Starts tonight. Seven strangers wake up in a seemingly abandoned hotel in the middle of nowhere with no idea how they got there. Cameras are everywhere. Seems like a stripped down American take on "The Prisoner", perhaps crossed with the Saw movies.
Be a part of the community.
It's free, join today!
Featured Reviews
-
Man on a Ledge plummets onto Blu-ray this week with an edition that presents the picture and sound as well as possible, along with a minimum of special features. The movie itself is hard to...
-
The most infamously unsuccessful movie at the box-office thus far in 2012 (though Battleship and Dark Shadows may give it some competition), Andrew Stanton’s John Carter mixes elements of...
-
What can I say? I love 3D! From the moment I began watching 3D content in my home I quickly discovered that I needed more content. I suspect that those of you just purchasing...
-
Smokey and the Bandit drives onto Blu-ray in a nice edition that can really take the viewer back to 1977 for 90 minutes of sheer moviemaking fun. The Blu-ray comes with the same HD transfer...
-
Monika Eriksson is one of the first antiheroines in the filmography of Ingmar Bergman. In Summer with Monika, she’s brash, effervescent, and completely captivating, that is, until the realities...
Persons Unknown - NBC Summer Miniseries from the screenwriter of The Usual Suspects
Hmm, hadn't heard of this, but your description makes it sounds like it's at least worth checking out (especially with the lack of competition), thanks.
- Adam Lenhardt
- Location: Albany, NY
- online
- Joined: February 2001
- Posts: 12,210
- Select All Posts By This User
I enjoyed it. Paralllels to "The Prisoner" were appreciated and enjoyed: the 1950's Anywhere USA town in the middle of nowhere versus the technicolor Italianate architecture of the Village, passing out at the town limits versus having the weather balloon come and absorb you; this is arguably a closer remake than the AMC miniseries a while back. The puzzles and rewards, the tease that the captors might just be long-time players of the Game that have been unable to escape, the ever-present cameras all intrigued me. I think it was a mistake to include the reporter subplot. While the idea that the captors control useful parts of the real world is intriguing, it undercuts the paranoia and mystery that would have come from being locked into the prisoners' point of view.
Definitely much better quality that we usually get for summer programming.
I liked it. Had a Saw II vib to it without the gore or traps.
I was pretty impressed as well. The characters for once acted reasonably intelligently in that kind of situation, which is always a plus. (As opposed to say a horror movie where you want to scream at their stupidity).
The one thing that bugged me is nobody really searched the initial room they were in other than the key in the bible, to see if there was any sort of clue to their situations. I know when she put her back against the door initially, the first thing that jumped out at me was the "Downtown Hotel Rules" which I thought was going to have some sort of secret message in it (don't most hotels have fire escape locations on the back of the doors?) but obviously I was wrong.
I could of course be very wrong but my guess is it's most likely a sort of reality show they're being forced to star in, similar to The Running Man. Seems too huge of a production for it to be one psychopath, at least.
Also, seems fairly obvious that Joe has a criminal past.
As for the showing the grandmother and the daughter together out of the 'town', I'm not sure if I like that or not myself. I can definitely see what you're saying, but the reveal plus the creepiness of the grandmother has my attention and I'll have to see where that goes before I'm sure on it.
Very Twilight Zone. I was surprised they made it outside within the first half hour.
Anyone know what movie the set was used in previously? I know I saw it before, it was a horror type movie.
Maybe it was one of the new The Hills have eyes?
- Adam Lenhardt
- Location: Albany, NY
- online
- Joined: February 2001
- Posts: 12,210
- Select All Posts By This User
They light that transported them instantly back into town reminded me strongly of Rover from "The Prisoner". It's the first thing we've seen so far that is definitively next-gen technology. Little touches like the way the damaged security camera slid into the ceiling and another one came down a seemingly endless line of replacements really give this show texture. I liked the way the archetypes got muddled a bit, for instance the dumb slutty blonde turning out to be smart, well-educated and well-connected. So far we've seen two flashbacks; both the mother and the ambassador's daughter got themselves into serious trouble right before they disappeared. Is that true for the others as well? Is the night innkeeper another pawn? Was his nasty smile at the end that of a chess player directing his pawns or a victim happy to see his immediate abusers get their comeuppance.
Still don't need the reporter storyline.
I didn't mind it because I like sci-fi, but I could picture that transportation thing being the last straw for a lot of people who had been on the fence watching this show the first two episodes.
And yeah, I agree that the outside world stuff they've shown has been pretty much useless so far at least.
What makes you think it "transported them instantly back into town"? All we saw was them approaching a bright light and then, some unknown amount of time later, coming to their senses in town. Hours could have passed. We don't know. The implants that knocked them out when they hit the boundry and the microwave gun also looked like "magic tech" when we first saw them. (The latter looked like some kind of force field.)
And once again we have a plot element of a serialized show being dismissed as "useless" after two frickin' episodes. "Dear Professor Tolkein: Who is this Strider guy? Hes' useless; get rid of him. He just slows the story down." Do modern audiences really need everything spoon fed to them, every connection made explicit, every plot point explained? That seems an especially odd requirement for a show that is intended to be a mystery.
Sheesh.
Regards,
Joe
- Adam Lenhardt
- Location: Albany, NY
- online
- Joined: February 2001
- Posts: 12,210
- Select All Posts By This User

What makes you think it "transported them instantly back into town"? All we saw was them approaching a bright light and then, some unknown amount of time later, coming to their senses in town. Hours could have passed. We don't know. The implants that knocked them out when they hit the boundry and the microwave gun also looked like "magic tech" when we first saw them. (The latter looked like some kind of force field.)
The fact that they never appeared to lose consciousness, the fact that the bright light continued at the new location along the main strip, and the fact that the lighting outside was the same both before and after. Now granted, it COULD turn out that hours passed, and I wouldn't feel cheated by the show if that turns out to be the case. But I don't think it's unreasonable to make an assumption based on what we were shown.
I would argue that even if the bright light merely rendered them unconcious -- allowing someone to run up, push the captive out of the driver's seat, drive the van back into town, reposition the captive back into the driver's seat, and then take off before they regained consciousness -- that it would also be a next-gen technology since their implants were removed.
Sheesh.
I think what Joe and I were trying to say -- Joe even spelled it out explicitly -- is that the reporter's storyline hasn't made compelling television so far. As I mentioned earlier, I have a structural issue with showing the outside world at all this early in the story, because it undermines some of the paranoia and mystery of the town itself.
But even setting that aside, what we've gotten from the reporter storyline so far has been cliched storytelling that has only shared with us redundant information. The renegade reporter sleeping with his by-the-books female boss storyline has been done many, many times before and this miniseries hasn't brought anything new to the table. What's he learned about the female protagonist is that her husband ditch her and their daughter, she's been trying to track him down, and bad people were after her at the time she disappeared. We learned all of that in the first five minutes of the pilot.
The stuff with the grandmother is interesting, but not worth sacrificing the ambiance of the isolated town.
- Josh Dial
- Josh Dial
- Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- offline
- Joined: January 2000
- Posts: 2,263
- Select All Posts By This User
As usual, Joe has tapped into my mind and wrote exactly what I feel :)
Eh...I don't know. I just watched the first 2 episodes. Not really feeling it and I can't quite put my finger on it. I think it might be the really bad writing. Hard to believe it's supposedly the same guy that wrote 'The Usual Suspects' (a brilliantly written film). The dialog in this show seems really poorly written. And could the overweight car salesman guy be any more cliche?
I didn't get a 'Saw' feel at all, but it reminded me of a little-known movie with a similar name called 'Unknown'. In fact, if I'm the creator of that movie I might be on the phone with the NBC lawyers right now.
I'm enjoying it so far, but there seems to already be some inconsistent dialogue and a bit of agenda-minded writing. For example:
- In the first episode, Janet (the main female character) says she wishes her daughter was captured as well because at least she would be safe. Then in the second episode she is driven to get out because as long as they are separated, she believes her daughter is in danger.
- "Torture never works." Really? Morality/ethics discussion aside, I think the case could be made that it surely has been successful in the past. It sounded to me more like a writer trying to put his/her/their opinion out there and less like something the characters would really say.
On a different note, while the 'real world' stuff may not be as compelling, are we supposed to take the camera shots at the grandmother's and the bar literally? It isn't a big stretch or anything, but it sure implies that some people are involved (again, no surprise). I guess they want us to think that the grandmother and maybe the cop are involved, but I'm thinking the twist is much more likely to be that the reporter's boss is the one.
- In the first episode, Janet (the main female character) says she wishes her daughter was captured as well because at least she would be safe. Then in the second episode she is driven to get out because as long as they are separated, she believes her daughter is in danger.
I don't see the contradiction. In both cases Janet only believes her daughter is safe when the two of them are together. She'd rather they were together at home, but her second choice would be for her daughter to be a fellow captive, because at least she'd know where she was and what was happening to her. (I think there are also hints that Janet knows or suspects why this is all happening, at least to her, and that's why she's so concerned that her daughter is alone back in the "real world.")
- "Torture never works." Really? Morality/ethics discussion aside, I think the case could be made that it surely has been successful in the past. It sounded to me more like a writer trying to put his/her/their opinion out there and less like something the characters would really say.
No more calls, please, we have a winner. Torture doesn't work in extracting confessions to crimes, because eventually even an innocent victim will "confess" just to make the pain stop. However, torture can be and has been used to extract intelligence information from captured spies and soldiers for centuries. Military personnel are, in fact, specifically trained to resist aggressive interrogation techniques (which stop well short of the kind of genuine torture some of our enemies might employ) in order to prepare them mentally for such an eventuality. But is widely recognized that everyone has a limit, and that a captive subjected to torture will talk sooner or later. The idea is to hold out long enough for the information the bad guys gain to be rendered useless by time. Thus attack plans will be cancelled or altered, codes changed and undercover operatives extracted as soon as possible after an asset is captured, to avoid having them compromised.
For a U.S. Marine to make that statement is ludicrous, and it sure seems like Joe knows a thing or two about that world, so his agreement makes no sense, either. The argument against torturing the night manager isn't "torture doesn't work", it's "this guy either knows nothing or has been fed disinformation to fool us if we do torture him." Personally, I'd bet on the latter.
BTW, I find it odd that through two episodes none of the characters has suggested the incredibly obvious idea that one of them is a plant. If the mysterious "They" want to know what is going on at all times, the best way to do so is to plant a mole among the hostages.
Regards,
Joe
Originally Posted by Joseph DeMartino
BTW, I find it odd that through two episodes none of the characters has suggested the incredibly obvious idea that one of them is a plant. If the mysterious "They" want to know what is going on at all times, the best way to do so is to plant a mole among the hostages.
They have, a few times over, mostly in the first episode.
The mystery is intriguing enough to continue watching but the characters continue to underwhelm.
So, was the big reveal at the end of the last episode real or just a Photoshopped image to get rid of Renbe? I'm leaning towards the latter though I guess they could make it work. The main thing for me is that Renbe met the Janet's mother. While I know their relationship has not been good you would think she would know what her granddaughter's father looks like.
Yeah pretty sure it was a set up.
- Adam Lenhardt
- Location: Albany, NY
- online
- Joined: February 2001
- Posts: 12,210
- Select All Posts By This User
Could the soldier be any more of a cliche? There's no there there. Otherwise, I liked the episode. I enjoy the way the manipulations turn human weaknesses against the captives.
I think it'd be far more interesting if Renbe actually is the husband. It'd certainly explain why he's so obsessed with this case. Otherwise, the holding pattern of Renbe pursuing the mystery, getting threatened, stopping pursuit appears as if it will continue indefinitely.
- Adam Lenhardt
- Location: Albany, NY
- online
- Joined: February 2001
- Posts: 12,210
- Select All Posts By This User
I just got used to this show being on at 10 PM, and now they move it to 8 PM. Damn.
Doozy of an ending tonight. The secret concrete interrogation room with the Chinese Restaurant guy who's as American as apple pie coupled with the reveal of the obvious -- that Joe's the plant.
Yeah wasn't surprised by that at all. That might be the last episode for me, I'm not sure. I do have a mild interest in what the hell is going on, but I really have no interest in any of the characters and the writing is terrible. This entire episode just seemed completely pointless until the reveal at the end.
And if the taxi cab can get through the magic wall with 2 of the captives in it, why couldn't the rest of them go through it with them? And how did they get back in? The wall knows which direction you're coming from?
- PhilipG
- PhilipG
- Location: deepest darkest Deutschland
- offline
- Joined: January 2000
- Posts: 1,984
- Select All Posts By This User
Well, I'm still enjoying this show as a (decent) new version of The Prisoner. I have no problems with the dialogue. Maybe the direction is a little flat, is all. And a pity Alan Ruck's character couldn't finish the job on the "car salesman"...
It's clear to me that, since everyone's on camera, the bad guys know when a car needs to get through the barrier and so can turn it off and on as appropriate.
Dead Show News: Persons Unknown Exiled To Saturday; The Forgotten Final 2 Episodes
Well at least they are showing the final 2 episodes.
I can't really get into the show, but I posted the news for fans of the show. I was never a fan of the Prisoner, either. I don't enjoy being frustrated every week. I think about a show like "Lost" which also had disappointments (remember trying to leave on the raft?), but that didn't affect me the same way. I think it's because with Lost, there wasn't just the overall goal (getting off the island) but many smaller goals where the Losties succeeded. Persons Unknown (and The Prisoner), feel like just a bunch of failures until the ultimate final success. It's a bit of a bummer on a weekly basis.
Edited by Mikah Cerucco - 7/7/10 at 1:51pm
You're referring to 2 episodes of The Forgotten, right? How many episodes is PU supposed to run?
EDIT: This is referring to Robert's post. I meant to quote him but hit reply instead.
This show would be so much better if it was played at 2x speed, with the Benny Hill theme music playing in the background.
- Adam Lenhardt
- Location: Albany, NY
- online
- Joined: February 2001
- Posts: 12,210
- Select All Posts By This User
I'm still digging it. Every hour introduces something new to change our perceptions of the overall puzzle. The outside world stuff, while still not terribly compelling, was made instantly better by the revelation that Renby is the former Mr. Cooper. And I think the show would be doing better in the ratings if the advertising had prominently previewed the introduction of Battlestar Galactica beauty Kandyse McClure. Her role on this show is a complete stereotype, as most of the characters are, but it's fascinating to watch since none of her previous performances had even a wiff of urban ghetto.
The characterizations may be rudimentary, but this is easily the bravest piece of summer programming NBC has launched in years. I love the way the show subverts the audience's expectations, without really cheating.
- Persons Unknown - NBC Summer Miniseries from the screenwriter of The Usual Suspects
Recent Discussions
- › Fox Cinema Archives - MODs are coming in June 8 seconds ago
- › Coppola/Zoetrope version of Napoleon? 44 seconds ago
- › Agatha Christie's Poirot: Series 4 Blu-ray Review 2 minutes ago
- › Mad Men: Season Five 3 minutes ago
- › While we wait for A few words about...™ Lawrence of Arabia -- in... 5 minutes ago
- › NFL 2012 Off Season Discussion Thread 6 minutes ago
- › Blade Runner 30th Anniversary Edition Blu-ray available for preorder 7 minutes ago
- › USHE Press Release: E.T. The Extra-Terrestrial 7 minutes ago
- › New 'Trek' Villain announced. 11 minutes ago
- › Fugitive comes to DVD in a 33 disc set on Nov. 1st 2011 17 minutes ago
Recent Reviews
- › Harold and Maude (The Criterion Collection) [Blu-ray] by MattH.
- › TouchSquid Universal Remote Control Tablet TS781 by dannydonqui
- › Man on a Ledge [Blu-ray] by Kevin EK
- › The Woman in Black (+ UltraViolet Digital Copy) [Blu-ray] by Richard Gallagher
- › John Carter (Four-Disc Combo: Blu-ray 3D/Blu-ray/DVD + Digital Copy) by MattH.
- › Journey 2: The Mysterious Island (Blu-ray 3D / Blu-ray / DVD /... by Ronald Epstein
- › Smokey and the Bandit [Blu-ray + DVD + Digital Copy]... by Kevin EK
- › Summer with Monika (The Criterion Collection) [Blu-ray] by MattH.
- › The Jungle Bunch: The Movie by Kevin EK
- › Chronicle (Two-Disc Blu-ray/DVD Combo +Digital Copy) by MattH.
New Articles
- › Harman Kardon Introduces a New Sound Bar... by nickvalluri
- › TruGreen by brand46
- › HTF Oscar Chat Prize List by Adam Gregorich
- › HTF AWARDS 2011 by Ronald Epstein
- › 2012 Home Theater Forum Meet Information by Ronald Epstein
- › HTF Official Blu Ray Review Archive Part 2 by Ronald Epstein
- › Robert Fowkes, HTF Moderator, 1942-2011 by Ronald Epstein
- › Blu-ray Previously Released Listing: #-D by Robert Crawford
- › Blu-ray Previously Released Listing: E-I by Robert Crawford
- › Blu-ray Previously Released Listing: J-P by Robert Crawford
About Home Theater Forum | Join the Community | HTF Chat | HTF Events | Advertise
© 2012 Home Theater Forum is powered by Huddler Tech | FAQ | Support | Privacy/TOS | Site Map





