Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › Track the Films You Watch (2010)
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Track the Films You Watch (2010) - Page 3

post #61 of 1166
I finished the Sony Sam Fuller boxset tonight.  Great stuff, I'm pleased with the blind buy.

Underworld U.S.A (1961) 3.5/5 - Another tight crime film by Sam Fuller.  This one differed in that in stead of using the format to pass a message about social injustice, it's instead about the obsessive drive to stop the ones who cause it.  Robertson seems doomed from the start, and the whole thing plays out in a clever way to keep you interested. 

post #62 of 1166
Thread Starter 

Black Emmanuelle, White Emmanuelle (1976) * 1/2

The actual merit of any Emmanuelle film could be debated but it seems the sleazier they got the more of a cult following they gathered.  We had official entries in the series, rips, countless sequels and at times films that had nothing to do with the sexy lady but a film still got her name in the credits.  That's the case with this film, also known as BLACK VELVET, which features some lovely ladies acting in various sexual acts but none are named Emmanuelle.  No white Emmanuelle and no black Emmanuelle.  Not only is there no Emmanuelle but there's not much plot either.  In the film Laura Gemser plays a beautiful model who is constantly being abused by her photographer boyfriend (Gabriele Tinti).  The two find themselves in Egypt where they encounter various strange folks including the daughter (Annie Belle) of a sexually frustrated woman and another pervert (Al Cliver) who tries to come off like a Jesus-type figure.  Again, there's really not too much going on here in terms of an actual story and in the end it pretty much hurts the film but to be honest, Emmanuelle films, no matter what country they were coming from, dealt with stories too well.  This film has a few good things going for it but just not enough to make it worth sitting through the 94-minute running time.  There are a few campy moments including one early on where the abusive boyfriend makes Gemser pose next to a rotting dog.  What this had to do with anything or the reason for it is beyond me but seeing the beautiful Gemser next to a dead dog was kind of weird to say the least. Fans of Gemser will certainly want to check this film out as she's naked plenty of times and I'm sure this is the main reason to turn into any of her films.  Belle comes off pretty good as well as she fits her role perfectly and her scenes with Gemser are quite erotic.  Cliver, best known for his role in Fulci's ZOMBIE, is also fun if you're a fan of his.  There's quite a bit of nudity but the sex scenes are all rather tame except for the one between Gemser and Belle.  The films pacing is all over the place and it's really too slow to make the film work.  The cinematography is above average for this type of flick and the editing by the one and only Bruno Mattei isn't that bad either.  Stiill, there's just not enough here to make the film work and in the end it's certainly for Gemser fans only.

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Teller View Post

The Rite (rewatch) - Rating: 7

Paranormal Activity -  Rating: 8



I really enjoyed THE RITE when I rented the R2 disc a few years ago.  I had never heard of the film before renting it so perhaps I didn't have any sort of expectation but I was completely soaked up in the drama. 

As a major horror fan, I never take horror fans opinions on certain movies when hype or backlash is in the subject.  I've seen so many movie that are considered "the next great thing" only to see a complete piece of shit and I've seen many great movies that get ripped apart shortly after they become a hit.  I thought PA was great and I still think BLAIR WITCH holds up perfectly well. 


Cobra (1986)
 

George P. Comatos
 

If it's the 80s, big, loud, stupid and has plenty of bad one-liners then it must be a film from Cannon.  A tough Lieutenant known as Cobra (Sylvester Stallone) tries stopping a gang of psychopaths who are killing and mutilating dozens of people for no apparent reason.  One victim (Brigitte Nielsen) manages to escape and gets protection from Cobra but sure enough the crazies come after them.  This film is certainly trashy enough to where you'd think it was a vehicle for Charles Bronson who was Cannon's #1 guy during this era.  I was a little surprised to see that Stallone wrote the screenplay but it really does seem like he was a fan of those earlier Bronson/Cannon movies and especially 10 TO MIDNIGHT, which this film shares a few familiar scenes.  This is an extremely stupid movie with an outrageous story but I really don't think Stallone was trying to make some sort of statement or social commentary.  I'm fairly certain his only goal was to make a loud and action packed film and that's what he has done and on that level this film is a moderate success.  I think the film works best when the action scenes are going full blast including the opening one, which is just downright brain dead as one of the maniacs goes into a grocery store and starts blowing people away.  This entire sequence is so over the top that you can't help but laugh but even funnier are some of the one-liners Sly gives.  On the performance side of things you really can't expect too much as Stallone just walks around like the coolest thing around and shouting out these bad lines.  Nielson, his main squeeze at the time, certainly can't act but at least she looks good.  Andrew Robinson and Reni Santori share supporting roles and the two previous appeared in DIRTY HARRY together.  When all is said and done, if you're wanting a serious film that takes a look at serious issues then you're certainly not going to find it here.  If you want silly camp then this film delivers for the most part.
 

American Werewolf in Paris, An (1997)
 

Anthony Waller
 

An American (Tom Everett Scott) saves a Parisian (Julie Delpy) from suicide and then falls in love with her not knowing she's a werewolf.  Soon he too is a werewolf and they must fight off other werewolves in this incredibly silly film.  I still remember going to see this thing on opening day and I still remember the sold out crowd booing at the end.  This really doesn't have any connections to AN AMERICAN WEREWOLF IN LONDON outside this being nothing more than a remake but I even have a hard time calling it a remake because for the most part this film comes off as a romantic comedy about an American in Paris trying to get over his nerves to get the girl he likes.  All of the werewolf stuff seems forced and it often times takes a back seat to some incredibly stupid comic bits.  For the life of me I'll never understand why they went for as much comedy as they did.  Not that I mind that because LONDON worked both sides of the coin perfectly well and I think you can watch this film and see why the Landis movie is such a masterpiece because it was able to pull this off.  This film, however, doesn't manage to get anything right and in the end it's just a boring mess with a lot more negative things than positive.  The one positive thing is Delpy who turns in a nice performance even though you can't help but think she's way too good for this material.  Scott, just off THAT THING YOU DO!, comes off with a decent performance but the screenplay really doesn't do him any justice.  The rest of the supporting players get lost in all the mess and none of them get much to do.  The biggest problem are the horrible CGI effects that are so cheap looking that many of them take place off camera.  The effects we do see are incredibly bad, cheap and laughable.  I'm really not sure what they were trying to do with this film but it turned out to be a complete misfire that has already been forgotten.
 

Gummo (1997) BOMB

Harmony Korine
 

A tornado ripped through an Ohio town and pretty much took it off the map.  All that remains is a bunch of white trash including two teens who work by killing cats and selling them to the local supermarket.  I really hate films that try to act like they're something they're not and that's one of the many problems with GUMMO.  Korine, who wrote the screenplay for the masterpiece KIDS, makes his directorial debut here and his screenplay once again tries to capture the spirit of the earlier Larry Clark film but this here is pretty much a complete disaster from the start and it never gets any better.  I'm really not sure what the point of this film was and I can't help but look at it as some sort of exploitation.  There are various non-actors used in the film and most of them either have some sort of mental defect, are handicapped in some form and we have a midget who gets molested by a gay guy, which actually turns out to be the funniest scene in the film.  We see these various people doing various cruel or crazy things and why?  To me it's just so the film can call itself controversial and get people to watch it, which is how I came across it so clearly the plan is working.  I'm really not sure what the killing of the cats had to do with anything story wise but we get countless scenes of dead cats and it's never really explained why the grocery store is buying them.  Chloe Sevigny shows up among some of the real actors but doesn't get to do much.  I don't mind the film showing controversial things but there has to be some reason behind it and there isn't any here that I could see.  Not only do we get one bad scene after another but the worse thing is that each scene just goes on and on and on.  GUMMO has its fans, as any movie ever made does, but this is an ultimately forgettable film that doesn't come close to doing what something like KIDS did.
 

Sixteen Candles (1984)
 

John Hughes
 

Molly Ringwald plays a teenager who wakes up on her sixteenth birthday only to realize that her entire family has forgotten that today's her special day.  The rest of the day is going to be one embarrassment after another as she gets the unwanted attention of a nerd (Anthony Michael Hall) while the guy (Michael Schoeffling) she has a crush on finds out through a sex quiz she takes.  I really wasn't sure what to expect from this 80s teen comedy but it turned out to be pretty good due in large part to the great cast and the nice screenplay.  Once again Hughes does a wonderful job in terms of dialogue as it comes freshly out of the mouths of all the young actors who really do a nice job with it and help make this a minor little gem.  I'm sure most people watching this film will be able to connect with at least one of the characters no matter if its the dork, the overlooked girl or the popular guy growing tired of the partying ways of high school.  Hughes' screenplay allows each person their own personality instead of having everyone sound and act the same.  That's the one thing I've noticed in these early films by Hughes but he clearly knows various groups of people and he brings them to life very well.  This film did shock me in terms of some of its humor including the rather racist jokes aimed at the Chinese exchange student, Long Duk Dong.  This racist humor will probably offend plenty but I don't think there was any cruelness meant by it and I must admit that I found actor Gedde Watanabe very funny in the role.  Needless to say, Ringwald really does good in her role and she's easy believable throughout.  Hall pretty much steals the film as "The Geek" as, again, you can't help but believe everything that happens to him.  I found the rest of the supporting players, from the grandparents to the sister and parents, to be well acted and once again their dialogue makes them all their own characters.  This isn't the greatest film of the genre but it does have enough going for it to make it very entertaining and that's really all that matters. 
 

Tomb of the Werewolf (2004)
 

Fred Olen Ray
 

Paul Naschy made his twelfth and final appearance as Waldemar Daninsky in this American production that was quickly thrown together when the Spanish legend came to the States for a quick visit.  The film centers on the Daninsky Castle where there's a hidden treasure somewhere.  The last relative of Waldemar invites a reality show there to try and find it but an evil servant (Michelle Bauer) decides to bring Waldemar, the werewolf, back to life.  Okay, if you're expecting the Waldemar of two decades ago then you're going to be disappointed but at the same time I think this film offers enough for fans of Naschy who aren't going to be offended by what the movie is.  There's no question that this film doesn't work but I think some of being overly harsh on it because it doesn't look, feel or smell like the films Naschy was making earlier in his career.  This film contains a lot of nudity, various sex scenes and a weak story but at the same time I think the werewolf side of things gets plenty of attention and we get to see Naschy, in full make up, attacking more people here than in any of the other films that this character appears in.  The transformation scenes, done through cheap CGI, are extremely bad so thankfully we only have to see them a couple times whereas the wolf just appears in the other scenes.  I think Naschy is good at his old tricks of howling, jumping out and biting folks but the screenplay never gives him any dialogue with the make up.  I understand how this might upset fans but again, we have to remember how quickly this thing was thrown together.  I found the rest of the cast to be entertaining even if they weren't giving the greatest performances out there.  Bauer is fine as the vamp with Stephanie Bentley, Danielle Petty and Jacy Andrews turning in fun characters as well.  There's plenty of bloody attacks to keep horror fans entertained and plenty of nudity for the teenage boy in all of us.  Ray hasn't created any masterpiece or anything ground breaking but I think fans of Naschy should at least check it out to see the man in his most famous role one last time. 

Stroker Ace (1983)
 

Hal Needham
 

I must admit that when people say Burt Reynolds I gladly call myself a fan since I love DELIVERANCE and enjoy both THE LONGEST YARD and SMOKEY AND THE BANDIT.  So far I've stayed away from his 80s output but decided to tackle my first one with this turkey and it's rather sad if you really think about how bad this thing is.  In the film Reynolds plays Stroker Ace, a hot-shot Nascar driver who signs a contract with a chicken king (Ned Beatty) who soon has the star on the road making a fool of himself.  With the help of his mechanic (Jim Nabors) and another associate (Loni Anderson), Ace must try and find a way to get fired and released from the contract.  Earlier I said it was sad to watch something like this considering some of the great things Reynolds had done in his career so it's rather stupid of me to highly recommend this film due to how incredibly bad it is.  I really wasn't expecting too much but it's rather shocking to see how unfunny this comedy is and the only reason it avoids a BOMB rating from me is simply because it remains entertaining simply so you can see how much worse it's going to get.  The movie has no plot to think of and what little there is is just downright stupid.  Do we really believe someone would sign this contract without reading it?  The movie contains one bad joke after another and we get at least four with Reynolds looking in the mirror to comment on how good his hair looks.  I honestly can't say he gives a bad performance because he plays that same Good Ol' Boy that he made a career out of.  He's certainly going through the motions but he comes off looking as if he thinks he's doing a great job.  Nabors is slightly charming in a few scenes but Beatty comes off pretty bad throughout.  Anderson's entire character seems like something from another movie and the supporting cast includes various Nascar drivers, Bubba Smith and even Elvira pops up in perhaps the best gag of the film.  I think the scariest thing is that this movie apparently did pretty well at the box office and this wasn't the film that would eventually kill Reynolds career.  I plan on going through more of his output from this decade and I really hope nothing is worse than this here.  Fingers crossed.


 


Edited by Michael Elliott - 3/4/10 at 5:34pm
post #63 of 1166
Carbine Johnson - James Stewart is a moonshiner who may or may not have killed a federal man and ends up in prison, doing hard time on a road gang and being an obstinant cuss. While spending a month in 'the box', Jimmy has a zen epiphany and learns to think about other things to keep his mind off his troubles. In his case it's guns guns guns. Eventually, the warden lets him start fiddling with gun prototypes in the machine shop and he is on his way to rehabilitation and redemption. A solid B picture from Stewart and Warners.

Captain Nemo and the Underwater City - Not nearly as good as I had hoped it would be. Robert Ryan as Captain Nemo should have been a home run, but the performance I wanted happened in another movie altogether (Billy Budd). This is a silly fantasy about Nemo building an underwater city and having interlopers come and nearly destroy the whole shooting match. Chuck Connors plays the silver tongued politician who gums up the works so that he can return topside and complete his urgent civil war mission. Nemo's city actually looks pretty cool, despite occasional visits from a giant mutated monster, and by the end, I was inclined to agree that, if I could spend the rest of my life playing on the water slide with nubile nymphets and drinking free ale, the rest of the planet could go to hell.

Crime School - The second film I've seen where Humphrey Bogart squares off against the Dead End kids. The other was, well, 'Dead End'. This one is a blow by blow remake of Cagney's 'City on Fire' and kind of shows how adept Warners was at cranking out B pictures. Bogie is fairly unspectacular as the do-right element here, believing there are no bad boys. It's a lot of fun watching the Dead End boys interact with all their slang and mannerisms. Apparently, in the early days, Leo Gorcey could always be trusted to snitch everybody out. How he ever got to be leader is a real mystery. The guy who plays the old fat sadistic martinet warden who whips misbehaving boys with a cat o' nine tails really steals the show. By the way, this is a Warners archive release and the print is in absolutely terrible shape!

Charge of the Light Brigade - Usually the combo of Errol Flynn and Michael Curtiz is a no-brainer but the decision to cast this epic tale through the prism of a tragic love triangle turns it all into a bit of a snooze fest, even if it does give the lovely Olivia de Haviland something to heave her equally lovely breast about. The final third of the movie gets around to the epic adventure at hand and it's all love and honor for king and country. Not a bad movie but there are a few other Flynn/Curtiz movies I would choose before it. Nigel Bruce wins the day as a British officer hiding his copious consumption of alcohol from his nagging chatter box wife.

A Colt is My Passport - Everyone's favorite chipmunk-cheeked Yakuza, Shishido Joe is back as a no-nonsense hit man who falls afoul of rival gangs who make him a scapegoat when they decide to make nice. The bulk of the story is a bit of cat and mouse at a water-front hotel, run by the inevitable love interest, a girl who has a past and can't seem to escape her unsavory surroundings. Ultimately, though, it's about honor and brotherhood and tackling your problems head on, all of which leads to a stunning, and stunningly improbable climax, straight out of a Spaghetti Western, which explains the Spaghetti Western theme music, which...oh never mind. You either just GO with these movies or you are quickly left behind. Me, I can't get enough and I hope Criterion is kind enough to bless us with a second helping of Nikkatsu Noir real soon.
Edited by Holer - 1/11/10 at 7:45am
post #64 of 1166

Theatrical Films Watched in 2010:

January
1/1- Up In The Air (second time) ****

1/2- Avatar (3-D) ***1/2

1/17- It's Complicated***

1/28- A Single Man**1/2

1/30- Sherlock Holmes **

 

February
2/8- The Lovely Bones**1/2

2/13- Alvin & the Chipmunks: The Squeakquel ½*

2/15- Dear John**1/2

2/13-When In Rome  1/2*

2/27-Avatar (3-D, second time, BPS)***1/2

2/27-A Serious Man (BPS)***

2/27-Precious (BPS)**

 

March

3/6-An Education (BPS, second time) ***

3/6-Alice In Wonderland (2010) ***

3/6-Up In The Air (BPS, third time) ****

3/6-The Blind Side (BPS) ***

3/13-2010 Academy Award-nominated Animated Shorts ****

3/13-Shutter Island ***1/2

3/28-How To Train Your Dragon (3-D) ***1/2

 

April

4/23- Date Night **1/2

4/25- Hot Tub Time Machine ***

4/29- The Ghost Writer ****

 

May

5/13- Iron Man 2 ***

5/16- Robin Hood (2010) *** 1/2

5/29- Sex and the City 2 ***

 

June

6/13- Sex and the City 2  (second time) ***

6/18- Toy Story 3 (3D) *****

6/19- Shrek Forever After ***

6/26- Toy Story 3 (second time) *****

6/30- Twilight: Eclipse ** 1/2

 

July

7/5- Knight & Day ***

7/11- Despicable Me (3D) *** 1/2

7/12- Toy Story 3 (3D, third time) *****

7/18- Toy Story 3 (fourth time) *****

7/20- Inception ***1/2

7/25- The Kids Are All Right ***

7/27- Step Up 3D **

7/31- Despicable Me (3D, second time) *** 1/2

 

August

8/12- Scott Pilgrim Vs. The World ****

8/22- The Switch ** 1/2

 

September

9/4- Going The Distance *** 1/2

 

October

10/2- Easy A ****

10/6- The Social Network **** 1/2

10/12- Let Me In ****

10/25- Back To The Future (25th Anniversary Re-Release) **** 1/2

 

November

11/5- The Town ****

11/7- Paranormal Activity 2 ***

11/22- Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, Part 1 ****

11/27- Tangled (Digital 3D) ***1/2

 

December

12/13- Black Swan ****

12/18- Love & Other Drugs ***

12/19- Megamind **

12/25- Tron: Legacy **


Edited by RafaelB - 12/28/10 at 7:47am
post #65 of 1166


Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott View Post

I still think BLAIR WITCH holds up perfectly well. 
 



I like it too.  It's far from perfect, but it's gotten a lot of unfair backlash over the years.  Still creepy for the final scene if nothing else.
post #66 of 1166

Quote:
Still creepy for the final scene if nothing else.
 

Yeah, that shot of the guy taking a leak in the corner is really heart-stopping.
post #67 of 1166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Teller View Post

Still creepy for the final scene if nothing else.
 


Yeah, that last shot is burned on to my brain. (Unlike Bob, I'm not being sarcastic.  )
post #68 of 1166


Quote:
Originally Posted by Bob_L View Post



Yeah, that shot of the guy taking a leak in the corner is really heart-stopping.
 


You can take anything out of context and reduce it to something banal.

The Shining: Yeah, that shot of two little girls in frilly clothes is really heart-stopping.

post #69 of 1166
Thread Starter 

I'm a sucker for any ghost stories so that's probably why I get sucked into "creepy" movies like THE SHINING, BLAIR WITCH or PA.  It's funny but that type of stuff is something I can find "scary".  I think it just has something to do with not being able to see something is a lot scarier than any monster, shark or stalker.  I know a lot of people say THE EXORCIST is terrifying but it's never bothered me a bit. 

 

Of course, after STROKER ACE I'm not sure anything will ever scare me again.

post #70 of 1166
 Race to Witch Mountain (2009)

This was another movie my granddaughters got for Christmas. Even though it's a kid's movie I think it was too old for them because they became bored quickly. Two teenage humanoids crash land on earth. They are there to gather info and answers to their planets ecological problems and prevent an invasion of earth. They end up being assisted on their adventures by ex-con turned cabbie played by the rock. This ended up being alittle bit more enjoyable than expected and I do like the Rock so mild pass from me. 

Amadeus (1984)

Another fair movie that somehow played better the first time I saw it. The modern dialogue was quite noticable and terrible at  times and some of the acting was bad, Elizabeth Berridge in particular but F. Murray Abraham was magnificent as Salieri. The story itself was good and that music.... So all my stars go to F. Murray and that glorious music. 

I Am Legend (2007) 

I sometimes don't get the dislike for this one though I do prefer the two previous renditions of Matheson's story slightly better. If you compare this movie to Matheson's book than it fails in it's execution but taken on it's own and pretending the book doesn't exist  makes the movie more digestable. Not a bad post apocalyptic story with Will Smith this time as the lone man on earth. If I had a real problem with anything in this story it was the unrealistic looking CGI creatures and the ending of this movie.  


post #71 of 1166

An Historical Mystery: The Man on the Rock (1938) (short) Dir: Edward Cahn

Production: MGM

 

Another one of Carey Wilson’s crazy, entertaining conspiracy theories.  History tells us that Napoleon Bonaparte died in exile on the island of St. Helena, May 5, 1821.  But what if he didn’t? Napoleon was known for using a double--a modest, unassuming farmer named Francois Robeaud, who would attend to routine state matters leaving Napoleon to spend time with his beloved son.  What if, following Napoleon’s defeat and imprisonment, the members of his inner circle conspired to somehow exchange their emperor with his double? And succeeded.  The ‘evidence’: Robeaud, who had gone back to his home in Baleycourt after Napoleon was defeated, suddenly disappears--forever as it would turn out; his sister becomes unaccountably wealthy; the wife of a Bonaparte conspirator sends a letter to a relation in Russia describing their triumph in freeing Napoleon from St. Helena; a man with an uncanny resemblance to Napoleon opens a shop in Verona, the locals jokingly call him “Bonaparte”, etc.  And most curiously, who was the stranger shot and killed trying to enter the residence of the young Duke of Reichstadt (who was once known as the son of Napoleon before the Hapsburg’s took custody of him), a man whose last words were “son”? 

 

There’s an odd, admiring sympathy toward Napoleon throughout the short, especially in regards to the mean, old Hapsburgs who were desperately trying to quell any budding notions in Napoleon’s son of him being an heir to his father’s ambitions, but the tale is well told, a bit wacky, fun to consider.

out of 4

 

 

 

John Nesbitt’s Passing Parade No. 52: The Seesaw and the Shoes (1945) (short) Dir: Douglas Foster

Production: MGM

 

A story of “two small, unimportant things that changed our lives for all time”, a seesaw and a pair of shoes.  The seesaw takes us to Paris, 1819, outside of a young doctor’s office, an era when doctors had no idea what the hell they were doing.  We see the young doctor listening to a patient’s heartbeat by putting his ear to the man’s chest. Of course this determines nothing, nothing is heard, the doctor knows he must lie and tell the patient he’s fine.  Eventually the children tapping on the seesaw outside will give the doctor, René Laennec, the idea of making a conduit for the sound of the heartbeat to travel. The stethoscope is born.

 

Next, to New Haven, Connecticut, the year is 1830.  An inventor proudly shows his friends the new waterproof shoes he’s made, from a substance he calls ‘caoutchouc’, that are going to make him rich.  As he tells the story, the wet shoes he’s set beside the fire to dry, melt into a noxious puddle. The inventor is a laughingstock.  He doubles his efforts, tries adding all sorts of chemicals to prevent the new substance from melting in heat, spends years of his life, goes broke, goes to prison for his debts, but still nothing.  Then one day, the inventor, in order to hide the fact from a visiting neighbor that he was still working on the substance that had effectively ruined his life, quickly hid a tray of ‘caoutchouc’ into an oven. And whaddaya know, the man, Charles Goodyear, had just invented the vulcanization process for what would soon be called ‘rubber’ (for its ability to rub out pencil marks).  Emblematic of the Passing Parade series, giving you a brief history of something you never wanted a brief history of, and making it interesting.

out of 4

 

 

 

James A. FitzPatrick’s Traveltalks: Modern Mexico City (1942) (short)

Production: MGM

 

Opens with a large, sweeping pan of Mexico City, “one of the largest and most modern cities in Latin America”.  Then a look at some notable monuments, like the Mexican independence monument, El Ángel, the George Washington statue, the Benito Juarez monument, and the Monument to the Revolution.  We see the Hotel Reforma, whose hotel roof garden is a popular hot spot for the elite to meet.  A shot of the city’s MGM offices highlights the close relationship between the United States and Mexico, as well as the fact that 75% of Mexican exports went to the U.S.  It’s not all go-go modern in Mexico City, as the amazing National Palace and Metropolitan Cathedral, buildings hundreds of years old, shows us.  Outside of Chapultepec Castle we view a street show featuring a dog and cat living in harmony.  Then off to a 30,000+ seat stadia, where bullfighting, something that “might otherwise appear objectionable” is explained by your typical bullfighting enthusiast as follows; “the bull comes into the ring to kill, and he gets killed.” Well, there you are.  Bullfighting season is short though, so Fitz tells us that other sports gaining popularity include tennis, baseball, futbol, polo and golf.  Standard, if colorful, Traveltalk.

 out of 4           

 

 

 

James A. FitzPatrick’s Traveltalks: Colorful Holland (1950) (short)

Production: MGM

 

To rural and serene Holland, a collection of canals, waterways, cities and farmlands, all “redundant with the simpler and more wholesome things of life.”  I guess we’re going to breeze over Amsterdam in this visit.  But who has time for whores, there are things to see, like the attractive dairy maid rowing along her route picking up milk.  Holland’s topography makes it a veritable bovine paradise, so it’s no wonder their dairy products, including famous Edam cheese, are known the world over.  I can understand pumping up local industry, but am I really supposed to believe, as Fitz states, that Holland’s cheese is “said to be a major factor in the longevity and health of the native people”?  Well, it makes the rest of the world fat, clogged and backed-up, so please Dutch folk, share with us your magical restorative cheese.  These people love cheese so much, the position of ‘cheese carrier’ (long story, but it is indeed someone who carries cheese) is given an exalted social position, complete with colored straw hat.  Next we visit Spakenburg, a fishing village near Utrecht, where we examine the costume of the typical woman.  Each village dress differs from another, so that a student of the costumes can tell where one is from by what they are wearing.  God help you if you are that student.  I don’t know if Fitz was high recording this one or not, but he tripped over his line like three times, something I’ve never heard him do in other shorts.  Nice look, if not for the lactose intolerant.

 out of 4

 

 

 

A Pete Smith Specialty: Seeing Hands: A True Story (1943) (short) Dir: Gunther V. Fritsch

Production: MGM

 

Inspiring and sobering Pete Smith war-time short about Ben Helwig, a young man who overcame a physical handicap (blindness) to work with distinction in a factory serving the war effort.  The intended effect, presumably, was to prod those in the audience to ask themselves if they were really doing all that they could on the homefront, and if not, to do so.  Ben’s story begins in the midst of the depression, 1932, when his mother, a single parent no longer capable of caring for Ben, decides to leave him in a Boys Town type facility.  An accident suffered while playing ball with the other kids eventually leaves Ben blind.  But the boy who used to joke that he could build his model airplanes blindfolded learns to cope and eventually does as much.  Flash forward to a grown Ben just after Pearl Harbor.  He is initially rejected for positions in the war plants, but his ‘seeing hands’ and amazing proficiency with a jigsaw is witnessed by two brothers passing his house one night.  The brothers happen to be the owners of a Los Angeles factory and they hire Ben to work the complex machinery, and he settles in with help from his loyal seeing-eye dog, Pang. 

 

At the beginning Pete mentions Ben’s story as having national prominence, so the original audiences, perhaps introduced to Ben through a story in LIFE or some other magazine, might have enjoyed the short on even another level.  ‘Spanky’ McFarland makes an appearance as one of the group home kids who initiate Ben upon his arrival.  One of the few light moments is at his expense (when the initiation of another kid backfires upon Spanky’s character, Pete says, “Fatty felt like a fugitive from an ‘Our Gang’ comedy”).

out of 4

 

 

 

A Crime Does Not Pay Subject No. 18: They’re Always Caught (1938) (short) Dir: Harold S. Bucquet

Production: MGM

 

Intelligent men commit what they think are fool-proof murders all the time.  They usually don’t reckon on Dr. John Pritchard of the crime lab being on the case.  Crusading Mayor Fletcher has created lots of enemies with his apple cart upsetting ways; the head of the company who has sacrificed delivering product in the name of profit; the bribe taking fire official he fires, a man just months away from his pension; the city official let go because he quietly allowed “punchboards and dice games” in the parks in exchange for a piece of the action; and perhaps most dangerously, publicity-loving special prosecutor Jimmy Stark who, despite the pronouncements of racket busting he gives on his radio show, has a dirty little habit of putting away the little fish while taking kick-backs from the big bosses.  And Mayor Fletcher is on to him.  When Jimmy gets the sack from the Mayor, he realizes he needs to do something soon to keep the gravy train rolling.  Next morning, when the Mayor goes to work, his car doesn’t so much as start up as it does blow up.  Enter Dr. Pritchard and his crime lab boys who use scientific methods to determine who the bomber is (and who he isn’t).  Louis Jean Heydt plays an angry cleaners operator who gets caught up initially as a suspect because he had innocently staked out the Mayor’s house the night before in an attempt to tip him off to syndicate pressure being applied to his store.  The advanced methods of detection on display must have been a mind-blower to those audiences (“wait, they can vacuum my hair!?!”).  Very nice little bit of crime drama, as most entries in this series are.  A few years later, Marsha Hunt and a romantic sub-plot would be added to John C. Higgins story resulting in Fred Zinnemann’s KID GLOVE KILLER, with Van Heflin as the head of the crime lab.

out of 4

 

 

 

A Pete Smith Specialty: I Love My Husband But! (1946) (short) Dir: David Barclay

Production: MGM

 

Part of a series in the Pete Smith universe of silly, irreverent looks at husbands, wives, mothers-in-law, etc.  Here we are looking at the annoying husband habits.  We are first introduced to the seemingly perfect husband.  The wife gives him a kiss on his way out in the morning only to be left to deal with the dramatic aftermath of his morning ritual; used guest towels, toothpaste spackled on the bathroom mirror, dirt ring in the tub.  Next the considerate ‘waker-upper’, the husband who gets up, dressed and out the door in silence.  Of course, he’s compared with the slumberer, who sleeps through the alarm and disturbs the wife.  Exhibit C is the constant loser, as in always losing things and then constantly pestering the wife, “have you seen my…?”  Then the “oofty-goofy”. This husband ignores the wife’s entreaties (“how do I look in this?”) only to magically come to life when the wife’s attractive friend tries out the same gear.  Other bad husbands include the tyrannical bridge partner, the unhandy man (best slapstick gag has him destroying the kitchen when all he needs to do is hang a curtain rod), and the hypocritical penny-pincher (where the wife gets her revenge via grapefruit, Cagney style).  These shorts can feature some, ahem, antiquated notions (benign of course, nothing nasty), but that’s a part of their breezy charm.  The best of the I LOVE MY___BUT shorts.

out of 4

 

 

 

A Miniature: Carey Wilson’s The Great Heart (1938) (short) Dir: David Miller

Production: MGM

 

It’s February of 1936 and an American Army transport, by request of the King of Belgium, is escorting from Hawaii to Belgium the remains of a man who died 50 years earlier.  The man is Jozef De Veuster (Tom Neal) and he arrived in Hawaii in 1864 to do missionary work.  What he found was a place ravaged by leprosy--the population had been reduced from 500,000 to barely 100,000.  Those afflicted were banished, sent on a weekly basis to the island of Molokai.  In 1873, a decree was issued: all non-lepers on Molokai must leave, including doctors and priests.  It was into this atmosphere that Father Damien, as he was now known, committed to live the rest of his life, ministering to the lepers on Molokai, knowing he would be resented.  After years of work, Father Damien would give some meaning to the lives of the lepers of Molokai, he built a fresh water system, got them to dispose each of the dead in their own grave, and most importantly, restored some of their dignity.  His efforts attracted greater attention around the world, leading to treatment breakthroughs, supplies for Molokai and increasing understanding.  After his many years of work, he himself contracted leprosy and died at 49.  A nicely told story about an admirable and obviously selfless man who made a hell of a sacrifice.

out of 4


Edited by Pete York - 1/12/10 at 1:51pm
post #72 of 1166
King Kong (1933): 4/5

On this rewatch, I was amazed at just how much stop-motion action Kong was involved in. It's a thrilling movie and a great achievement.
post #73 of 1166
Ikiru (rewatch) - It's a shame, really, that this film is so strongly associated with just one scene. Perhaps it's even a shame that Criterion uses it for the DVD cover, although one can hardly blame them for going with such an iconic image. There are so many great scenes to behold: the "passing the buck" montage, Watanabe's meeting with the doctor, the jazz hall, the confrontation with the yakuza... the list goes on. The film also seems to be rarely remembered for its cinematography, which is quite phenomenal, even show-offy, at points. Take just about any scene involving stairs as an example. Or the penultimate scene: Kimura takes a bold stand against the bureaucratic complacency, and defeated, literally sinks under a pile of paperwork. Great, great stuff. I don't care for the unnecessary narration, but there's so little of it that it's easy to forgive. But one thing that does bug me, and I'm sure this will be heresy to many, is Takashi Shimura's performance. "Overacting" is a different animal when it comes to Japanese cinema, but Shimura really overplays it. The slouching, the hangdog "pity me" expression, the constantly watery eyes, the weak raspy voice. It gets to be a little too much, I would have liked to see it toned down a notch. It's a Noh performance in a film that's otherwise not Noh-influenced. I also find the film doesn't move me as much as it seems to do for others, but this is my third or fourth time seeing it. Nonetheless, I do think it's some masterful filmmaking. Also interesting to note how the third act somewhat resembles Rashomon, where the truth must be pieced together from several different accounts. In this case, of course, the accounts don't conflict quite so much. Rating: 9


The Super-Inframan - I vaguely remember watching "Ultraman" as a kid, but this is not that. Oh, the kaiju staples are all here: guys in rubber suits, absurd science (yes, there are gauges for "cyan", "magneta" and "yellow"... professor, these color combinations are dangerously unstylish!), cheap effects, children and loved ones in peril. But this is the Chinese knockoff... China, protected by a squad of kung fu experts/lab scientists wearing identical Elvis jumpsuits. I don't really get into either monster movies or martial arts these days, and "so bad it's good" doesn't usually do much for me, so I didn't get a lot out of this. It was silly enough to be mildly entertaining, but the endless kung fu throwdowns at the climax got really boring. I did find it interesting that instead of aliens and mutants (with the exception of "Mutant Drill"), the monsters were all characterized as skeletons, witches, demons and devils. The head baddie was even called "Princess Elzebub". I suppose this is because China has deeper spiritual roots (and less fear of radiation and outsiders) than Japan. Other than that, it was just the occasional ridiculous image, such as a skeleton steering a demonic speedboat, that kept me amused... but not amused enough. Rating: 5


Hatari!
- You can tell this is a Howard Hawks film because it feels like a cross between Only Angels Have Wings and Bringing Up Baby... and maybe a Disney movie or a nature documentary. It's about a multi-cultural (although, notably, it's the two American white guys who end up with the girls) ragtag team of a big game hunters in the African wilderness. There isn't much of a plot, it's more a series of anecdotes. Some exciting, some funny, some cute. Some of the hunting scenes are marvelously done, and there's some of that terrific Hawks banter. But a lot of it just feels goofy, and the Henry Mancini score doesn't help (at least now I know where "Baby Elephant Walk" comes from). All it takes are a few lame sight gags or slapstick segments to ruin it, and there's more than a few. But I do love how Hawks handles the John Wayne persona and always makes him much more likeable and fallible. Overall it just didn't strike the right tone with me, too cutesy and flippant and dare I say wholesome, but there are some nice moments. Rating: 6


A Colt Is My Passport - Joe Shishido, he of the unmistakable surgically-altered cheeks, stars in a film similar to his work in Branded to Kill, from the same year. Both movies are excellent, but for different reasons. Branded to Kill is surreal spin on the yakuza flick, with an anything-goes, who-gives-a-fuck attitude. Colt takes the yakuza flick and blends it with equal parts noir and spaghetti western, resulting in a beautifully crafted, tightly plotted cat-and-mouse game. Shishido is as slick and cunning as James Bond and there's a lot of clever ruses and tense scenarios. Director Takashi Nomura manages to keep just about every shot interesting, culminating in a superb climax that could have come straight out of a Leone film. Very enjoyable. Rating: 9
post #74 of 1166
Thread Starter 

Slaughter (1972)
 

Jack Starrett
 

Ex Green Beret Slaughter (Jim Brown) seeks vengeance against the Mob who killed his father and soon teams up with some Feds to track down the gang and take them out one by one including the head guy (Rip Torn).  This AIP blaxploitation flick has a lot going for it but I found the direction to be all over the place and there were a few too many slow spots to be a complete winner, which is a shame because there's a terrific cast on display here.  The screenplay is your typical revenge tale but I think the film could have benefited from a small re-write because what we have here isn't all that interesting because the script really lets us down in terms of the bad guys.  We have a couple different bad guys but neither of them are very interesting and I think the film would have benefited by touching them up a tad bit more especially since you have an actor like Torn eating up the scenery and turning in a fine performance.  Brown, not the greatest actor out there, but he still manages to be quite cool in the role and he's got some funny comic timing as well.  The sequence where he crashes into a party and the servant asks if he has an invitation and Brown slowly pulls out his gun and says "yep" is certainly one of the highlights of the film.  We also get Cameron Mitchell in a couple brief scenes and it's always fun seeing him.  Even though all the guys do a good job it's the beautiful Stella Stevens who steals the film.  It's not her acting that steals the movie but her chest, which is constantly coming out of no matter what type of outfit she's wearing. 
 

Slaughter's Big Rip-Off (1973)
 

Gordon Douglas
 

Violent sequel sees a mob boss (Ed McMahon) taking a hit out on Slaughter (Jim Brown) who of course has to seek vengeance when a couple of his friends are killed instead.  This sequel to the 1972 hit comes as a major letdown because we've got a pretty good cast here but sadly they're given very little to do and this film runs out of gas before we even hit the thirty-minute mark.  Not only do we have Brown and McMahon but we also have a brief appearance by Scatman Crothers and Don Stroud as well as Brock Peters who most will remember from TO KILL A MOCKINGBIRD.  The biggest problem with this film is that the entire set up is just boring and never really gets us interested in what's going on.  As soon as the movie starts we witness this hit and we have no reason why it's happening or who the people are that are getting killed.  We're thrown right into this story but it's so slim that you can't help but feel you're just watching this movie because the first one made money and the studio is trying to milk some more cash.  I know that just about every blaxploitation flick used this revenge storyline but they still could have came up with something better here.  What we do get are a few fun performances with Brown once again delivering the good lines and kicking enough heads in for some slight entertainment.  It was very funny seeing McMahon playing the womanizing gangster and Peters turns in a good performance as a cop helping Slaughter.  Veteran director Gordon, whose credits go as far back as campy stuff like ZOMBIES ON BROADWAY, handles the material fairly well but he's just not given enough to save the movie.

Secrets of Sweet Sixteen (1973)
 

Ernst Hofbauer
 

Another entry in Germany's long running "report" series, which director Hofbauer was an expert at since he was behind the camera on this as well as countless others in the SCHOOLGIRL REPORT series.  I'm really not sure why this one here wasn't in the SCHOOLGIRL REPORT series as this here contains the basic premise.  Here we get several "stories" about teens and the troubles they can get into.  One deals with a daughter learning of her mother's lover and going to meet him for herself.  We have a nerdy boy afraid to have sex so his friend hooks him up with a beautiful girl (Christina Lindberg).  Next up is a strange one where a post master believes his delivery man wants his daughter.  The final story deals with a group of Satan worshipers needing a virgin for their sect but not being able to find one.  If you're a fan of these German sex comedies then I'm sure you'll enjoy this one.  It's not quite as good as the entries in the SCHOOLGIRL REPORT series that I've seen but it's certainly better than many others out there.  I think the best story is probably the first one as it contains some pretty goofy sequence including constant flashbacks to a women's club where they are trying to lose weight and taking mud baths to stay young.  Whatever this had to do with the actual story is beyond me but it does give us a few laughs.  The weakest story is probably the one dealing with the dorky guy because there are so many opportunities for laughs but the film never really goes for them.  Fans of Lindberg, myself included, will still enjoy the episode just for her.  The film gets off to a pretty tasteless start as a pedophile lures a kid away from a school only to be "hypnotized" by a couple girls who hold him until the police arrive.  I'm really not sure why this was put in the film but it probably should have been cut (even though this production comedy and director would make a film called 14 AND UNDER).   

In the Year 2889 (1967)
 

Larry Buchanan
 

In the late 1960s AIP began remaking their films for television and this production by the one and only Buchanan is a reworking of Roger Corman's THE DAY THE WORLD ENDED.  As in the previous film, an atomic bomb goes off and leaves only a few survivors in a small town.  The people are sitting around worried about acid rain but the real threat is an ugly monster walking around (and not really doing anything).  The title actually has nothing to do with the film but I've read AIP had a copyright on it so they decided to just throw it on this film, which pretty much tells you all you need to know about this sucker.  I'm not the biggest fan of the original Corman movie but it's certainly a lot better than this thing but at the same time this is certainly better than your typical Buchanan movie.  That's not really saying much considering he's made some really horrible stuff but the biggest disappointment here is the confusion of not using the monster.  The monster looks incredibly silly and it's clear he's just an actor wearing a mask but the only time we see him he's just walking around in the woods or watching a couple of the women swim.  There really aren't any attacks, any suspense or anything else that you'd expect in a horror film.  The monster is so rarely seen up until the end you'll really be scratching your head trying to figure out what they were thinking.  The film is very dialogue heavy and none of it is overly good, although the majority of it is just carried over from the Corman flick.  Performances are pretty bad as you'd expect but you've gotta love the father who is constantly preaching to everyone and then tries to pimp off his daughter and in another scene he wants to kill people yet he always goes back to talking about how good he is.  Director Buchanan has gained a pretty big following over the years by bad movie lovers so I'm sure those folks will want to check this out but others should avoid at all costs.
 

Beauties and the Beast, The (1974)
 

Ray Nadeau
 

What's better than nudity and a Yeti?  This soft core romp has plenty of both as a lonely Yeti stalks the woods kidnapping beautiful women and taking them back to his cage.  He's in luck as some hippies and a couple other ladies (one played by Swedish bombshell Uschi Digard) come to stay for the weekend so he has plenty to pick from.  I love Yeti movies but this here is one of the wackiest out there even though it contains absolutely no plot.  I'm still not quite sure why the Yeti here was taking the women to begin with as he never does anything with them except throw them in his cave and we never find out what happens to any of them.  The main reason this film was made was to show off countless nude women and especially the 44-26-35 Digard who many will remember from Russ Meyer's CHERRY, HARRY & RACHEL!.  As far as soft core flicks go this one here is pretty good but at only 66-minutes there's not too much going on and that includes everything with our hairy friend Mr. Yeti.  I'm still not sure what the point of throwing him in here was for because we really don't get enough of him and when we do see him he's usually just carrying the women around.  The idea of a horny Yeti wasn't started here as BIGFOOT beat this one by a few years and it had the added bonus of John Carradine.  The main reason to watch this film is just for the nudity and some really bad sex scenes including one of the most hilarious "make out" sessions I've seen from any movie.  This here takes place inside a car and you certainly won't forget it due to how stupid it is.
 

Alice in Wonderland (2010) ** 1/2

Updated version of the Disney classic has teenager Alice () about to be forced into a lifeless marriage when she takes off running, falls into a hole and into Wonderland.  There the Mad Hatter (Johnny Depp) has a mission for her and that's to bring the evil queen (Helena Bohnam Carter) down and free (Anne Hathaway).  I really wasn't sure what to expect from this film and when the end credits started I walked out of the theater with a take-it or leave-it feeling.  This certainly doesn't match the animated film but at the same time I'm sure kids watching the story for the first time are really going to love what they see.  For me the film just seemed to by the numbers as if Burton really didn't know where he wanted to go with the material.  Everything is very beautiful on the eyes but a lot of the emotion seemed to be missing and the film really lacked any heart or soul.  Out of all the Depp-Burton films I must admit that this was the first time I was disappointed with Depp.  He certainly gives a good performance here but for the life of me I couldn't help but feel he got robbed by the screenplay that really didn't leave him much to do.  In some ways I felt that Depp was a bit too good for this part and that the character was underwritten.  I was also bored with Carter and her performance.  Perhaps she's just been in too many of Burton's films but I didn't find any part of her character or performance to be entertaining.  Even Hathaway's character is rather weak but the actress at least gives it her all.  ALICE is the real reason this movie works as well as it does.  I really couldn't take my eyes off of her and she did a marvelous job as Alice.  I thought she gave an incredibly strong performance and I believed her every step of the way.  She was cute, charming and fun which is exactly what the movie needed.  Horror legend Christopher Lee lends his voice at the end of the film as well.  The visuals here are very easy on the eyes but, again, without the heart of soul there's really not enough here to make it a winner.

 

Ghost Writer, The (2010) *** 1/2

Extremely well-made thriller has Ewan McGregor playing a ghost writer who is asked to help clean up a former Prime Minster's (Pierce Brosnan) autobiography.  He is replacing the previous ghost writer who committed sucide but as he starts to dig into the Prime Minister's past he starts to uncover some secrets that might have led to the murder of the previous writer.  This is pretty much the Polanski that so many people love because we have a complicated story but with many classic touches that comes in the best work from the director.  The story being told here is a very interesting one because for the first hour the movie really doesn't contain any dramam because it's used to get to know all the characters.  We get to learn about the ghost writer, the Prime Minister and his current charges of being involved in war crimes and we also get to know about his wife ().  The three characters get time to develop in front of our eyes and this much knowledge will probably have mainstream viewers walking out but those wanting intelligence will be rewarded.  The final hour is when Polanski puts his foot down and really delivers some tense drama and edge-of-your-seat thrills.  The drama works itself up slowly and then it really takes off.  Then, in classic Polanski fashion, we get the rug pulled out from us and then we get stabbed in the back with something you certainly won't expect to happen.  There are at least three different twists in the final ten-minutes and they work marveously well.  Polanski works this screenplay like a painter would do his masterpiece and that's by making small touches that add up to greatness and he makes sure not to rush anything.  The film takes its sweet time letting all the pieces fall into place before we get to go on the final ride.  Polanski doesn't miss a beat but this is helped by the terrific cast.  McGregor is perfect as the ghost writer because we can believe that he's smart enough to uncover all of this stuff but also because the actor's laid back humor also comes off as being realistic.  Whenever you're dealing with one of these interlectual movies it's alway snice when you can believe that the lead really isn't smart enough to be doing the things we're seeing him do.  Brosnan also turns in one of the strongest performances of his career as he really sinks his teeth into this character.  Brosnan gets to display some of his usual charm but he also gets to play the character's dark side with a couple emotional and angry outburst and he handles these extremely well.  WIFE is terrific in the role of the wife as she, like McGregor, really makes us believe who the character is.  She comes off incredibly smart here but she's also got some sexyness to her that also helps the story in key spots.  Supporting players JHHHHHHHHHHH  also do great work.  There are a few minor problems here and there but there's no denying that Polanski is at the top of his game and working in a genre that fans of his will love.  This movie will remind a lot of people of the political thrillers of the 70s as it relies more on brains instead of muscle.  This movie isn't going to be for everyone but those who like great directing and acting will certainly have to check it out.


Edited by Michael Elliott - 4/3/10 at 9:46pm
post #75 of 1166
Erik the Conqueror – Two Viking brothers are separated as boys when their father’s kingdom is destroyed by an army of treacherous Britons. Cameron Mitchell plays the grown Erin, the Viking king determined to avenge his father, unaware that his brother is alive and living la vida Briton. The brothers do battle on an extremely crowded Viking ship where it’s hard to tell who is who and then things get really confusing when they both fall in love with a pair of ravishing twin virgins. By the time they discover they’re brothers, the spit is naturally hitting the fan, and Cameron gets a grandstanding death scene that may be the longest (and silliest) in cinema history. Still, as with any Mario Bava movie, there are some great action set pieces, with plenty of blood and beautiful women to spare. Mitchell and Bava went on to make several other movies together, and yet remain unacknowledged as one of the great cinema partnerships. Hmm. Must’ve been that death scene...

Escape from Fort Bravo – What a great premise for a western! An ever dwindling Union Army platoon must guard an equal number of scheming, disgruntled Confederate prisoners in a remote outpost surrounded by hostile Indians. Into this snake pit rides a Derringer slinging blonde with shifting alliances determined to stir the testosterone pot. Master Storyteller John Sturges turns a potential potboiler into a veritable treatise on conflict at every level: Man versus his environment, men versus other men, Man versus woman and ultimately, himself. One of them allegorical westerns, I reckon! Solid acting by a great cast (William Demarest alert!) and a killer finale make this character driven oater an absolute keeper.
Down Argentina Way – Don Ameche is a horse breeder who comes to New York and wants to sell his champion jumper to Betty Grable but he can’t because her father did his father some injustice many years ago. Betty doesn’t do rejection so she follows Don back to Argentina, where everyone just goes to nightclubs every night to watch Carmen Miranda and the Nicholas Brothers do their thing. Oh if only life were just that grand. Anyway, Don and Betty fall in love, there is a lot more confusion about horses who jump versus horses who race, someone sings the title song every five minutes and, naturally, everything works out in the end. For me, this one is all about Carmen Miranda, but it’s one of her lesser musicals, with just two very brief numbers and the Nicholas Brothers end up with the better showing. It also gets me how heavy this film is with racist depictions of lazy, lothario Latins, but it was a more innocent time and I guess nobody cares if you insult a few Argentineans.

Edited by Holer - 1/17/10 at 8:45am
post #76 of 1166
01/09/10: DOUCE (Claude Autant-Lara, 1943)
 
DOUCE – known in the English-speaking world under the blandly generic title of LOVE STORY but, obviously bearing no relation to either the 1944 British  movie or the popular 1970 American romance – inaugurated Claude Autant-Lara’s great period that would end 15 years later with EN CAS DE MALHEUR (1958; see my review above) and incorporated around a dozen films. Although I have been aware from the outset of the film’s renown – via Leslie Halliwell’s positive capsule review and its being selected by the “Movie” magazine (published in the 1980s) as a key film of 1943 – the review that made me really prick up my ears was the ***** one in the inestimable “Films De France” website which also goes so far as to declare it Lara’s best. Ostensibly a period romance, what actually unfolds is a bleak portrayal of bourgeois hypocrisy that has few peers among its contemporaries: Lara’s stylish direction makes brilliant use of tracking shots on studio sets to display the immediate surroundings of the mansion owned by the noble Parisian family whose life over the Christmas 1887 period we follow throughout the course of the movie. Clever scripting and sparkling dialogue (courtesy of the ubiquitous writing duo of Jean Aurenche-Pierre Bost) are highlighted in two outstanding sequences: the opening showing a solemn Christmas mass being ‘interrupted’ by the socially-sensitive confession of a mysterious lady whose identity (or that of whom she is speaking) we are not sure of until much later, and the wonderfully ironic Boxing Day sequence featuring the wealthy matriarch bestowing purposefully ‘small’ gifts on the paupers of her community flanked but her ostensibly blissful (but actually freshly broken-up) younger companions. To top it all, we have a handful of impeccable performances from a relatively unknown cast: Odette Joyeux (portraying the fated title character, hers is easily a career-best performance; in real-life, she was Mrs. Pierre Brasseur and mother of actor Claude), Madeleine Robinson (as Douce’s maid/companion, she inadvertently is the catalyst for the surge of passions that eventually brings down the family who ‘adopted’ her), Marguerite Moreno (delightful as the archetypal cantankerous matriarch), Jean Debucourt (as Douce’s one-legged father, movingly portraying his forbidden and unrequited love for the socially inferior Robinson) and Roger Pigaut (as the other rogue dependent of the family: he loves Robinson but, impatient of her stalling and jealous of Debucourt’s attentions, turns to Douce instead who, on her part, willfully gives in to her precocious impulses). The ending, then, is at once tragic and paradoxical: runaway couple Joyeux and Pigaut decide they are not made for each other after all but, while fully intent on returning into the folds of her family, Douce expires in a fire at a theater…and the original, socially acceptable couple of Robinson-Pigaut are subsequently reunited in their being simultaneously expelled from the mourning household!   
 
 
01/09/10: GOOD MORNING, NIGHT (Marco Bellocchio, 2003)
 
While I was aware of the 1978 kidnapping and execution of “Democrazia Cristiana” President Aldo Moro by the terrorist group “Brigate Rosse”, I was clearly not knowledgeable of the exact details since I was a mere toddler when the event that shook the nation took place; in retrospect, it is not that the vicissitudes behind the case are made all that clear in the film – but, at least, here the obligatory didacticism is balanced by a surprising yet genuinely moving humanism. It was perhaps inevitable, then, that controversial director Bellocchio would tackle the subject – despite its having already been rendered cinematically in THE MORO AFFAIR (1986), in which the former Italian Prime Minister was played by the great Gian Maria Volonte` – since his work had always been politically-oriented to some degree. What I did not anticipate was the fact that Bellocchio would present the story from the ambivalent eyes of one of the radicals themselves, superbly played by lovely Maya Sansa, and even less so the touches of outright fantasy (equating, in its depiction of Moro’s flight from captivity, wishful thinking!) he inserted intermittently within the compelling and generally intense narrative. Incidentally, newsreel and other assorted TV footage dating from the era are similarly juxtaposed; however, as I said earlier, all of this does not really enlighten one on the matter: especially baffling is the lack of an objective, i.e. opposing view, of the politics involved (for instance, there seems to be no ongoing police investigation and the suggestion that Moro’s peers simply chose to forget about him is rather disturbing). By the way, the obscure title refers to a screenplay Moro happens to be carrying with him at the time of the abduction: ironically, it turns out to have been written by an infatuated colleague from the heroine’s conservative work-place, a public library…but, then, this emerges as just another flight of fancy on the director’s part since it tells of a comparable act of terrorism, albeit blessed with a happy ending for its victim! Of particular interest here is the accompanying soundtrack, deftly mixing operatic arias with no less grandiose Pink Floyd classics such as “The Great Gig In The Sky” and “Shine On You Crazy Diamond (Part One)”.
 
 
01/10/10: SLAP THE MONSTER ON PAGE ONE (Marco Bellocchio, 1972)
 
Considering the sheer amount of (vaguely boring) movies flaunting their individual creator’s extreme left-wing politics to emerge from Europe throughout the 1960s and 1970s, it is hard in hindsight to believe just how many talented film-makers were ‘duped’ into upholding such naïve ideals; that said, the other side of the coin – basically equating Fascism – was even less comforting and that more dangerous…but it does make for rather intriguing (and ultimately more rewarding) cinema! Bellocchio’s film, then, was one of a handful of titles to look at this alternative ‘option’: perhaps the most famous such example was Elio Petri’s Oscar-winning INVESTIGATION OF A CITIZEN ABOVE SUSPICION (1970), which shares with the picture under review its leading man – Gian Maria Volonte`; like that one and Dino Risi’s similarly excellent IN NOME DEL POPOLO ITALIANO (1971), the film takes the form of a thriller – both this and the latter, in fact, involve the investigation into the rape and murder of a teenager emanating from high society: here, a radical is accused of the crime – and hounded by Volonte`’s opportunistic newspaper for it – but the guilty party turns out to be somebody else, ferreted by a reporter not taken in by his superior’s wiles, who is pursued in turn (and even blackmailed!) by the unscrupulous editor. The movie paints a most cynical image of the press, beginning with Volonte` ‘embellishing’ – and directing his underlings to shoot – a fire that broke out at the office during a riot (he is seen making intermittent contact throughout with the politically-affiliated  young owner of the paper, played by “Euro-Cult” stalwart John Steiner); later on, while viewing the TV broadcast of a talk-show he was involved in, the man even takes it upon his wife – for her passivity and intellectual limitations!; however, the worst victim of his dishonesty is the uncouth schoolteacher (Laura Betti) he befriended in order to exploit for her affair with the murder suspect – one of the film’s best sequences is the one where she is made to confront her lover’s fellow activists in the police station. The film features a good Morricone-esque score by Nicola Piovani and ends on a shot depicting the rampant pollution at the city limits – a metaphor for the so-called “yellow press” and remarkably similar to the finale of yet another newspaper movie, the classic FIVE STAR FINAL (1931).
 
 
01/11/10: HANCOCK (Peter Berg, 2008)
 
I had decided to dedicate the start of this year mostly to the viewing of foreign-language films but, since my father rented this atypical superhero flick, I took the opportunity of a break from the relative seriousness and watch something that was not too demanding. The premise in itself – of a reckless and uncouth alien whose superhuman abilities prove singularly alienating – is not half bad, but it is let down by the unreal CGI effects and the equally fake machismo displayed throughout by star Will Smith. Mind you, the results are entertaining enough – but, again, the baffling emphasis on vulgarity negates the film at least part of its intended audience! The twist involving the character of Charlize Theron (wasted here) was kind of unnecessary, too, especially since it inserts an incongruous dose of sobriety (vis-a`-vis her subsequent conflicted relationship with the conveniently amnesiac Smith and oblivious hubby Jason Bateman) – eventually giving way to outright and unwarranted sentimentality, only to be dispelled soon after by the obligatory ‘happy’ ending. While I admit to not expecting much from it in the first place, I did enjoy the film on the whole…but, at the end of the day, it is all pretty bland and not sufficiently quirky to live in the memory.
post #77 of 1166
Ghostbusters (1984): 3/5

I bolded this one because I only remember the Slimer parts, the refrigerator, and Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man from seeing it in early childhood. This time around, I had a few laughs, and I enjoyed seeing the origins of some of the staples of the animated series. I find Ghostbusters to be a great concept, but I don't understand how this became the phenomenon it did. Perhaps I don't appreciate Bill Murray's style of humor as much as the mass audience does.
post #78 of 1166
Late to the party and hopefully I will do better than last year

Ratings out of 5, first time viewings in bold

January

Elevator to the Gallows (1958)  
(Netflix 360)
Black Belt Jones (1974) 1/2
(DVD, my collection)

post #79 of 1166
Thread Starter 

Mrs. Doubtfire (1993)
 

Chris Columbus
 

When his wife (Sally Field) divorces him and the courts take his children away except for one day a week, an actor/father (Robin Williams) decides to dress us as the elderly Mrs. Doubtfire so that he can be the family maid and spend more time with the children.  I remember seeing this hit a couple times when it was originally released in theaters but it's been quite a while between viewings but I was pleasantly surprised to see how well the film held up.  There are still many, many problems in the film but the main goal here was to be a showcase for Williams and it's certainly that.  The highlights are certainly Williams going all out and delivering a marvelous performance not only as Mrs. Doubtfire but also as the father.  I thought Williams did a very good job at handling the role of the struggling father even if the screenplay lets the film down with a few of these dramatic moments that I'll talk about later.  Williams handles every situation wonderfully well but there's no doubt the real genius comes in the role of Doubtfire.  The way he plays this character isn't simply him in a fat suit and make up but instead he really delivers a true performance and makes this character feel real and not just some put on.  I think Williams perfectly nails this character so well that one could pass it off as a real English woman.  He perfectly handles all the comedy scenes and that includes two sequences that rank as some of the best screwball moments of the decade.  There are two sequences where he must go back and forth between the father role and that of Doubtfire and these scenes get the biggest laughs of the movie.  This is especially true towards the end of the film when he has to spend time with the family as Doubtfire as well as impress a hopeful boss as the father.  Field and Pierce Brosnan turn in fine supporting work but there's no question that the film belongs to Williams.  I think there are a few major flaws with the film, which includes the biggest and that's the final twenty-minutes of the film when we enter some rather very dark moments including a very distasteful courtroom scene where Williams' character's mental issues are questioned.  This was just way too dark for all the laughs that preceded it.  The actual ending is one you'd expect but even it doesn't work out overly well.  With that said, this is still one of the better, mainstream comedies of the 90s and Williams performance makes it a must see.

Adventures of Sherlock Holmes, The (1939)
 

Alfred L. Werker
 

The second and final film in Fox's original Sherlock Holmes series once again sees Basil Rathbone playing the master detective and Nigel Bruce as Dr. Watson.  This time out they're trying to determine the murderer of a woman's (Ida Lupino) brother but Holmes' number one enemy, Professor Moriarty (George Zucco) might be planning his next crime at the same time.  I read a lot of reviews calling this the best film in Rathbone's stint as Holmes but I must say that I found it to be a lot less entertaining than THE HOUND OF THE BASKERVILLES and several of the future Universal entries.  That's not to say this is a bad movie because it's not but at the same time I found there to be way too much plot and not enough of it interesting enough to keep the film moving.  With all this plot and not much moving, I found the film drags in spots and that's certainly not something this series did often.  With that said, I found the performances to once again be the best thing for the film with Rathbone taking the lead and really delivering in the role of Holmes, which is of course what you'd expect.  I always find a lot of actors struggle when they're playing brilliant minds because the actor can never quite act "smart enough" to make the role believable but that's never been a problem with Rathbone in this series or various other films he's done.  Bruce, as always, is good in his role of Dr. Watson and Zucco really delivers in what limited screen time he's given.  I really wish his character had been padded a little.  Lupino and the rest of the supporting cast are decent if not overly spectacular. 

Case of the Hillside Stranglers, The (1989)
 

Steve Gethers
 

Extremely well-acted and dramatic made-for-TV flick about the cousins (Dennis Farina, Billy Zane) who stalked Northern L.A. back in 1978-79 and ended up murdering a total of ten people.  Richard Crenna plays Sgt. ob Grogan, the man put on the case who slowly finds everything slipping away when a lack of evidence causes the D.A. to worry about going forward with charges.  I remember watching this movie when it first showed up on television but I really couldn't remember too much about it nearly twenty years later.  I was pleasantly surprised to see how well the film held up over time and it actually managed to be quite dramatic from start to finish.  Anyone who knows anything about the real case will say this movie portrayals everything fairly accurately and this helps the drama because it's also unbelievable how this case eventually turned out.  I think the film's strongest aspect is that it pretty much gives equal time to everything involved here.  We get to spend time with the killers, spend time with the police trying to crack the case but we also get to peak in at Grogan's personal life and the effect this case had on it.  I thought the film managed to play all sides and for the most part we get a pretty full knowledge of everything that happened and I think we also get to know the killers quite well.  The movie manages to be quite intense not only as the police try to crack down but also with the killers stalking their victims.  The direction by Gethers is extremely good as he manages to keep everything moving very quickly but he also fills the film with some great atmosphere and really manages to put you right in the middle of everything going on.  Crenna gives a very good performance in the role of the cop as his energy is right on target and you can believe everything he does.  Zane and Farina are extremely good as the killers and you can't help but see and feel the cold blood running through their veins.  Both actors really dig deep into the role and comes off quite chilling.  
 

Stagecoach (1986)
 

Ted Post
 

Made-for-TV remake of John Ford's classic 1939 film is pretty lifeless from start to finish but fans of country music (or at least the actors here) will find some mild entertainment to be had.  Willie Nelson (Doc Holliday), Kris Kristopherson (Ringo Kid), Johnny Cash (Marshal Curly Wilcox) and Waylon Jennings (Hatfield) lead the stagecoach into Apache territory where Geronimo is wanting some scalps.  I'm somewhat shocked that they even bothered calling this STAGECOACH as it owes very little to the John Ford film.  Sure, the entire set up is the same but it seems this film was more interesting in dialogue than any sort of action or drama.  I think a lot of people will hate this movie with a passion or turn it off at the half way point unless they're fans of the cast and if that's the case they'll probably be able to make it through simply on their charm.  I've always found Cash to be a fairly good actor (see THE GUNFIGHT with Kirk Douglas) and he clearly steals the film with his down to earth qualities that really come off quite charming.  I think he fit the role perfectly well and there's not a second where you see Johnny Cash but instead you see the character.  Kristopherson also comes off pretty well as he should since he's the most credited member of the cast.  Nelson, as Doc Holliday, isn't going to go down as one of the greatest to ever play the role but he's not too bad and he does manage to get a few laughs with that dry sense of humor.  Jennings doesn't get as good of a role but he's not too bad either.  Fans of the Ford film really shouldn't compare the two movies as they're clearly both trying to do something different.  This film here just wants to be fun and the cast delivers that but I think the screenplay is still full of holes and I have to wonder why they waited until the very end of a 100-minute movie to throw in some action.  I think the film would have been better had some been sprinkled in towards the start of the film.  With that said, country music fans will certainly want to see these legends acting together in one film and we even get the title song sung by Nelson.  Look fast for other country folks including June Carter Cash and David Allan Coe.

Nut Guilty (1936)
 

Lloyd French
 

MGM short has Edgar Bergen and his dummy Charlie McCarthy given the right to be judges for a day where they must look over three cases.  One involving a girl driving without a license plate, the next a sexy woman doing naughty things and the third dealing with a violent criminal.  Needless to say, this short was made to get laughs and it actually delivers in a few spots.  Your tolerance level of Bergen and McCarthy will certainly play into things but they've always been hit and miss with me.  This short here is probably one of the more entertaining I've seen from the duo because it's a lot more adult in nature and I was surprised to see that this was released after the Pre-Code era because there are a few scenes where the sexual innuendo is quite obviously and in your face as McCarthy goes after a couple sexy women.  None of the three "cases" are that interesting but they each manage a few small laughs. 
 

Rainbow Pass, The (1937)
 

Jacques Tourneur
 

Carey Wilson narrates this mildly interesting but extremely flawed short that was put into theaters shortly before MGM's THE GOOD EARTH.  In the film we are told that all groups of people in China enjoy the theatre and we go inside one of these places to see a performance of "The Rainbow Pass", the story of a woman who challenges the man who killed her husband to a battle.  There's quite a bit to enjoy in this short but for the most part I don't think it really succeeds at what it's trying to do.  There's no doubt that it's trying to throw some attention to the Paul Muni flick even though the film isn't ever said directly there are several moments where "the good earth" is said, often times aimed at the Chinese people.  For the most part Tourneur's direction is top-notch as he's able to build a pretty good atmosphere with the production of the play given a lot of great details and it's certainly more interesting that the side plot of the Chinese people and their love for the theater.  Just about all of this side plot is overlooked and in the end what's here is pretty useless as we're just never given enough details to find it interesting.

Hollywood Hobbies (1939)
 

George Sidney
 

Pretty good "let's show off our stars" short from MGM is cheaply made but we at least get to see countless A-list stars.  The film centers on a couple tourists who take a trip across Hollywood where they get to see a few famous faces like Clark Gable and Reginald Denny.  The two then go to a charity baseball game where more stars appear including James Stewart, Spencer Tracy, Buster Keaton, Joe E. Brown, Virginia Bruce, Joan Davis, Buddy Ebsen, Mary Pickford, Tyrone Power, Dick Powell, the Ritz Brothers, Cesar Romero and many more.  The actual "plot" of this short is pretty silly but that's to be expected as the main goal is to just show as many Hollywood stars as possible and this film certainly does that.  A lot of the footage is just edited in from previous films but we do get quite a bit of actual footage including a funny bit with the ladies wanting Stewart's autograph and not realizing that he's sitting in front of them. 

Just Suppose (1948)
 

Dave O'Brien
 

Just suppose who came home to greet your wife the way detectives do in a film noir.  Just suppose men selected their hats the same way women their dresses.  Just suppose men were the ones who had babies.  And just suppose the roles of parents were switched with their kids.  Those four supposes are the comedy stories in this Pete Smith short that once again features Dave O'Brien as the bumbling fool who is constantly getting himself in trouble.  The best of the four stories is without question the first one with the husband coming home acting tough and cool but he has a rude awakening coming.  The one with the parents and kids roles reversed was also quite funny with O'Brien really shining here.  The one I didn't care too much for what the hat as I felt this one went on way too long and never really had any good laughs.  As usual we have Smith delivering very funny narration but a lot of credit has to go to O'Brien and his comic timing as an actor. 
 

Seesaw and the Shoes, The (1945)
 

Douglas Foster
 

Another nice entry in MGM's Passing Parade series with this one taking a look at two simple items that led to major discoveries.  The first deals with a doctor who sees two kids playing on a seesaw and this leads to him discovering the stethoscope.  The second deals with shoes and how a man finally discovered the way to make rubber after many failed attempts and even a turn in jail.  To be honest with you I don't think either story is the greatest out there and that's probably why they were turned into just one film instead of being made into two.  That's not to say these are weak stories but I don't think either one carried enough drama to warrant their own movie.  With that said, their still interesting enough to warrant four-minutes each and as usual the filmmakers do a nice job at telling the story and John Nesbitt's narration is wonderful as usual.  I think the best of the two stories has to belong to the seesaw as it does contain a nice little twist as to how the discovery was made.
 

post #80 of 1166
The Day the Earth Stood Still (1951): 4/5

This science fiction classic holds up today because of its marvelous acting, script, and music. The special effects hold up pretty well, especially the animation. The themes are unfortunately still as relevant today as ever.

Probably the only thing that strikes me as false in the film is the security. Escape from the hospital and Klaatu's trip back to the spaceship are surprisingly easy, yet an all-points bulletin corners him for the climax. Such a major event would not calm down so fast within the first week and then pick back up like it did on a tip from an insurance salesman. These logistical concerns are very minor, though, and addressing them would likely detract from the powerful, lean narrative.
post #81 of 1166
 have to agree with you Michael on "Adventures of Sherlock Holmes".  I disliked it only slightly less than a couple of the very last entries.
It's very stodgy and overly bogged down in a far too espionage type plot.
Bruce also has some of his stupidest moments.

Though Bruce's much maligned Watson on the radio series is (although the voice is the same kind of bumbling tone) actually far less a comic figure or as silly.

yes, I thought Rathbone's "Baskervilles" (not my fave story as Holmes vanishes for too long) was much better, and for me it still the best  (rather unexplained ending as far as the villain goes aside) movie adaptation.
post #82 of 1166
01/12/10: CHLOE` IN THE AFTERNOON (Eric Rohmer, 1972)
 
The most popular entries in the late Eric Rohmer’s long and distinguished career are, undoubtedly, his “Six Moral Tales” which began in 1963 with the short THE BAKERY GIRL OF MONCEAU and ended with the film under review. For the record, I was genuinely impressed with the centerpiece of the sextet – MY NIGHT AT MAUD’S (1969), which is easily Rohmer’s most popular film – and, many years ago, I had also watched the successive chapter LA COLLECTIONNEUSE (shot in 1967 but released in 1971!) but I have only vague recollections of that one and some of the later Rohmers that I have seen since then. But back to CHLOE` or, I should say, LOVE IN THE AFTERNOON which is the film’s original title (although, obviously enough, it bears no relation whatsoever to Billy Wilder’s 1957 tribute to his idol Ernst Lubitsch)! Speaking of idols, the lead actor here, Bernard Verley, portrayed (irony of ironies) Jesus Christ in one of the major works of my own personal cinematic idol, Luis Bunuel’s THE MILKY WAY (1969) and, besides, the central situation of the movie is also dealt with in one of my favorite band's loveliest songs,  The Velvet Underground's "Pale Blue Eyes" (which, likewise, dates from 1969)!! In CHLOE`, Verley plays a happily married man (unsurprisingly enough to his own real-life wife Francoise, no less – in her first of just two screen appearances) who spends his daily idle time (train journeys, lunch breaks, etc.) entertaining the notion of betraying his wife with every woman he meets! In fact, much has been made of the fact that CHLOE` features the only dream sequence (featuring cameos by the likes of Marie-Christine Barrault, Francoise Fabian and Haydee` Politoff) in Rohmer’s entire oeuvre but, frankly, I did not find the reverie all that extraordinary in itself; actually, the purposefully cheesy electronic score (redolent of the then-currently topical sci-fi pieces for the intelligentsia) over the opening credits seems to me to have been more of a successful 'departure' for Rohmer . Anyway, flanked by two particularly attractive secretaries, Verley is never too far away from the company of desirable women but always manages to resist temptation and uphold his marriage fidelity vows…that is until the long-lost titular character presents herself unheralded in his office one day and just keeps coming back! Portrayed by the tomboyish, bob-haired Zouzou (more on her fascinating life history later), Chloe` is the epitome of sheer kookiness: free-spirited and fun-loving but also passionate and volatile. A past acquaintance of Verley (she was once his best friend’s girlfriend), she had subsequently gone abroad and through several short-lived romances but, not having accomplished much of significance career-wise, comes back to her roots and, consequently, Verley. After breaking up with her current casual boyfriend (who also employs Chloe` as a nightclub hostess), she asks Verley to find her a respectable job and, gradually, they take to meeting up every afternoon during his lunch-break (without, of course, letting the wife in on these innocent escapades). Eventually, he aids Chloe` to settle into a new apartment but one day she drops the bomb: confessing to him that he has been her ideal all along and she wants to bear his son! Verley and Zouzou do get to shack up at her apartment one afternoon and a bathing Chloe` invites him to dry her with a towel...but this is as far as it goes because, by the time she has gotten into bed, Verley has sensibly rushed out of there and back into the rightful arms of his wife! To return to the real Zouzou for a minute: born Daniele Ciarlet, she came to prominence in 1961 on the Paris scene as a nightclub twist sensation and, eventually, started hobnobbing with an elite crowd that included Andy Warhol, Bob Dylan, The Beatles, The Rolling Stones’ Brian Jones (with whom she had a two-year affair), Marianne Faithfull and Jack Nicholson! Rohmer’s film, her looks and enviable connections should have rightfully turned her into an international superstar but, as with so many others before and since, she witnessed her career potential waste away via drug addiction and unwise decisions. Apart from Zouzou’s utterly entrancing performance, the film’s trump card is its flawlessly perceptive depiction of the marital state of mind and, more importantly on a personal level, that fine line that exists between friendship and love – where somebody’s platonic feelings for, say, a colleague can transform themselves with time (and virtually imperceptibly) from affectionate camaraderie to genuine love. Perhaps I ought not to be admitting this here but, the erratic nature of my film-viewing habits for the last two months or so, can be directly attributed to just such an unforeseen event happening to me…although, lamentably I might add, I play the part of Chloe` in my own private everyday morality play!!      
 
 

01/13/10: THE MARQUISE OF O (Eric Rohmer, 1976)
 
Despite – or perhaps because of – its being atypically filmed in German, this remains one of Rohmer’s more recognized titles. The period setting (the director’s first, though not last, feature to adopt this) lends an aesthetic quality in this case which complements – or, one might say, excuses – his customary austerity. The simple plot proves quietly fascinating throughout: an aristocratic lady is saved from near-rape by an enemy Count (Bruno Ganz); though the woman is no great beauty, the man apparently loses his head over her, almost compromising his own rank into the bargain. The Marquise and her family cannot understand this impulsive behavior but, then, she finds herself mysteriously pregnant; her parents and brother obviously shun her, but the returning Count is even more intent on marrying her (she is a widow who has already borne two children). Eventually, the Marquise puts an ad in a newspaper requesting the father to present himself – and, at the appointed hour, it is none other than the mortified Count himself who turns up (having apparently taken advantage of her while she was unconscious on the night of the attack)! As with all of the director’s work, this is certainly not for all tastes but, as I said at the beginning, it is exquisitely filmed (by Nestor Almendros) on wonderful and expansive locations – though the approach is thoroughly low-key (mostly confined to medium shots of people conversing against a backdrop of candle-lit interiors), in keeping with the intimate nature of the tale. While, for all his straining for realism, even Rohmer’s modern-day efforts could be deemed contrived on occasion, here he seems to have embraced a deliberate artificiality (the expulsion of the bewildered heroine in particular is redolent of barnstorming melodramas!) perhaps to better convey the intolerant morality of its (distant) time. Though I am not sure parallels to the Immaculate Conception were intended, THE MARQUISE OF O does recall Manoel De Oliveira’s contemporaneous and, regrettably, little-known BENILDE OR THE VIRGIN MOTHER (1975) which, while comparably ‘self-conscious’, is perhaps an even more compelling, thought-provoking – and altogether spiritual – experience.

Edited by Mario Gauci - 1/17/10 at 9:41pm
post #83 of 1166
Pontypool (2008)

The absurdity of this material just strikes the right note with me.  This is sort of a zombie flick set in a small town in Ontario where violence and acts of cannibalism have struck the fair town of Pontypool. Stephen McHattie is brilliant here as Grant Mazzy a radio talk host that operates out of the basement of a small church. He and his two female co-workers gradually become aware of the growing insanity going on in their small town. Being updated by a co-worker in the Sunshine chopter, you can feel the atmophere of growing uncertainty and dread while they try to find out what is going on. This movie embraces the fact that it is Canadian and is proud of it. The reason for all this is shall we say, original. Though it's extremely low budget it can be ranked up there as one of the best in its genre at least for me. 


What Women What (2000)

I really enjoyed this movie at one time but my love for it has dwindled over time. Still it's engaging enough in the last half to rate a mild pass. 


A Perfect Getaway (2009)

God another movie with a twist. This time it was scary enough to keep my attention all the way through. I was totally wrong as to who the murderers were, but I still enjoyed the journey. Saw this on bluray and the locations they chose  were breathtaking at times. Good little thriller.  

post #84 of 1166
Thread Starter 


Quote:
Originally Posted by PatW View Post

A Perfect Getaway (2009)

God another movie with a twist. This time it was scary enough to keep my attention all the way through. I was totally wrong as to who the murderers were, but I still enjoyed the journey. Saw this on bluray and the locations they chose  were breathtaking at times. Good little thriller.  

 


I'm glad you enjoyed this one.  I watched it when it was first released last year and was impressed with the entire thing for many reasons.  I always respect a film that tries to be "scary" and taking place during the day.  Those beautiful locations also helped a lot.  It's a shame this film was sold as some cheap slasher as I'm sure it's one reason why the thing bombed at the box office.  Hopefully it'll get another life on DVD.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 42nd Street Freak View Post

 have to agree with you Michael on "Adventures of Sherlock Holmes".  I disliked it only slightly less than a couple of the very last entries.
It's very stodgy and overly bogged down in a far too espionage type plot.
Bruce also has some of his stupidest moments.

Though Bruce's much maligned Watson on the radio series is (although the voice is the same kind of bumbling tone) actually far less a comic figure or as silly.

yes, I thought Rathbone's "Baskervilles" (not my fave story as Holmes vanishes for too long) was much better, and for me it still the best  (rather unexplained ending as far as the villain goes aside) movie adaptation.
 

I still need to see PURSUIT TO ALGIERS to finish off the Holmes/Rathbone series but I'd probably call THE HOUSE OF FEAR as my favorite followed by IN WASHINGTON.  I still need to watch ALGIERS and then revisit the final three (which I saw years ago) before jumping over to the Chan series.  I'm going to try and watch a few other versions of BASKERVILLES this year but I'm not expecting any to top the Fox or Hammer versions. 


 

More catching up.  It's funny but having a kid has me in front or around a television a lot more than I thought it would have but it's the writing of everything that's nearly impossible and can only be done at work.  Dylan doesn't mind the movies but he doesn't like me walking over to the computer.


Wildcats (1986)
 

Michael Ritchie
 

Goldie Hawn plays a woman's track coach whose dream in life is to coach a football team.  When her high school passes over her for being a woman, she gets a job at another school but the bad news is that it's in the ghetto and none of the players respect her.  The toughest part is going to be breaking through to the players and then getting them to play her way.  This film seems to have been a hit when released but it doesn't hold up overly well today.  I think the biggest problem is the screenplay that at times seems to forget we're watching a comedy because it dives into a subplot with Hawn's ex-husband and this eats up so much of the running time that the film loses focus on trying to make us laughs.  What laughs the film does try to get comes from various toilet humor, which includes one player who likes to fart and another (Wesley Snipes) who just wants to have a piece of Hawn.  The screenplay is also quite predictable as everything we see here was borrowed from previous sport films and you just know Hawn is going to get a chance at revenge in the final game in the film.  What does work with the movie are the performances with Hawn giving it her all as her energy level is certainly on high and one can't help but smile seeing her going up against this opposite crowd.  The supporting cast is also pretty good as we get early performances by Snipes and Woody Harrelson as well as nice work from Nipsey Russell, James Keach, Bruce McGill and Ann Doran in what would turn out to be her final film role (she started way back in 1922).  There's no question that this movie is mildly entertaining from start to finish but at the same time I couldn't help but be somewhat disappointed because we weren't given more laughs as the side story was just too much and kept going on and on.  Even the surprising nude scene by Hawn seemed out of place as did quite a bit here.  Still, the attractive cast makes this one worth at least a rental.
 

Fletch (1985)
 

Michael Ritchie
 

Extremely entertaining film has Chevy Chase playing Irwin 'Fletch' Fletcher, a reporter who is working undercover as a bum when a multi-millionaire (Tim Matheson) asks him to kill him for insurance purposes.  The "bum" agrees to do it but the reporter in Fletch takes over and he tries to figure out who this guy is and what his plan is.  I had heard a lot of good things about this film over the years and I'm really not sure why it took me so long to check it out but I'm certainly glad I did as I can see myself revisiting this film every so often.  The screenplay by future director Andrew Bergman is pretty straight-forward, simple and I'm sure followed the novel pretty well but the real key to this film is Chase and his masterful character of Chase.  I always try to say there's no movie without a good screenplay but there are exceptions to the rules and I think this is the case because I seriously doubt a lot of what we're seeing was actually on the page and I'm fairly positive it's all coming from Chase's wacky mind.  The mannerisms are one of the best things in the film as Chase is constantly getting into one mess after another and many of the best laughs don't come from dialogue but instead his reactions to what is going on.  Whether he's getting busted for charging food to someone elses account or having police chase him, old Chase does a masterful job just reacting to everything and this delivers so many laughs throughout the film.  We also get countless situations where Chase has to act out as different characters and once again he handles this masterfully and never misses a touch.  Ritchie's direction is also very good because it really never feels like you're watching a movie.  Instead, it really seems like you're just following Fletch around on this journey and  the film runs so smoothly that you'll feel as if you're watching a documentary of the events or just watching them live.  How the film constantly cuts to the next sequence of events comes off so fresh that you can't help but enjoy the ride and be excited for what's going to come next.  Matheson is as fun as usual and we get nice supporting work from Joe Don Baker, M. Emmet Walsh, George Wendt and a young Geena Davis.  Dana Wheeler-Nicholson is extremely charming as the love interest.  Outside the bad 80s soundtrack, this film has enough laughs for two movies and it's the perfect example of how great Chase could be.
 

Fletch Lives (1989)
 

Michael Ritchie

Chevy Chase returns as Irwin 'Fletch' Fletcher in this sequel to the 1985 flick.  This time out Fletch inherits a Louisiana estate and on his first night there the woman who contacted him ends up dying.  The reporter in Fletch comes and and he starts an investigation that leads him to a preacher (R. Lee Ermey) who might be hiding a few things.  This movie seems to have been beaten to death when originally released and it's somewhat hard to find a positive review of it anywhere but I thought it was a lot better than its reputation.  Sure, the movie isn't as smooth or as good as the first one but the most important thing is laughs and that's something I did quite a few times.  The movie obviously cuts back on the various characters Chase plays as this is pretty much left to the final twenty-minutes but I didn't mind this too much.  You could argue that the screenplay is lazy and just throwing him into a plot involving countless stereotypes but, again, I don't mind this because it made me laugh.  The scenes with the KKK, the dumb cop with the termite in his ear and the raccoon hunt were full of stereotypes but they were all funny.  Heck, we even get a spoof of SONG OF THE SOUTH.  Chase isn't quite as great as in the original film but he's still good enough to keep everything moving and his various characters once again get plenty of laughs.  Chase easily plays the role without any problems and even his narration can get some laughs.  Ermey is good in his role as usual as is Hal Holbrook and Julianne Phillips.  The one and only Randall 'Tex' Cobb does his usual tough character and gets some nice laughs.  The film's actual mystery isn't all that interesting and the ending take a while to get to but I still feel this film manages to be a lot more entertaining than its rep would lead you to believe.
 

Road House (1989)
 

Rowdy Herrington
 

Movies like CITIZEN KANE, 2001: A SPACE ODYSSEY and GONE WITH THE WIND are quite important to this countries legacy of films but we also need pure redneck excitement movies like ROAD HOUSE.  The plot is quite simple as "cooler" Dalton (Patrick Swayze) is hired to clean up a rough bar and soon gets involved with a sadistic loon (Ben Gazzara) who runs the town.  Soon Dalton gets a love interest (Kelly Lynch) as well as back up in another ultra-cool cooler (Sam Elliott).  This movie is small on brains but large on action, breasts, violence, bar fights, drinking, smoking, loud rock music, throat-ripping, bad one-liners and all out entertainment.  This movie has always played to me like a Western as we have a rundown town being held hostage by the bad guy and the loner rides into to town to take things back.  This movie might not be the smartest thing out there but it makes up for that as being a pure adrenaline rush and in the end it's hard not to find yourself caught up in the story and characters.  Swayze does a great job at playing the role as he can certainly act cool enough for the part and his fighting moves aren't too bad either.  He even gets to shout out some nice one-liners especially an early scene when he's giving orders to the workers and one guy asks something about a mother line.  Swayze's reply is priceless.  Elliott is also wonderful in his part and you'd really have a hard time finding someone cooler than Sam and he really gets to be playful here.  Lynch isn't too bad as the love interest and Gazzara appears to be having a blast playing the bad guy.  All the supporting players from Gazzara's goons to the good guys are played nicely as well.  This movie runs 114-minutes and there's really not a dry moment to be found.  If there's not a fight going on then there's some sort of nudity.  If there's no nudity then we've got some sort of other action.  The Jeff Healey Band does a very good job with the soundtrack, which includes several original tunes as well as covers including Bob Dylan playing over the end credits. 
 

Rolling Thunder (1977)
 

John Flynn
 

Simple but effective drama about Major Charles Rane (William Devane) who returns home from Vietnam after eight years as a POW.  A few weeks in a gang of thugs kill his wife and child but also cut off one of his hands.  The thugs think they kill him but don't and of course revenge is going to follow.  This film got a shot of popularity back when Quentin Tarantino raved about it and even named a production company after the film.  It had been on my radar to see every since and I'm glad I got to watch the film but I actually ended up enjoying it for other reasons than what I expected.  I had heard that this was another violent tale from screenwriter Paul Schrader and there's no question that this shares many elements with his very own TAXI DRIVER but what really pushes this film isn't the violence but the performance of Devane.  Much like Travis from the Martin Scorsese flick, Major doesn't say too much and how effective director Flynn makes this is what's so memorable about the film.  The silence and how Devane can play it makes this film so effective and we have many great examples of this early on including when the wife tells him that she's been unfaithful and even when he's being tortured by the thugs.  The effectiveness of these scenes is what really grabbed my attention and these quiet moments are a lot more powerful than all the violence that would follow.  Devane certainly owns this film but Tommy Lee Jones and Linda Haynes also turn in fine performances.  The ending, again partially borrowed from TAXI DRIVER, packs a nice little punch but I think the fifteen-minutes before this could have been touched up a bit.  With that said, the performance by Devane makes this a must see.

post #85 of 1166


Quote:
Originally Posted by 42nd Street Freak View Post

 have to agree with you Michael on "Adventures of Sherlock Holmes".  I disliked it only slightly less than a couple of the very last entries.
It's very stodgy and overly bogged down in a far too espionage type plot.

 

I'd also agree, based on the last time I saw it. I'm not sure it would actually qualify for a full three out of four stars.
post #86 of 1166
(Man I thought I watched a lot of movies, but some of you guys put me to shame!!! )

The Executioner – The DVD case claimed that this would be the ‘craziest’ Sonny Chiba movie I would ever see – a tall order indeed. Neither as relentlessly brutal as the Streetfighter movies nor as endearingly crazy as the Karate For Life trilogy, this still serves as a pretty fine example of what makes Chiba-san so uniquely enjoyable: gory, bare-knuckled karate action with plenty of over-the-top Blaxploitation swagger. Here, Chiba plays a charming rogue/Ninja assassin hired to curtail the influx of drugs into Tokyo, and kicking plenty of ass in the process. Ears get ripped off, eyes get gouged out and at least one guy gets eviscerated, but its all business as usual for Chiba-san. Directed in surprisingly straight forward style by Teruo Ishii, he of ‘Blind Woman’s Curse’ and other seriously weird flicks. Fortunately, he left the vengeful cats and deformed pervert midgets at home this time.  
Executioner II: Karate Inferno – Oooh man – they should have called this ‘Karate Interminable’. Someone made the decision to take the same characters from the first film and cast them in a caper comedy, only the ‘comedy’ consists of pee and poop jokes and the kind of low stuntman humor that Hal Needham built a career out of. There are two very brief, very minor Chiba-fights and they cannot begin to make up for all the idiot mugging and grab-assing that goes on (and on and on) here. Watching Chiba mug for the camera and wear funny hats as he extinguishes his flaming cohort by peeing on him is a far cry from watching him disembowel someone with his bare hands. Call me crazy, but I prefer the latter. Seriously, avoid this one at all costs.
Eeegah – Let’s face it – ‘The Sadist’ is so far and away the best Arch Hall movie (Senior or Junior), that it’s hard to say which one of the rest comes in a distant second. ‘Eeegah’ has a pretty good shot though, as steeped as it is in sheer ridiculousness. When Junior’s girlfriend Roxy gets accosted in her roadster by a giant prehistoric man (a baby-faced Richard Kiel with a fake hillbilly beard), Arch senior goes into the Hollywood wilderness in hopes of finding something he can exploit as much as he has his son. When he doesn’t come back, it’s Junior to the rescue but he still manages to take time out for a few musical numbers, my favorite being the echo drenched ‘Valerie’ with the sibilant whistling chorus. Roxy gets kidnapped and gives the caveman a shave, though where she got shaving cream is never explained. The caveman reciprocates by trying to defile her and develops a serious crush. Everything goes all Beauty and the Beast after that and I suppose you can guess the rest. In the end, Senior justifies the whole mess by quoting scripture. The Hall family must have been a hoot to hang out with.
Dirty Mary Crazy Larry – A couple of car jockeys rob a grocery store in hopes of fueling their Nascar dreams and are joined by an impulsive hippy chick as they try to outrun the law. ‘DMCL’ is part of the great triumvirate of counter-culture road movies, along with ‘Vanishing Point’ (Homeric allegory) and ‘Two-Lane Blacktop’ (‘Waiting for Godot’ nihilism). This one, sort of a combination of the first two, is probably the most anarchistic and fatalistic of the bunch and is a wonderfully cynical 'F-You' of a movie. Each of the characters seems to be running away from some personal demon or specter of conformity, even the crusty old sheriff who pursues the trio, but the movie’s message seems to be that, no matter how hard you try, you simply can’t outrun the crushing constrictions of your ‘Ralston Purina life’.

Edited by Holer - 1/16/10 at 9:42am
post #87 of 1166
The Hangover (2009) 4/5 - It's always nice to find a comedy as funny as everyone says it is.  You've probably already heard all the praise, I wont repeat it here.  So yeah, I liked it.

The Tournament (2009) 3/5 - As far as I know, this went straight to DVD.  So a film about an assassins olympics debuting in the cheap bins means this should be pretty crap.  So it's a nice surprise to find that it's quite good.  It doesn't attempt to re-write the action movie film book.  Instead it's content to offer a series of action set pieces mixing gory shoot 'em ups with some impressive chop socky.  Worth the time to shut your brain of and enjoy.

Big Fan (2009) 3/5 - Comedian Patton Oswalt stars in a rather dreary and serious film about a New York giants fan who has a run in with his quarter back hero.  Written & directed by the guy who wrote "The Wrestler", it's no surprise that this isn't a wacky summer comedy.  It does manage to be pretty good though.  Patton puts in a hell of a performance in the lead roll, the main problem is that the film just kinda happens and in the end doesn't leave much of an impression. 

The Fourth Kind
(2009) 4/5 - First off, I'm of the opinion that aliens visiting the earth on a regular basis to be complete bunk.  Secondly, I have an irrational love of all things Milla Jovovich.  So right off the bat, I'm torn with contradiction going into this one.  Now, this film is supposedly based on a true story, and the main device is that it starts off with the always stunnig Milla telling us that we will be seeing a mix of real footage and audio mixed in with the reenactments.  The end result is, this one spooked the hell out of me, and resulted in a rather restless nights sleep.  If the "real" footage actually is real, this might be the best evidence of paranormal wackiness ever committed to a film and is truly disturbing.  If it isn't true, then I don't want to hear about it since this is one of the few films to weeb me out and I don't want to ruin it. 
post #88 of 1166
Thread Starter 


Quote:
Originally Posted by Joe Karlosi View Post

003) 01-10 Hunchback of the Morgue (1973)
004) 01-10 Panic Beats (1983)
005) 01-16 Exorcism (1975)


I keep hoping to hear your thoughts on these.  I always thought you enjoyed HUNCHBACK a little more.  I enjoyed PANIC BEATS a lot more just for the gore alone.  I'm a little shocked to see your rating for EXORCISM as I hated this film when I first watched it.  I now look at it as a laugh fest so I enjoy it on that level.  I've seen two alternate versions but didn't think they were any better.
post #89 of 1166


Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Elliott View Post

I keep hoping to hear your thoughts on these.  I always thought you enjoyed HUNCHBACK a little more.  I enjoyed PANIC BEATS a lot more just for the gore alone.  I'm a little shocked to see your rating for EXORCISM as I hated this film when I first watched it.  I now look at it as a laugh fest so I enjoy it on that level.  I've seen two alternate versions but didn't think they were any better.
 


Hi, Mike.
It's funny; I didn't get as much out of Naschy's HUNCHBACK OF THE MORGUE this time as I did a long time ago. These three Naschy films pretty much struck me as average horror fare.Thinking back on PANIC BEATS, it was maybe a little more interesting than I gave it credit for, being one of his later films.

The thing about EXORCISM was, I liked Naschy in the serious straight role of a concerned priest. While the whole thing was typical and predictable EXORCIST-inspired nonsense (although Naschy claimed it wasn't), I thought some of the makeup on the possessed girl was pretty creepy and effective. Of course, the english dubbed demonic-induced namecalling stuff was also unintentionally funny at times, but then that seems to be how all of these "possession" movies come off today. It was okay, nothing exceptional, but not without some worth.
post #90 of 1166
Thread Starter 
Oops, that was my bad if what I said didn't make any sense because I thought you watched the Jess Franco film EXORCISM.  I had always called Naschy's film EXORCISMO as I think that's what the DVD was called that I watched.  I didn't care for this Naschy film at all.  It wasn't bad but it wasn't all that entertaining either.  At least something like BEYOND THE DOOR or Franco's EXORCISM were at least trashy.  The Naschy film was just a little too mild, tame and overall boring for my tastes. 

I'm not sure if you were aware or not but PANIC BEATS was a sequel to HORROR RISES FROM THE TOMB, which I believe you watched last year.  I haven't seen this one in a few years but I plan on checking out the uncut DVD sometime this year.  ROJO SANGRE was a pretty good one. 

With that said, outside a handful of films I'm not a major Naschy fan.
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Movies (Theatrical)
Home Theater Forum › Home Theater Forum › Entertainment › Movies (Theatrical) › Track the Films You Watch (2010)