Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › TV Programming › Fringe season 3 thread
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Fringe season 3 thread - Page 12

post #331 of 357
post #332 of 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kurt Lang View Post

Some answers about Peter at these links:

 

http://www.tvline.com/2011/05/fringe-season-3-finale-review-answers/

 

 Very good news. Okay, I'm OFFICIALLY on for season 4. Funny, though, I was never a Joshua Jackson fan until I started watching FRINGE. Never paid any attention to him since I couldn't stand that DAWSON'S CREEK show, and most movies I saw him, well, he just never impressed me as an actor. He has now, though.

post #333 of 357

Same thing with Brian Austin Green.  Back in the '90s, I was all, "That guy from Beverly Hills 90210?  Bah!"  Then, he turns up as a badass on Terminator.  I also didn't like Dawson's Creek, and I saw Jackson in The Skulls, and thought, "I'll never be a fan of this guy."  Now, he's definitely one of my favorites on the air right now.  James Van Der Beek and Luke Perry, it's not too late.  Make me believe.  :)

post #334 of 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by SWFF View Post



 Very good news. Okay, I'm OFFICIALLY on for season 4. Funny, though, I was never a Joshua Jackson fan until I started watching FRINGE. Never paid any attention to him since I couldn't stand that DAWSON'S CREEK show, and most movies I saw him, well, he just never impressed me as an actor. He has now, though.

I did like Jackson's cameo in Soderbergh's Ocean's Eleven though. I never bothered wathcing Dawson's Creek but I agree that he is very impressive in Fringe.
 

 

post #335 of 357
The only things that I remember Joshua Jackson being in are a pair of Wes Craven movies (Cursed and he's got one scene in Scream 2) but he's definitely doing good work in Fringe.
post #336 of 357

I did not like the reduction of Walternate into a 1-dimensional villain -- that kind of threw off the suspension of disbelief for me. But I'll forgive. I just don't think Walternate would want to eliminate the entire human race. If he had been shown to have gone insane, that would have allowed for his desire. But they did not show that. Actually they also did not show him coming over to this side (he says he did, but that was the first the viewers had heard of it) -- maybe there was a lot of content that couldn't fit into the episode? If there's an expanded version of the last two episodes on DVD next year, maybe those missing bits about Walternate will be filled in.

 

Not worried about Peter. Of course he'll be back. It will be Fringe IV: The Search for Peter.

post #337 of 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Will_B View Post

I did not like the reduction of Walternate into a 1-dimensional villain -- that kind of threw off the suspension of disbelief for me. But I'll forgive. I just don't think Walternate would want to eliminate the entire human race. If he had been shown to have gone insane, that would have allowed for his desire. But they did not show that. Actually they also did not show him coming over to this side (he says he did, but that was the first the viewers had heard of it) 


Didn't they cover that with a line where he said he escaped his world to come over on a mercy mission, and failed?

 

Are you referring to Walternate as a one-dimensional villain in the future glimpse, or in this season as a whole?  Because at least in this season, I didn't find him to be one-dimensional.  I was actually really impressed with John Noble's portrayal of the two versions; after seeing Walter on our side, to see what he was like over there was startling.  And I think one thing worth keeping in mind is that Walternate's discovery of an alternate universe came as he found out his son was kidnapped by someone who looked just like him.  Isn't that one of the ultimate nightmare scenarios, that someone who looked like you could come into your home and just walk out with what was most precious to you?  Also, from earlier episodes this season, I got the impression that Walternate genuinely believed that our side was actively waging a war against his side, when we (the viewing audience) know that our side didn't intentionally start a war.

 

As for Walternate wanting the destruction of our world many years in the future, who knows what the horror of seeing your whole universe collapsing would do to you?  That's destruction on a level we can't fathom; even a nuclear attack wouldn't come close to time and space and physics literally coming apart at the seams.

post #338 of 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh Steinberg View Post




Didn't they cover that with a line where he said he escaped his world to come over on a mercy mission, and failed?

 

Are you referring to Walternate as a one-dimensional villain in the future glimpse, or in this season as a whole?  Because at least in this season, I didn't find him to be one-dimensional.  I was actually really impressed with John Noble's portrayal of the two versions; after seeing Walter on our side, to see what he was like over there was startling.  And I think one thing worth keeping in mind is that Walternate's discovery of an alternate universe came as he found out his son was kidnapped by someone who looked just like him.  Isn't that one of the ultimate nightmare scenarios, that someone who looked like you could come into your home and just walk out with what was most precious to you?  Also, from earlier episodes this season, I got the impression that Walternate genuinely believed that our side was actively waging a war against his side, when we (the viewing audience) know that our side didn't intentionally start a war.

 

As for Walternate wanting the destruction of our world many years in the future, who knows what the horror of seeing your whole universe collapsing would do to you?  That's destruction on a level we can't fathom; even a nuclear attack wouldn't come close to time and space and physics literally coming apart at the seams.




Yes, there was that line of dialogue about him having come over, but we never saw that happen.

 

I felt Walternate was a rich 3-dimensional character until this last episode. 

 

Did anyone else recognize the hospital Peter was in as the same hospital that Starbuck was in? Starbuck approached the same nurses station as she too wandered from her room...

post #339 of 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Will_B View Post

Did anyone else recognize the hospital Peter was in as the same hospital that Starbuck was in? Starbuck approached the same nurses station as she too wandered from her room...

I think it's the only hospital in Vancouver. I've seen it on The X-Files and Supernatural about 50 times each. I've also seen it in Millennium, The Killing and probably every show that has ever shot a hospital scene in British Columbia.
post #340 of 357

It's the Crease Clinic at Riverview Psych Hospital, which is actually in Coquitlam.  It's a *very* popular shooting location, though, and it does indeed pop up everywhere, most recently I've seen it in The Killing (which is amazing), as Travis stated above.

post #341 of 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by TravisR View Post


I think it's the only hospital in Vancouver. 


I know you probably didn't mean that to be humorous.. but I can't help but laugh at the idea anyway smile.gif

 

I finally got my brother to watch Fringe, and he's about a third of the way through the third season - I happened to watch an episode with him, and at one point they said they were going out to Oyster Bay, a town on Long Island, which is minutes away from where we grew up - when they put the title card onscreen, I couldn't help but blurt out, "Wow, I never realized Oyster Bay looked so much like Canada!"

post #342 of 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh Dial View Post

It's the Crease Clinic at Riverview Psych Hospital, which is actually in Coquitlam.  It's a *very* popular shooting location, though, and it does indeed pop up everywhere, most recently I've seen it in The Killing (which is amazing), as Travis stated above.


Is the whole hospital closed down or is just that wing closed?

And yes, The Killing is amazing. smile.gif
post #343 of 357

 

Quote:
 Yes, there was that line of dialogue about him having come over, but we never saw that happen.

 

But it was 2026.  There was 15 years worth of events we never saw happen.

post #344 of 357

True, but I think it bothered me because the episodes DID show the time period during which Walternate would have had to have crossed over -- he'd have to have done so between the time that his assistant called him to alert him that the device was acting strangely, and the moment when Peter got into it. The viewer was shown that period of time. And during that period of time, we were not shown Walternate making a decision to cross over, nor did we see him cross over. We were just told later. And that felt like a cheat, or at least, it felt like a cheat as far as seeing Walternate's character development was concerned, since next time we see him, he's a terrorist claiming that he came over to broker peace. It was just a lot of character-development ground to cover with exposition.

post #345 of 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Will_B View Post

True, but I think it bothered me because the episodes DID show the time period during which Walternate would have had to have crossed over -- he'd have to have done so between the time that his assistant called him to alert him that the device was acting strangely, and the moment when Peter got into it. The viewer was shown that period of time. And during that period of time, we were not shown Walternate making a decision to cross over, nor did we see him cross over. We were just told later. And that felt like a cheat...



I'm not sure that's entirely true.  Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think it was stated that the destruction of the other universe was instantaneous, making the window in which Walternate had to cross over extremely short.  It seems that it was hinted that the destruction of the other universe was similar to that which our universe is suffering, albeit at a very reduced rate.

 

Walternate told Peter that he came over on a mission of mercy "at the end," and that he was "asking for help."  That, to me, sounds like there was some delay between Peter getting into the machine and the machine over there acting strangely, and the complete annhilation of the universe.

 

However, Walternate also said that he was going to destory Peter's universe, and "not all at once."  That sort of implies that the annihilation was indeed instantaneous, though it might have been a comment made for dramatic effect.  At any rate, I think it looks more like there was some time for Walternate to try to counteract our machine, fail, realize he was beaten, and embark on his mission of mercy.

post #346 of 357

What Josh said - I don't think Walternate's transformation was instantaneous, or that any of the events happened all at once.  There's 15 years of backstory we didn't get.

 

I think what it really comes down to is what we see in that moment when Walter and Walternate finally meet each other; they're both understandable pissed (and I'm paraphrasing here) but Walter essentially says, everything I did was an accident, well-intentioned and ultimately selfish, but that I never intended for these consequences - and that you, Walternate, all of the destruction and violence you waged, that was intentional.  It's an important distinction.  But I think the brilliance in Noble's performance is that I can understand the motivations of Walternate as well as Walter.  There's a little bonus feature on the Fox website called "Noble Intentions" where every week, they have a brief interview with John Noble about whatever the episode concerns, and it's really interesting to hear his thoughts on the characters and how he plays them.

 

In the end, for a show like Fringe, I find it hard to make any kind of final determination or judgment of what I think -- because I'm very aware that I haven't seen the full picture yet.  To my mind (and I totally understand how others would differ, this is just my opinion), to judge whether a certain plotline or episode works at this point would be like saying a random chapter out of book worked or didn't work - I feel like I really need to see the whole before I can fully criticize what's going on.  So while I reserve final judgment until the show is, well, finalized - I have to say I'm enjoying the ride.  It's certainly tough to have to wait months for it to come back, and even week to week, it's not so easy waiting for the next episode.  It's one of this cases for me where, if the last episode I've seen has been a little disappointing, I want the next week's to make up for it, and if the last episode I saw was great, then I can't wait for what comes next.

 

(There are some people or websites that review each episode from week to week, for instance saying one episode was a B+ and another was a D, and without seeing how they all fit into the larger whole, I find it impossible to make that kind of determination - and almost unfair to even try to.)

post #347 of 357

A note from the NBC schedule -

http://www.deadline.com/2011/05/analysis-of-nbcs-schedule-bob-greenblatt-on-renewing-chuck-canceling-lola/

 

 

Quote:
SCRIPTED PROGRAMMING ON FRIDAY: NBC has not aired scripted series on the night for awhile but will run Chuck’s final season and the first season of the fairy tale-themed Grimm from 8-10 PM, leading into Dateline.”I think reinventing Friday with some genre shows is the way to go,” Greenblatt said, adding that he decided to use fan favorite Chuck to support freshman Grimm. The decision is somewhat surprising as Fox has already put a claim on Friday as genre night with Fringe.

 

They just continue to encourage the use of DVRs.

post #348 of 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilO View Post

They just continue to encourage the use of DVRs.


...and then are shocked, absolutely shocked, when people actually do use them instead of watching live.

post #349 of 357

As can be seen in many reports - FOX did not lie when they said that Fringe was renewed.  It is on the schedule on Friday nights at 9 PM.  

 

For some networks and shows this might not be noteworthy, but you can never tell with FOX.

post #350 of 357

The inaugural Critics' Choice Television Awards nominees were just announced.  There is an article on Deadline about them with the official press release.

Fringe was nominated in the Best Drama category, Anna Torv in Best Actress in a Drama Series, and John Noble as Best Supporting Actor in a Drama Series.

post #351 of 357

I just watched the Pilot episode again. Its really strange now because the way the characters are set up at the start is so different - best example is Broyles

 

Loved Nina at the end - How long has he been dead ---- Question him :)

 

post #352 of 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Simon Massey View Post

I just watched the Pilot episode again. Its really strange now because the way the characters are set up at the start is so different - best example is Broyles

 

Loved Nina at the end - How long has he been dead ---- Question him :)

 


I'm so glad they dropped the accent Broyles had.

 

post #353 of 357

I'm so glad they dropped John Scott biggrin.gif

post #354 of 357
Quote:
Originally Posted by Josh Steinberg View Post

I'm so glad they dropped John Scott biggrin.gif



It would have been difficult for the actress who plays Olivia to play with him since they broke up...

post #355 of 357

Jack Webb cast his ex and her new husband in Emergency!.  smile.gif

post #356 of 357
From and August 5 Deadline article of what Fox entertainment president Kevin Reilly told reporters at TCA:
Quote:
As for cult favorite, Fringe, "I don’t expect Fringe to grow, but if it does exactly what it did last year, we will be very, very happy," Reilly said.
http://www.deadline.com/2011/08/tca-decision-whether-this-is-houses-final-season-will-be-made-in-late-fall/#more-154228
post #357 of 357
Just finished Season 1 - going to be very interesting to see how they explore some of this in Season 4 given what happened at the end of 3.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: TV Programming
Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › TV Programming › Fringe season 3 thread