge on the River Kwai was filmed to be shown at 2.55:1, but was cropped to 2.35:1 to make room for the audio track. Here it is shown as originally intended. In fact, there is slightly more information on the Blu-ray transfer than on the prior DVD release. For example, in the scene where Colonel Saito is making his first address to the prisoners, on the DVD the soldiers at both ends of the front line are partially cropped out of the image. On the Blu-ray, nearly their entire bodies can be seen.

There is one slight hiccup which I had not noticed previously, but which also exists on the prior DVD release. At the 1:50:36 mark there is a shot of a bird flying, and for a split second the bird disappears, only to immediately reappear. I went through it in slow motion and it appears that a frame or so is shown twice, creating this "disappearing" effect. I compared it with the previous DVD release, and as noted the same effect is seen there. I have no way of knowing if this was a mastering error somewhere along the line or if this anomaly has always been present. It is a very minor thing and many viewers may not even notice it.

Overall this is a grand video presentation of a truly remarkable film.

The Audio

If there is going to be any bone of contention about this Blu-ray release, it will (and to some extent already is) about the audio. Sony has elected to provide only one English soundtrack, in lossless 5.1 DTS-HD MA. The mono soundtrack with which fans of the film are familiar is nowhere to be found (the prior DVD release included both a 5.1 Dolby Digital soundtrack and the mono soundtrack).

As Mr. Harris has explained, the film originally was planned to be released with a stereo soundtrack. The good news for purists is that the surround effects in the new soundtrack have been applied (again, using Mr. Harris' words) "with a delicate hand." The surround channels are used primarily to create a more realistic sensation of being in the jungle. Sounds of birds, rain, and waterfalls which previously were confined to the center channel are now effectively spread to the surround channels, while dialogue remains mostly confined to the center channel. An A/B comparison of the new audio to the mono soundtrack reveals the latter to be somewhat harsh. For a war movie, The Bridge of the River Kwai contains very little in the way of gunfire and explosions, so the new soundtrack really is not a major departure from the mono. I found the new soundtrack to both more enveloping and more pleasing, but the "more pleasing" part is really a matter of individual preference.

I would have preferred to see Sony offer the mono soundtrack as an option for those who prefer it, but I would not discourage anyone from buying this Blu-ray release solely because the mono soundtrack is missing. 

The superb musical score by Malcolm Arnold benefits from the expanded soundstage provided by the 5.1 mix. The best-known part of the musical soundtrack is the "Colonel Bogey March," which is whistled by the British prisoners as they march into camp.

The Supplements

There are numerous extras in this collector's edition. First I will discuss the Blu-ray exclusives.

William Holden narrates an audio description of the film's London premiere. The narration is supplemented by still photos from the film and of the premiere, and it runs for just under two minutes.

An appearance by William Holden and Alec Guinness on "The Steve Allen Show" in 1957 is shown in 4:3 black and white. Holden and Guinness were interviewed "remotely" by Allen while the actors were still working on the film in Ceylon. The questions obviously were sent to the actors in advance, their answers were then filmed and Allen dubbed in the questions during the telecast. This segment runs for 6 1/2 minutes.

"Crossing the Bridge" is what Sony calls a "picture-in-graphics" track. While the film is playing, factoids about the novel, the historical background of the film, the experiences of real POWs, etc. appear. When the graphics come up, the scene from the film which is playing is reduced by roughly 80%. When the graphics disappear, the film image returns to its full size. I am not a particular fan of such features, but this one includes a considerable amount of interesting information for those who are willing to spend the time to sit through it.

Also included are the original theatrical trailer and the re-release trailer. The re-release trailer apparently dates to 1962, based upon its mention of Lawrence of Arabia. Both trailers are in very good shape, although not nearly as sharp and clean as the feature.

The remaining extras have been ported over from the Collector's Edition DVD which was released in 2008. Included are four featurettes:

"Making of The Bridge on the River Kwai" is a featurette which is self-explanatory.

A black and white University of Southern California short film which is narrated by William Holden includes extensive footage from The Bridge on the River Kwai.

"The Rise and Fall of a Jungle Giant" is a black and white film which describes how the bridge was built and covers other aspects of the filming. The crew spent 251 days in Ceylon.

"An Appreciation by Filmmaker John Milius" is an eight-minute featurette which was made in 2000. It is presented in standard definition 4:3, with excerpts from the feature which are letterboxed.

A photo gallery/slide show runs for seven minutes and shows posters and lobby cards from around the world, as well as some still photos taken during the filming.

Also included are a Sony promotion for its classic films, a trailer for the first Turner Classic Movies Film Festival, and trailers for Tommy and Midnight Express.

In addition to the Blu-ray disc, this Collector's Edition also includes the new DVD of The Bridge on the River Kwai. A sampling of various scenes revealed that the new DVD is an improvement over the prior release, though it still falls well short of the Blu-ray version. The DVD version also includes the four featurettes mentioned above, but like the Blu-ray it does not include the mono soundtrack.

Finally, Sony also has included a packet of a dozen lobby card reproductions.

The Packaging

There are two discs, one containing the Blu-ray version and one containing the DVD version. The discs are packed in a rather thick digi-book. The book itself contains 34 pages of commentary, photographs and cast information. The digi-book fits into a sturdy slipcase. For those concerned about shelf space, the slipcase is 1 inch wide and 7 1/2 inches high.

The Final Analysis

The Bridge on the River Kwai is a time-honored classic film which has lost none of its impact since it was released more than a half-century ago. Over the years I have seen this film on television, on VHS, on laserdisc and on DVD, but watching it on Blu-ray is like seeing it for the first time. The only caveat that I have is that there are going to be fans of the film who will be disappointed that Sony has not included the mono soundtrack. However, the 5.1 DTS-HD MA soundtrack has been mixed with the greatest of care. Those who want to retain a copy of the film with the mono soundtrack should plan on holding onto the older DVD release, although by no means should they avoid the Blu-ray. This Collector's Edition is a magnificent achievement and is a presentation which demands repeated viewing.

Equipment used for this review:

Panasonic DMP-BD50 Blu-ray player
Panasonic Viera TC-P46G15 Plasma display, calibrated to THX specifications by Gregg Loewen
Yamaha HTR-5890 THX Surround Receiver
BIC Acoustech speakers
Interconnects: Monster Cable

Release Date: November 2, 2010

Gear mentioned in this thread:

post #2 of 45

Thanks for the review Richard.  I'll definitely be picking this one up.  A great film.  I upgraded the LD to DVD and now the DVD to BD.

post #3 of 45

Excellent review. Many thanks!

post #4 of 45

 

Some stuff does NOT make sense here.

One - the film was planned for showing in 2:55 but to put on the soundtrack (mono optical?) it thenwaws narrowed to 2:35

wELL, ALL SCOPE FILMS FROM THE FIRST ONE(THE ROBE) WERE ORIGINALLLY 2:55 AND WITH four TRACKS OF STEREO, SO THIS MONO TRACK NARROWING DEOSN'T WASH.

 

The Narrowing only happened in late 56 whenFox began the MatgOptical prints whichput on four channels of mag stereo and the optical mono track on one film.

 

stereo - when Fox introduced stereo, and marketed it to other studios they did so on two conditions - A. the film had to be in color, B- the film had to have stereo.

While other studios went to scope in 1954, Columbia came to it late, only in 1955 beginning with

Count Three and Pray,

The last Frontier,

The Long Gray Line, the Man from Laramie,

My Sister Eileen,

Picnic

Three for the Show,

and The Violent Men   all in stereo

1956  broughtClckleshell Heroes

The Eddy Duchin Story,

jubal, Odongo, Safari, Storm Over the Nile,

and You Can;t run away from It.  again, all stereo

1957-

The only scope films were sthe stero and color rule was releazed over at Fox itself, but the other studios were still doing stereo.

When I was a kid, my home town had two revival theaters - the capitil and the Regent.  The capitol showed Bridge on the River kwai many times - and always in the original four channel true stereo.

 

Private stereo prints have circulated among colectors, particularly in new York and San Francisco for over twenty years.

Mr. Harris once mentioned he found only mono music tracks for Bridge on the River Kwai.  I tcould be that only a mono mixdown dupe set was kept, but this hardly means that it wasn;t also recorded in stereo, as almost every studio was recording in three track mag, whenther the film was stereo or not.

Again, just food for thought.

post #5 of 45

 

 

 

Quote:

Joe Caps wrote:

Some stuff does NOT make sense here.

One - the film was planned for showing in 2:55 but to put on the soundtrack (mono optical?) it thenwaws narrowed to 2:35

wELL, ALL SCOPE FILMS FROM THE FIRST ONE(THE ROBE) WERE ORIGINALLLY 2:55 AND WITH four TRACKS OF STEREO, SO THIS MONO TRACK NARROWING DEOSN'T WASH. 

 

Most early Cinemascope films had separate 4-channel soundtrack on separate full-coated 35mm magnetic film that ran in synchronize with the film projector on separate sound reproducer machine, that's why those early Cinemascope prints had no soundtrack printed on the film thus were shown in full 2.55:1 or 2.66:1 ratio.   

post #6 of 45
Thread Starter 


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Caps View Post

 

Some stuff does NOT make sense here.

One - the film was planned for showing in 2:55 but to put on the soundtrack (mono optical?) it thenwaws narrowed to 2:35

wELL, ALL SCOPE FILMS FROM THE FIRST ONE(THE ROBE) WERE ORIGINALLLY 2:55 AND WITH four TRACKS OF STEREO, SO THIS MONO TRACK NARROWING DEOSN'T WASH.


Sebastian's response makes sense to me, but in any event the review quotes Mr. Harris, who is the most reliable source I know. I would suggest that you address your questions to him in the following thread:

 

http://www.hometheaterforum.com/forum/thread/305267/a-few-words-about-the-bridge-on-the-river-kwai-in-blu-ray

post #7 of 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sebastian1972 View Post

 

Most early Cinemascope films had separate 4-channel soundtrack on separate full-coated 35mm magnetic film that ran in synchronize with the film projector on separate sound reproducer machine, that's why those early Cinemascope prints had no soundtrack printed on the film thus were shown in full 2.55:1 or 2.66:1 ratio.   

 

 

No, no, no. While the original CinemaScope patent called for 2.66:1 without a soundtrack, no film was ever released this way. Early CinemaScope had four tiny magnetic tracks - two on the outside of the sprocket holes (these were smaller that normal sprocket holes) and two inside. The AR for this configuration was 2.55:1. Eventually releases with optical soundtracks and normal-sized holes resulted in narrowing the AR to 2.35:1. And finally mag-optical, with the smaller sprocket holes, 4 magnetic tracks and a half-width optical track, came about and was also 2.35:1

 

Kwai was originally released in the optical mono configuration even though it was orginally conceived (and filmed) in 2.55:1.

 

post #8 of 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mark-P View Post



No, no, no. While the original CinemaScope patent called for 2.66:1 without a soundtrack, no film was ever released this way. Early CinemaScope had four tiny magnetic tracks - two on the outside of the sprocket holes (these were smaller that normal sprocket holes) and two inside. The AR for this configuration was 2.55:1. Eventually releases with optical soundtracks and normal-sized holes resulted in narrowing the AR to 2.35:1. And finally mag-optical, with the smaller sprocket holes, 4 magnetic tracks and a half-width optical track, came about and was also 2.35:1

 

Kwai was originally released in the optical mono configuration even though it was orginally conceived (and filmed) in 2.55:1.

 


And therefore not"recentered" and had one side lopped off to make room for the optical track. The only two showing of Scope with a seperate mag track, that I have been able to trace, were the two Robe openings in N.Y and L.A.

Fox were quick to push the combined mag print  and picture  as it obviously made installations  cheaper and easier to run.
 

post #9 of 45

I should also add that I saw the film during a reissue about 1964/5 at then newish Odeon St Martin's Lane in London.I am pretty sure it was a mag print. One thing that stayed with me from that showing was during the intermission or just before the beginng of part 2, the surround ( sorry "audience participation" track as I think it was then called), had jungle noises that slowly rose in volume as the lights went down and part 2  began.

 

Lean used a similar technique for the roadshows of "Zhivago"  with train noises during the intermission although a few months after the opening,"Lara's theme" was stuck on and then the train noises faded in.

post #10 of 45

I am like Adam. I have this on LD and then bought it on DVD. Now I will be adding the Blu-ray.

 

post #11 of 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by john a hunter View Post

I should also add that I saw the film during a reissue about 1964/5 at then newish Odeon St Martin's Lane in London.I am pretty sure it was a mag print. One thing that stayed with me from that showing was during the intermission or just before the beginng of part 2, the surround ( sorry "audience participation" track as I think it was then called), had jungle noises that slowly rose in volume as the lights went down and part 2  began.

 

Lean used a similar technique for the roadshows of "Zhivago"  with train noises during the intermission...


Don't you yearn for intermissions like that today? Mind, don't you yearn for a director like David Lean today...

post #12 of 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by john a hunter View Post

I should also add that I saw the film during a reissue about 1964/5 at then newish Odeon St Martin's Lane in London.I am pretty sure it was a mag print. One thing that stayed with me from that showing was during the intermission or just before the beginng of part 2, the surround ( sorry "audience participation" track as I think it was then called), had jungle noises that slowly rose in volume as the lights went down and part 2  began.

 

 

In the interests of accuracy rather than pedantry, the brief revival of Kwai was at the Odeon Haymarket, not the Odeon St Martin's Lane which didn't open until 1967 with Thoroughly Modern Millie.  The Kwai screenings may even have been in a 70mm blowup, though I'm not 100% certain about that.  Can't wait to see this Blu-ray release.

 

One has to agree  wholeheartedly with Mr Hodson's comment - I remember a friend of mine, at a screening of Mutiny on the Bounty, leaned over and said, "I'm only here to see the intermission."
 

post #13 of 45

Where was the KWAI intermission, and why hasn't it been reinstated? I've never seen it on any video incarnation. Nor do I recall a break in the 1957 wide release theatricially or the re-issue in the 1960's. I have, however, always noticed the one and only instance of a complete fade-to-black, which occurs roughly 2/3 in following the careless collapse an unfinished portion of the bridge, which would seem to be where an intermission would have gone. Was this the case?


Edited by Dick - 10/28/10 at 2:15pm
post #14 of 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdrianTurner View Post



In the interests of accuracy rather than pedantry, the brief revival of Kwai was at the Odeon Haymarket, not the Odeon St Martin's Lane which didn't open until 1967 with Thoroughly Modern Millie.  The Kwai screenings may even have been in a 70mm blowup, though I'm not 100% certain about that.  Can't wait to see this Blu-ray release.

 

One has to agree  wholeheartedly with Mr Hodson's comment - I remember a friend of mine, at a screening of Mutiny on the Bounty, leaned over and said, "I'm only here to see the intermission."
 


Quite right and thank you for correcting me. Not living in London for 30 years I was getting my Odeons mixed up. It was Haymarket which opened in 1962 or thereabouts with Barrabas.( I can still recall the black and white(or gray) seats).

 

I am sure the reissue  of "Kwai" I saw was not advertised as 70mm or I would have picked up on it. That release( for the U.K at least)  was in the mid 70's when it opened at the Casino Cinerama. It looked dreadful and I walked out and got my money back. I still have the poster here somewhere.

 

Part two of "Kwai" opened with the beach scenes  and Holden  "relaxing" with his friends. I haven't seen the DVD for sometime-saving myself for the BD , but I seem to think that the fade in and out where the break was,is quite obvious.
 

post #15 of 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by john a hunter View Post




 

I am sure the reissue  of "Kwai" I saw was not advertised as 70mm or I would have picked up on it. That release( for the U.K at least)  was in the mid 70's when it opened at the Casino Cinerama. It looked dreadful and I walked out and got my money back. I still have the poster here somewhere.

 

 



I went to that Casino Cinerama showing as well John. As you say, it looked awful blown up on that huge screen. So bad that I've never forgotten it. I didn't think to ask for my money back - well done in having your ticket refunded! I'd love to see that poster again.


Edited by Douglas R - 10/29/10 at 10:13pm
post #16 of 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by Douglas R View Post





 I'd love to see that poster again.


It was  an "economy" one. Simple graphics and a very yellow background from memory, Doug. Will try to find if for when I have friends around to see the BD.

As you "survived" the Cinerama presentation, do you remember whether it was shown with an intermission?
 

post #17 of 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by john a hunter View Post




It was  an "economy" one. Simple graphics and a very yellow background from memory, Doug. Will try to find if for when I have friends around to see the BD.

As you "survived" the Cinerama presentation, do you remember whether it was shown with an intermission?
 



That showing (and the one I saw when the film was first released) had an intermission.

post #18 of 45

Screen captures and DVD - BD comparison:

 

http://www.dvdbeaver.com/film2/DVDReviews27/bridge_on_the_river_kwai.htm

 

Note the observation on horizontal stretching.


Edited by Richard--W - 10/29/10 at 10:49pm
post #19 of 45

Also note the footnote on horizontal stretching. The caps show that this is more a case of CinemaScope mumps, and thank goodness nobody tried to digitally "correct" it.

post #20 of 45

$20 flat at Wal Mart. Good deal. Call first. Some only have one copy, some have several.

post #21 of 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hollywoodaholic View Post

$20 flat at Wal Mart. Good deal. Call first. Some only have one copy, some have several.


Finally got mine yesterday, 'though I pre-ordered it when first announced at Amazon (cheaper for me to buy from them since there's no tax - and no shipping when you buy $25 worth). This masterpiece in this beautiful set has to be the best value in the history of commerce!
 

I've seen the movie so often that I can anticipate the dialog verbatim, but what follows from the time the demolition group arrive at the bridge took my breath away as though I'd watched it for the first time. Until then, although the canvas is comparatively huge, one doesn't expect anything less from the maker of 'Great Expectations'; yet none of his 'smaller' masterpieces prepares one for

the suspenseful, epic scale of the final action scenes nor the masterful intercutting of these scenes with the light-hearted counterpoint of the show celebrating the completion of the bridge. Also one of the best editors in the world, Lean was operating at genius level at that time, happily carried through to the next little job he took on.

 

It was wonderful to see Adrian Turner (his post is #12 here) again being interviewed in Laurent Bouzerau's magnificent 'making of ' documentary on the included DVD. A few months ago I finished reading his biographical masterpiece of Robert Bolt. It's out of print but I was lucky enough to be able to get a new copy from England. I was so impressed with the exquisite writing and astonishing research that took him to practically every known piece of ground that Bolt ever stood on that I felt compelled to purchase a used copy of his beautiful, large-format 'Making of Lawrence of Arabia' - again from England but this time - since it was published only in Britain (I think that's right...?) and therefore extremely rare - accompanied by massive sticker shock. And I mean 'massive'! The book is lavishly illustrated with actual 70mm frames from the movie and nicely acknowledges the help of Robert Harris. It's a wonderful complement to the must-have '30th Anniversary Pictorial History of Lawrence of Arabia' by L. Robert Morris and Lawrence Raskin. The last chapter of this is a priceless mini-history of Robert Harris's heroic almost-never-realized restoration of 'Lawrence'.

 

Thanks to Richard Gallagher for this terrific review.

post #22 of 45

Quote:

Originally Posted by marsnkc View Post

It was wonderful to see Adrian Turner (his post is #12 here) again being interviewed in Laurent Bouzerau's magnificent 'making of ' documentary on the included DVD. A few months ago I finished reading his biographical masterpiece of Robert Bolt. It's out of print but I was lucky enough to be able to get a new copy from England.



Thanks for that; prompted me to finally get a copy, and I have an off-air HD recording of The Bounty to enjoy shortly, though, obviously, it's a project I would have loved Lean to complete.

post #23 of 45

Speaking of 'The Bounty', Dino passed away today. Adrian Turner's description of Dino's maneuverings to abandon his 'Bounty' contract with DL is hilarious.

 

I envy you getting the opportunity to see it in HD. I'd kill to have that beauty in Blu.........

post #24 of 45
Thread Starter 


 

Quote:
Originally Posted by marsnkc View Post

 

I've seen the movie so often that I can anticipate the dialog verbatim, but what follows from the time the demolition group arrive at the bridge took my breath away as though I'd watched it for the first time. Until then, although the canvas is comparatively huge, one doesn't expect anything less from the maker of 'Great Expectations'; yet none of his 'smaller' masterpieces prepares one for the suspenseful, epic scale of the final action scenes nor the masterful intercutting of these scenes with the light-hearted counterpoint of the show celebrating the completion of the bridge. Also one of the best editors in the world, Lean was operating at genius level at that time, happily carried through to the next little job he took on.

 

 

You make some excellent points. No matter how many times I see it, when I get to the final scene a part of me still hopes that Colonel Nicholson will act differently! And Lean plays very fairly with the audience. The prior scene where Nicholson visits the men in the hospital is in keeping with how he acts at the end, yet it is subtle enough that the ending is still a shocker.
 

post #25 of 45

Many thanks for all those kind comments - I was saddened to hear of the death of Dino, a very charismatic man who I had the privilege of meeting on several occasions.  Am writing this, by the way, from Wallis & Futuna in the South Pacific, having just sailed in from Bounty territory in Tahiti. 

post #26 of 45

Quote:

Originally Posted by marsnkc View Post
I envy you getting the opportunity to see it in HD. I'd kill to have that beauty in Blu.........


Having now seen it, so would I. I'm not really a revisionist kind of chap, but I'm among those that would dearly love to ditch the Vangelis score, or at least score an alternative - I think it would do the film a power of good.

 

Adrian's biography of Robert Bolt arrived today, so it's all good. Thanks again for the nudge.

post #27 of 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by AdrianTurner View Post

Many thanks for all those kind comments - I was saddened to hear of the death of Dino, a very charismatic man who I had the privilege of meeting on several occasions.  Am writing this, by the way, from Wallis & Futuna in the South Pacific, having just sailed in from Bounty territory in Tahiti. 

You'll be forgiven only if this is a recce for future delights from your pen! (Oh, hell! Even if it's not, you've earned it - in spades!)
 

I spotted Dino at a Hollywood studio in the late '80s. If memory serves me, he wasn't in the best shape financially at the time, yet alighted from the back of the longest limousine I've ever seen - the kind one usually sees only in cartoons. The man had a healthy sense of self (...promotion?).
 

post #28 of 45

I noticed the weird frame double or skip that Mr. Gallagher, the blu-ray reviewer, pointed out in his review. It is quite obvious and I noticed it my first time viewing the blu-ray.

 

The video hiccup happens around 1:50:36 during an insert shot of a bird flying in the sky overhead. 

 

Since Mr. Gallagher states that the hiccup is also on the previously released DVD version, this leads me to believe that whatever master Sony/Columbia has of the film has the flaw in it and that the hiccup is not an encoding error. I do not know if this hiccup is present in the original theatrical prints (I've never seen the film projected from a theatrical print, but I can only assume the prints lacked this obvious error), but I suspect that the error has somehow been formed along the way in finding source material for home video and transferring it. Unfortunately, either Sony/Columbia hasn't noticed this problem or is too lazy to fix it.

 

Too bad they didn't choose new source material, one without the error, for the transfer. It is annoying that such a great film has been restored so nicely and released on an awesome home video format with an obvious, startling error. 

 

Other than the video hiccup, the blu-ray is excellent. In fact, the audio and video quality of the blu-ray is so good that it makes the video hiccup at 1:50:36 that much more disappointing.

 

I plan on contacting Sony/Colombia's Home Video Department to try and get information about the video hiccup and why it wasn't fixed/removed.

 

If anyone else has insight into this issue, I'd appreciate you posting it in this thread.

 

Thanks. 

post #29 of 45

I can help you.  I have received a response to your concern.

 

It is a jumpcut in the negative of the film and has always been there. 

There is nothing wrong with this shot.   That is why it is in previous releases, too.   

post #30 of 45

Ronald,

 

Thanks for the information.

 

Prior to reading your post, I sent Sony/Colombia an e-mail about the issue. They have yet to get back to me, and, now, they don't need to bother.

 

Thanks again for your insight into this "hiccup."

New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Official HTF Blu-ray Reviews

Gear mentioned in this thread:

Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Blu-ray, DVD, Streaming Video and Digital Downloads › Blu-ray › Official HTF Blu-ray Reviews › HTF BLU-RAY REVIEW: The Bridge on the River Kwai Collector's Edition