Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Blu-ray, DVD, Streaming Video and Digital Downloads › DVD › Universal Vault Series - Amazon.com exclusive DVD-Rs
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Universal Vault Series - Amazon.com exclusive DVD-Rs - Page 8

post #211 of 542
Is there a link at amazon for these, I couldn't find one.
post #212 of 542
Go to "Movies & TV" in Amazon and search "Amazon exclusives" (or "Amazon.com exclusives"). They'll all pop up. Great marketing, right?
post #213 of 542
I wish MGM would release The Satan Bug, which has never seen a release other than pan and scan VHS. Unlikely to happen for the time being however.

Doug
post #214 of 542
I thought The Satan Bug was released in letterbox on laserdisc.
post #215 of 542
THE SATAN BUG did get a wide screen laser disc release. I have it.
post #216 of 542
Ah yeah you're right about the laserdisc. But that doesn't help me now! There is a region 2 PAL release, but the quality of the transfer is not great.

Doug
post #217 of 542
I use this link to monitor the Amazon-Universal Vault series:

http://www.amazon.com/s/ref=nb_sb_noss?url=search-alias%3Ddvd&field-keywords=Universal+Vault+series&x=7&y=16

Too bad they can't make up there mind to have all the titles priced the same, preferably $14.95; some of the titles go up and down almost daily.
post #218 of 542
Quote:
Originally Posted by Douglas Monce View Post




I don't know. Netflix instant view service, which is available on a large number of DVD and blu-ray players, not to mention the Xbox 360 and Playstation 3 couldn't be much simpler to use. The movie starts playing in about 5 to 8 seconds. Faster than most blu-rays load. Some TVs are now coming out with this service built into them so you don't even need a player. Blockbuster now has an instant view service too. The quality is remarkably good, particularly with the films in HD, and they have thousands of films available now. My guess is that optical media has about 5 years left before it is seriously on its way out.

At that point I think this kind of service will be the only way you can watch movies in the future. Soon I don't think you'll even be able to download a movie, it will be streaming only. Honestly I think owning a physical copy of a movie is on the way out, which is exactly what studios want.

Doug

 




This is absolutely true on all accounts.  Blu-Ray and MOD are the last breaths of any home video system or format which entails the public "owning" studio property.  I think the current streaming system Netflix offers will only continue to evolve and become the new standard.  It will be a subscription based service that will work differently, but as easily as a DVR, something that many of those in the allegedly slow to adapt older demographics have already mastered.
post #219 of 542
Streaming is great.

If you want to watch something once in crap quality that is.

Never mind "I'S WATCHIN' MOVIES ON MAH IPHONE, INNIT"

It's somewhat ironic that everyone seems to be looking forward to rushing into what is, in actuality, the archaic mode of delivery that was subscription cable TV movie channels, which VHS and then later DVD liberated us from.

The sole sifferences being, you choose when you watch rather than the broadcaster, and the content comes over the internet rather than broadcast.

Other than that it's exactly the same.

And equally rubbish for movie collectors.
post #220 of 542
I don't know anyone who is actually looking forward to streaming as the new standard, I'm certainly not, but I do believe Doug's forecast seems quite prescient, whether we like it or not.
post #221 of 542
     Quote:
Originally Posted by Point-Blank View Post

I don't know anyone who is actually looking forward to streaming as the new standard, I'm certainly not, but I do believe Doug's forecast seems quite prescient, whether we like it or not.


I have to agree with this, unfortunately (like Walker, I'm not looking forward to it, but it seems inevitable).  A friend I know who is a Sony rep basically told me the same thing about streaming being the future just last month.  He also said he was surprised to see how well some streaming content looked coming thru a device attached to a large screen TV.  I would have thought anything of this nature would have looked pretty poor compared to Blu-ray, but from the anecdotal evidence I'm privy to that's not necessarily the case.  So yes, I think Doug's forecast is probably spot on correct.


Gary "I do think we'll have access to dvd and blu-ray players for at least another decade or so, but I'm not as sure we'll see films released in either format 10 years down the line" O.
post #222 of 542
I have my doubts., though they keep saying DVD/BlueRay sales are down they are still a very good revenue stream(pun may or may not be intended).  Look at all the people just on the forums who have large collections...with streaming only I know I for one will not be buying not even close to what I do now. The appeal just won't be there...unless they offer a download along with it so I can at least burn a copy then forget it. I'll just cut way down on what I see...fact is most people just collect and they sit on the shelf till they get around ot it if ever...well those sales are gone if they do streaming only...no time to watch everything we have so why would most buy a steaming look at a movie...who has the time to watch as many as we buy not to mention keeping up with watching new releases. Back catalog titles will wilt and die so why would the studios just let the revenue go...if they don't at least offer some sort of download then they are just plain stupid. 

From what I am reading they are doing pretty well with the burn on demand stuff so I don't think they will stop offering  that anytime soon...even with pressed, when WB says they make a 2 million dollar profit on the Esther Williams collection...Yes Esther Williams..I have to believe in some form there will be an avenue for collector's to still collect. They aren't that stupid.
post #223 of 542
I have a book called THE PICTORAL HISTORY OF THE TALKIES by Daniel Blum. Looking through it I found some titles I thought would be good for Universal's Vault series.  Some are early Paramounts that Universal may have the rights to. Assuming none of these end up preferably on pressed disc.  The titles are:ISLAND OF LOST SOULS, MARY BURNS,FUGITIVE, THE JUNGLE PRINCESS, SING YOU SINNERS, THE BUCCANEER ('38),NORTH WEST MOUNTED POLICE, REAP THE WILD WIND, FLESH AND FANTASY, CHINA. DARK MIRROR,THE GREAT IMPOSTER, ROMANOFF AND JULIET, THE JOKERS and TOBRUK to name a few.
post #224 of 542
Quote:
Originally Posted by montag View Post

I have a book called THE PICTORAL HISTORY OF THE TALKIES by Daniel Blum. Looking through it I found some titles I thought would be good for Universal's Vault series.  Some are early Paramounts that Universal may have the rights to. Assuming none of these end up preferably on pressed disc.  The titles are:ISLAND OF LOST SOULS, MARY BURNS,FUGITIVE, THE JUNGLE PRINCESS, SING YOU SINNERS, THE BUCCANEER ('38),NORTH WEST MOUNTED POLICE, REAP THE WILD WIND, FLESH AND FANTASY, CHINA. DARK MIRROR,THE GREAT IMPOSTER, ROMANOFF AND JULIET, THE JOKERS and TOBRUK to name a few.

Reap the Wild Wind is available on DVD from Universal now.  Amazon has several copies.
The Buccaneer is still owned by Paramount.  It was not sold to MCA since DeMille was interested in a remake.
All purists are hoping for a pressed discs of Island Of Lost Souls and North West Mounted Police.  We would more than likely rise in revolt on an announcement of a DVD-r on either of these films.

The rest of the list are all I would buy. Good suggestions.

PS- I have the book too and it is pure enjoyment.
post #225 of 542
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahollis View Post




Reap the Wild Wind is available on DVD from Universal now.  Amazon has several copies.
The Buccaneer is still owned by Paramount.  It was not sold to MCA since DeMille was interested in a remake.
All purists are hoping for a pressed discs of Island Of Lost Souls and North West Mounted Police.  We would more than likely rise in revolt on an announcement of a DVD-r on either of these films.

The rest of the list are all I would buy. Good suggestions.

PS- I have the book too and it is pure enjoyment.

Really, how do you speak for all "purists"?





Crawdaddy
post #226 of 542
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Crawford View Post




Really, how do you speak for all "purists"?





Crawdaddy

 

Your right I don't, I guess I speak for myself and a few friends. I would be disappointed if the two films showed up as DVD-r's and not pressed, though I am a full supporter of both Warners and Universal MOD's and have own many that I know I would not have if they were not MOD's.  I am not a fan of MGM's attempt.

Thanks for putting me straight and getting my nose out of the air. 
post #227 of 542
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahollis View Post




Your right I don't, I guess I speak for myself and a few friends. I would be disappointed if the two films showed up as DVD-r's and not pressed, though I am a full supporter of both Warners and Universal MOD's and have own many that I know I would not have if they were not MOD's.  I am not a fan of MGM's attempt.

Thanks for putting me straight and getting my nose out of the air. 
 

Hey, I want them on press discs too with some work done on the film elements, but at this time, it doesn't look good for those prospects.






Crawdaddy
post #228 of 542
Quote:
Originally Posted by Robert Crawford View Post




Hey, I want them on press discs too with some work done on the film elements, but at this time, it doesn't look good for those prospects.






Crawdaddy
 

I understand the elements for Island Of Lost Souls are in terrible shape.  If not, I think we would have seen this on DVD already.  The laserdisc is not anything to write home about either (or in this forum), but I am glad I have it.  It is a very interesting film and Laughton's acting is intriguing. 
post #229 of 542
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gary OS View Post

     Quote:



I have to agree with this, unfortunately (like Walker, I'm not looking forward to it, but it seems inevitable).  A friend I know who is a Sony rep basically told me the same thing about streaming being the future just last month.  He also said he was surprised to see how well some streaming content looked coming thru a device attached to a large screen TV.  I would have thought anything of this nature would have looked pretty poor compared to Blu-ray, but from the anecdotal evidence I'm privy to that's not necessarily the case.  So yes, I think Doug's forecast is probably spot on correct.


Gary "I do think we'll have access to dvd and blu-ray players for at least another decade or so, but I'm not as sure we'll see films released in either format 10 years down the line" O.

I wouldn't say I'm looking forward to it, its just the reality of the situation. And yes the quality is improving by leaps and bounds. I know that codecs are being worked on that will bring the bitrate down even more, and the same quality. I suspect you will have near blu-ray quality with in 2 or 3 years. Again my only real complaint right now is that they are cropping 2.35:1 films to 1.78:1. But to have unlimited access to as many movies as I want for $9.95 a month is a fairly good deal.

Doug
post #230 of 542
Quote:
Originally Posted by Van594 View Post

I have my doubts., though they keep saying DVD/BlueRay sales are down they are still a very good revenue stream(pun may or may not be intended).  Look at all the people just on the forums who have large collections...with streaming only I know I for one will not be buying not even close to what I do now. The appeal just won't be there...unless they offer a download along with it so I can at least burn a copy then forget it. I'll just cut way down on what I see...fact is most people just collect and they sit on the shelf till they get around ot it if ever...well those sales are gone if they do streaming only...no time to watch everything we have so why would most buy a steaming look at a movie...who has the time to watch as many as we buy not to mention keeping up with watching new releases. Back catalog titles will wilt and die so why would the studios just let the revenue go...if they don't at least offer some sort of download then they are just plain stupid. 

From what I am reading they are doing pretty well with the burn on demand stuff so I don't think they will stop offering  that anytime soon...even with pressed, when WB says they make a 2 million dollar profit on the Esther Williams collection...Yes Esther Williams..I have to believe in some form there will be an avenue for collector's to still collect. They aren't that stupid.

I'm actually finding that I'm watching more movies that I wouldn't ordinarily, because its so easy to browse and just click on something. I watch some films that I wouldn't waste my time with because if I don't like it I can just stop it and move on to something else, rather than having to send it back and wait for the next movie.

Doug
post #231 of 542
Quote:
Originally Posted by ahollis View Post




Reap the Wild Wind is available on DVD from Universal now.  Amazon has several copies.
The Buccaneer is still owned by Paramount.  It was not sold to MCA since DeMille was interested in a remake.
All purists are hoping for a pressed discs of Island Of Lost Souls and North West Mounted Police.  We would more than likely rise in revolt on an announcement of a DVD-r on either of these films.

The rest of the list are all I would buy. Good suggestions.

PS- I have the book too and it is pure enjoyment.

I don't really care what the delivery method is as long as the film is watchable. I would prefer some kind of clean up process, but with many of these film I'm not going to complain to much as long as I can watch them.

I'm not convenience that a pressed DVD is really all that much more durable than a DVD-R. I've had a fair number of pressed discs go bad on me.

Doug
post #232 of 542
Quote:
Originally Posted by Douglas Monce View Post




I don't really care what the delivery method is as long as the film is watchable. I would prefer some kind of clean up process, but with many of these film I'm not going to complain to much as long as I can watch them.

I'm not convenience that a pressed DVD is really all that much more durable than a DVD-R. I've had a fair number of pressed discs go bad on me.

Doug

 

I do agree with you on most titles that is does not matter, but Island Of Lost Souls released on a pressed DVD would hopefully include some extras.  Universal has at least given us a few featurettes and trailers on there Vault series and IOLS is deserving of this.  I have about 10 of the Universal MOD's from Amazon and very happy with them.  From Ruggles of Red Gap to Tell Them Willie Boy Is Here are titles that more or less would not see light of day unless released this way and have them.  My resentment to IOLS on MOD is not the delivery as much as the need for some restoration and extras.  It seems only pressed discs get the extra restoration that is sometimes needed.

I completely understand that the WA and Universal MOD's are not in the same league as home DVD-r's are, 
post #233 of 542
I have a feeling that as the MOD programs grow, you will start to see special features on some of the films. I believe that some of them are already starting to include the trailers.

Actually the MOD DVD-rs are exactly the same technology as home burned DVD-r. The only difference it they have the ability to do regular maintenance on their writing equipment which most people at home don't. I suspect that they also buy the highest quality blank discs, which if it is the case they should have a 100 year or more life span.

Doug
post #234 of 542
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebiroth View Post

Streaming is great.

If you want to watch something once in crap quality that is.


Never mind "I'S WATCHIN' MOVIES ON MAH IPHONE, INNIT"

It's somewhat ironic that everyone seems to be looking forward to rushing into what is, in actuality, the archaic mode of delivery that was subscription cable TV movie channels, which VHS and then later DVD liberated us from.

The sole sifferences being, you choose when you watch rather than the broadcaster, and the content comes over the internet rather than broadcast.

Other than that it's exactly the same.

And equally rubbish for movie collectors.

 
Very untrue.
Netflix streaming has a large portion of titles in HD, and they look like HD,
Most of the non hd titles also look very good, at about dvd quality.
post #235 of 542
Quote:
Originally Posted by Douglas Monce View Post

I
Actually the MOD DVD-rs are exactly the same technology as home burned DVD-r. The only difference it they have the ability to do regular maintenance on their writing equipment which most people at home don't. I suspect that they also buy the highest quality blank discs, which if it is the case they should have a 100 year or more life span.

Doug
 

Do you know this for a fact? Saying they are the same technology could mean anything really...many things share the same technology but doesn't mean one is not better than the other. I mean heck a Yugo was the same technology as a Porsche but I  think you know one is definitley better than the other. I'm sure they have a little better quality machines(especially to do high volumes of burns) then average Joe Blow has on his computer from Dell or whomever.
post #236 of 542
Yes. A DVD-R is a DVD-R. They are the same thing you can buy in the store and burn yourself. It just uses light from a laser to write to a dye that is in a layer of the disc. The only real difference it probably the robust build of an industrial burner.

Doug

Edit: Oh and of course the Archive and Vault discs have a screened label on them rather than something you might do in an inkjet printer.
post #237 of 542
Quote:
Originally Posted by Douglas Monce View Post

Yes. A DVD-R is a DVD-R. They are the same thing you can buy in the store and burn yourself. It just uses light from a laser to write to a dye that is in a layer of the disc. The only real difference it probably the robust build of an industrial burner.

Doug

Edit: Oh and of course the Archive and Vault discs have a screened label on them rather than something you might do in an inkjet printer.



 

I will agree with you that the process is the same, but are they not using equipment that is better than one would buy off of the self at Best Buy?  All I can say is that the WA DVD-r's seem to be of better quality than what I have burned from my Sony DVD recorder. 
post #238 of 542
I don't know why you would assume that.

The MOD programs all have the hallmarks of minimum outlay. I have absolutely no doubt that these things are produced in a roomful of PC's each of which has seven or eight bog-standard DVD writer drives in it; the main difference between home burning and this is the scale, and they'll be using software that permits making many copies simultaneously across a network of many machines and drives rather than the one-to-one process you use at home (in much the same way that software can be used to clone an operating system disc across many machines in a network, rather than having to run the installer on all of them one at a time). We should also remember that in digital reproduction, you're just making a copy of the ones and zeroes so quality becomes less of an issue. Far less than it would in an analogue system.

It will all be off-the-shelf kit, for there is no reason for it not to be. The interview claims that "these aren't like home burnt DVD's" which is true considering the way they are made, but fundamentally they are no different.

DVD recorders are a different kettle of fish, because that starts to involve the authoring and encoding rather than simply reproduction and in those areas the WA is probably superior; the master copy will be better.

There is no reason to assume "top quality", any more than the studios used top-grade VHS tape - or indeed, top grade recorders for reproduction. It was basically a warehouse full of cheap VHS machines recording onto inexpensive tape!

The main difference between cheap and quality DVD media is the failure rate - of the initial write and also how long it remains readable.

There is one way to tell; start sticking WA DVD-R's into disc checkers that will give you the media code. From this you can tell the exact brand of the disc, the dye used and where it was made.

If they are top-quality they'll have good quality dyes like Taiyo Yuden, and they'll be made in Japan.

If of the shall we say less expensive variety they probably got churned out by CMC Magnetics.

Brand names are not always that informative, since many "quality brands" use quite cheap and nasty rebadged media.
post #239 of 542
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nebiroth View Post

I don't know why you would assume that.

The MOD programs all have the hallmarks of minimum outlay. I have absolutely no doubt that these things are produced in a roomful of PC's each of which has seven or eight bog-standard DVD writer drives in it; the main difference between home burning and this is the scale, and they'll be using software that permits making many copies simultaneously across a network of many machines and drives rather than the one-to-one process you use at home (in much the same way that software can be used to clone an operating system disc across many machines in a network, rather than having to run the installer on all of them one at a time). We should also remember that in digital reproduction, you're just making a copy of the ones and zeroes so quality becomes less of an issue. Far less than it would in an analogue system.

It will all be off-the-shelf kit, for there is no reason for it not to be. The interview claims that "these aren't like home burnt DVD's" which is true considering the way they are made, but fundamentally they are no different.

DVD recorders are a different kettle of fish, because that starts to involve the authoring and encoding rather than simply reproduction and in those areas the WA is probably superior; the master copy will be better.

There is no reason to assume "top quality", any more than the studios used top-grade VHS tape - or indeed, top grade recorders for reproduction. It was basically a warehouse full of cheap VHS machines recording onto inexpensive tape!

The main difference between cheap and quality DVD media is the failure rate - of the initial write and also how long it remains readable.

There is one way to tell; start sticking WA DVD-R's into disc checkers that will give you the media code. From this you can tell the exact brand of the disc, the dye used and where it was made.

If they are top-quality they'll have good quality dyes like Taiyo Yuden, and they'll be made in Japan.

If of the shall we say less expensive variety they probably got churned out by CMC Magnetics.

Brand names are not always that informative, since many "quality brands" use quite cheap and nasty rebadged media.
 

I think the that the thing is that neither of us have seen or know what equipment is being used.  I just know that some of my burned DVD's off my equipment have problems after a period of time that is shorter than some of the titles I own from WA.  My unfortunate lack of ture success with home burned DVD's has soured me on recording off TCM.  I have not had a DVD-r from WA that will not play, nor one that has pixilated on me.  I know that I am fortunate since others have had problems, but I have not.  Common sense tells me that the better transfer would come from better equipment, whether they are hooked up in a line or not. 
post #240 of 542
Quote:
Originally Posted by Douglas Monce View Post

Yes. A DVD-R is a DVD-R. They are the same thing you can buy in the store and burn yourself. It just uses light from a laser to write to a dye that is in a layer of the disc. The only real difference it probably the robust build of an industrial burner.

Doug

Edit: Oh and of course the Archive and Vault discs have a screened label on them rather than something you might do in an inkjet printer.



 

So basically you don't really know either way it's just another firum type opinion based on what you think. Once again same tech does not mean same quality machines. A Yugo processes gas the same way as a Porsche but once again not the same.

 I could have sworn WB addressed this once and in fact said it was of a higher quality then at home burners.  Frankly, I don't really care I buy them because I love the movie or I don't get it. Whatever process odds are the discs will out live me anyway.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: DVD
Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Blu-ray, DVD, Streaming Video and Digital Downloads › DVD › Universal Vault Series - Amazon.com exclusive DVD-Rs